Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

supreme-court-upholds-district-court&amp Case Commentaries

State of Louisiana v. FCC: JPML Lottery Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a) Is Binding—Once the Record Is Filed, the Designated Circuit Retains Venue for Consolidated Agency-Review Petitions

State of Louisiana v. FCC: JPML Lottery Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a) Is Binding—Once the Record Is Filed, the Designated Circuit Retains Venue for Consolidated Agency-Review Petitions

Date: Nov 2, 2025
State of Louisiana v. FCC: JPML Lottery Under 28 U.S.C. § 2112(a) Is Binding—Once the Record Is Filed, the Designated Circuit Retains Venue for Consolidated Agency-Review Petitions Introduction In...
Articulation, Not Hunch: Denial of Leave in People v. Duff Leaves COA Ruling Intact; Dissent Reasserts Particularized, Experience‑Based Reasonable Suspicion for Parked‑Vehicle Seizures

Articulation, Not Hunch: Denial of Leave in People v. Duff Leaves COA Ruling Intact; Dissent Reasserts Particularized, Experience‑Based Reasonable Suspicion for Parked‑Vehicle Seizures

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Articulation, Not Hunch: Denial of Leave in People v. Duff Leaves COA Ruling Intact; Dissent Reasserts Particularized, Experience‑Based Reasonable Suspicion for Parked‑Vehicle Seizures Introduction...
Guardrails for Video Evidence: Michigan Supreme Court Signals Limits on Non‑Perceiving Officer Narration (People v. Johnson)

Guardrails for Video Evidence: Michigan Supreme Court Signals Limits on Non‑Perceiving Officer Narration (People v. Johnson)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Guardrails for Video Evidence: Michigan Supreme Court Signals Limits on Non‑Perceiving Officer Narration (People v. Johnson) Introduction In People of Michigan v. Trashawn Demarqus Johnson (SC...
Juvenile Courts May Temporarily Stay HHS Placement Moves Pending Best‑Interests Review Under Iowa Code § 232.102

Juvenile Courts May Temporarily Stay HHS Placement Moves Pending Best‑Interests Review Under Iowa Code § 232.102

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Juvenile Courts May Temporarily Stay HHS Placement Moves Pending Best‑Interests Review Under Iowa Code § 232.102 Introduction This commentary analyzes the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision in Iowa...
Misappropriation Is Not a Distribution: Nebraska Supreme Court Clarifies LLC Membership, Transferable Interests, and Derivative Standing

Misappropriation Is Not a Distribution: Nebraska Supreme Court Clarifies LLC Membership, Transferable Interests, and Derivative Standing

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Misappropriation Is Not a Distribution: Nebraska Supreme Court Clarifies LLC Membership, Transferable Interests, and Derivative Standing Introduction In Kellogg v. Mathiesen, 320 Neb. 223 (Neb. Oct....
State v. Leatherwood: Jail Credit Belongs to the Sovereign with Primary Jurisdiction When a Defendant Is “On Loan” Under a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Prosequendum

State v. Leatherwood: Jail Credit Belongs to the Sovereign with Primary Jurisdiction When a Defendant Is “On Loan” Under a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Prosequendum

Date: Nov 2, 2025
State v. Leatherwood: Jail Credit Belongs to the Sovereign with Primary Jurisdiction When a Defendant Is “On Loan” Under a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Prosequendum Introduction In State v. Leatherwood,...
Consent Decree Fee Waivers Bind Across Bifurcated Proceedings; Tracing Burdens and Court-Ordered Farm Sales Reaffirmed — White v. White (Neb. 2025)

Consent Decree Fee Waivers Bind Across Bifurcated Proceedings; Tracing Burdens and Court-Ordered Farm Sales Reaffirmed — White v. White (Neb. 2025)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Consent Decree Fee Waivers Bind Across Bifurcated Proceedings; Tracing Burdens and Court-Ordered Farm Sales Reaffirmed — White v. White (Neb. 2025) Introduction In White v. White, 320 Neb. 256...
Settlement Payments After a Short‑Form Merger Are “Under” the Merger Contract for § 483 Imputed Interest; Minority Assent Not Required (Third Circuit)

Settlement Payments After a Short‑Form Merger Are “Under” the Merger Contract for § 483 Imputed Interest; Minority Assent Not Required (Third Circuit)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Settlement Payments After a Short‑Form Merger Are “Under” the Merger Contract for § 483 Imputed Interest; Minority Assent Not Required Case: Charles G. Berwind Trust v. Commissioner of Internal...
“Under” Means “Authorized By”: Third Circuit Holds Short‑Form Merger Plans Are “Contracts” for § 483 and Imputes Interest to Later Settlement Payments

“Under” Means “Authorized By”: Third Circuit Holds Short‑Form Merger Plans Are “Contracts” for § 483 and Imputes Interest to Later Settlement Payments

Date: Nov 2, 2025
“Under” Means “Authorized By”: Third Circuit Holds Short‑Form Merger Plans Are “Contracts” for § 483 and Imputes Interest to Later Settlement Payments Introduction In a precedential decision with...
Section 483 Applies to Deferred Settlement Payments Authorized by Short‑Form Merger Plans: Third Circuit Defines “Under” and Confirms Merger Plans as “Contracts” Without Minority Assent

Section 483 Applies to Deferred Settlement Payments Authorized by Short‑Form Merger Plans: Third Circuit Defines “Under” and Confirms Merger Plans as “Contracts” Without Minority Assent

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Section 483 Applies to Deferred Settlement Payments Authorized by Short‑Form Merger Plans: Third Circuit Defines “Under” and Confirms Merger Plans as “Contracts” Without Minority Assent Court: U.S....
Settlement Payments Fixing Price After a Short‑Form Merger Are “Under” the Merger for IRC §483; Short‑Form Merger Agreements Are “Contracts” Despite Minority Non‑Assent

Settlement Payments Fixing Price After a Short‑Form Merger Are “Under” the Merger for IRC §483; Short‑Form Merger Agreements Are “Contracts” Despite Minority Non‑Assent

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Settlement Payments Fixing Price After a Short‑Form Merger Are “Under” the Merger for IRC §483; Short‑Form Merger Agreements Are “Contracts” Despite Minority Non‑Assent Introduction In Estate of...
“Under” Means “Authorized By”: Third Circuit Holds § 483 Imputes Interest to Settlement Payments That Satisfy Obligations Created by a Short‑Form Merger Agreement—Minority Assent Not Required

“Under” Means “Authorized By”: Third Circuit Holds § 483 Imputes Interest to Settlement Payments That Satisfy Obligations Created by a Short‑Form Merger Agreement—Minority Assent Not Required

Date: Nov 2, 2025
“Under” Means “Authorized By”: Third Circuit Holds § 483 Imputes Interest to Settlement Payments That Satisfy Obligations Created by a Short‑Form Merger Agreement—Minority Assent Not Required Case:...
Section 3553(a) as an Independent, Dispositive Ground for Denying Compassionate Release; No Stay Pending Supreme Court Review of Amendment 814 Issues; Proper Post-Conviction Vehicles After Rivers v. Guerrero

Section 3553(a) as an Independent, Dispositive Ground for Denying Compassionate Release; No Stay Pending Supreme Court Review of Amendment 814 Issues; Proper Post-Conviction Vehicles After Rivers v. Guerrero

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Section 3553(a) as an Independent, Dispositive Ground for Denying Compassionate Release; No Stay Pending Supreme Court Review of Amendment 814 Issues; Proper Post-Conviction Vehicles After Rivers v....
Meaningful Access, Not Physical Access: Fifth Circuit Upholds Courthouse Restrictions, Declines Bivens Expansion, and Rejects ADA Title II Claims Against Federal Courts

Meaningful Access, Not Physical Access: Fifth Circuit Upholds Courthouse Restrictions, Declines Bivens Expansion, and Rejects ADA Title II Claims Against Federal Courts

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Meaningful Access, Not Physical Access: Fifth Circuit Upholds Courthouse Restrictions, Declines Bivens Expansion, and Rejects ADA Title II Claims Against Federal Courts Case: Garces v. Biery, No....
Stays Do Not Suspend Compliance: Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal With Prejudice and Rejects PACER/Pro Se Excuses as “Excusable Neglect”

Stays Do Not Suspend Compliance: Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal With Prejudice and Rejects PACER/Pro Se Excuses as “Excusable Neglect”

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Stays Do Not Suspend Compliance: Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal With Prejudice and Rejects PACER/Pro Se Excuses as “Excusable Neglect” Introduction In Miller v. Ohio Security Insurance, No. 24-30740...
Adoption-by-Reference After Diggles: Rule 32 Verification Is a Prerequisite to Imposing Discretionary Supervised-Release Conditions

Adoption-by-Reference After Diggles: Rule 32 Verification Is a Prerequisite to Imposing Discretionary Supervised-Release Conditions

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Adoption-by-Reference After Diggles: Rule 32 Verification Is a Prerequisite to Imposing Discretionary Supervised-Release Conditions Introduction In United States v. Rivera-Hernandez, No. 25-20022...
Direct Threat, Not Diagnostic Perfection: Fifth Circuit Endorses FMCSA-Guided, File-Review Assessments for Safety-Critical Rail Jobs and Tightens Proof of Reassignment under the ADA

Direct Threat, Not Diagnostic Perfection: Fifth Circuit Endorses FMCSA-Guided, File-Review Assessments for Safety-Critical Rail Jobs and Tightens Proof of Reassignment under the ADA

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Direct Threat, Not Diagnostic Perfection: Fifth Circuit Endorses FMCSA-Guided, File-Review Assessments for Safety-Critical Rail Jobs and Tightens Proof of Reassignment under the ADA Introduction In...
Fourth Circuit Confirms No Financial-Distress Prerequisite for Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction: En Banc Rehearing Denied in Bestwall (Texas Two‑Step Context)

Fourth Circuit Confirms No Financial-Distress Prerequisite for Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction: En Banc Rehearing Denied in Bestwall (Texas Two‑Step Context)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Fourth Circuit Confirms No Financial-Distress Prerequisite for Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction: En Banc Rehearing Denied in Bestwall (Texas Two‑Step Context) Introduction In Bestwall LLC v. Official...
Ruelas v. State: Nevada Clarifies that Motive-to-Lie Inquiries Are Not Vouching and Endorses Mid‑Trial Date‑Range Amendments Absent Prejudice

Ruelas v. State: Nevada Clarifies that Motive-to-Lie Inquiries Are Not Vouching and Endorses Mid‑Trial Date‑Range Amendments Absent Prejudice

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Ruelas v. State: Nevada Clarifies that Motive-to-Lie Inquiries Are Not Vouching and Endorses Mid‑Trial Date‑Range Amendments Absent Prejudice Court: Supreme Court of Nevada Date: October 30, 2025...
Shelton v. State: Nevada Supreme Court narrows res gestae to same‑transaction events and reaffirms mandatory limiting instructions for identity-based other‑acts evidence (harmless error applied)

Shelton v. State: Nevada Supreme Court narrows res gestae to same‑transaction events and reaffirms mandatory limiting instructions for identity-based other‑acts evidence (harmless error applied)

Date: Nov 2, 2025
Shelton v. State: Nevada Supreme Court narrows res gestae to same‑transaction events and reaffirms mandatory limiting instructions for identity-based other‑acts evidence (harmless error applied)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.