Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

imputation-of-agent&amp Case Commentaries

Grand Jury’s Prerogative Over Witness Presentation: Neither Prosecutors Nor Defendants Have a Unilateral Right to Dictate In‑Person vs. Remote Testimony Before Oregon Grand Juries

Grand Jury’s Prerogative Over Witness Presentation: Neither Prosecutors Nor Defendants Have a Unilateral Right to Dictate In‑Person vs. Remote Testimony Before Oregon Grand Juries

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Grand Jury’s Prerogative Over Witness Presentation: Neither Prosecutors Nor Defendants Have a Unilateral Right to Dictate In‑Person vs. Remote Testimony Before Oregon Grand Juries Introduction In...
Hearing Required Where a Plea May Have Been Influenced by Counsel’s Predictions of Future Legal Change and a Conditional Third‑Party Payment: People v. Mower

Hearing Required Where a Plea May Have Been Influenced by Counsel’s Predictions of Future Legal Change and a Conditional Third‑Party Payment: People v. Mower

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Hearing Required Where a Plea May Have Been Influenced by Counsel’s Predictions of Future Legal Change and a Conditional Third‑Party Payment Commentary on People v. Mower, 2025 NY Slip Op 05851 (App...
No Enhanced Sentence for an Unstated Restitution Condition: Third Department Orders Specific Performance of Plea in People v. Nestler

No Enhanced Sentence for an Unstated Restitution Condition: Third Department Orders Specific Performance of Plea in People v. Nestler

Date: Oct 30, 2025
No Enhanced Sentence for an Unstated Restitution Condition: Third Department Orders Specific Performance of Plea in People v. Nestler Introduction In People v. Nestler, 2025 NY Slip Op 05852 (App Div...
Part Performance at the Preliminary-Injunction Stage: Third Department Affirms Denial of Mandatory Relief Where the Parties’ Conduct Evidences Assent to a Lease Relocation

Part Performance at the Preliminary-Injunction Stage: Third Department Affirms Denial of Mandatory Relief Where the Parties’ Conduct Evidences Assent to a Lease Relocation

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Part Performance at the Preliminary-Injunction Stage: Third Department Affirms Denial of Mandatory Relief Where the Parties’ Conduct Evidences Assent to a Lease Relocation Introduction In R. Kelly...
CPLR 5001 Does Not Expand a Surety’s Liability Beyond the Bond: No Prejudgment Interest Under Payment Bonds Limited to “Labor, Materials, and Equipment”

CPLR 5001 Does Not Expand a Surety’s Liability Beyond the Bond: No Prejudgment Interest Under Payment Bonds Limited to “Labor, Materials, and Equipment”

Date: Oct 30, 2025
CPLR 5001 Does Not Expand a Surety’s Liability Beyond the Bond: No Prejudgment Interest Under Payment Bonds Limited to “Labor, Materials, and Equipment” Introduction In Stone Cast, Inc. v. Couch,...
Plain Meaning Over “Spirit”: Pennsylvania High Court Bars ARD Revocation for Pre‑Admission Conduct or Implied Conditions

Plain Meaning Over “Spirit”: Pennsylvania High Court Bars ARD Revocation for Pre‑Admission Conduct or Implied Conditions

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Plain Meaning Over “Spirit”: Pennsylvania High Court Bars ARD Revocation for Pre‑Admission Conduct or Implied Conditions Introduction In Commonwealth v. Jenkins, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania...
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Confirms Home Inspection Law’s One‑Year Period Is a Statute of Repose Triggered by Report Delivery (Gidor v. Mangus)

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Confirms Home Inspection Law’s One‑Year Period Is a Statute of Repose Triggered by Report Delivery (Gidor v. Mangus)

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Confirms Home Inspection Law’s One‑Year Period Is a Statute of Repose Triggered by Report Delivery Case: Gidor v. Mangus (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District,...
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Broadens MHPA Immunity to All Care During MHPA Admissions; Dissent Would Limit Immunity to Care That Facilitates Recovery from Mental Illness

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Broadens MHPA Immunity to All Care During MHPA Admissions; Dissent Would Limit Immunity to Care That Facilitates Recovery from Mental Illness

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Broadens MHPA Immunity to All Care During MHPA Admissions; Dissent Would Limit Immunity to Care That Facilitates Recovery from Mental Illness Introduction In Wunderly v....
Judges, Not Juries, Decide Criminal Statute-of-Limitations Disputes by a Preponderance Under Utah Code § 76-1-306

Judges, Not Juries, Decide Criminal Statute-of-Limitations Disputes by a Preponderance Under Utah Code § 76-1-306

Date: Oct 30, 2025
Judges, Not Juries, Decide Criminal Statute-of-Limitations Disputes by a Preponderance Under Utah Code § 76-1-306 Introduction In State v. Smith, 2025 UT 45, the Utah Supreme Court addressed a...
Sheriffs Need Not Accept Warrantless Municipal Arrestees Absent Statute or Agreement: Custody–Jurisdiction Line Clarified in City of Birmingham v. Pettway

Sheriffs Need Not Accept Warrantless Municipal Arrestees Absent Statute or Agreement: Custody–Jurisdiction Line Clarified in City of Birmingham v. Pettway

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Sheriffs Need Not Accept Warrantless Municipal Arrestees Absent Statute or Agreement: Custody–Jurisdiction Line Clarified in City of Birmingham v. Pettway Introduction In City of Birmingham v....
Mootness Bars Post‑Remand Declaratory Judgments: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Dismissal When Relief Is Afforded and Damages Are Barred — City of Orange Beach v. Boles (2025)

Mootness Bars Post‑Remand Declaratory Judgments: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Dismissal When Relief Is Afforded and Damages Are Barred — City of Orange Beach v. Boles (2025)

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Mootness Bars Post‑Remand Declaratory Judgments: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Dismissal When Relief Is Afforded and Damages Are Barred — City of Orange Beach v. Boles (2025) Introduction In City of...
Kolessar v. SJP: Alabama Supreme Court Bars Trial Courts from Ordering Receivers to Pay Pre‑Receivership Debts Without Respecting Creditor Priorities; Such Orders Are Appealable Injunctions

Kolessar v. SJP: Alabama Supreme Court Bars Trial Courts from Ordering Receivers to Pay Pre‑Receivership Debts Without Respecting Creditor Priorities; Such Orders Are Appealable Injunctions

Date: Oct 29, 2025
Kolessar v. SJP: Alabama Supreme Court Bars Trial Courts from Ordering Receivers to Pay Pre‑Receivership Debts Without Respecting Creditor Priorities; Such Orders Are Appealable Injunctions...
“Toward Another” Under Iowa’s Assault Statute Does Not Require Pointing a Weapon: State v. Meisheid

“Toward Another” Under Iowa’s Assault Statute Does Not Require Pointing a Weapon: State v. Meisheid

Date: Oct 28, 2025
“Toward Another” Under Iowa’s Assault Statute Does Not Require Pointing a Weapon: State v. Meisheid Introduction In State of Iowa v. Matthew James Meisheid, the Iowa Supreme Court addressed whether a...
No Final Opinion Yet: The Disciplinary Case Against Mark E. Anderson Signals Strict Enforcement of MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4 for Abusive Litigation Conduct

No Final Opinion Yet: The Disciplinary Case Against Mark E. Anderson Signals Strict Enforcement of MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4 for Abusive Litigation Conduct

Date: Oct 28, 2025
No Final Opinion Yet: The Disciplinary Case Against Mark E. Anderson Signals Strict Enforcement of MRPC 3.1, 3.5, and 8.4 for Abusive Litigation Conduct Introduction This commentary examines the...
Public Censure for a Single, Self‑Reported False Affidavit: Rhode Island Supreme Court Clarifies Sanction Factors under Rules 3.3 and 8.4

Public Censure for a Single, Self‑Reported False Affidavit: Rhode Island Supreme Court Clarifies Sanction Factors under Rules 3.3 and 8.4

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Public Censure for a Single, Self‑Reported False Affidavit: Rhode Island Supreme Court Clarifies Sanction Factors under Rules 3.3 and 8.4 Introduction In In the Matter of Santiago H. Posas, No....
Ceccarelli v. Morgan Stanley: Second Circuit reiterates the Rooker-Feldman/Res Judicata divide in post-foreclosure TILA suits and requires without-prejudice jurisdictional dismissals

Ceccarelli v. Morgan Stanley: Second Circuit reiterates the Rooker-Feldman/Res Judicata divide in post-foreclosure TILA suits and requires without-prejudice jurisdictional dismissals

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Ceccarelli v. Morgan Stanley: Second Circuit reiterates the Rooker-Feldman/Res Judicata divide in post-foreclosure TILA suits and requires without-prejudice jurisdictional dismissals Introduction In...
Non‑Reserved Acceptance Triggers Inter‑Insurer Estoppel: Second Circuit Affirms Standing, Reliance, and Prejudice in Penn‑Star v. Dongbu

Non‑Reserved Acceptance Triggers Inter‑Insurer Estoppel: Second Circuit Affirms Standing, Reliance, and Prejudice in Penn‑Star v. Dongbu

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Non‑Reserved Acceptance Triggers Inter‑Insurer Estoppel: Second Circuit Affirms Standing, Reliance, and Prejudice in Penn‑Star v. Dongbu Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit...
Residential Storage Triggers the §2D1.1(b)(12) “Stash House” Enhancement; DWAI Always Counts in Criminal History Under Amended §4A1.2 cmt. n.5; Appeal Waiver Bars Fine Challenge — United States v. Luizzi (2d Cir. 2025 Summary Order)

Residential Storage Triggers the §2D1.1(b)(12) “Stash House” Enhancement; DWAI Always Counts in Criminal History Under Amended §4A1.2 cmt. n.5; Appeal Waiver Bars Fine Challenge — United States v. Luizzi (2d Cir. 2025 Summary Order)

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Residential Storage Triggers the §2D1.1(b)(12) “Stash House” Enhancement; DWAI Always Counts in Criminal History Under Amended §4A1.2 cmt. n.5; Appeal Waiver Bars Fine Challenge — United States v....
Second Circuit Reaffirms PLRA 150% Fee Cap and Declines “Mini En Banc” Reconsideration in Webb v. Trombley

Second Circuit Reaffirms PLRA 150% Fee Cap and Declines “Mini En Banc” Reconsideration in Webb v. Trombley

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Second Circuit Reaffirms PLRA 150% Fee Cap and Declines “Mini En Banc” Reconsideration in Webb v. Trombley Introduction In Webb v. Trombley, No. 24-2582-pr (2d Cir. Oct. 24, 2025) (Summary Order),...
Second Circuit Confirms Constitutional Limit on Mandatory § 1226(c) Detention: Bond Hearing Required Once Detention Becomes Unreasonably Prolonged, With Government’s Clear-and-Convincing Burden

Second Circuit Confirms Constitutional Limit on Mandatory § 1226(c) Detention: Bond Hearing Required Once Detention Becomes Unreasonably Prolonged, With Government’s Clear-and-Convincing Burden

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Second Circuit Confirms Constitutional Limit on Mandatory § 1226(c) Detention: Bond Hearing Required Once Detention Becomes Unreasonably Prolonged, With Government’s Clear-and-Convincing Burden...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert