National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014 [Repealed]
*[An Act to regulate the procedure to be followed by the National Judicial Appointments Commission for recommending persons for appointment as the Chief Justice of India and other Judges of the Supreme Court and Chief Justices and other Judges of High Courts and for their transfers and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto
Be it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-fifth Year of the Republic of India as follows ]
statement of objects and reasons
The Constitution of India contains provisions for the appointment of Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts including the transfer of Judges from one High Court to another High Court. The Supreme Court in Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (1993) 4 SCC 441 in the year 1993, and in its Advisory Opinion in 1998 in the Third Judges case, Special Reference No. 1 of 1998, In re, (1998) 7 SCC 739, had interpreted clause (2) of Article 124 and clause (1) of Article 217 of the Constitution with respect to the meaning of consultation as concurrence . Consequently, a Memorandum of Procedure for appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts was formulated, and the same is being followed for appointment.
2. After review of the relevant constitutional provisions, the pronouncements of the Supreme Court and consultations with eminent Jurists, it is felt that a broad based National Judicial Appointments Commission should be established for making recommendations for appointments of Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts. The said Commission would provide a meaningful role for the judiciary, the executive and eminent persons to present their view points and make the participants accountable, while also introducing transparency in the selection process. Keeping this in view, a Bill, namely, the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-first Amendment) Bill, 2014 has been introduced in Parliament which provides for the establishment of the National Judicial Appointments Commission to discharge functions specified therein.
3. The National Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, 2014 inter alia provides for the time frame to initiate the process of filling up of vacancies in the Supreme Court and High Courts and the procedure for selection of Chief Justice of India, Chief Justice of High Courts and Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts. It further provides that if two members of National Judicial Appointments Commission do not agree, then the Commission shall not make such recommendation. It also provides that the President may, if necessary, require the Commission to reconsider the recommendation. However, if the Commission makes unanimous recommendations on such reconsideration, then the President shall make the appointment accordingly.
4. Further, the Bill provides that the National Judicial Appointments Commission may make regulations inter alia specifying the criteria of suitability with respect to the appointment of Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts, the procedure and conditions for selection and appointment of Judge of the Supreme Court and High Court, the procedure for transfer of Judges from one High Court to another High Court and the procedure to be followed by the Commission in the discharge of its functions.
5. The National Judicial Appointments Commission Bill, 2014 seeks to broad base the appointment of Judges in the Supreme Court and High Courts, enables participation of and judiciary, executive and eminent persons and ensures greater transparency, accountability objectivity in the appointment of the Judges in the Supreme Court and High Courts.
6. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives.
Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
Section 1. Short title and commencement
*[(1) This Act may be called the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014.
(2) It shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.]
Section 2. Definitions
*[In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,
(f) regulations means the regulations made by the Commission under this Act.]
Section 3. Headquarters of Commission
*[The Headquarters of the Commission shall be at Delhi.]
Section 4. Reference to Commission for filling up of vacancies
*[(1) The Central Government shall, within a period of thirty days from the date of coming into force of this Act, intimate the vacancies existing in the posts of Judges in the Supreme Court and in a High Court to the Commission for making its recommendations to fill up such vacancies.
(3) The Central Government shall, within a period of thirty days from the date of occurrence of any vacancy by reason of death or resignation of a Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court, make a reference to the Commission for making its recommendations to fill up such vacancy.]
Section 5. Procedure for selection of Judge of Supreme Court
*[(1) The Commission shall recommend for appointment the senior-most Judge of the Supreme Court as the Chief Justice of India if he is considered fit to hold the office:
(3) The Commission may, by regulations, specify such other procedure and conditions for selection and appointment of a Judge of the Supreme Court as it may consider necessary.]
Section 6. Procedure for selection of Judge of High Court
*[(1) The Commission shall recommend for appointment a Judge of a High Court to be the Chief Justice of a High Court on the basis of inter se seniority of High Court Judges and ability, merit and any other criteria of suitability as may be specified by regulations.
(8) The Commission may, by regulations, specify such other procedure and conditions for selection and appointment of a Chief Justice of a High Court and a Judge of a High Court as it may consider necessary.]
Section 7. Power of President to require reconsideration
*[The President shall, on the recommendations made by the Commission, appoint the Chief Justice of India or a Judge of the Supreme Court or, as the case may be, the Chief Justice of a High Court or the Judge of a High Court:
Provided further that if the Commission makes a recommendation after reconsideration in accordance with the provisions contained in Sections 5 or 6, the President shall make the appointment accordingly.]
Section 8. Officers and employees of Commission
*[(1) The Central Government may, in consultation with the Commission, appoint such number of officers and other employees for the discharge of functions of the Commission under this Act.
(3) The Convenor of the Commission shall be the Secretary to the Government of India in the Department of Justice.]
Section 9. Procedure for transfer of Judges
*[The Commission shall recommend for transfer of Chief Justices and other Judges of High Courts from one High Court to any other High Court, and for this purpose, specify, by regulations, the procedure for such transfer.]
Section 10. Procedure to be followed by Commission in discharge of its functions
*[(1) The Commission shall have the power to specify, by regulations, the procedure for the discharge of its functions.
(2) The Commission shall meet at such time and place as the Chairperson may direct and observe such rules of procedure in regard to the transaction of business at its meetings (including the quorum at its meeting), as it may specify by regulations.]
Section 11. Power to make rules
*[(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules to carry out the provisions of this Act.
(c) any other matter which is to be, or may be, prescribed, in respect of which provision is to be made by the rules.]
Section 12. Power to make regulations
*[(1) The Commission may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make regulations consistent with this Act, and the rules made thereunder, to carry out the provisions of this Act.
(j) any other matter which is required to be, or may be, specified by regulations or in respect of which provision is to be made by regulations.]
Section 13. Rules and regulations to be laid before Parliament
*[Every rule and regulation made under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session, for a total period of thirty days, which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or regulation or both Houses agree that the rule or regulation should not be made, the rule or regulation shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule or regulation.]
Section 14. Power to remove difficulties
*[(1) If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of this Act, the Central Government may, after consultation with the Commission, by an order published in the Official Gazette, make such provisions, not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act as appear to it to be necessary or expedient for removing the difficulty:
(2) Every order made under this section shall, as soon as may be after it is made, be laid before each House of Parliament.]
1. Received the assent of the President on December 31, 2014 and published in the Gazette of India, Extra., Part II, Section 1, dated 31st December, 2014, pp. 1-5, No. 48.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.
* Declared unconstitutional and void by Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 5 SCC 1 : 2015 SCC Online SC 964.