Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

Pursuit Eliminates Justification and Defendant Admissions Defeat Georgia’s Circumstantial Evidence Rule: A Commentary on Mack v. State (Ga. 2025)

Pursuit Eliminates Justification and Defendant Admissions Defeat Georgia’s Circumstantial Evidence Rule: A Commentary on Mack v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Pursuit Eliminates Justification and Defendant Admissions Defeat Georgia’s Circumstantial Evidence Rule: A Commentary on Mack v. State (Ga. 2025) Introduction In Mack v. State, the Supreme Court of...
No Voluntary Manslaughter Charge Without Serious Provocation: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Plain-Error Limits and Strickland Prejudice in Marrow v. State

No Voluntary Manslaughter Charge Without Serious Provocation: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Plain-Error Limits and Strickland Prejudice in Marrow v. State

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Voluntary Manslaughter Charge Without Serious Provocation: Georgia Supreme Court Reaffirms Plain-Error Limits and Strickland Prejudice in Marrow v. State Introduction In Marrow v. State (Supreme...
Payne v. State: Limiting Debelbot and Clarifying Photo‑Lineup Challenges—Media Exposure Arguments Go to Weight, and “50%” Reasonable‑Doubt Misstatements Are Deficient but Not Automatically Prejudicial

Payne v. State: Limiting Debelbot and Clarifying Photo‑Lineup Challenges—Media Exposure Arguments Go to Weight, and “50%” Reasonable‑Doubt Misstatements Are Deficient but Not Automatically Prejudicial

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Payne v. State: Limiting Debelbot and Clarifying Photo‑Lineup Challenges—Media Exposure Arguments Go to Weight, and “50%” Reasonable‑Doubt Misstatements Are Deficient but Not Automatically...
Limiting the “Bolstering” Harmless-Error Rule: Prior Inconsistent Statements Fall Outside the Exclusion in Georgia

Limiting the “Bolstering” Harmless-Error Rule: Prior Inconsistent Statements Fall Outside the Exclusion in Georgia

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Limiting the “Bolstering” Harmless-Error Rule: Prior Inconsistent Statements Fall Outside the Exclusion in Georgia Introduction In Richardson v. State (Supreme Court of Georgia, Aug. 26, 2025), the...
Scott v. State (Ga. 2025): Independent Evidence Required to Show Prejudice on Ineffective-Assistance Claims Based on Unpursued Delusional-Compulsion Defenses; No Abuse in Denying Serial Continuances

Scott v. State (Ga. 2025): Independent Evidence Required to Show Prejudice on Ineffective-Assistance Claims Based on Unpursued Delusional-Compulsion Defenses; No Abuse in Denying Serial Continuances

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Scott v. State (Ga. 2025): Independent Evidence Required to Show Prejudice on Ineffective-Assistance Claims Based on Unpursued Delusional-Compulsion Defenses; No Abuse in Denying Serial Continuances...
Incremental Tort Reform Survives Equal Protection: Williams v. Regency Hospital Reaffirms Georgia’s Non‑Tolling Rule for Mentally Incompetent Medical‑Malpractice Plaintiffs

Incremental Tort Reform Survives Equal Protection: Williams v. Regency Hospital Reaffirms Georgia’s Non‑Tolling Rule for Mentally Incompetent Medical‑Malpractice Plaintiffs

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Incremental Tort Reform Survives Equal Protection: Williams v. Regency Hospital Reaffirms Georgia’s Non‑Tolling Rule for Mentally Incompetent Medical‑Malpractice Plaintiffs Introduction In Williams...
Walton v. State: Preservation Pitfalls, Plain‑Error Limits, and the Narrow Path for Unpreserved 404(b) Gang Evidence

Walton v. State: Preservation Pitfalls, Plain‑Error Limits, and the Narrow Path for Unpreserved 404(b) Gang Evidence

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Walton v. State: Preservation Pitfalls, Plain‑Error Limits, and the Narrow Path for Unpreserved 404(b) Gang Evidence Introduction In Walton v. State, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed Richard...
Record Silence and Personal Waiver Foreclose Ineffective-Assistance Claims About Advice Not to Testify: Woods v. State (Ga. 2025)

Record Silence and Personal Waiver Foreclose Ineffective-Assistance Claims About Advice Not to Testify: Woods v. State (Ga. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Record Silence and Personal Waiver Foreclose Ineffective-Assistance Claims About Advice Not to Testify: Woods v. State (Ga. 2025) Introduction In Woods v. State, the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed...
Municipal Immunity Does Not Automatically Defeat Fraud Claims: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies § 11-47-190 and Limits Mandamus Review to Preserved Immunity Grounds

Municipal Immunity Does Not Automatically Defeat Fraud Claims: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies § 11-47-190 and Limits Mandamus Review to Preserved Immunity Grounds

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Municipal Immunity Does Not Automatically Defeat Fraud Claims: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies § 11-47-190 and Limits Mandamus Review to Preserved Immunity Grounds Introduction In Ex parte City of...
Absent Transcript, Appellate Deference Controls: Circuit Courts May Not Recalculate Probate Administrator ad Litem Fees on Appeal Under § 12-22-20

Absent Transcript, Appellate Deference Controls: Circuit Courts May Not Recalculate Probate Administrator ad Litem Fees on Appeal Under § 12-22-20

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Absent Transcript, Appellate Deference Controls: Circuit Courts May Not Recalculate Probate Administrator ad Litem Fees on Appeal Under § 12-22-20 Introduction This commentary examines the Alabama...
Franklin Structures v. Williams: Ratification by Warranty Service Binds Homebuyers to Mediation-First Arbitration; Trial Courts Must Compel Mediation Before Arbitration

Franklin Structures v. Williams: Ratification by Warranty Service Binds Homebuyers to Mediation-First Arbitration; Trial Courts Must Compel Mediation Before Arbitration

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Franklin Structures v. Williams: Ratification by Warranty Service Binds Homebuyers to Mediation-First Arbitration; Trial Courts Must Compel Mediation Before Arbitration Introduction In Franklin...
Relative-Hardship Over Breach: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Clean-Hands Limits and Balancing in Restrictive Covenant Injunctions

Relative-Hardship Over Breach: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Clean-Hands Limits and Balancing in Restrictive Covenant Injunctions

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Relative-Hardship Over Breach: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Clean-Hands Limits and Balancing in Restrictive Covenant Injunctions Case: Rodney G. Englund, Dyann K. Englund, and Georgetown...
Tracing to a “Specific Drug Transaction” Not Required for Currency Forfeiture under Former § 20-2-93; Ore Tenus Deference Reaffirmed — Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Broussard (Ala. 2025)

Tracing to a “Specific Drug Transaction” Not Required for Currency Forfeiture under Former § 20-2-93; Ore Tenus Deference Reaffirmed — Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Broussard (Ala. 2025)

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Tracing to a “Specific Drug Transaction” Not Required for Currency Forfeiture under Former § 20-2-93; Ore Tenus Deference Reaffirmed Ex parte State of Alabama ex rel. Robert Broussard, District...
No Stand‑Your‑Ground, No Prior‑Crimes: Alabama Supreme Court Limits 404(b) Use To Prove “Unlawful Activity” When Self‑Defense Proceeds Under the Common Law

No Stand‑Your‑Ground, No Prior‑Crimes: Alabama Supreme Court Limits 404(b) Use To Prove “Unlawful Activity” When Self‑Defense Proceeds Under the Common Law

Date: Aug 30, 2025
No Stand‑Your‑Ground, No Prior‑Crimes: Alabama Supreme Court Limits 404(b) Use To Prove “Unlawful Activity” When Self‑Defense Proceeds Under the Common Law Case: Ex parte Corey Lee Walton, Supreme...
Rogers v. Cedar Bluff: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Municipal Vicarious Immunity for Volunteer Firefighters and the Status of Municipal Volunteer Fire Departments

Rogers v. Cedar Bluff: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Municipal Vicarious Immunity for Volunteer Firefighters and the Status of Municipal Volunteer Fire Departments

Date: Aug 30, 2025
Rogers v. Cedar Bluff: Alabama Supreme Court Clarifies Municipal Vicarious Immunity for Volunteer Firefighters and the Status of Municipal Volunteer Fire Departments Introduction In Carol Rogers, as...
Resisting-Arrest Pleas Do Not Blanket-Authorize Police Force: Third Circuit Requires a Complete Record—Including Bodycam Footage—Before Summary Judgment in Excessive-Force Cases

Resisting-Arrest Pleas Do Not Blanket-Authorize Police Force: Third Circuit Requires a Complete Record—Including Bodycam Footage—Before Summary Judgment in Excessive-Force Cases

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Resisting-Arrest Pleas Do Not Blanket-Authorize Police Force: Third Circuit Requires a Complete Record—Including Bodycam Footage—Before Summary Judgment in Excessive-Force Cases Introduction In...
Third Circuit clarifies de novo review of Rule 60(d)(1) dismissals and reaffirms broad transactional claim preclusion in serial fee litigation

Third Circuit clarifies de novo review of Rule 60(d)(1) dismissals and reaffirms broad transactional claim preclusion in serial fee litigation

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Third Circuit clarifies de novo review of Rule 60(d)(1) dismissals and reaffirms broad transactional claim preclusion in serial fee litigation Case: Law Offices of Bruce J. Chasan, LLC v. John Pierce...
A Two‑Track Roadmap When a Plaintiff Goes Silent: Rule 56 Record Review or Poulis‑Based Rule 41(b) Dismissal—Not “Default” Summary Judgment

A Two‑Track Roadmap When a Plaintiff Goes Silent: Rule 56 Record Review or Poulis‑Based Rule 41(b) Dismissal—Not “Default” Summary Judgment

Date: Aug 29, 2025
A Two‑Track Roadmap When a Plaintiff Goes Silent: Rule 56 Record Review or Poulis‑Based Rule 41(b) Dismissal—Not “Default” Summary Judgment Case: Michael Goodson, Sr. v. City of Philadelphia and...
Subsection 2516(2) Defers to State Law: Third Circuit Confirms State AGs May Delegate Wiretap-Application Authority Without a Federal “Personal Review” Requirement

Subsection 2516(2) Defers to State Law: Third Circuit Confirms State AGs May Delegate Wiretap-Application Authority Without a Federal “Personal Review” Requirement

Date: Aug 29, 2025
Subsection 2516(2) Defers to State Law: Third Circuit Confirms State AGs May Delegate Wiretap-Application Authority Without a Federal “Personal Review” Requirement Introduction In United States v....
No Personal Review Required: Third Circuit Holds State AG’s Delegation of Wiretap Authority Under §2516(2) Is Valid If Authorized by State Law

No Personal Review Required: Third Circuit Holds State AG’s Delegation of Wiretap Authority Under §2516(2) Is Valid If Authorized by State Law

Date: Aug 29, 2025
No Personal Review Required: Third Circuit Holds State AG’s Delegation of Wiretap Authority Under §2516(2) Is Valid If Authorized by State Law Case: United States v. Price Montgomery; United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.