Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

strict-standards-for-successive-habeas-petitions-reinforced-in-in-re-ivan-abner-cantu Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Applies Substantial-Evidence Review to § 1229b(b)(1)(D) and Reaffirms the Two‑Part Health‑Hardship Test (Matter of J‑J‑G‑) in Cancellation Cases

Eleventh Circuit Applies Substantial-Evidence Review to § 1229b(b)(1)(D) and Reaffirms the Two‑Part Health‑Hardship Test (Matter of J‑J‑G‑) in Cancellation Cases

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Applies Substantial-Evidence Review to § 1229b(b)(1)(D) and Reaffirms the Two‑Part Health‑Hardship Test (Matter of J‑J‑G‑) in Cancellation Cases Case: Maria Virginia Rodriguez Robles...
Eleventh Circuit solidifies substantial-evidence review of §1229b(b)(1)(D) hardship and endorses J-J-G-’s two-part health-care test

Eleventh Circuit solidifies substantial-evidence review of §1229b(b)(1)(D) hardship and endorses J-J-G-’s two-part health-care test

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Eleventh Circuit solidifies substantial-evidence review of §1229b(b)(1)(D) hardship and endorses J-J-G-’s two-part health-care test Introduction In this consolidated, unpublished decision, the U.S....
Forgoing a Suppression Motion Is Not Ineffective Assistance When Reasonable Suspicion to Prolong a Traffic Stop Is At Least Debatable

Forgoing a Suppression Motion Is Not Ineffective Assistance When Reasonable Suspicion to Prolong a Traffic Stop Is At Least Debatable

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Forgoing a Suppression Motion Is Not Ineffective Assistance When Reasonable Suspicion to Prolong a Traffic Stop Is At Least Debatable Introduction In Richard Norris v. United States, No. 24-13306...
Objective Harmless-Error Review of ACCA “Different Occasions” Post‑Erlinger: Unrebutted PSRs and Months‑Long Gaps Sustain Enhancements — United States v. Ballinger (6th Cir. 2025)

Objective Harmless-Error Review of ACCA “Different Occasions” Post‑Erlinger: Unrebutted PSRs and Months‑Long Gaps Sustain Enhancements — United States v. Ballinger (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Objective Harmless-Error Review of ACCA “Different Occasions” Post‑Erlinger: Unrebutted PSRs and Months‑Long Gaps Sustain Enhancements — United States v. Ballinger (6th Cir. 2025) Introduction United...
Unrelated Questioning After Mission Tasks Are Complete Unlawfully Prolongs Traffic Stop and Taints Consent: Sixth Circuit in United States v. Moffitt

Unrelated Questioning After Mission Tasks Are Complete Unlawfully Prolongs Traffic Stop and Taints Consent: Sixth Circuit in United States v. Moffitt

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Unrelated Questioning After Mission Tasks Are Complete Unlawfully Prolongs Traffic Stop and Taints Consent: Sixth Circuit in United States v. Moffitt Introduction In United States v. Frankie L....
Bad Faith Requires More Than Negligence: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 56’s Demands, Coverage-Investigation Leeway, and Global-Settlement Strategy in Florida Third-Party Claims

Bad Faith Requires More Than Negligence: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 56’s Demands, Coverage-Investigation Leeway, and Global-Settlement Strategy in Florida Third-Party Claims

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Bad Faith Requires More Than Negligence: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Rule 56’s Demands, Coverage-Investigation Leeway, and Global-Settlement Strategy in Florida Third-Party Claims Introduction In a...
Eleventh Circuit Carves a Redressability Window for Closed Adult Businesses and Reaffirms Secondary-Effects Analysis Post‑Reed

Eleventh Circuit Carves a Redressability Window for Closed Adult Businesses and Reaffirms Secondary-Effects Analysis Post‑Reed

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Carves a Redressability Window for Closed Adult Businesses and Reaffirms Secondary-Effects Analysis Post‑Reed Introduction In WBY, Inc. v. City of Chamblee, Georgia, the United...
Third Circuit: Rule 11 Reaches Attached “Dispute Letters” and Removed Complaints; Inherent-Power Sanctions Extend to Prelitigation Schemes to Manufacture FDCPA Claims

Third Circuit: Rule 11 Reaches Attached “Dispute Letters” and Removed Complaints; Inherent-Power Sanctions Extend to Prelitigation Schemes to Manufacture FDCPA Claims

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Third Circuit: Rule 11 Reaches Attached “Dispute Letters” and Removed Complaints; Inherent-Power Sanctions Extend to Prelitigation Schemes to Manufacture FDCPA Claims Introduction In a precedential...
No State-Created Danger Without Direct But-For Causation: Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Tightens Rule 56(d) Discovery in Estate of Lagano v. BCPO

No State-Created Danger Without Direct But-For Causation: Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Tightens Rule 56(d) Discovery in Estate of Lagano v. BCPO

Date: Sep 25, 2025
No State-Created Danger Without Direct But-For Causation: Third Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment and Tightens Rule 56(d) Discovery in Estate of Lagano v. BCPO Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Reaffirming Divisibility by Drug Identity: The Third Circuit Holds Pennsylvania PWID Remains a Controlled-Substance “Element” Offense for INA Removability

Reaffirming Divisibility by Drug Identity: The Third Circuit Holds Pennsylvania PWID Remains a Controlled-Substance “Element” Offense for INA Removability

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Reaffirming Divisibility by Drug Identity: The Third Circuit Holds Pennsylvania PWID Remains a Controlled-Substance “Element” Offense for INA Removability Introduction In Jose Miguel German Santos v....
Liberal Construction of Notices of Appeal and Qualified Immunity for Executing Facially Valid Warrants: Commentary on Pinkney v. Meadville

Liberal Construction of Notices of Appeal and Qualified Immunity for Executing Facially Valid Warrants: Commentary on Pinkney v. Meadville

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Liberal Construction of Notices of Appeal and Qualified Immunity for Executing Facially Valid Warrants: Commentary on Pinkney v. Meadville Note: This Third Circuit disposition is designated not...
Rule 11 Reaches Attached Pre‑Suit Letters and Post‑Removal Advocacy; Inherent Power Sanctions Pre‑Suit Deception: Sofaly v. Portfolio Recovery Associates

Rule 11 Reaches Attached Pre‑Suit Letters and Post‑Removal Advocacy; Inherent Power Sanctions Pre‑Suit Deception: Sofaly v. Portfolio Recovery Associates

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Rule 11 Reaches Attached Pre‑Suit Letters and Post‑Removal Advocacy; Inherent Power Sanctions Pre‑Suit Deception: Sofaly v. Portfolio Recovery Associates Introduction In Robert Sofaly v. Portfolio...
No Safe Harbor in Delay: Fifth Circuit Confirms EPA May Disapprove Overdue Good Neighbor SIPs Using Updated Modeling and Requires Independent “Maintenance” Analysis Beyond Formal Nonattainment Designations

No Safe Harbor in Delay: Fifth Circuit Confirms EPA May Disapprove Overdue Good Neighbor SIPs Using Updated Modeling and Requires Independent “Maintenance” Analysis Beyond Formal Nonattainment Designations

Date: Sep 25, 2025
No Safe Harbor in Delay: Fifth Circuit Confirms EPA May Disapprove Overdue Good Neighbor SIPs Using Updated Modeling and Requires Independent “Maintenance” Analysis Beyond Formal Nonattainment...
Florida Supreme Court Clarifies That Eligibility Under the Dozier/Okeechobee Victim-Compensation Program Is Not “Newly Discovered Evidence” and Tightens Limits on Post‑Warrant Records and Due Process Challenges

Florida Supreme Court Clarifies That Eligibility Under the Dozier/Okeechobee Victim-Compensation Program Is Not “Newly Discovered Evidence” and Tightens Limits on Post‑Warrant Records and Due Process Challenges

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Florida Supreme Court Clarifies That Eligibility Under the Dozier/Okeechobee Victim-Compensation Program Is Not “Newly Discovered Evidence” and Tightens Limits on Post‑Warrant Records and Due Process...
Aguilar-Morales v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Waivability of NTA Time-and-Place Defects and Demands a Non-Incidental Nexus for Family and Imputed-Political-Opinion Claims

Aguilar-Morales v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Waivability of NTA Time-and-Place Defects and Demands a Non-Incidental Nexus for Family and Imputed-Political-Opinion Claims

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Aguilar-Morales v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Waivability of NTA Time-and-Place Defects and Demands a Non-Incidental Nexus for Family and Imputed-Political-Opinion Claims Court: U.S. Court of...
No Victim-Identity Limit for FDCA § 333(a)(2); FDCA § 334 Is Not a Civil Forfeiture Statute — United States v. Fishman, Giannelli (2d Cir. 2025)

No Victim-Identity Limit for FDCA § 333(a)(2); FDCA § 334 Is Not a Civil Forfeiture Statute — United States v. Fishman, Giannelli (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 24, 2025
No Victim-Identity Limit for FDCA § 333(a)(2); FDCA § 334 Is Not a Civil Forfeiture Statute United States v. Fishman, Giannelli, Nos. 22-1600-cr (L), 22-2063-cr (C), 23-6819-cv (C) — U.S. Court of...
Misdescribed Bills of Lading Do Not Prevent Risk-of-Loss Transfer Under Shipment Contracts When the Buyer Hires the Carrier

Misdescribed Bills of Lading Do Not Prevent Risk-of-Loss Transfer Under Shipment Contracts When the Buyer Hires the Carrier

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Misdescribed Bills of Lading Do Not Prevent Risk-of-Loss Transfer Under Shipment Contracts When the Buyer Hires the Carrier Introduction In Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London v. Scents...
No Retroactivity Where Offense Period Includes Post-Scheduling Conduct; Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Time-of-Conviction Comparison for § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II)

No Retroactivity Where Offense Period Includes Post-Scheduling Conduct; Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Time-of-Conviction Comparison for § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II)

Date: Sep 24, 2025
No Retroactivity Where Offense Period Includes Post-Scheduling Conduct; Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Time-of-Conviction Comparison for § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) Case: Md Zaberul Hasan v. U.S. Attorney...
Esteras Plain-Error Barrier and PSI Admissions at Revocation: The Eleventh Circuit’s Framework in United States v. Higgs

Esteras Plain-Error Barrier and PSI Admissions at Revocation: The Eleventh Circuit’s Framework in United States v. Higgs

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Esteras Plain-Error Barrier and PSI Admissions at Revocation: The Eleventh Circuit’s Framework in United States v. Higgs Introduction In United States v. Zeno Higgs (11th Cir. No. 25-10996, Sept. 22,...
Information Control and Intangible Benefits Can Prove Leadership; Dangerousness-Based Disarmament Defeats § 922(g)(1) Challenges

Information Control and Intangible Benefits Can Prove Leadership; Dangerousness-Based Disarmament Defeats § 922(g)(1) Challenges

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Information Control and Intangible Benefits Can Prove Leadership; Dangerousness-Based Disarmament Defeats § 922(g)(1) Challenges Case: United States v. Avis Damone Coward (No. 24-1885) Court: United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert