Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

strict-enforcement-of-probation-conditions:-a-landmark-decision-in-in-re:-michael-thomas-joseph, Case Commentaries

Seventh Circuit Confirms Muldrow’s “Some-Harm” Standard Applies Broadly to ADEA Claims – A Comment on Mary Arnold v. United Airlines, Inc.

Seventh Circuit Confirms Muldrow’s “Some-Harm” Standard Applies Broadly to ADEA Claims – A Comment on Mary Arnold v. United Airlines, Inc.

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Seventh Circuit Confirms Muldrow’s “Some-Harm” Standard Applies Broadly to ADEA Claims Introduction Mary Ann Arnold spent twenty-six years working in corporate communications at United Airlines...

        United States v. Haddad, Jr.: The Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review 
        and Anders Procedure in Supervised-Release Revocations

United States v. Haddad, Jr.: The Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review and Anders Procedure in Supervised-Release Revocations

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Haddad, Jr.: The Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review and Anders Procedure in Supervised-Release Revocations 1. Introduction In United States v. Ronald Haddad, Jr., Nos....
Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review of Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors in Supervised-Release Revocations – Comment on United States v. Haddad

Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review of Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors in Supervised-Release Revocations – Comment on United States v. Haddad

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review of Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors in Supervised-Release Revocations Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Ronald Haddad, Jr., Nos. 24-2855 et al....
United States v. Haddad, Jr.: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review When Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors Appear in Revocation Sentencing

United States v. Haddad, Jr.: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review When Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors Appear in Revocation Sentencing

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Haddad, Jr.: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Plain-Error Review When Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors Appear in Revocation Sentencing Introduction Ronald Haddad, Jr. appealed the revocation...
United States v. Haddad: Clarifying Plain-Error Review When Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors Creep into Revocation Sentencing

United States v. Haddad: Clarifying Plain-Error Review When Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors Creep into Revocation Sentencing

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Haddad: Clarifying Plain-Error Review When Impermissible § 3553(a) Factors Creep into Revocation Sentencing Introduction United States v. Ronald Haddad, Jr., Nos. 24-2855, 25-1484,...
Constitutional Supremacy and the Court’s Mandatory Jurisdiction: A Commentary on Louisiana v. Callais (2025)

Constitutional Supremacy and the Court’s Mandatory Jurisdiction: A Commentary on Louisiana v. Callais (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Constitutional Supremacy and the Court’s Mandatory Jurisdiction: A Commentary on Louisiana v. Callais (606 U.S. ___ (2025)) 1. Introduction Louisiana v. Callais is the latest chapter in the...
“Qualitative Sufficiency” as an Intelligible Principle: A Detailed Commentary on FCC v. Consumers’ Research (2025)

“Qualitative Sufficiency” as an Intelligible Principle: A Detailed Commentary on FCC v. Consumers’ Research (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Qualitative Sufficiency” as an Intelligible Principle: A Comprehensive Commentary on FCC v. Consumers’ Research, 606 U.S. ___ (2025) 1. Introduction For nearly three decades the Federal...
From “Strict” to “Intermediate”: Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton and the New Standard for Online Age-Verification Laws

From “Strict” to “Intermediate”: Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton and the New Standard for Online Age-Verification Laws

Date: Jun 30, 2025
From “Strict” to “Intermediate”: Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton and the New Standard for Online Age-Verification Laws 1. Introduction In Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, No. 23-1122...
“Convene-and-Transfer” Doctrine: Kennedy v. Braidwood Management Clarifies Inferior-Officer Status and Two-Step Vesting Under the Appointments Clause

“Convene-and-Transfer” Doctrine: Kennedy v. Braidwood Management Clarifies Inferior-Officer Status and Two-Step Vesting Under the Appointments Clause

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Convene-and-Transfer” Doctrine: Kennedy v. Braidwood Management Clarifies Inferior-Officer Status and Two-Step Vesting Under the Appointments Clause 1. Introduction Kennedy v. Braidwood Management,...
Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025): The New Constitutional Right to Religious Opt-Outs from Public-School Instruction

Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025): The New Constitutional Right to Religious Opt-Outs from Public-School Instruction

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Mahmoud v. Taylor: The U.S. Supreme Court Recognizes a Parental Free-Exercise Right to Opt Children Out of Public-School Lessons 1. Introduction Mahmoud v. Taylor, 606 U.S. ___ (2025), is the Supreme...
Trump v. CASA, Inc.: The Demise of the “Universal Injunction” and the Re-drawn Limits of Federal Equitable Power

Trump v. CASA, Inc.: The Demise of the “Universal Injunction” and the Re-drawn Limits of Federal Equitable Power

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Trump v. CASA, Inc. The Supreme Court Abolishes the Universal Injunction 1. Introduction In Trump v. CASA, Inc., 606 U.S. ___ (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court issued what is likely to become the...
Escalating Racial Abuse, Physical Harm, and Threats as “Adverse Action”:  New Guidance on Retaliation & Equal-Protection Pleading Standards in Coleman v. Kent

Escalating Racial Abuse, Physical Harm, and Threats as “Adverse Action”: New Guidance on Retaliation & Equal-Protection Pleading Standards in Coleman v. Kent

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Escalating Racial Abuse, Physical Harm, and Threats as “Adverse Action”: New Guidance on Retaliation & Equal-Protection Pleading Standards in Coleman v. Kent 1. Introduction Charlie Omar Coleman, an...
United States v. Doyce Barnes: The Sixth Circuit Declares Pyramid Schemes Per Se Mail-Fraud and Unveils the “Emperor-Package” Investment-Contract Test

United States v. Doyce Barnes: The Sixth Circuit Declares Pyramid Schemes Per Se Mail-Fraud and Unveils the “Emperor-Package” Investment-Contract Test

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Doyce Barnes: The Sixth Circuit Declares Pyramid Schemes Per Se Mail-Fraud and Unveils the “Emperor-Package” Investment-Contract Test Introduction In United States v. Doyce Barnes...
Pyramid Schemes as Per Se Schemes to Defraud & Hybrid MLM “Packages” as Securities ―
            A Commentary on United States v. Doyce Barnes (6th Cir. 2025)

Pyramid Schemes as Per Se Schemes to Defraud & Hybrid MLM “Packages” as Securities ― A Commentary on United States v. Doyce Barnes (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Pyramid Schemes Are, by Definition, Federal Schemes to Defraud & Hybrid MLM Investments Can Be “Securities” — Detailed Commentary on United States v. Doyce Barnes, 84 F.4th ___ (6th Cir. 2025)...
Pyramid Schemes as Per-Se Mail Fraud & “Passive-Income” Packages as Securities: A Commentary on United States v. Faraday Hosseinipour

Pyramid Schemes as Per-Se Mail Fraud & “Passive-Income” Packages as Securities: A Commentary on United States v. Faraday Hosseinipour

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Pyramid Schemes as Per-Se Mail Fraud & “Passive-Income” Packages as Securities: Commentary on United States v. Faraday Hosseinipour, 82 F.4th 921 (6th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction United States v....
United States v. Faraday Hosseinipour – The Sixth Circuit Clarifies that “Pyramid Schemes” Are Not a Separate Federal Crime but Simply One Variety of Mail- or Securities-Fraud Conspiracy

United States v. Faraday Hosseinipour – The Sixth Circuit Clarifies that “Pyramid Schemes” Are Not a Separate Federal Crime but Simply One Variety of Mail- or Securities-Fraud Conspiracy

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Faraday Hosseinipour – The Sixth Circuit Clarifies that “Pyramid Schemes” Are Not a Separate Federal Crime but Simply One Variety of Mail- or Securities-Fraud Conspiracy Introduction...
United States v. Maike: Sixth Circuit Clarifies that Pyramid Schemes Are Per Se Mail-Fraud “Schemes to Defraud” and That High-Tier MLM Packages Qualify as Securities

United States v. Maike: Sixth Circuit Clarifies that Pyramid Schemes Are Per Se Mail-Fraud “Schemes to Defraud” and That High-Tier MLM Packages Qualify as Securities

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Maike Sixth Circuit Clarifies that Pyramid Schemes Are Per Se Mail-Fraud “Schemes to Defraud” and That High-Tier MLM Packages Qualify as Securities 1. Introduction This consolidated...
United States v. Maike: Pyramid Schemes as Per-Se Mail Fraud & “Emperor” Packages as Securities

United States v. Maike: Pyramid Schemes as Per-Se Mail Fraud & “Emperor” Packages as Securities

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Maike: Pyramid Schemes as Per-Se Mail Fraud & “Emperor” Packages as Securities 1. Introduction United States v. Richard Maike, Nos. 22-6114/6121/23-5029/5560/5561/5563 (6th Cir....
“Knowing-and-Voluntary” Appeal Waivers in Immigration Proceedings: The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification in Saleem v. Garland

“Knowing-and-Voluntary” Appeal Waivers in Immigration Proceedings: The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification in Saleem v. Garland

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Knowing-and-Voluntary” Appeal Waivers in Immigration Proceedings: The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification in Saleem v. Garland Introduction On 26 June 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
The “Actual-Innocence” Gateway Post-Taylor: Seventh Circuit Narrows Collateral Relief Under § 2255 in Cobbs v. United States

The “Actual-Innocence” Gateway Post-Taylor: Seventh Circuit Narrows Collateral Relief Under § 2255 in Cobbs v. United States

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The “Actual-Innocence” Gateway Post-Taylor: Seventh Circuit Narrows Collateral Relief Under § 2255 in Cobbs v. United States Introduction On 26 June 2025 the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert