Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

strict-enforcement-of-probation-conditions:-a-landmark-decision-in-in-re:-michael-thomas-joseph, Case Commentaries

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Reliance under North Carolina UDTPA and Punitive-Damages Cap: CPI Security Systems, Inc. v. Vivint Smart Home, Inc.

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Reliance under North Carolina UDTPA and Punitive-Damages Cap: CPI Security Systems, Inc. v. Vivint Smart Home, Inc.

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Reliance Requirement under North Carolina UDTPA and How to Apply the Statutory Cap on Punitive Damages in Multi-Claim Actions I. Introduction In CPI Security Systems, Inc. v....
The “Robertson Rule” – When Federal Sovereign Immunity Mirrors State Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity

The “Robertson Rule” – When Federal Sovereign Immunity Mirrors State Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity

Date: Jul 24, 2025
The “Robertson Rule” – When Federal Sovereign Immunity Mirrors State Workers’ Compensation Exclusivity Introduction Katrina Robertson v. United States (4th Cir. July 22 2025) squarely addresses the...
Coffman v. Nexstar (4th Cir. 2025): Clarifying that Only “Objectively Reasonable” Accommodation Requests Trigger Protection under the WVHRA

Coffman v. Nexstar (4th Cir. 2025): Clarifying that Only “Objectively Reasonable” Accommodation Requests Trigger Protection under the WVHRA

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Coffman v. Nexstar Media Inc. (4th Cir. 2025): Clarifying that Only “Objectively Reasonable” Accommodation Requests Trigger Protection under the WVHRA Introduction Leanna Coffman, an Account...
Holt v. Hull: Fourth Circuit Clarifies that Pre-Trial Detention Credits Do Not Transfer Across Unrelated Virginia Jurisdictions Absent a “Same-Act” Nexus

Holt v. Hull: Fourth Circuit Clarifies that Pre-Trial Detention Credits Do Not Transfer Across Unrelated Virginia Jurisdictions Absent a “Same-Act” Nexus

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Holt v. Hull: Fourth Circuit Clarifies that Pre-Trial Detention Credits Do Not Transfer Across Unrelated Virginia Jurisdictions Absent a “Same-Act” Nexus 1. Introduction Michael Warren Holt brought a...
Rise for Animals v. Washington: Fourth Circuit Re-calibrates Informational-Standing—Plausible Statutory Entitlement to Specific Information Now a Threshold Requirement

Rise for Animals v. Washington: Fourth Circuit Re-calibrates Informational-Standing—Plausible Statutory Entitlement to Specific Information Now a Threshold Requirement

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Rise for Animals v. Washington: Fourth Circuit Re-calibrates Informational Standing— “A Plausible Statutory Entitlement to the Specific Information Sought” as an Article III Gatekeeper 1....
United States v. Booker: The Fourth Circuit Upholds the Anti-Kickback Statute, Narrows “Merger” Concerns in Money-Laundering, and Re-Affirms Post-Kisor Loss-Calculation Principles

United States v. Booker: The Fourth Circuit Upholds the Anti-Kickback Statute, Narrows “Merger” Concerns in Money-Laundering, and Re-Affirms Post-Kisor Loss-Calculation Principles

Date: Jul 24, 2025
United States v. Booker: The Fourth Circuit Upholds the Anti-Kickback Statute, Narrows “Merger” Concerns in Money-Laundering, and Re-Affirms Post-Kisor Loss-Calculation Principles Introduction On 22...
“From Wheels to Wires” – The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Ambiguous Appeal Waivers and Rejects Wiretap-Act Analogies for GPS & Cell-Site TrackingA Commentary on United States v. Reginald Twitty, 4th Cir. (2025)

“From Wheels to Wires” – The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Ambiguous Appeal Waivers and Rejects Wiretap-Act Analogies for GPS & Cell-Site TrackingA Commentary on United States v. Reginald Twitty, 4th Cir. (2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“From Wheels to Wires” – The Fourth Circuit Clarifies Ambiguous Appeal Waivers and Rejects Wiretap-Act Analogies for GPS & Cell-Site Tracking A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Reginald...
Bellinsky v. Galan: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Sprint Gatekeeping” for Younger Abstention and Tightens Rooker-Feldman in Domestic-Relations Civil-Rights Suits

Bellinsky v. Galan: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Sprint Gatekeeping” for Younger Abstention and Tightens Rooker-Feldman in Domestic-Relations Civil-Rights Suits

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Bellinsky v. Galan: Tenth Circuit Reaffirms “Sprint Gatekeeping” for Younger Abstention and Tightens Rooker-Feldman in Domestic-Relations Civil-Rights Suits 1. Introduction Bellinsky v. Galan, United...
Sprint-Gatekeeping Reinforced: Domestic-Relations Suits Alone Do Not Trigger Younger Abstention – A Commentary on Bellinsky v. Galan (10th Cir. 2025)

Sprint-Gatekeeping Reinforced: Domestic-Relations Suits Alone Do Not Trigger Younger Abstention – A Commentary on Bellinsky v. Galan (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Sprint-Gatekeeping Reinforced: Domestic-Relations Suits Alone Do Not Trigger Younger Abstention – A Commentary on Bellinsky v. Galan (10th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Bellinsky v. Galan, the United...
Rhode Island Supreme Court Affirms Six-Year Limitation on All Executions, Including Replacement Pluries Executions – Commentary on Capital Video Corp. v. Bevilacqua (2025)

Rhode Island Supreme Court Affirms Six-Year Limitation on All Executions, Including Replacement Pluries Executions – Commentary on Capital Video Corp. v. Bevilacqua (2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Rhode Island Supreme Court Affirms Six-Year Limitation on All Executions, Including Replacement Pluries Executions Capital Video Corporation v. Joseph A. Bevilacqua, No. 2023-244 (R.I. Jul. 22, 2025)...
“From Leniency to Liability” –  Zajradhara v. Northern Marianas College (2025 MP 4) and the Supreme Court’s New Standard for Declaring Pro-Se Parties Vexatious Litigants

“From Leniency to Liability” – Zajradhara v. Northern Marianas College (2025 MP 4) and the Supreme Court’s New Standard for Declaring Pro-Se Parties Vexatious Litigants

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“From Leniency to Liability” – Zajradhara v. Northern Marianas College (2025 MP 4) and the Supreme Court’s New Standard for Declaring Pro-Se Parties Vexatious Litigants 1. Introduction In Zajradhara...
State v. Hernandez-Peralta: Limiting Padilla — No Constitutional Duty to Investigate Citizenship Beyond the Client’s Own Answer

State v. Hernandez-Peralta: Limiting Padilla — No Constitutional Duty to Investigate Citizenship Beyond the Client’s Own Answer

Date: Jul 24, 2025
State v. Hernandez-Peralta (2025): “No Independent Duty to Verify Citizenship” — A New Limit on Padilla Obligations for Sentencing Counsel 1. Introduction In State v. Juan C. Hernandez-Peralta, the...
Local Governments May Classify Elected Officials as Part-Time Employees for Health-Insurance Purposes — A Commentary on Perry County, Indiana, et al. v. Keith D. Huck

Local Governments May Classify Elected Officials as Part-Time Employees for Health-Insurance Purposes — A Commentary on Perry County, Indiana, et al. v. Keith D. Huck

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Local Governments May Classify Elected Officials as Part-Time Employees for Health-Insurance Purposes: Commentary on Perry County, Indiana; Board of Commissioners, et al. v. Keith D. Huck, Supreme...

        Inflation-Adjusted Replacement-Cost Damages Plus Pre-Judgment Interest Do
        Not Constitute Double Recovery – 11th Cir. Clarifies Waiver and Damage
        Principles in Central Baptist Church v. Church Mutual (2025)

Inflation-Adjusted Replacement-Cost Damages Plus Pre-Judgment Interest Do Not Constitute Double Recovery – 11th Cir. Clarifies Waiver and Damage Principles in Central Baptist Church v. Church Mutual (2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Inflation-Adjusted Replacement-Cost Damages Plus Pre-Judgment Interest Do Not Constitute Double Recovery Central Baptist Church of Albany, Georgia Inc. v. Church Mutual Insurance Co., 22-11082 (11th...

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies “Scrivener’s Error,” Continuing-Violation Limits, and Comparator Standards in Federal Employment Litigation – Commentary on Joseph Jimenez v. Acting U.S. Attorney General

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies “Scrivener’s Error,” Continuing-Violation Limits, and Comparator Standards in Federal Employment Litigation – Commentary on Joseph Jimenez v. Acting U.S. Attorney General

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies “Scrivener’s Error,” Continuing-Violation Limits, and Comparator Standards in Federal Employment Litigation Commentary on Joseph Jimenez v. Acting U.S. Attorney General,...
Voluntary Demolition Forecloses Dimensional Variance: Commentary on RH McLeod Family LLC v. Westerly Zoning Board of Review (R.I. 2025)

Voluntary Demolition Forecloses Dimensional Variance: Commentary on RH McLeod Family LLC v. Westerly Zoning Board of Review (R.I. 2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Voluntary Demolition Forecloses Dimensional Variance: RH McLeod Family LLC & 4 Spray Rock, LLC v. Westerly Zoning Board of Review (R.I. 2025) 1. Introduction In this consolidated certiorari...
“No Romance, No Inference”: State v. Threadgill and the Refined Standard for When Consent Must Be Charged

“No Romance, No Inference”: State v. Threadgill and the Refined Standard for When Consent Must Be Charged

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“No Romance, No Inference”: State v. Threadgill and the Refined Standard for When Consent Must Be Charged 1. Introduction In State v. Larry Threadgill, No. 2023-23-C.A. (R.I. July 18 2025), the Rhode...
Reaffirming the “More-Than-Mere-Inconvenience” Test: Commentary on Watch Hill Fire District v. Westerly Zoning Board of Review (R.I. 2025)

Reaffirming the “More-Than-Mere-Inconvenience” Test: Commentary on Watch Hill Fire District v. Westerly Zoning Board of Review (R.I. 2025)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Reaffirming the “More-Than-Mere-Inconvenience” Test for Dimensional Variances: A Comprehensive Commentary on Watch Hill Fire District v. Westerly Zoning Board of Review, 330 A.3d ___ (R.I. 2025) I....
Self-Inflicted Compliance Costs Are Not “Concrete Injuries”: Nelson v. Experian and the Eleventh Circuit’s New Limitation on Article III Standing under the FCRA

Self-Inflicted Compliance Costs Are Not “Concrete Injuries”: Nelson v. Experian and the Eleventh Circuit’s New Limitation on Article III Standing under the FCRA

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Self-Inflicted Compliance Costs Are Not “Concrete Injuries”: The Eleventh Circuit Redefines Article III Standing for Undisclosed Credit-File Errors in Jessica Nelson v. Experian Information Solutions...
Cunningham v. Cunningham (2025):  Rule 11 Sanctions for Improper Attempts to Alter an Incorporated-but-Not-Merged Marital Settlement Agreement

Cunningham v. Cunningham (2025): Rule 11 Sanctions for Improper Attempts to Alter an Incorporated-but-Not-Merged Marital Settlement Agreement

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Cunningham v. Cunningham (R.I. 2025): Supreme Court Affirms Family Court’s Power to Impose Rule 11 Sanctions and Attorneys’ Fees for Motions Seeking Unauthorized Modification of an...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert