Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

strict-enforcement-of-probation-conditions:-a-landmark-decision-in-in-re:-michael-thomas-joseph, Case Commentaries

Notice-Recipient Designations in Reverse Mortgages Impute Knowledge to the Lender: Second Department narrows CPLR 306‑b “interest of justice” extensions for heir defendants

Notice-Recipient Designations in Reverse Mortgages Impute Knowledge to the Lender: Second Department narrows CPLR 306‑b “interest of justice” extensions for heir defendants

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Notice-Recipient Designations in Reverse Mortgages Impute Knowledge to the Lender: Second Department narrows CPLR 306‑b “interest of justice” extensions for heir defendants Introduction In OneWest...
“Every Civil Claim” Means Every: Second Department Holds CPLR 214‑j (Adult Survivors Act) Revives Claims Despite Prior Dismissal for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction

“Every Civil Claim” Means Every: Second Department Holds CPLR 214‑j (Adult Survivors Act) Revives Claims Despite Prior Dismissal for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction

Date: Jul 24, 2025
“Every Civil Claim” Means Every: Second Department Holds CPLR 214‑j (Adult Survivors Act) Revives Claims Despite Prior Dismissal for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Introduction Esposito v. Isaac (2025...
Neutral-Principles Discovery of Clergy Files in Child Victims Act Litigation: Limits of Religious and Counseling Privileges and Preservation of Attorney-Client/Work-Product Protections — Commentary on S.E. v. Diocese of Brooklyn (2025 NY Slip Op 04228)

Neutral-Principles Discovery of Clergy Files in Child Victims Act Litigation: Limits of Religious and Counseling Privileges and Preservation of Attorney-Client/Work-Product Protections — Commentary on S.E. v. Diocese of Brooklyn (2025 NY Slip Op 04228)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Neutral-Principles Discovery of Clergy Files in Child Victims Act Litigation: Limits of Religious and Counseling Privileges and Preservation of Attorney-Client/Work-Product Protections Introduction...
No-Proof Delay Damages in Arbitration Vacated as Irrational: Second Department narrows damages without evidentiary basis and construes CPLR 7511(c) “miscalculation” narrowly

No-Proof Delay Damages in Arbitration Vacated as Irrational: Second Department narrows damages without evidentiary basis and construes CPLR 7511(c) “miscalculation” narrowly

Date: Jul 24, 2025
No-Proof Delay Damages in Arbitration Vacated as Irrational: Second Department narrows damages without evidentiary basis and construes CPLR 7511(c) “miscalculation” narrowly Introduction In Matter of...
Late-Stage Discovery Cannot Expand Theories; No Labor Law Liability Without Supervisory Control — Commentary on Novegil-Peralta v. Rettig (2025 NY Slip Op 04255)

Late-Stage Discovery Cannot Expand Theories; No Labor Law Liability Without Supervisory Control — Commentary on Novegil-Peralta v. Rettig (2025 NY Slip Op 04255)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Late-Stage Discovery Cannot Expand Theories; No Labor Law Liability Without Supervisory Control — Novegil-Peralta v. Rettig (2025 NY Slip Op 04255) Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court,...
No Commission Without Procuring Cause Absent Unequivocal “Exclusive Right” Language in Financing Brokerage Agreements: Commentary on Angelic Real Estate, LLC v. Aurora Properties, LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 04223)

No Commission Without Procuring Cause Absent Unequivocal “Exclusive Right” Language in Financing Brokerage Agreements: Commentary on Angelic Real Estate, LLC v. Aurora Properties, LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 04223)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
No Commission Without Procuring Cause Absent Unequivocal “Exclusive Right” Language in Financing Brokerage Agreements Commentary on Angelic Real Estate, LLC v. Aurora Properties, LLC (2025 NY Slip Op...
Origis USA v. Great American Insurance: Reconciling “No-Action” Clauses with Advancement Duties in Indemnity-Only D&O Policies

Origis USA v. Great American Insurance: Reconciling “No-Action” Clauses with Advancement Duties in Indemnity-Only D&O Policies

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Origis USA v. Great American Insurance: Reconciling “No-Action” Clauses with Advancement Duties in Indemnity-Only D&O Policies 1. Introduction In Origis USA LLC v. Great American Insurance Co., No....
CPLR 205(a) Strictly Applied: Default Dismissals Terminate Immediately; Refiling by Unappointed Estate Representative and Late Service Cannot Invoke the Savings Statute

CPLR 205(a) Strictly Applied: Default Dismissals Terminate Immediately; Refiling by Unappointed Estate Representative and Late Service Cannot Invoke the Savings Statute

Date: Jul 24, 2025
CPLR 205(a) Strictly Applied: Default Dismissals Terminate Immediately; Refiling by Unappointed Estate Representative and Late Service Cannot Invoke the Savings Statute Introduction In Ellis v....
Interlocutory Foreclosure Orders and Lis Pendens Cancellations Are Not “Final Judgments” for Res Judicata: Commentary on Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Davis (2025 NY Slip Op 04253)

Interlocutory Foreclosure Orders and Lis Pendens Cancellations Are Not “Final Judgments” for Res Judicata: Commentary on Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Davis (2025 NY Slip Op 04253)

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Interlocutory Foreclosure Orders and Lis Pendens Cancellations Are Not “Final Judgments” for Res Judicata: Commentary on Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Davis (2025 NY Slip Op 04253) Introduction This...
Under FAPA, a foreclosure judgment is not “enforced” until the auction concludes: Second Department applies retroactivity and time-bars suit despite judgment of foreclosure and sale

Under FAPA, a foreclosure judgment is not “enforced” until the auction concludes: Second Department applies retroactivity and time-bars suit despite judgment of foreclosure and sale

Date: Jul 24, 2025
Under FAPA, a foreclosure judgment is not “enforced” until the auction concludes: Second Department applies retroactivity and time-bars suit despite judgment of foreclosure and sale Introduction...
Refining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Misconduct: The “Reasonable-Inference” Rule & Contextual Review after State v. Willis (2025)

Refining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Misconduct: The “Reasonable-Inference” Rule & Contextual Review after State v. Willis (2025)

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Refining the Boundaries of Prosecutorial Misconduct: The “Reasonable-Inference” Rule & Contextual Review after State v. Willis (Haw. 2025) 1. Introduction Case: State of Hawaiʻi v. Erik Willis,...
Distinguishing Weapons Offenses from “Marijuana Offenses” Under Missouri Amendment 3 – A Commentary on C.S. v. Missouri State Highway Patrol CJIS (Mo. banc 2025)

Distinguishing Weapons Offenses from “Marijuana Offenses” Under Missouri Amendment 3 – A Commentary on C.S. v. Missouri State Highway Patrol CJIS (Mo. banc 2025)

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Distinguishing Weapons Offenses from “Marijuana Offenses” Under Missouri Amendment 3 A Comprehensive Commentary on C.S. v. Missouri State Highway Patrol Criminal Justice Information Service, 645...
Mack v. Missouri – Curtailing the Abandonment Doctrine and Foreclosing Re-litigation of Direct-Appeal Issues in Rule 29.15 Proceedings

Mack v. Missouri – Curtailing the Abandonment Doctrine and Foreclosing Re-litigation of Direct-Appeal Issues in Rule 29.15 Proceedings

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Mack v. Missouri – Curtailing the Abandonment Doctrine and Foreclosing Re-litigation of Direct-Appeal Issues in Rule 29.15 Proceedings 1. Introduction In Cedric Dewayne Mack v. State of Missouri, the...
“The Sentencing-Date Rule” & the Limits of the Abandonment Doctrine: Commentary on Christopher A. Scott v. State of Missouri (Mo. banc 2025)

“The Sentencing-Date Rule” & the Limits of the Abandonment Doctrine: Commentary on Christopher A. Scott v. State of Missouri (Mo. banc 2025)

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“The Sentencing-Date Rule” & the Limits of the Abandonment Doctrine Commentary on Christopher A. Scott v. State of Missouri Supreme Court of Missouri, en banc, July 22, 2025 1. Introduction In...
McCarty v. OCDC: Whistle-Blowing Does Not Trump Attorney-Client Confidentiality for Former Government Lawyers

McCarty v. OCDC: Whistle-Blowing Does Not Trump Attorney-Client Confidentiality for Former Government Lawyers

Date: Jul 23, 2025
McCarty v. OCDC: Whistle-Blowing Does Not Trump Attorney-Client Confidentiality for Former Government Lawyers 1. Introduction In In re: Ryan Christopher McCarty, the Supreme Court of Missouri,...
“Record-Based Abandonment”:  The Missouri Supreme Court Dispenses with Remand when Counsel’s Untimeliness is Apparent on the Face of the Record

“Record-Based Abandonment”: The Missouri Supreme Court Dispenses with Remand when Counsel’s Untimeliness is Apparent on the Face of the Record

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“Record-Based Abandonment”: The Missouri Supreme Court Dispenses with Remand when Counsel’s Untimeliness is Apparent on the Face of the Record Introduction Nelson v. State of Missouri and Woods v....
“One-Tax, One-Jurisdiction”: The Missouri Supreme Court Limits Counties’ Marijuana Sales-Tax Authority to Unincorporated Areas

“One-Tax, One-Jurisdiction”: The Missouri Supreme Court Limits Counties’ Marijuana Sales-Tax Authority to Unincorporated Areas

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“One-Tax, One-Jurisdiction”: The Missouri Supreme Court Limits Counties’ Marijuana Sales-Tax Authority to Unincorporated Areas 1. Introduction In Robust Missouri Dispensary 3, LLC v. St. Louis...
From Pre-emption to Abrogation: Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Statutory Impact on Common-Law Claims in Online-Gambling Disputes

From Pre-emption to Abrogation: Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Statutory Impact on Common-Law Claims in Online-Gambling Disputes

Date: Jul 23, 2025
From Pre-emption to Abrogation: Michigan Supreme Court Clarifies Statutory Impact on Common-Law Claims in Online-Gambling Disputes Introduction In Jacqueline Davis v. BetMGM LLC, the Michigan Supreme...
Zakrzewski v. State – Fortifying Timeliness and Procedural-Bar Limits in Florida Capital Post-Conviction Practice

Zakrzewski v. State – Fortifying Timeliness and Procedural-Bar Limits in Florida Capital Post-Conviction Practice

Date: Jul 23, 2025
Zakrzewski v. State – Fortifying Timeliness and Procedural-Bar Limits in Florida Capital Post-Conviction Practice Introduction The Florida Supreme Court’s 2025 decision in Edward J. Zakrzewski, II v....
“A Six-Month Benchmark for Accounting Violations & Fitness-to-Practice Condition” – Commentary on In the Matter of Charles M. Dalziel, Jr.

“A Six-Month Benchmark for Accounting Violations & Fitness-to-Practice Condition” – Commentary on In the Matter of Charles M. Dalziel, Jr.

Date: Jul 23, 2025
“A Six-Month Benchmark for Accounting Violations & Fitness-to-Practice Condition” Commentary on In the Matter of Charles M. Dalziel, Jr. 1. Introduction In In the Matter of Charles M. Dalziel, Jr....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert