Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

interpreting-& Case Commentaries

Second Circuit Reaffirms Three-Year Limitations and Narrow Continuing-Violation Doctrine for Title IX Claims; Upholds Early Conversion to Summary Judgment in Pund v. St. Francis College

Second Circuit Reaffirms Three-Year Limitations and Narrow Continuing-Violation Doctrine for Title IX Claims; Upholds Early Conversion to Summary Judgment in Pund v. St. Francis College

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Second Circuit Reaffirms Three-Year Limitations and Narrow Continuing-Violation Doctrine for Title IX Claims; Upholds Early Conversion to Summary Judgment in Pund v. St. Francis College Court: U.S....
No Habeas-by-Compassionate-Release: Second Circuit Affirms Denial Based on § 3553(a) and Individualized Circumstances in United States v. Andrews

No Habeas-by-Compassionate-Release: Second Circuit Affirms Denial Based on § 3553(a) and Individualized Circumstances in United States v. Andrews

Date: Oct 18, 2025
No Habeas-by-Compassionate-Release: Second Circuit Affirms Denial Based on § 3553(a) and Individualized Circumstances in United States v. Andrews Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit...
Reliable Hearsay and Foreign Seizure Evidence Are Sufficient To Support a 450-Kilogram Drug-Quantity Finding at Sentencing

Reliable Hearsay and Foreign Seizure Evidence Are Sufficient To Support a 450-Kilogram Drug-Quantity Finding at Sentencing

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Reliable Hearsay and Foreign Seizure Evidence Are Sufficient To Support a 450-Kilogram Drug-Quantity Finding at Sentencing Introduction In United States v. Francisco Javier Montano-Ortiz, the...
Clarifying MDLEA Statelessness: “Captain” Inquiry Plus Opportunity to Claim Nationality Suffices; EEZ Counts as “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause

Clarifying MDLEA Statelessness: “Captain” Inquiry Plus Opportunity to Claim Nationality Suffices; EEZ Counts as “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Clarifying MDLEA Statelessness: “Captain” Inquiry Plus Opportunity to Claim Nationality Suffices; EEZ Counts as “High Seas” Under the Felonies Clause Introduction This consolidated, unpublished...
Asking “Captain” Is Enough: EEZ-as-High-Seas and Proof of Statelessness under the MDLEA in United States v. Guerrero‑Rosario

Asking “Captain” Is Enough: EEZ-as-High-Seas and Proof of Statelessness under the MDLEA in United States v. Guerrero‑Rosario

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Asking “Captain” Is Enough: EEZ-as-High-Seas and Proof of Statelessness under the MDLEA in United States v. Guerrero‑Rosario Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Non-Argument...
Particularity Requires Internal Discreteness, Not Mere Descriptive Clarity: Sixth Circuit Rejects “Gender-Plus-One” PSGs and Holds “Honduran Women” Incognizable

Particularity Requires Internal Discreteness, Not Mere Descriptive Clarity: Sixth Circuit Rejects “Gender-Plus-One” PSGs and Holds “Honduran Women” Incognizable

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Particularity Requires Internal Discreteness, Not Mere Descriptive Clarity: Sixth Circuit Rejects “Gender-Plus-One” PSGs and Holds “Honduran Women” Incognizable Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Dangerous-and-Unusual Doctrine Controls: Sixth Circuit Upholds NFA Registration for Short-Barreled Shotguns and Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) for “Dangerous” Felons

Dangerous-and-Unusual Doctrine Controls: Sixth Circuit Upholds NFA Registration for Short-Barreled Shotguns and Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) for “Dangerous” Felons

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Dangerous-and-Unusual Doctrine Controls: Sixth Circuit Upholds NFA Registration for Short-Barreled Shotguns and Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) for “Dangerous” Felons Case: United States v. Dalton Samuel...
“Reason to Believe” Means a Probable-Cause “Fair Probability”: Sixth Circuit Upholds §2K2.1 Firearms-Trafficking Enhancement for Undercover Sales and Rejects Double Counting

“Reason to Believe” Means a Probable-Cause “Fair Probability”: Sixth Circuit Upholds §2K2.1 Firearms-Trafficking Enhancement for Undercover Sales and Rejects Double Counting

Date: Oct 18, 2025
“Reason to Believe” Means a Probable-Cause “Fair Probability”: Sixth Circuit Upholds §2K2.1 Firearms-Trafficking Enhancement for Undercover Sales and Rejects Double Counting Introduction In United...
Ohio Aggravated Robbery by Theft (§ 2911.01(A)(1) + § 2913.02) Categorically Matches Guidelines “Extortion,” and Therefore Is a Crime of Violence

Ohio Aggravated Robbery by Theft (§ 2911.01(A)(1) + § 2913.02) Categorically Matches Guidelines “Extortion,” and Therefore Is a Crime of Violence

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Ohio Aggravated Robbery by Theft (§ 2911.01(A)(1) + § 2913.02) Categorically Matches Guidelines “Extortion,” and Therefore Is a Crime of Violence Introduction In United States v. Kenneth Evans, the...
Egregious Firearm Use and Combined Permanent–Life-Threatening Injury Take § 924(c) Cases Outside the Guidelines Heartland, Justifying Major Upward Variances

Egregious Firearm Use and Combined Permanent–Life-Threatening Injury Take § 924(c) Cases Outside the Guidelines Heartland, Justifying Major Upward Variances

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Egregious Firearm Use and Combined Permanent–Life-Threatening Injury Take § 924(c) Cases Outside the Guidelines Heartland, Justifying Major Upward Variances Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
United States v. Bycroft: Tenth Circuit Requires On-the-Record, Defendant-Specific §3583(d) Findings for Lifetime Internet Bans; Generic §3553(a) Recitations Are Insufficient

United States v. Bycroft: Tenth Circuit Requires On-the-Record, Defendant-Specific §3583(d) Findings for Lifetime Internet Bans; Generic §3553(a) Recitations Are Insufficient

Date: Oct 18, 2025
United States v. Bycroft: Tenth Circuit Requires On-the-Record, Defendant-Specific §3583(d) Findings for Lifetime Internet Bans; Generic §3553(a) Recitations Are Insufficient Introduction In United...
Scantland, Not Aimable, Governs FLSA Employee Status in the Eleventh Circuit: Scheduling Control, Nonnegotiable Day Rates, and Employer-Provided Systems Support Employee Classification

Scantland, Not Aimable, Governs FLSA Employee Status in the Eleventh Circuit: Scheduling Control, Nonnegotiable Day Rates, and Employer-Provided Systems Support Employee Classification

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Scantland, Not Aimable, Governs FLSA Employee Status in the Eleventh Circuit: Scheduling Control, Nonnegotiable Day Rates, and Employer-Provided Systems Support Employee Classification Case: Joel...
Opening the Door Is Not Consent: Eleventh Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity for Warrantless Entry and Subsumes Derivative Seizure/Excessive-Force Claims

Opening the Door Is Not Consent: Eleventh Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity for Warrantless Entry and Subsumes Derivative Seizure/Excessive-Force Claims

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Opening the Door Is Not Consent: Eleventh Circuit Denies Qualified Immunity for Warrantless Entry and Subsumes Derivative Seizure/Excessive-Force Claims Case: Terry Dukes, Sr. v. Chase Gregory Court:...
Dusky, Not “Decisional Competency,” Controls; Misallocation of the § 4241 Burden Is Harmless Absent Evidentiary Equipoise

Dusky, Not “Decisional Competency,” Controls; Misallocation of the § 4241 Burden Is Harmless Absent Evidentiary Equipoise

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Dusky, Not “Decisional Competency,” Controls; Misallocation of the § 4241 Burden Is Harmless Absent Evidentiary Equipoise Introduction In United States v. Steven Michael Marks, the Eleventh Circuit...
Assignees Must Prove Assignors’ Diversity or Non‑Collusive Purpose: First Circuit Orders Dismissal When Section 1359 Inquiry Fails

Assignees Must Prove Assignors’ Diversity or Non‑Collusive Purpose: First Circuit Orders Dismissal When Section 1359 Inquiry Fails

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Assignees Must Prove Assignors’ Diversity or Non‑Collusive Purpose: First Circuit Orders Dismissal When Section 1359 Inquiry Fails Case: Gore and Associates Management Co., Inc. v. SLSCO Ltd. and...
Sewage Disposal Is an Essential Service for Tenant-Owned RV Spaces; Tenant Sanitation Duties Are Independent of Landlord Habitability Compliance

Sewage Disposal Is an Essential Service for Tenant-Owned RV Spaces; Tenant Sanitation Duties Are Independent of Landlord Habitability Compliance

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Sewage Disposal Is an Essential Service for Tenant-Owned RV Spaces; Tenant Sanitation Duties Are Independent of Landlord Habitability Compliance Introduction In Jared v. Harmon, 374 Or 381 (2025),...
Legislative Immunity Covers Local Member Discipline, But Not Gratuitous Third‑Party Defamation: Commentary on Brooks‑Buck v. Wahlstrom

Legislative Immunity Covers Local Member Discipline, But Not Gratuitous Third‑Party Defamation: Commentary on Brooks‑Buck v. Wahlstrom

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Legislative Immunity Covers Local Member Discipline, But Not Gratuitous Third‑Party Defamation: Brooks‑Buck v. Wahlstrom Court: Supreme Court of Virginia Date: October 16, 2025 Author: Justice Teresa...
Candor Requires Full Disclosure in Guardianship Petitions: Agreed “Good Faith” Orders Do Not Shield Attorneys from Discipline — Commentary on Pollack v. Virginia State Bar (Va. Oct. 16, 2025)

Candor Requires Full Disclosure in Guardianship Petitions: Agreed “Good Faith” Orders Do Not Shield Attorneys from Discipline — Commentary on Pollack v. Virginia State Bar (Va. Oct. 16, 2025)

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Candor Requires Full Disclosure in Guardianship Petitions: Agreed “Good Faith” Orders Do Not Shield Attorneys from Discipline Introduction This commentary analyzes the Supreme Court of Virginia’s...
Preservation Is Paramount: Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 33.1 Applies to Sentence Enhancements and Specific Sufficiency Grounds

Preservation Is Paramount: Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 33.1 Applies to Sentence Enhancements and Specific Sufficiency Grounds

Date: Oct 18, 2025
Preservation Is Paramount: Arkansas Supreme Court Clarifies Rule 33.1 Applies to Sentence Enhancements and Specific Sufficiency Grounds Introduction In Morgan Weatherford v. State of Arkansas, 2025...
No Ministerial Duty to Provide Free Transcripts: Arkansas Supreme Court Reaffirms “Compelling Need” and Limits Mandamus in Scott v. Sullivan, 2025 Ark. 152

No Ministerial Duty to Provide Free Transcripts: Arkansas Supreme Court Reaffirms “Compelling Need” and Limits Mandamus in Scott v. Sullivan, 2025 Ark. 152

Date: Oct 18, 2025
No Ministerial Duty to Provide Free Transcripts: Arkansas Supreme Court Reaffirms “Compelling Need” and Limits Mandamus in Scott v. Sullivan, 2025 Ark. 152 Introduction In Scott v. Sullivan, 2025...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert