Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

strict-enforcement-of-probation-conditions:-a-landmark-decision-in-in-re:-michael-thomas-joseph, Case Commentaries

The Barnes Rule: Recruiting and Directing a Single Accomplice Constitutes Supervisory Role under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) and Bars Safety-Valve Relief

The Barnes Rule: Recruiting and Directing a Single Accomplice Constitutes Supervisory Role under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) and Bars Safety-Valve Relief

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The Barnes Rule: Recruiting and Directing a Single Accomplice Constitutes Supervisory Role under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) and Bars Safety-Valve Relief 1. Introduction United States v. Zachary Barnes,...
The “Infliction Rule”: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Venue in Felony-Murder Prosecutions – Commentary on Lewis v. State (2025)

The “Infliction Rule”: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Venue in Felony-Murder Prosecutions – Commentary on Lewis v. State (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The “Infliction Rule”: Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies Venue in Felony-Murder Prosecutions A Comprehensive Commentary on Lewis v. State, S25A0023 (Ga. June 26 2025) Introduction Aaron Lewis was...
“Removing One Barrier Is Redress Enough” – Gutierrez v. Saenz and the Supreme Court’s Refined Doctrine of Standing in Post-Conviction DNA-Testing Litigation

“Removing One Barrier Is Redress Enough” – Gutierrez v. Saenz and the Supreme Court’s Refined Doctrine of Standing in Post-Conviction DNA-Testing Litigation

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Removing One Barrier Is Redress Enough” – Gutierrez v. Saenz and the Supreme Court’s Refined Doctrine of Standing in Post-Conviction DNA-Testing Litigation I. Introduction On 26 June 2025 the U.S....
“No Sentence Means No Bar” – Hewitt v. United States and the Present-Perfect Test for First-Step-Act Retroactivity

“No Sentence Means No Bar” – Hewitt v. United States and the Present-Perfect Test for First-Step-Act Retroactivity

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“No Sentence Means No Bar” – Hewitt v. United States (2025) and the Present-Perfect Test for Retroactivity under §403(b) of the First Step Act 1. Introduction In Hewitt v. United States, 606 U.S. ___...
Medina v. Planned Parenthood: A Landmark Restriction on Private §1983 Actions Under Spending-Clause Statutes

Medina v. Planned Parenthood: A Landmark Restriction on Private §1983 Actions Under Spending-Clause Statutes

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (2025): The Supreme Court Narrows §1983 Enforcement of Spending-Clause Statutes Introduction On 26 June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Medina v....
Riley v. Bondi: Clarifying “Final Orders of Removal” and Re-branding the §1252(b)(1) Deadline as a Non-Jurisdictional Claims-Processing Rule

Riley v. Bondi: Clarifying “Final Orders of Removal” and Re-branding the §1252(b)(1) Deadline as a Non-Jurisdictional Claims-Processing Rule

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Riley v. Bondi: Clarifying “Final Orders of Removal” and Re-branding the §1252(b)(1) Deadline as a Non-Jurisdictional Claims-Processing Rule 1. Introduction In Riley v. Bondi, 606 U.S. ____ (2025),...
Anonymous Retention of Newborn Blood Spots Not a Constitutional Violation: Sixth Circuit Defines Limits of Parental Due Process and Fourth-Amendment Rights

Anonymous Retention of Newborn Blood Spots Not a Constitutional Violation: Sixth Circuit Defines Limits of Parental Due Process and Fourth-Amendment Rights

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Anonymous Retention of Newborn Blood Spots Not a Constitutional Violation: Sixth Circuit Defines Limits of Parental Due Process and Fourth-Amendment Rights Introduction In Adam Kanuszewski v....
“Minimal-Explanation Suffices” – The Sixth Circuit’s Clarification on Consecutive Revocation Sentences in United States v. Daniel Lamor Major

“Minimal-Explanation Suffices” – The Sixth Circuit’s Clarification on Consecutive Revocation Sentences in United States v. Daniel Lamor Major

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Minimal-Explanation Suffices” – The Sixth Circuit’s Clarification on Consecutive Revocation Sentences in United States v. Daniel Lamor Major Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s unpublished opinion in...
District-Court Discretion and Minimal-Explanation Standard in Post-Amendment 821 Motions – A Commentary on United States v. Paul Turner (6th Cir. 2025)

District-Court Discretion and Minimal-Explanation Standard in Post-Amendment 821 Motions – A Commentary on United States v. Paul Turner (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
District-Court Discretion and the Minimal-Explanation Standard in Post-Amendment 821 Sentence-Reduction Motions A Commentary on United States v. Paul Turner, 24-4011 (6th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction...
“One Strike Further”: Hale-El v. Doe and the Tenth Circuit’s Clarification that
           (1) a Mis-Captioned Notice of Appeal Does Not Defeat Jurisdiction and
           (2) Frivolous Prisoner Appeals Trigger PLRA Strikes and IFP Denials

“One Strike Further”: Hale-El v. Doe and the Tenth Circuit’s Clarification that (1) a Mis-Captioned Notice of Appeal Does Not Defeat Jurisdiction and (2) Frivolous Prisoner Appeals Trigger PLRA Strikes and IFP Denials

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“One Strike Further”: Hale-El v. Doe and the Tenth Circuit’s Clarification that (1) a Mis-Captioned Notice of Appeal Does Not Defeat Jurisdiction and (2) Frivolous Prisoner Appeals Trigger PLRA...
“Timely Medication as a Clearly-Established Right” – A Comment on Dennis Wiertella v. Lake County, Ohio

“Timely Medication as a Clearly-Established Right” – A Comment on Dennis Wiertella v. Lake County, Ohio

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Timely Medication as a Clearly-Established Right” – Detailed Commentary on Dennis Wiertella v. Lake County, Ohio (6th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Dennis Wiertella v. Lake County, Ohio, the United...
Porter v. Jackson Township: Sixth Circuit Clarifies the “Honest-Belief” Rule in FMLA Retaliation Litigation

Porter v. Jackson Township: Sixth Circuit Clarifies the “Honest-Belief” Rule in FMLA Retaliation Litigation

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Porter v. Jackson Township: Sixth Circuit Clarifies the “Honest-Belief” Rule in FMLA Retaliation Litigation 1. Introduction Shawn Porter, a nine-year employee of the Jackson Township Highway...
Reaffirming the “Crime-of-Violence” Status of Kentucky Assault-EED: A Commentary on United States v. Joshua Delmare Habern (6th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming the “Crime-of-Violence” Status of Kentucky Assault-EED: A Commentary on United States v. Joshua Delmare Habern (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Reaffirming the “Crime-of-Violence” Status of Kentucky Assault under Extreme Emotional Disturbance: United States v. Joshua Delmare Habern Introduction In United States v. Joshua Delmare Habern, the...
City of Milton v. Chang: Georgia Re-defines “Road” to Include the Shoulder, Expanding Municipal Liability and Clarifying Pre-Judgment Interest

City of Milton v. Chang: Georgia Re-defines “Road” to Include the Shoulder, Expanding Municipal Liability and Clarifying Pre-Judgment Interest

Date: Jun 30, 2025
City of Milton v. Chang: Georgia Re-defines “Road” to Include the Shoulder, Expanding Municipal Liability and Clarifying Pre-Judgment Interest Introduction On 24 June 2025 the Supreme Court of...
Pufahl v. Commissioner of Social Security – Seventh Circuit Clarifies
            Deference Owed to Treating-Source Opinions and Adequacy of “Two-Hour-Segment”
            Limitations in SSA Disability Cases

Pufahl v. Commissioner of Social Security – Seventh Circuit Clarifies Deference Owed to Treating-Source Opinions and Adequacy of “Two-Hour-Segment” Limitations in SSA Disability Cases

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Pufahl v. Commissioner of Social Security (7th Cir. 2025) Clarifying the Limits of Treating-Physician Deference and the Sufficiency of “Two-Hour-Segment” Concentration Restrictions 1. Introduction...
Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Reassignment to Pre-Existing Job Duties Is Not a “Tangible Employment Action” — Commentary on Bankruptcy Estate of Santoasha Harris v. City of Milwaukee

Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Reassignment to Pre-Existing Job Duties Is Not a “Tangible Employment Action” — Commentary on Bankruptcy Estate of Santoasha Harris v. City of Milwaukee

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Reassignment to Pre-Existing Job Duties Is Not a “Tangible Employment Action”: A Comprehensive Commentary on Bankruptcy Estate of Santoasha Harris v. City of Milwaukee...
Non-Physician Opinions and Post-Hearing Evidence: Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Materiality Barriers in Disability Appeals – Commentary on Vuletich v. Bisignano (2025)

Non-Physician Opinions and Post-Hearing Evidence: Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Materiality Barriers in Disability Appeals – Commentary on Vuletich v. Bisignano (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Non-Physician Opinions and Post-Hearing Evidence: Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Materiality Barriers in Disability Appeals Comprehensive Commentary on Jason Vuletich v. Frank Bisignano, Court of Appeals...
“Competent Proof” at the Screening Stage: The Seventh Circuit Raises the Pleading Bar for Corporate Citizenship in Pro Se Diversity Cases

“Competent Proof” at the Screening Stage: The Seventh Circuit Raises the Pleading Bar for Corporate Citizenship in Pro Se Diversity Cases

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Competent Proof” at the Screening Stage: The Seventh Circuit Raises the Pleading Bar for Corporate Citizenship in Pro Se Diversity Cases 1. Introduction In Kendall Harlson v. Government Employees...
Seventh Circuit Mandates Review of “Changed Circumstances” in Successive Motions
            to Recruit Counsel – Commentary on Miguel Rico v. John Howe (2025)

Seventh Circuit Mandates Review of “Changed Circumstances” in Successive Motions to Recruit Counsel – Commentary on Miguel Rico v. John Howe (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Seventh Circuit Mandates Review of “Changed Circumstances” in Successive Motions to Recruit Counsel Commentary on Miguel Rico v. John Howe, 24-1175 (7th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Miguel Rico, an...
Walls v. Mershon (7th Cir. 2025): Delineating Prisoners’ Informed-Consent Rights and Trial-Court Discretion to Sever Misjoined Claims

Walls v. Mershon (7th Cir. 2025): Delineating Prisoners’ Informed-Consent Rights and Trial-Court Discretion to Sever Misjoined Claims

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Walls v. Mershon (7th Cir. 2025): Delineating Prisoners’ Informed-Consent Rights and Trial-Court Discretion to Sever Misjoined Claims 1. Introduction In Nirin Walls v. N.P. Mershon, the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert