Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reaffirmation-of-strict-liability-in-manufacturers&amp Case Commentaries

Uncharged Conduct, Officer Video Identification, and the Departure/Variance Label: Eleventh Circuit Affirms a Major Upward Sentence in United States v. White

Uncharged Conduct, Officer Video Identification, and the Departure/Variance Label: Eleventh Circuit Affirms a Major Upward Sentence in United States v. White

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Uncharged Conduct, Officer Video Identification, and the Departure/Variance Label: Eleventh Circuit Affirms a Major Upward Sentence in United States v. White Introduction In United States v. Narada...
EFIN Responsibility, Circumstantial Mens Rea, and the Zero‑Point Offender Carve‑Out: The Eleventh Circuit Affirms Managerial Role Enhancement and Loss Extrapolation in Tax‑Preparer Fraud

EFIN Responsibility, Circumstantial Mens Rea, and the Zero‑Point Offender Carve‑Out: The Eleventh Circuit Affirms Managerial Role Enhancement and Loss Extrapolation in Tax‑Preparer Fraud

Date: Sep 8, 2025
EFIN Responsibility, Circumstantial Mens Rea, and the Zero‑Point Offender Carve‑Out: The Eleventh Circuit Affirms Managerial Role Enhancement and Loss Extrapolation in Tax‑Preparer Fraud Case: United...
No “Naked” Remands in Social Security Appeals: Third Circuit Reaffirms that § 405(g) Remands Must Be Either a Merits Judgment under Sentence Four or a Good‑Cause Remand under Sentence Six

No “Naked” Remands in Social Security Appeals: Third Circuit Reaffirms that § 405(g) Remands Must Be Either a Merits Judgment under Sentence Four or a Good‑Cause Remand under Sentence Six

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No “Naked” Remands in Social Security Appeals: Third Circuit Reaffirms that § 405(g) Remands Must Be Either a Merits Judgment under Sentence Four or a Good‑Cause Remand under Sentence Six...
Preclusion, Not Rooker‑Feldman, Governs Post‑Foreclosure Bankruptcy Litigation: Third Circuit’s Two‑Part Clarification for When Rooker‑Feldman Applies in Bankruptcy

Preclusion, Not Rooker‑Feldman, Governs Post‑Foreclosure Bankruptcy Litigation: Third Circuit’s Two‑Part Clarification for When Rooker‑Feldman Applies in Bankruptcy

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Preclusion, Not Rooker‑Feldman, Governs Post‑Foreclosure Bankruptcy Litigation: Third Circuit’s Two‑Part Clarification for When Rooker‑Feldman Applies in Bankruptcy Introduction In a precedential...
Harmless Error, Moderate Social Limits, and Post‑2017 Opinion Articulation: The Fifth Circuit’s Clarification in Madkins v. Bisignano

Harmless Error, Moderate Social Limits, and Post‑2017 Opinion Articulation: The Fifth Circuit’s Clarification in Madkins v. Bisignano

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Harmless Error, Moderate Social Limits, and Post‑2017 Opinion Articulation: The Fifth Circuit’s Clarification in Madkins v. Bisignano Introduction In Madkins v. Bisignano (5th Cir. Sept. 3, 2025),...
Reinstatement Need Not Be Immediate: Fifth Circuit Requires “Next Available Position” Relief in Title VII/§1981 Retaliatory Discharge Cases

Reinstatement Need Not Be Immediate: Fifth Circuit Requires “Next Available Position” Relief in Title VII/§1981 Retaliatory Discharge Cases

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Reinstatement Need Not Be Immediate: Fifth Circuit Requires “Next Available Position” Relief in Title VII/§1981 Retaliatory Discharge Cases Introduction This Fifth Circuit decision in McMillian v....
McNair v. Pratt (6th Cir. 2025): No Clearly Established Eighth Amendment Violation for a Ground Takedown of a Handcuffed, Noncompliant Inmate When the Officer Is Alone—And a Sharp Reminder on Record-Handling at Summary Judgment

McNair v. Pratt (6th Cir. 2025): No Clearly Established Eighth Amendment Violation for a Ground Takedown of a Handcuffed, Noncompliant Inmate When the Officer Is Alone—And a Sharp Reminder on Record-Handling at Summary Judgment

Date: Sep 8, 2025
McNair v. Pratt (6th Cir. 2025): No Clearly Established Eighth Amendment Violation for a Ground Takedown of a Handcuffed, Noncompliant Inmate When the Officer Is Alone—And a Sharp Reminder on...
Reasonableness and “Good Faith for Cause” Reaffirmed: Louisiana Supreme Court Limits Judicial Power to Alter Civil Service Board Sanctions and Clarifies the Board’s Discretion to Modify Unreasonable Discipline

Reasonableness and “Good Faith for Cause” Reaffirmed: Louisiana Supreme Court Limits Judicial Power to Alter Civil Service Board Sanctions and Clarifies the Board’s Discretion to Modify Unreasonable Discipline

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Reasonableness and “Good Faith for Cause” Reaffirmed: Louisiana Supreme Court Limits Judicial Power to Alter Civil Service Board Sanctions and Clarifies the Board’s Discretion to Modify Unreasonable...
No Mens Rea Required for DEA Registration Revocations Under 21 U.S.C. § 824; Due Process Satisfied by Opportunity for Hearing

No Mens Rea Required for DEA Registration Revocations Under 21 U.S.C. § 824; Due Process Satisfied by Opportunity for Hearing

Date: Sep 8, 2025
No Mens Rea Required for DEA Registration Revocations Under 21 U.S.C. § 824; Due Process Satisfied by Opportunity for Hearing Introduction In Sualeh Kamal Ashraf v. United States Drug Enforcement...
Regulatory Complaints Are Not FCA Notice: Seventh Circuit Clarifies §3730(h) in Off‑Label Marketing and Third‑Party Causation (Lewis v. AbbVie)

Regulatory Complaints Are Not FCA Notice: Seventh Circuit Clarifies §3730(h) in Off‑Label Marketing and Third‑Party Causation (Lewis v. AbbVie)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Regulatory Complaints Are Not FCA Notice: Seventh Circuit Clarifies §3730(h) in Off‑Label Marketing and Third‑Party Causation Commentary on Jeffrey Lewis v. AbbVie Inc., Court of Appeals for the...
Reaffirming Key Sex‑Trafficking Sentencing Enhancements and Mandatory Restitution: Seventh Circuit Dismisses Appeal Under Anders in United States v. Arnold

Reaffirming Key Sex‑Trafficking Sentencing Enhancements and Mandatory Restitution: Seventh Circuit Dismisses Appeal Under Anders in United States v. Arnold

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Reaffirming Key Sex‑Trafficking Sentencing Enhancements and Mandatory Restitution: Seventh Circuit Dismisses Appeal Under Anders in United States v. Arnold Introduction In United States v. Daryl S....
Limitation Actions Do Not Implicate State Sovereign Immunity When the State Voluntarily Files a Claim: Fourth Circuit in Jackson Creek Marine v. State of Maryland

Limitation Actions Do Not Implicate State Sovereign Immunity When the State Voluntarily Files a Claim: Fourth Circuit in Jackson Creek Marine v. State of Maryland

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Limitation Actions Do Not Implicate State Sovereign Immunity When the State Voluntarily Files a Claim: Fourth Circuit in Jackson Creek Marine v. State of Maryland Court: United States Court of...
Fourth Circuit sets damages blueprint for “uninsurability” claims: face value of life insurance is not the measure; plaintiffs must prove expected lifespan to quantify increased premiums with reasonable certainty

Fourth Circuit sets damages blueprint for “uninsurability” claims: face value of life insurance is not the measure; plaintiffs must prove expected lifespan to quantify increased premiums with reasonable certainty

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Fourth Circuit sets damages blueprint for “uninsurability” claims: face value of life insurance is not the measure; plaintiffs must prove expected lifespan to quantify increased premiums with...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies That Ex Parte Young Normally Does Not Permit Injunctions Against State Judges or Clerks; Sovereign and Quasi‑Judicial Immunity Defeat § 1983 Challenge to State‑Court Filing Restrictions

Tenth Circuit Clarifies That Ex Parte Young Normally Does Not Permit Injunctions Against State Judges or Clerks; Sovereign and Quasi‑Judicial Immunity Defeat § 1983 Challenge to State‑Court Filing Restrictions

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies That Ex Parte Young Normally Does Not Permit Injunctions Against State Judges or Clerks; Sovereign and Quasi‑Judicial Immunity Defeat § 1983 Challenge to State‑Court Filing...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: No Implied Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity by Litigation Silence; Post‑Judgment Amendment Requires Prior Vacatur

Tenth Circuit Clarifies: No Implied Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity by Litigation Silence; Post‑Judgment Amendment Requires Prior Vacatur

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: No Implied Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity by Litigation Silence; Post‑Judgment Amendment Requires Prior Vacatur Introduction In Merryfield v. State of Kansas, the...
Illegality Trumps Comparative Fault: Tenth Circuit Predicts Kansas Bars Product Liability Claims Arising from a Plaintiff’s Criminal Misuse

Illegality Trumps Comparative Fault: Tenth Circuit Predicts Kansas Bars Product Liability Claims Arising from a Plaintiff’s Criminal Misuse

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Illegality Trumps Comparative Fault: Tenth Circuit Predicts Kansas Bars Product Liability Claims Arising from a Plaintiff’s Criminal Misuse Introduction This published decision of the United States...
Scott v. Allen: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Pre‑Enforcement Standing—No Admission of Illegality or Proof of Statutory Mens Rea Required

Scott v. Allen: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Pre‑Enforcement Standing—No Admission of Illegality or Proof of Statutory Mens Rea Required

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Scott v. Allen: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Pre‑Enforcement Standing—No Admission of Illegality or Proof of Statutory Mens Rea Required Introduction In Scott v. Allen, the Tenth Circuit reversed a...
Unsubstantiated Third‑Party Abuse Allegations Are Generally Irrelevant Under Rule 412(b)(1)(C); Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Foundations for Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statements

Unsubstantiated Third‑Party Abuse Allegations Are Generally Irrelevant Under Rule 412(b)(1)(C); Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Foundations for Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statements

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Unsubstantiated Third‑Party Abuse Allegations Are Generally Irrelevant Under Rule 412(b)(1)(C); Tenth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Foundations for Impeachment by Prior Inconsistent Statements...
Record-Supported Adult-Pornography Bans Survive Plain-Error Review; Harm-and-Duration Can Justify Significant Upward Variances: Commentary on United States v. Doty (10th Cir. 2025)

Record-Supported Adult-Pornography Bans Survive Plain-Error Review; Harm-and-Duration Can Justify Significant Upward Variances: Commentary on United States v. Doty (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Record-Supported Adult-Pornography Bans Survive Plain-Error Review; Harm-and-Duration Can Justify Significant Upward Variances Case: United States v. Doty, No. 24-5091 (10th Cir. Sept. 3, 2025)...
Pretrial Detention as the Historical Analogue: Tenth Circuit Upholds § 922(n)’s Temporary Ban on Firearm Receipt by Indicted Persons

Pretrial Detention as the Historical Analogue: Tenth Circuit Upholds § 922(n)’s Temporary Ban on Firearm Receipt by Indicted Persons

Date: Sep 8, 2025
Pretrial Detention as the Historical Analogue: Tenth Circuit Upholds § 922(n)’s Temporary Ban on Firearm Receipt by Indicted Persons Case: United States v. Ogilvie, No. 24-4089 (10th Cir. Sept. 3,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert