Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

protection-of-fanciful-trademarks-and-recovery-of-infringer& Case Commentaries

Confrontation Beyond “Similar Motive”: Michigan Supreme Court flags distinct constitutional and evidentiary inquiries and questions diligence when cooperators go missing

Confrontation Beyond “Similar Motive”: Michigan Supreme Court flags distinct constitutional and evidentiary inquiries and questions diligence when cooperators go missing

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Confrontation Beyond “Similar Motive”: The Michigan Supreme Court flags distinct constitutional and evidentiary inquiries and questions diligence when cooperators go missing Introduction In People of...
Oros and Chambers Remain Controlling—But the Court Signals Reassessment of Premeditation and Police “Effect-on-Listener” Testimony in People v. Turner

Oros and Chambers Remain Controlling—But the Court Signals Reassessment of Premeditation and Police “Effect-on-Listener” Testimony in People v. Turner

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Oros and Chambers Remain Controlling—But the Court Signals Reassessment of Premeditation and Police “Effect-on-Listener” Testimony in People v. Turner Case: People of Michigan v. Keith Devon Turner,...
OV 13 Means “Felonious Activity,” Not “Felony Convictions”: Denial of Leave in People v. Carey and the Unresolved Scope of Kaczmarek for Post‑Revocation Guidelines Challenges

OV 13 Means “Felonious Activity,” Not “Felony Convictions”: Denial of Leave in People v. Carey and the Unresolved Scope of Kaczmarek for Post‑Revocation Guidelines Challenges

Date: Oct 9, 2025
OV 13 Means “Felonious Activity,” Not “Felony Convictions”: Denial of Leave in People v. Carey and the Unresolved Scope of Kaczmarek for Post‑Revocation Guidelines Challenges Introduction In People...
Retaliatory Eviction at the End of “Hybrid” Leases: Michigan Supreme Court Signals Reconsideration of the Fixed‑Term Exception and Remands for Full Review

Retaliatory Eviction at the End of “Hybrid” Leases: Michigan Supreme Court Signals Reconsideration of the Fixed‑Term Exception and Remands for Full Review

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Retaliatory Eviction at the End of “Hybrid” Leases: Michigan Supreme Court Signals Reconsideration of the Fixed‑Term Exception and Remands for Full Review Introduction In Prudential Properties v....
State v. Price: Nebraska adopts abuse-of-discretion review for expanded news media coverage objections; clarifies Miranda waiver/invocation and reaffirms no jail‑time credit against life sentences

State v. Price: Nebraska adopts abuse-of-discretion review for expanded news media coverage objections; clarifies Miranda waiver/invocation and reaffirms no jail‑time credit against life sentences

Date: Oct 9, 2025
State v. Price: Nebraska adopts abuse-of-discretion review for expanded news media coverage objections; clarifies Miranda waiver/invocation and reaffirms no jail‑time credit against life sentences...
Invited Error Waives Instructional Objections; Single-Count Third-Degree Sexual Abuse Requires No Act-Specific Jury Instruction

Invited Error Waives Instructional Objections; Single-Count Third-Degree Sexual Abuse Requires No Act-Specific Jury Instruction

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Invited Error Waives Instructional Objections; Single-Count Third-Degree Sexual Abuse Requires No Act-Specific Jury Instruction Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Wyoming’s...
Consent Decree Dissolution Does Not Terminate Divestment Contracts: Alaska Supreme Court Clarifies Contract Survival and Permissive Intervention in ARTA Enforcement

Consent Decree Dissolution Does Not Terminate Divestment Contracts: Alaska Supreme Court Clarifies Contract Survival and Permissive Intervention in ARTA Enforcement

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Consent Decree Dissolution Does Not Terminate Divestment Contracts: Alaska Supreme Court Clarifies Contract Survival and Permissive Intervention in ARTA Enforcement Court: Supreme Court of the State...
Independent Warrant Analysis Required for Ride‑Hail App Searches During Traffic Stops: Second Circuit’s Nonprecedential Reminder in Etere v. Nassau County

Independent Warrant Analysis Required for Ride‑Hail App Searches During Traffic Stops: Second Circuit’s Nonprecedential Reminder in Etere v. Nassau County

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Independent Warrant Analysis Required for Ride‑Hail App Searches During Traffic Stops: Second Circuit’s Nonprecedential Reminder in Etere v. Nassau County Introduction In Etere v. Nassau County (No....
No Clearly Established Right to Proximity-Based Religious Accommodation in Prison Laundry: Tripathy v. Lockwood (2d Cir. 2025 Summary Order)

No Clearly Established Right to Proximity-Based Religious Accommodation in Prison Laundry: Tripathy v. Lockwood (2d Cir. 2025 Summary Order)

Date: Oct 9, 2025
No Clearly Established Right to Proximity-Based Religious Accommodation in Prison Laundry: Tripathy v. Lockwood (2d Cir. 2025 Summary Order) Introduction This commentary analyzes the Second Circuit’s...
Reaffirming Individualized Justifications Yet Affirming via Plain-Error Narrow Constructions: The Second Circuit’s Approach to Special Supervised Release Conditions in United States v. Schloss

Reaffirming Individualized Justifications Yet Affirming via Plain-Error Narrow Constructions: The Second Circuit’s Approach to Special Supervised Release Conditions in United States v. Schloss

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Reaffirming Individualized Justifications Yet Affirming via Plain-Error Narrow Constructions: The Second Circuit’s Approach to Special Supervised Release Conditions in United States v. Schloss...
Fee-Shifting After Remand: Second Circuit Confirms § 1447(c) Awards in “Unusual Circumstances” and Permits Post-Precedent Reasonableness Assessment

Fee-Shifting After Remand: Second Circuit Confirms § 1447(c) Awards in “Unusual Circumstances” and Permits Post-Precedent Reasonableness Assessment

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Fee-Shifting After Remand: Second Circuit Confirms § 1447(c) Awards in “Unusual Circumstances” and Permits Post-Precedent Reasonableness Assessment Introduction In City of New York v. Exxon Mobil...
“#1 Brand” Claims Under the Lanham Act: The Second Circuit Clarifies That Literal Falsity Requires an Unambiguous Consumer Meaning When “Brand” May Refer to Parent or Product Lines

“#1 Brand” Claims Under the Lanham Act: The Second Circuit Clarifies That Literal Falsity Requires an Unambiguous Consumer Meaning When “Brand” May Refer to Parent or Product Lines

Date: Oct 9, 2025
“#1 Brand” Claims Under the Lanham Act: The Second Circuit Clarifies That Literal Falsity Requires an Unambiguous Consumer Meaning When “Brand” May Refer to Parent or Product Lines Introduction In...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: After One Instructed Repleader and Explicit Warnings, Pro Se Shotgun Pleadings May Be Dismissed With Prejudice Under Rule 41(b)

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: After One Instructed Repleader and Explicit Warnings, Pro Se Shotgun Pleadings May Be Dismissed With Prejudice Under Rule 41(b)

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: After One Instructed Repleader and Explicit Warnings, Pro Se Shotgun Pleadings May Be Dismissed With Prejudice Under Rule 41(b) Introduction In this unpublished, per...
Conditional Intent, Short Stays, and Tourist Visas: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Habitual Residence and Harmless-Error Review in ICARA Cases

Conditional Intent, Short Stays, and Tourist Visas: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Habitual Residence and Harmless-Error Review in ICARA Cases

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Conditional Intent, Short Stays, and Tourist Visas: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Habitual Residence and Harmless-Error Review in ICARA Cases Introduction In Forest Lee v. Tiffany Curcio, No. 25-11835...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies FDCPA Limits: State‑Mandated Nonjudicial Foreclosure Notices Do Not Create “Debt Collector” Status; § 1692f(6) Requires Absence of a Present Right to Possession

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies FDCPA Limits: State‑Mandated Nonjudicial Foreclosure Notices Do Not Create “Debt Collector” Status; § 1692f(6) Requires Absence of a Present Right to Possession

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies FDCPA Limits: State‑Mandated Nonjudicial Foreclosure Notices Do Not Create “Debt Collector” Status; § 1692f(6) Requires Absence of a Present Right to Possession...
“Play ALJ, Not Doctor”: Eleventh Circuit Affirms ALJ’s Authority Under Post‑2017 SSA Regulations to Reject Medical Opinion Limitations Based on Supportability and Consistency

“Play ALJ, Not Doctor”: Eleventh Circuit Affirms ALJ’s Authority Under Post‑2017 SSA Regulations to Reject Medical Opinion Limitations Based on Supportability and Consistency

Date: Oct 9, 2025
“Play ALJ, Not Doctor”: Eleventh Circuit Affirms ALJ’s Authority Under Post‑2017 SSA Regulations to Reject Medical Opinion Limitations Based on Supportability and Consistency Case: Marta Rivera v....
Independent Obligations Under California Law Do Not Excuse Self‑Help Termination; Good‑Faith Amount‑in‑Controversy Pleading Controls Diversity Jurisdiction

Independent Obligations Under California Law Do Not Excuse Self‑Help Termination; Good‑Faith Amount‑in‑Controversy Pleading Controls Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Independent Obligations Under California Law Do Not Excuse Self‑Help Termination; Good‑Faith Amount‑in‑Controversy Pleading Controls Diversity Jurisdiction Case: Music Royalty Consulting, Inc. v....
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Two Gatekeepers: Specific, Merits-Based Grounds Are Required to Withdraw Rule 36 Admissions, and FCRA §1681s‑2(b) Claims Fail Absent Proof of Inaccuracy—No Right to an Oral Hearing on Summary Judgment

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Two Gatekeepers: Specific, Merits-Based Grounds Are Required to Withdraw Rule 36 Admissions, and FCRA §1681s‑2(b) Claims Fail Absent Proof of Inaccuracy—No Right to an Oral Hearing on Summary Judgment

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Two Gatekeepers: Specific, Merits-Based Grounds Are Required to Withdraw Rule 36 Admissions, and FCRA §1681s‑2(b) Claims Fail Absent Proof of Inaccuracy—No Right to an Oral...
No Plain Error in Dual Lay–Expert Agent Narrative; Express Assent Invokes Invited-Error Bar to Modified Allen Charge — United States v. Kentrail Brown (11th Cir. 2025)

No Plain Error in Dual Lay–Expert Agent Narrative; Express Assent Invokes Invited-Error Bar to Modified Allen Charge — United States v. Kentrail Brown (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 9, 2025
No Plain Error in Dual Lay–Expert Agent Narrative; Express Assent Invokes Invited-Error Bar to Modified Allen Charge — United States v. Kentrail Brown (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States...
Appeal Waivers Enforced, Rule 11 Factual-Basis Challenges Allowed, and “Protective” Gun Possession Suffices for § 924(c)’s “In Furtherance” Element: Commentary on United States v. Elbert (11th Cir. 2025)

Appeal Waivers Enforced, Rule 11 Factual-Basis Challenges Allowed, and “Protective” Gun Possession Suffices for § 924(c)’s “In Furtherance” Element: Commentary on United States v. Elbert (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Appeal Waivers Enforced, Rule 11 Factual-Basis Challenges Allowed, and “Protective” Gun Possession Suffices for § 924(c)’s “In Furtherance” Element Commentary on United States v. Mario Lenard Elbert,...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert