Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-illinois-central-railroad&amp Case Commentaries

“Life Minus Months Still Equals Life”: Second Circuit Reaffirms § 3583(h) Supervised-Release Calculus for § 2252A Revocations and Enforces Oral-Pronouncement Rule

“Life Minus Months Still Equals Life”: Second Circuit Reaffirms § 3583(h) Supervised-Release Calculus for § 2252A Revocations and Enforces Oral-Pronouncement Rule

Date: Oct 10, 2025
“Life Minus Months Still Equals Life”: Second Circuit Reaffirms § 3583(h) Supervised-Release Calculus for § 2252A Revocations and Enforces Oral-Pronouncement Rule Note on precedential status: This...
No FTCA Waiver When Vermont Workers’ Compensation Covers Multi‑Employer Injuries: Coverage by Any Employer Preserves Exclusive-Remedy Immunity for Federal “Statutory Employers”

No FTCA Waiver When Vermont Workers’ Compensation Covers Multi‑Employer Injuries: Coverage by Any Employer Preserves Exclusive-Remedy Immunity for Federal “Statutory Employers”

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No FTCA Waiver When Vermont Workers’ Compensation Covers Multi‑Employer Injuries: Coverage by Any Employer Preserves Exclusive-Remedy Immunity for Federal “Statutory Employers” Case: Williams v....
Clark v. Valletta: Second Circuit Holds No Clearly Established Right to Specific Gender-Dysphoria Treatments; Qualified Immunity Applies and Objective Reasonableness Remains Distinct

Clark v. Valletta: Second Circuit Holds No Clearly Established Right to Specific Gender-Dysphoria Treatments; Qualified Immunity Applies and Objective Reasonableness Remains Distinct

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Clark v. Valletta: No Clearly Established Right to Specific Gender-Dysphoria Treatments; Objective Reasonableness Remains Distinct in Eighth Amendment Qualified Immunity Introduction In Clark v....
Fair Use Shields Satirical Broadcasts of Commissioned Cameo Videos; No Bad-Faith Bar, and Platform Terms Not Enforceable by Creators Absent Express Third-Party-Beneficiary Status

Fair Use Shields Satirical Broadcasts of Commissioned Cameo Videos; No Bad-Faith Bar, and Platform Terms Not Enforceable by Creators Absent Express Third-Party-Beneficiary Status

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Fair Use Shields Satirical Broadcasts of Commissioned Cameo Videos; No Bad-Faith Bar, and Platform Terms Not Enforceable by Creators Absent Express Third-Party-Beneficiary Status Case: Santos v....
Pleading Across Proceedings: Second Circuit Endorses Use of Other-Case Allegations (Rule 11–Limited) and Narrows “Storm Warnings” for Securities Act Timeliness — Commentary on Sherman v. Abengoa, S.A. (2d Cir. 2025)

Pleading Across Proceedings: Second Circuit Endorses Use of Other-Case Allegations (Rule 11–Limited) and Narrows “Storm Warnings” for Securities Act Timeliness — Commentary on Sherman v. Abengoa, S.A. (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Pleading Across Proceedings: Second Circuit Endorses Use of Other-Case Allegations (Rule 11–Limited) and Narrows “Storm Warnings” for Securities Act Timeliness — Commentary on Sherman v. Abengoa,...
Bad‑Faith, Post‑Auction Chapter 13 Filings Can Justify Retroactive Annulment of the Automatic Stay: Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification in Smith v. Shoma Homes

Bad‑Faith, Post‑Auction Chapter 13 Filings Can Justify Retroactive Annulment of the Automatic Stay: Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification in Smith v. Shoma Homes

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Bad‑Faith, Post‑Auction Chapter 13 Filings Can Justify Retroactive Annulment of the Automatic Stay: Eleventh Circuit’s Clarification in Smith v. Shoma Homes Case: Marisa Smith v. Shoma Homes at...
Guilty Plea Is Not Enough: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of §3E1.1 Acceptance Reduction Where Post‑Plea Conduct Undermines Responsibility (United States v. Leszczynski)

Guilty Plea Is Not Enough: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of §3E1.1 Acceptance Reduction Where Post‑Plea Conduct Undermines Responsibility (United States v. Leszczynski)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Guilty Plea Is Not Enough: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of §3E1.1 Acceptance Reduction Where Post‑Plea Conduct Undermines Responsibility Introduction In United States v. Alexander Leszczynski...
Rule 11 Colloquy Cures Counsel’s Sentencing Misadvice: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Plea Withdrawal in United States v. Walden

Rule 11 Colloquy Cures Counsel’s Sentencing Misadvice: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Plea Withdrawal in United States v. Walden

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Rule 11 Colloquy Cures Counsel’s Sentencing Misadvice: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Plea Withdrawal in United States v. Walden Introduction In United States v. Walden (11th Cir. Oct. 6, 2025)...
Dealer Noncompliance Is Irrelevant to § 922(a)(6); Serial-Number Enhancement Requires No Knowledge: United States v. Woozencroft (11th Cir. 2025)

Dealer Noncompliance Is Irrelevant to § 922(a)(6); Serial-Number Enhancement Requires No Knowledge: United States v. Woozencroft (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Dealer Noncompliance Is Irrelevant to § 922(a)(6); Serial-Number Enhancement Requires No Knowledge: United States v. Woozencroft (11th Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit...
Broad “In Connection With” Nexus and Fraud-Related Character of § 843(a)(3) Drug Diversion Trigger Mandatory Exclusion Under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a‑7(a)(3)

Broad “In Connection With” Nexus and Fraud-Related Character of § 843(a)(3) Drug Diversion Trigger Mandatory Exclusion Under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a‑7(a)(3)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Broad “In Connection With” Nexus and Fraud-Related Character of § 843(a)(3) Drug Diversion Trigger Mandatory Exclusion Under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a‑7(a)(3) Court: United States Court of Appeals for the...
TCPA’s “Any Person” Robocall Ban Does Not Reach State Legislators Performing Legitimate Official Functions: Third Circuit Sets a Federalism-Grounded Limitation

TCPA’s “Any Person” Robocall Ban Does Not Reach State Legislators Performing Legitimate Official Functions: Third Circuit Sets a Federalism-Grounded Limitation

Date: Oct 10, 2025
TCPA’s “Any Person” Robocall Ban Does Not Reach State Legislators Performing Legitimate Official Functions Commentary on Andrew R. Perrong v. Matthew Bradford, No. 24-1925 (3d Cir. Oct. 6, 2025)...
No Review Means No Review: Third Circuit Holds IRA § 1320f-7(2) Bars Challenges to CMS’s Product-Grouping and Other Steps in Drug Selection, and Upholds Guidance-Only Implementation Through 2028

No Review Means No Review: Third Circuit Holds IRA § 1320f-7(2) Bars Challenges to CMS’s Product-Grouping and Other Steps in Drug Selection, and Upholds Guidance-Only Implementation Through 2028

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No Review Means No Review: Third Circuit Holds IRA § 1320f-7(2) Bars Challenges to CMS’s Product-Grouping and Other Steps in Drug Selection, and Upholds Guidance-Only Implementation Through 2028...
Default as Accrual: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms That a Borrower’s Default Starts the Clock on Texas Fraud Claims; Tolling and Conspiracy Claims Can Be Dismissed on the Pleadings

Default as Accrual: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms That a Borrower’s Default Starts the Clock on Texas Fraud Claims; Tolling and Conspiracy Claims Can Be Dismissed on the Pleadings

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Default as Accrual: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms That a Borrower’s Default Starts the Clock on Texas Fraud Claims; Tolling and Conspiracy Claims Can Be Dismissed on the Pleadings Introduction In McGrath...
Honest-Belief, Not Exhaustive Investigation: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Pretext Analysis and Comparator Severity in ADA/PWDCRA and Michigan WDCA Retaliation Cases

Honest-Belief, Not Exhaustive Investigation: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Pretext Analysis and Comparator Severity in ADA/PWDCRA and Michigan WDCA Retaliation Cases

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Honest-Belief, Not Exhaustive Investigation: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Pretext Analysis and Comparator Severity in ADA/PWDCRA and Michigan WDCA Retaliation Cases Case: Daniel Welch v. Heart Truss &...
Safety-Based Union Discretion: Sixth Circuit Affirms No DFR Breach When Union Declines to Grieve Termination Based on Credible Workplace-Safety Concerns

Safety-Based Union Discretion: Sixth Circuit Affirms No DFR Breach When Union Declines to Grieve Termination Based on Credible Workplace-Safety Concerns

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Safety-Based Union Discretion: Sixth Circuit Affirms No DFR Breach When Union Declines to Grieve Termination Based on Credible Workplace-Safety Concerns Case: Thomas Schramm v. Neenah Paper Michigan,...
Sixth Circuit Confirms District Courts May Deny Amendment 821 Reductions and Maintain Above-Amended-Guidelines Sentences with an Adequate § 3553(a) Explanation

Sixth Circuit Confirms District Courts May Deny Amendment 821 Reductions and Maintain Above-Amended-Guidelines Sentences with an Adequate § 3553(a) Explanation

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Sixth Circuit Confirms District Courts May Deny Amendment 821 Reductions and Maintain Above-Amended-Guidelines Sentences with an Adequate § 3553(a) Explanation Introduction United States v. Luster is...
No-Hindsight Review and the Alignment of Rule 23(a) and Rule 23(e): The Sixth Circuit Affirms a Global Settlement of Michigan “Home-Equity Theft” Claims

No-Hindsight Review and the Alignment of Rule 23(a) and Rule 23(e): The Sixth Circuit Affirms a Global Settlement of Michigan “Home-Equity Theft” Claims

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No-Hindsight Review and the Alignment of Rule 23(a) and Rule 23(e): The Sixth Circuit Affirms a Global Settlement of Michigan “Home-Equity Theft” Claims Introduction This appeal arises from a...
"Fairness Is Judged at the Time of Settlement": Sixth Circuit Affirms Arm’s‑Length, Pro Rata Class Settlement and Rejects Unproven “Reverse Auction” Allegations in Michigan Surplus‑Proceeds Takings Litigation

"Fairness Is Judged at the Time of Settlement": Sixth Circuit Affirms Arm’s‑Length, Pro Rata Class Settlement and Rejects Unproven “Reverse Auction” Allegations in Michigan Surplus‑Proceeds Takings Litigation

Date: Oct 10, 2025
"Fairness Is Judged at the Time of Settlement": Sixth Circuit Affirms Arm’s‑Length, Pro Rata Class Settlement and Rejects Unproven “Reverse Auction” Allegations in Michigan Surplus‑Proceeds Takings...
Seventh Circuit Clarifies Martin: No Independent Duty for a Second ALJ to Address a Prior ALJ’s Findings on Remand; Substantial Evidence Controls

Seventh Circuit Clarifies Martin: No Independent Duty for a Second ALJ to Address a Prior ALJ’s Findings on Remand; Substantial Evidence Controls

Date: Oct 10, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies Martin: No Independent Duty for a Second ALJ to Address a Prior ALJ’s Findings on Remand; Substantial Evidence Controls Introduction This commentary analyzes the Seventh...
No CERCLA Recovery Without Proven Causation; Clean Water Act Penalties Accrue Per Unpermitted Discharge: Commentary on The Courtland Company, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corporation (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 2025)

No CERCLA Recovery Without Proven Causation; Clean Water Act Penalties Accrue Per Unpermitted Discharge: Commentary on The Courtland Company, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corporation (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 2025)

Date: Oct 10, 2025
No CERCLA Recovery Without Proven Causation; Clean Water Act Penalties Accrue Per Unpermitted Discharge Commentary on The Courtland Company, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corporation (4th Cir. Oct. 6, 2025)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert