Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

employment-status-of-minors-under-workers&amp Case Commentaries

Exigent Circumstances Permit Warrantless Real‑Time CSLI During Ongoing Bomb Threats; Overinclusive Rule 404(b) Instruction Not Plain Error — United States v. Mubarak (6th Cir. 2025)

Exigent Circumstances Permit Warrantless Real‑Time CSLI During Ongoing Bomb Threats; Overinclusive Rule 404(b) Instruction Not Plain Error — United States v. Mubarak (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Exigent Circumstances Permit Warrantless Real‑Time CSLI During Ongoing Bomb Threats; Overinclusive Rule 404(b) Instruction Not Plain Error — United States v. Mubarak (6th Cir. 2025) Court: United...
Exclusive-Control Communications, Not Clean Deeds, Trigger Quiet Title Act Accrual for Implied Easements; ANILCA Access Claims Must Proceed Under the QTA; Takings Declaratory Relief Unripe Without Tucker Act Compensation

Exclusive-Control Communications, Not Clean Deeds, Trigger Quiet Title Act Accrual for Implied Easements; ANILCA Access Claims Must Proceed Under the QTA; Takings Declaratory Relief Unripe Without Tucker Act Compensation

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Exclusive-Control Communications, Not Clean Deeds, Trigger Quiet Title Act Accrual for Implied Easements; ANILCA Access Claims Must Proceed Under the QTA; Takings Declaratory Relief Unripe Without...
ADA Title I Requires But-For Causation; USERRA §4311 Does Not Reach Disability-Based Bias: The Tenth Circuit’s Published Clarification in Sellman v. Aviation Training Consulting

ADA Title I Requires But-For Causation; USERRA §4311 Does Not Reach Disability-Based Bias: The Tenth Circuit’s Published Clarification in Sellman v. Aviation Training Consulting

Date: Oct 24, 2025
ADA Title I Requires But-For Causation; USERRA §4311 Does Not Reach Disability-Based Bias: The Tenth Circuit’s Published Clarification in Sellman v. Aviation Training Consulting Introduction In a...
Tenth Circuit holds EUA and PREP Act do not create § 1983-enforceable rights; healthcare vaccine mandates survive constitutional attack

Tenth Circuit holds EUA and PREP Act do not create § 1983-enforceable rights; healthcare vaccine mandates survive constitutional attack

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Tenth Circuit holds EUA and PREP Act do not create § 1983-enforceable rights; healthcare vaccine mandates survive constitutional attack Introduction This consolidated appeal from the District of...
EUA “Option to Refuse” Is Not a § 1983 Right: Tenth Circuit Rejects Private Enforcement of EUA, PREP Act, and 10 U.S.C. § 980 in Vaccine-Mandate Suits

EUA “Option to Refuse” Is Not a § 1983 Right: Tenth Circuit Rejects Private Enforcement of EUA, PREP Act, and 10 U.S.C. § 980 in Vaccine-Mandate Suits

Date: Oct 24, 2025
EUA “Option to Refuse” Is Not a § 1983 Right: Tenth Circuit Rejects Private Enforcement of EUA, PREP Act, and 10 U.S.C. § 980 in Vaccine-Mandate Suits Introduction In a published decision, the Tenth...
Post‑Rebuttal Presumption, International Travel Evidence, and Drug‑Trafficking “Danger” under the Bail Reform Act: United States v. Legaretta (10th Cir. 2025)

Post‑Rebuttal Presumption, International Travel Evidence, and Drug‑Trafficking “Danger” under the Bail Reform Act: United States v. Legaretta (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Post‑Rebuttal Presumption, International Travel Evidence, and Drug‑Trafficking “Danger” under the Bail Reform Act: United States v. Legaretta (10th Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the...
Tenth Circuit Confirms JSIN-Based Disparity Claims Are Substantive; Upholds Statutory-Maximum Upward Variance Without Explicit § 3553(a)(6) Recitation

Tenth Circuit Confirms JSIN-Based Disparity Claims Are Substantive; Upholds Statutory-Maximum Upward Variance Without Explicit § 3553(a)(6) Recitation

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Tenth Circuit Confirms JSIN-Based Disparity Claims Are Substantive; Upholds Statutory-Maximum Upward Variance Without Explicit § 3553(a)(6) Recitation Case: United States v. Rios, No. 24-6251 (10th...
Failure to Challenge Jurisdictional Dismissal in Opening Brief Renders Appeal Frivolous and Warrants a PLRA Strike — Washington v. State of Oklahoma (10th Cir. 2025)

Failure to Challenge Jurisdictional Dismissal in Opening Brief Renders Appeal Frivolous and Warrants a PLRA Strike — Washington v. State of Oklahoma (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 24, 2025
Failure to Challenge Jurisdictional Dismissal in Opening Brief Renders Appeal Frivolous and Warrants a PLRA Strike — Washington v. State of Oklahoma (10th Cir. 2025) Court: United States Court of...
No Police Brady Liability Where Exculpatory Evidence Is Court‑Impounded and Accessible to the Prosecutor: Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Suppression” in § 1983 Claims

No Police Brady Liability Where Exculpatory Evidence Is Court‑Impounded and Accessible to the Prosecutor: Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Suppression” in § 1983 Claims

Date: Oct 24, 2025
No Police Brady Liability Where Exculpatory Evidence Is Court‑Impounded and Accessible to the Prosecutor Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Suppression” in § 1983 Claims Introduction In Bernard Mims v. City...
No Look-Through for FAA § 9: First Circuit Orders Without-Prejudice Dismissal and Avoids Standing Inquiry Post-Badgerow

No Look-Through for FAA § 9: First Circuit Orders Without-Prejudice Dismissal and Avoids Standing Inquiry Post-Badgerow

Date: Oct 23, 2025
No Look-Through for FAA § 9: First Circuit Orders Without-Prejudice Dismissal and Avoids Standing Inquiry Post-Badgerow Case: Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. v. WorldNet Telecommunications, LLC...
StandWithUs v. MIT: First Circuit Harmonizes Title VI with the First Amendment and Rejects a Per Se Equation of Anti‑Zionism with Antisemitism

StandWithUs v. MIT: First Circuit Harmonizes Title VI with the First Amendment and Rejects a Per Se Equation of Anti‑Zionism with Antisemitism

Date: Oct 23, 2025
StandWithUs v. MIT: First Circuit Harmonizes Title VI with the First Amendment and Rejects a Per Se Equation of Anti‑Zionism with Antisemitism Introduction In StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice v....
Silence Is Not Acceptance; Unilateral UCC-1 Filings Cannot Create Security Interests; and Courts May Dismiss as Frivolous Before Deciding IFP: Third Circuit’s Non-Precedential Affirmance in Nah v. Carvana

Silence Is Not Acceptance; Unilateral UCC-1 Filings Cannot Create Security Interests; and Courts May Dismiss as Frivolous Before Deciding IFP: Third Circuit’s Non-Precedential Affirmance in Nah v. Carvana

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Silence Is Not Acceptance; Unilateral UCC-1 Filings Cannot Create Security Interests; and Courts May Dismiss as Frivolous Before Deciding IFP: Third Circuit’s Non-Precedential Affirmance in Nah v....
Colorado River Controls Mixed Declaratory/Injunctive Actions; “Ready, Willing, and Able” for Texas Equitable Redemption Requires Conjunctive Proof: Commentary on All About Property, L.L.C. v. Midland Mortgage (5th Cir. 2025)

Colorado River Controls Mixed Declaratory/Injunctive Actions; “Ready, Willing, and Able” for Texas Equitable Redemption Requires Conjunctive Proof: Commentary on All About Property, L.L.C. v. Midland Mortgage (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Colorado River Controls Mixed Declaratory/Injunctive Actions; “Ready, Willing, and Able” for Texas Equitable Redemption Requires Conjunctive Proof: Commentary on All About Property, L.L.C. v. Midland...
Contractual Pre‑Suit ADR Can Trigger a CGL “Duty to Defend,” and Wrongful Denial Waives Consent-to-ADR; Bankruptcy Assignment Does Not Bar Indemnity Litigation

Contractual Pre‑Suit ADR Can Trigger a CGL “Duty to Defend,” and Wrongful Denial Waives Consent-to-ADR; Bankruptcy Assignment Does Not Bar Indemnity Litigation

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Contractual Pre‑Suit ADR Can Trigger a CGL “Duty to Defend,” and Wrongful Denial Waives Consent-to-ADR; Bankruptcy Assignment Does Not Bar Indemnity Litigation Case: BPX Prod. Co. v. Certain...
No Internet Shortcut: Creditor’s Right to Repayment and Escrow Possession Qualify as “Property” Under Wire Fraud; Interstate Proof Required for Online Wires

No Internet Shortcut: Creditor’s Right to Repayment and Escrow Possession Qualify as “Property” Under Wire Fraud; Interstate Proof Required for Online Wires

Date: Oct 23, 2025
No Internet Shortcut: Creditor’s Right to Repayment and Escrow Possession Qualify as “Property” Under Wire Fraud; Interstate Proof Required for Online Wires Introduction In United States v. Baker,...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Wire Fraud “Property”: Creditor’s Collection Right and Escrow Possession Qualify; Internet Use Alone Does Not Satisfy Interstate Element; Grand Jury May Initiate §401 Contempt

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Wire Fraud “Property”: Creditor’s Collection Right and Escrow Possession Qualify; Internet Use Alone Does Not Satisfy Interstate Element; Grand Jury May Initiate §401 Contempt

Date: Oct 23, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Wire Fraud “Property”: Creditor’s Collection Right and Escrow Possession Qualify; Internet Use Alone Does Not Satisfy Interstate Element; Grand Jury May Initiate §401 Contempt...
Prospective Application of Amended S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(A) and Strict Limits on Habeas Relief Reaffirmed: Gordon v. Smith

Prospective Application of Amended S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(A) and Strict Limits on Habeas Relief Reaffirmed: Gordon v. Smith

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Prospective Application of Amended S.Ct.Prac.R. 4.03(A) and Strict Limits on Habeas Relief Reaffirmed: Gordon v. Smith Introduction In Gordon v. Smith, 2025-Ohio-4768, the Supreme Court of Ohio...
Strict, Time-of-Filing Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A): No Post-Filing Cure via Updated Affidavits or Civ.R. 15 in State ex rel. Harris v. Schwendeman

Strict, Time-of-Filing Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A): No Post-Filing Cure via Updated Affidavits or Civ.R. 15 in State ex rel. Harris v. Schwendeman

Date: Oct 22, 2025
Strict, Time-of-Filing Compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A): No Post-Filing Cure via Updated Affidavits or Civ.R. 15 Introduction In State ex rel. Harris v. Schwendeman, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-4769,...
A Bifurcated Test for “Cruel or Unusual”: Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies Article 1, § 14 and Declines Categorical Protections for Emerging Adults

A Bifurcated Test for “Cruel or Unusual”: Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies Article 1, § 14 and Declines Categorical Protections for Emerging Adults

Date: Oct 22, 2025
A Bifurcated Test for “Cruel or Unusual”: Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies Article 1, § 14 and Declines Categorical Protections for Emerging Adults Introduction In Christopher Robert Hicks v. The...
When Parties Fail to Provide Valuation Evidence, a District Court May Order Appraisal or Sale and Still Equitably Divide the Estate: Nonprecedential Affirmance in Marriage of Schafer

When Parties Fail to Provide Valuation Evidence, a District Court May Order Appraisal or Sale and Still Equitably Divide the Estate: Nonprecedential Affirmance in Marriage of Schafer

Date: Oct 22, 2025
When Parties Fail to Provide Valuation Evidence, a District Court May Order Appraisal or Sale and Still Equitably Divide the Estate: Nonprecedential Affirmance in Marriage of Schafer Court: Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert