Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

establishing-&amp Case Commentaries

Errato v. Seder (2d Cir. 2025): No Federal Do‑Over of Divorce Judgments; Independent Fraud Claims May Evade the Domestic Relations Exception but Are Precluded After Prior Litigation

Errato v. Seder (2d Cir. 2025): No Federal Do‑Over of Divorce Judgments; Independent Fraud Claims May Evade the Domestic Relations Exception but Are Precluded After Prior Litigation

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Errato v. Seder (2d Cir. 2025): No Federal Do‑Over of Divorce Judgments; Independent Fraud Claims May Evade the Domestic Relations Exception but Are Precluded After Prior Litigation Court: U.S. Court...
Second Circuit confirms: Seven-figure emotional distress awards in attempted workplace rape need no medical proof; amounts exceeding the Title VII cap properly ride on NYCHRL/NYSHRL

Second Circuit confirms: Seven-figure emotional distress awards in attempted workplace rape need no medical proof; amounts exceeding the Title VII cap properly ride on NYCHRL/NYSHRL

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Second Circuit confirms: Seven-figure emotional distress awards in attempted workplace rape need no medical proof; amounts exceeding the Title VII cap properly ride on NYCHRL/NYSHRL Introduction In...
Reaffirming Broad District Court Discretion in § 3582(c)(2) Motions After Amendment 821: Emphasis on Unchanged Criminal History Is Permissible

Reaffirming Broad District Court Discretion in § 3582(c)(2) Motions After Amendment 821: Emphasis on Unchanged Criminal History Is Permissible

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Reaffirming Broad District Court Discretion in § 3582(c)(2) Motions After Amendment 821: Emphasis on Unchanged Criminal History Is Permissible Introduction In United States v. Ahmed (No. 24-2629),...
Short Orders, Broad Discretion: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Amendment 821 “Zero‑Point Offender” Reductions Based on § 3553(a) Factors

Short Orders, Broad Discretion: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Amendment 821 “Zero‑Point Offender” Reductions Based on § 3553(a) Factors

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Short Orders, Broad Discretion: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Amendment 821 “Zero‑Point Offender” Reductions Based on § 3553(a) Factors Introduction In United States v. Jose Rogelio...
Marginian’s Shield Extends to Group Captives: No Ohio Bad‑Faith Claim When Insurer Settles Within Policy Limits Despite Captive Reimbursement

Marginian’s Shield Extends to Group Captives: No Ohio Bad‑Faith Claim When Insurer Settles Within Policy Limits Despite Captive Reimbursement

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Marginian’s Shield Extends to Group Captives: No Ohio Bad‑Faith Claim When Insurer Settles Within Policy Limits Despite Captive Reimbursement Introduction In Chemical Solvents, Inc. v. Greenwich...
Breach of Contract as Concrete Injury and Classwide Challenges to “Negotiation” Adjustments: Sixth Circuit Affirms Certification in Clippinger v. State Farm

Breach of Contract as Concrete Injury and Classwide Challenges to “Negotiation” Adjustments: Sixth Circuit Affirms Certification in Clippinger v. State Farm

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Breach of Contract as Concrete Injury and Classwide Challenges to “Negotiation” Adjustments: Sixth Circuit Affirms Certification in Clippinger v. State Farm Introduction This published decision from...
Habeas Courts Retain Jurisdiction to Sanction Pre‑Compliance Violations of Conditional and Unconditional Writs, Even After Belated State Compliance; “Penalty Bar” Reserved for Substantial Inequitable Conduct

Habeas Courts Retain Jurisdiction to Sanction Pre‑Compliance Violations of Conditional and Unconditional Writs, Even After Belated State Compliance; “Penalty Bar” Reserved for Substantial Inequitable Conduct

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Habeas Courts Retain Jurisdiction to Sanction Pre‑Compliance Violations of Conditional and Unconditional Writs, Even After Belated State Compliance; “Penalty Bar” Reserved for Substantial Inequitable...
United States v. Riley: Pro se allegations that counsel entered a sentencing stipulation without client consent trigger a mandatory judicial inquiry; the hybrid-representation bar does not apply

United States v. Riley: Pro se allegations that counsel entered a sentencing stipulation without client consent trigger a mandatory judicial inquiry; the hybrid-representation bar does not apply

Date: Oct 11, 2025
United States v. Riley: Pro se allegations that counsel entered a sentencing stipulation without client consent trigger a mandatory judicial inquiry; the hybrid-representation bar does not apply...
Frericks v. Department of the Navy: Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Motive and Timing May Inform “Reasonable Belief” Under the WPA and Endorses Disclosure-by-Disclosure Contributing-Factor Analysis

Frericks v. Department of the Navy: Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Motive and Timing May Inform “Reasonable Belief” Under the WPA and Endorses Disclosure-by-Disclosure Contributing-Factor Analysis

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Frericks v. Department of the Navy: Tenth Circuit Clarifies that Motive and Timing May Inform “Reasonable Belief” Under the WPA and Endorses Disclosure-by-Disclosure Contributing-Factor Analysis...
Tenth Circuit rejects categorical “hub” placements: Individualized placement determinations are required under IDEA, ADA, and Section 504; futility excuses Section 504 exhaustion when hearing officers lack jurisdiction

Tenth Circuit rejects categorical “hub” placements: Individualized placement determinations are required under IDEA, ADA, and Section 504; futility excuses Section 504 exhaustion when hearing officers lack jurisdiction

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Tenth Circuit rejects categorical “hub” placements: Individualized placement determinations are required under IDEA, ADA, and Section 504; futility excuses Section 504 exhaustion when hearing...
Unexplained VE Skill Labels Won’t Do: Tenth Circuit Requires Record Documentation of Transferable Skills Under SSR 82-41

Unexplained VE Skill Labels Won’t Do: Tenth Circuit Requires Record Documentation of Transferable Skills Under SSR 82-41

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Unexplained VE Skill Labels Won’t Do: Tenth Circuit Requires Record Documentation of Transferable Skills Under SSR 82-41 Introduction This commentary analyzes the Tenth Circuit’s unpublished order...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Mental-Health Progress Notes Without Functional Assessments Are Not “Medical Opinions” Under SSA’s Post-2017 Regulations

Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Mental-Health Progress Notes Without Functional Assessments Are Not “Medical Opinions” Under SSA’s Post-2017 Regulations

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies: Mental-Health Progress Notes Without Functional Assessments Are Not “Medical Opinions” Under SSA’s Post-2017 Regulations Introduction In Parsons v. Commissioner, SSA (10th...
Pre‑Enforcement Standing Demands a Proscribing Law: Tenth Circuit Rejects HCSM Challenge Based on New Mexico’s Insurance Definition

Pre‑Enforcement Standing Demands a Proscribing Law: Tenth Circuit Rejects HCSM Challenge Based on New Mexico’s Insurance Definition

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Pre‑Enforcement Standing Demands a Proscribing Law: Tenth Circuit Rejects HCSM Challenge Based on New Mexico’s Insurance Definition Introduction In Samaritan Ministries International v. Kane, No....
No State Action in Private Condemnation: Tenth Circuit Holds Private Landowners Using Oklahoma’s “Private Way of Necessity” Statutes Are Not § 1983 Actors

No State Action in Private Condemnation: Tenth Circuit Holds Private Landowners Using Oklahoma’s “Private Way of Necessity” Statutes Are Not § 1983 Actors

Date: Oct 11, 2025
No State Action in Private Condemnation: Tenth Circuit Holds Private Landowners Using Oklahoma’s “Private Way of Necessity” Statutes Are Not § 1983 Actors Introduction In Witherspoon v. Ince, the...
Acknowledgment-of-Receipt Not Required: Corroborated Sworn Statements Can Defeat Summary Judgment on PLRA Exhaustion, and District Courts Must Assess Perttu’s Jury-Trial Mandate Before Holding a Pavey Hearing

Acknowledgment-of-Receipt Not Required: Corroborated Sworn Statements Can Defeat Summary Judgment on PLRA Exhaustion, and District Courts Must Assess Perttu’s Jury-Trial Mandate Before Holding a Pavey Hearing

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Acknowledgment-of-Receipt Not Required: Corroborated Sworn Statements Can Defeat Summary Judgment on PLRA Exhaustion, and District Courts Must Assess Perttu’s Jury-Trial Mandate Before Holding a...
No § 4204 Carve-Out in § 4219 Installment Calculations: Seventh Circuit Clarifies That “the highest” Means the Highest

No § 4204 Carve-Out in § 4219 Installment Calculations: Seventh Circuit Clarifies That “the highest” Means the Highest

Date: Oct 11, 2025
No § 4204 Carve-Out in § 4219 Installment Calculations: Seventh Circuit Clarifies That “the highest” Means the Highest Case: SuperValu, Inc. v. United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers...
Rent Is Not Purchase Price: Alabama Supreme Court Strictly Construes Lease-Option Credits and Applies Prevention Doctrine in McCain v. Sneed

Rent Is Not Purchase Price: Alabama Supreme Court Strictly Construes Lease-Option Credits and Applies Prevention Doctrine in McCain v. Sneed

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Rent Is Not Purchase Price: Alabama Supreme Court Strictly Construes Lease-Option Credits and Applies Prevention Doctrine in McCain v. Sneed Introduction In LaTonya McCain v. James Sneed and Vernetta...
“Opening the Door” Does Not Bypass Rule 403: Guam Supreme Court Requires Explicit On‑the‑Record Balancing Before Admitting Pretrial‑Release or Pending‑Case Evidence

“Opening the Door” Does Not Bypass Rule 403: Guam Supreme Court Requires Explicit On‑the‑Record Balancing Before Admitting Pretrial‑Release or Pending‑Case Evidence

Date: Oct 11, 2025
“Opening the Door” Does Not Bypass Rule 403: Guam Supreme Court Requires Explicit On‑the‑Record Balancing Before Admitting Pretrial‑Release or Pending‑Case Evidence Introduction In People of Guam v....
State v. Beck (Kan. 2025): No State-Name Requirement on License Plates; Totality-of-the-Circumstances Standard Replaces “Safe Following Distance” Test

State v. Beck (Kan. 2025): No State-Name Requirement on License Plates; Totality-of-the-Circumstances Standard Replaces “Safe Following Distance” Test

Date: Oct 11, 2025
State v. Beck (Kan. 2025): No State-Name Requirement on License Plates; Totality-of-the-Circumstances Standard Replaces “Safe Following Distance” Test Introduction In State v. Beck, No. 126,350 (Kan....
Mandamus Review Under § 45-37A-51.139 Requires the Board Record or Additional Evidence; Progressive Conditions Do Not Satisfy the “Accident at a Definite Time and Place” Requirement for Extraordinary Disability

Mandamus Review Under § 45-37A-51.139 Requires the Board Record or Additional Evidence; Progressive Conditions Do Not Satisfy the “Accident at a Definite Time and Place” Requirement for Extraordinary Disability

Date: Oct 11, 2025
Mandamus Review Under § 45-37A-51.139 Requires the Board Record or Additional Evidence; Progressive Conditions Do Not Satisfy the “Accident at a Definite Time and Place” Requirement for Extraordinary...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.