Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Noerr-Pennington Immunity for Contested TCPA Suits: Sham Litigation Exception Refined

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Noerr-Pennington Immunity for Contested TCPA Suits: Sham Litigation Exception Refined

Date: May 7, 2025
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Noerr-Pennington Immunity for Contested TCPA Suits: Sham Litigation Exception Refined Introduction This case arises from a 2019 suit brought by Navient Solutions, LLC...
Preservation of Suppression Objections and Strickland Prejudice in Carrillo v. State

Preservation of Suppression Objections and Strickland Prejudice in Carrillo v. State

Date: May 7, 2025
Preservation of Suppression Objections and Strickland Prejudice in Carrillo v. State Introduction The Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision in Carrillo v. State, decided May 6, 2025, reaffirms two...
No Reasonable Likelihood, No Less Restrictive Alternative: Affirming Termination of Parental Rights under WV Code §49-4-604(c)(6)

No Reasonable Likelihood, No Less Restrictive Alternative: Affirming Termination of Parental Rights under WV Code §49-4-604(c)(6)

Date: May 7, 2025
No Reasonable Likelihood, No Less Restrictive Alternative: Affirming Termination of Parental Rights under WV Code §49-4-604(c)(6) Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of West...
In re P.M.: Necessity of Terminating Parental Rights in Cases of Chronic Parental Absence and Violent Criminal Conduct

In re P.M.: Necessity of Terminating Parental Rights in Cases of Chronic Parental Absence and Violent Criminal Conduct

Date: May 7, 2025
In re P.M.: Necessity of Terminating Parental Rights in Cases of Chronic Parental Absence and Violent Criminal Conduct Introduction In In re P.M. (No. 24-215, W. Va. May 6, 2025), the Supreme Court...
“From Notice to Action” – The Donaldson Standard on Engineering Delays and Suicide-Prevention Duties for Bridge Owners

“From Notice to Action” – The Donaldson Standard on Engineering Delays and Suicide-Prevention Duties for Bridge Owners

Date: May 7, 2025
“From Notice to Action” – The Donaldson Standard on Engineering Delay, Suicide-Prevention Measures and the Bridge Owner’s Duty of Reasonable Care Introduction Donaldson v. Port Authority of New York...
OCGA § 15-11-32 Precludes Setting Aside Juvenile Termination Orders for Post-Judgment Counsel Mistakes

OCGA § 15-11-32 Precludes Setting Aside Juvenile Termination Orders for Post-Judgment Counsel Mistakes

Date: May 7, 2025
OCGA § 15-11-32 Precludes Setting Aside Juvenile Termination Orders for Post-Judgment Counsel Mistakes Introduction This case arises from the Court of Appeals of Georgia’s review of a juvenile...
Clarifying Exceptions to Autopsy Photograph Exemption under Georgia’s Open Records Act

Clarifying Exceptions to Autopsy Photograph Exemption under Georgia’s Open Records Act

Date: May 7, 2025
Clarifying Exceptions to Autopsy Photograph Exemption under Georgia’s Open Records Act Introduction In Wallace v. State, 345 Ga. ___ (2025), the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed whether autopsy...
Routh v. State: Trial Court Discretion in Limiting Cross-Examination and Lay Opinion Testimony

Routh v. State: Trial Court Discretion in Limiting Cross-Examination and Lay Opinion Testimony

Date: May 7, 2025
Routh v. State: Trial Court Discretion in Limiting Cross-Examination and Lay Opinion Testimony Introduction Routh v. State, decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on May 6, 2025, clarifies the scope...
Maglana v. Celebrity Cruises Inc.: Clarifying Unlawful Detention and Outrageous Conduct in Maritime Torts

Maglana v. Celebrity Cruises Inc.: Clarifying Unlawful Detention and Outrageous Conduct in Maritime Torts

Date: May 7, 2025
Maglana v. Celebrity Cruises Inc.: Clarifying Unlawful Detention and Outrageous Conduct in Maritime Torts Introduction In Maglana v. Celebrity Cruises Inc., the Eleventh Circuit addressed whether...
Judicial Determination of Felony Status as a Question of Law: United States v. Steven Fulton

Judicial Determination of Felony Status as a Question of Law: United States v. Steven Fulton

Date: May 7, 2025
Judicial Determination of Felony Status as a Question of Law: United States v. Steven Fulton Introduction United States v. Steven Fulton, decided May 6, 2025 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Voluntary Surrender of Bar License Equates to Disbarment and Limits on Court-Imposed Conditions

Voluntary Surrender of Bar License Equates to Disbarment and Limits on Court-Imposed Conditions

Date: May 7, 2025
Voluntary Surrender of Bar License Equates to Disbarment and Limits on Court-Imposed Conditions Introduction This case arises from the Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision on the petition of Stephen...
Materiality of Omitted Administrative Rulings in Probable Cause Determinations

Materiality of Omitted Administrative Rulings in Probable Cause Determinations

Date: May 7, 2025
Materiality of Omitted Administrative Rulings in Probable Cause Determinations Introduction Megan Hedgepeth v. Nash County is an unpublished Fourth Circuit decision addressing the interplay between...
Recognition of Parental Denial and Third-Party Abuse as Aggravating Circumstances in Termination Proceedings

Recognition of Parental Denial and Third-Party Abuse as Aggravating Circumstances in Termination Proceedings

Date: May 7, 2025
Recognition of Parental Denial and Third-Party Abuse as Aggravating Circumstances in Termination Proceedings Introduction In “In re E.V. and J.H.” (No. 24-216, May 6, 2025), the Supreme Court of West...
Mandating Child-Specific Findings in Abuse and Neglect Adjudications: In re A.B., Z.J., J.J.-1, R.J.-1 & J.J.-2

Mandating Child-Specific Findings in Abuse and Neglect Adjudications: In re A.B., Z.J., J.J.-1, R.J.-1 & J.J.-2

Date: May 7, 2025
Mandating Child-Specific Findings in Abuse and Neglect Adjudications: In re A.B., Z.J., J.J.-1, R.J.-1 & J.J.-2 Introduction In the May 6, 2025 memorandum decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals of...
DNA and Circumstantial Evidence Establishing Constructive Possession in Watson v. State

DNA and Circumstantial Evidence Establishing Constructive Possession in Watson v. State

Date: May 7, 2025
DNA and Circumstantial Evidence Establishing Constructive Possession in Watson v. State Introduction Watson v. State, decided by the Supreme Court of Delaware on May 6, 2025, arises from the...
Reaffirming the Mandatory Nature of Abatement Ab Initio in New York: People v. Cruciani & People v. Nowell (2025)

Reaffirming the Mandatory Nature of Abatement Ab Initio in New York: People v. Cruciani & People v. Nowell (2025)

Date: May 7, 2025
Reaffirming the Mandatory Nature of the Abatement Ab Initio Doctrine in New York: Appellate Division Maintains that Only the Court of Appeals or the Legislature May Alter the Rule 1. Introduction The...
“Clarifying the Boundary of ‘Questions of Law’ in Asylum-Deadline Challenges” — A Commentary on Hernandez Benito v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

“Clarifying the Boundary of ‘Questions of Law’ in Asylum-Deadline Challenges” — A Commentary on Hernandez Benito v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: May 7, 2025
“Clarifying the Boundary of ‘Questions of Law’ in Asylum-Deadline Challenges” Commentary on Hernandez Benito v. Bondi, 23-6697 (2d Cir. May 6 2025) Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for...
Sequential Sentencing Requirement for Enhanced Fifth DUI Sentences Under § 61-8-1008(2), MCA

Sequential Sentencing Requirement for Enhanced Fifth DUI Sentences Under § 61-8-1008(2), MCA

Date: May 7, 2025
Sequential Sentencing Requirement for Enhanced Fifth DUI Sentences Under § 61-8-1008(2), MCA Introduction State v. Bloomer, 2025 MT 93 (Mont. 2025), considers whether a district court may impose the...
Furnisher’s Duty to Conduct Reasonable Reinvestigation Under FCRA §1681s-2(b)

Furnisher’s Duty to Conduct Reasonable Reinvestigation Under FCRA §1681s-2(b)

Date: May 7, 2025
Furnisher’s Duty to Conduct Reasonable Reinvestigation Under FCRA §1681s-2(b) Introduction Michael and Andrew Ritz ("Plaintiffs") leased a vehicle that Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation ("Nissan")...
Broad Application of Montana Stalking Statute: Protecting Attorney‐Victims from Harassing Conduct

Broad Application of Montana Stalking Statute: Protecting Attorney‐Victims from Harassing Conduct

Date: May 7, 2025
Broad Application of Montana Stalking Statute: Protecting Attorney‐Victims from Harassing Conduct Introduction The Supreme Court of Montana’s decision in Groenke v. Gabriel, 2025 MT 91, extends the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert