Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

eighth-circuit-rules-oklahoma& Case Commentaries

United States v. Hild: No Actual-Loss Requirement, No Brady Duty to Highlight, and No Automatic Recusal for Spouse’s Law Firm Ties (2d Cir. 2025)

United States v. Hild: No Actual-Loss Requirement, No Brady Duty to Highlight, and No Automatic Recusal for Spouse’s Law Firm Ties (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
United States v. Hild: No Actual-Loss Requirement, No Brady Duty to Highlight, and No Automatic Recusal for Spouse’s Law Firm Ties Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Date:...
Reserved-Rights Plea Agreements Permit Government Advocacy for Additional Enhancements; Sadism Enhancement Applies to Morphed Images; Obstruction Adjustment Reaches Overlapping Investigations

Reserved-Rights Plea Agreements Permit Government Advocacy for Additional Enhancements; Sadism Enhancement Applies to Morphed Images; Obstruction Adjustment Reaches Overlapping Investigations

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Reserved-Rights Plea Agreements Permit Government Advocacy for Additional Enhancements; Sadism Enhancement Applies to Morphed Images; Obstruction Adjustment Reaches Overlapping Investigations Note:...
Conscious Avoidance Limited to Conspiracy Knowledge and MVRA Attorneys’ Fees May Be Awarded Without Detailed Billing: United States v. Rains (2d Cir. 2025, Summary Order)

Conscious Avoidance Limited to Conspiracy Knowledge and MVRA Attorneys’ Fees May Be Awarded Without Detailed Billing: United States v. Rains (2d Cir. 2025, Summary Order)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Conscious Avoidance Limited to Conspiracy Knowledge and MVRA Attorneys’ Fees May Be Awarded Without Detailed Billing: United States v. Rains (2d Cir. 2025, Summary Order) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals...
Clearing the 340B Antitrust Path: Second Circuit Confirms Astra/Illinois Brick Do Not Bar Section 1 Claims and Endorses a Flexible Parallel-Conduct Pleading Standard

Clearing the 340B Antitrust Path: Second Circuit Confirms Astra/Illinois Brick Do Not Bar Section 1 Claims and Endorses a Flexible Parallel-Conduct Pleading Standard

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Clearing the 340B Antitrust Path: Second Circuit Confirms Astra/Illinois Brick Do Not Bar Section 1 Claims and Endorses a Flexible Parallel-Conduct Pleading Standard Introduction In Mosaic Health,...
No Step-Two Without a “Meaningful Constraint”: Second Circuit Upholds New York’s Ammunition Background Check Regime at Bruen’s Threshold

No Step-Two Without a “Meaningful Constraint”: Second Circuit Upholds New York’s Ammunition Background Check Regime at Bruen’s Threshold

Date: Oct 17, 2025
No Step-Two Without a “Meaningful Constraint”: Second Circuit Upholds New York’s Ammunition Background Check Regime at Bruen’s Threshold Introduction In N.Y. State Firearms Ass'n v. James, No....
Affirmance by Abandonment and Reaffirmation that Indefinite Leave Is Not a Reasonable Accommodation under the Rehabilitation Act

Affirmance by Abandonment and Reaffirmation that Indefinite Leave Is Not a Reasonable Accommodation under the Rehabilitation Act

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Affirmance by Abandonment and Reaffirmation that Indefinite Leave Is Not a Reasonable Accommodation under the Rehabilitation Act Case: Bill V. Ypsilantis v. Secretary, U.S. Department of the...
Substantial Similarity Requires Protectable Expression: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal Where Shared Afterlife Imagery Is Scènes à Faire

Substantial Similarity Requires Protectable Expression: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal Where Shared Afterlife Imagery Is Scènes à Faire

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Substantial Similarity Requires Protectable Expression: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal Where Shared Afterlife Imagery Is Scènes à Faire Introduction In George Lee Clark v. Dr. Eben Alexander,...
ALJs May Determine the Identity of a Treating Physician When the OWCP District Director Authorizes a Change: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Physician-Choice and Reimbursement Rules Under the LHWCA

ALJs May Determine the Identity of a Treating Physician When the OWCP District Director Authorizes a Change: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Physician-Choice and Reimbursement Rules Under the LHWCA

Date: Oct 17, 2025
ALJs May Determine the Identity of a Treating Physician When the OWCP District Director Authorizes a Change: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Physician-Choice and Reimbursement Rules Under the LHWCA...
Esteras in Action: Express Reliance on § 3553(a)(2)(A) at Revocation Is Plain Error; Home Confinement Treated as an Alternative to Incarceration for Substantial-Rights Analysis

Esteras in Action: Express Reliance on § 3553(a)(2)(A) at Revocation Is Plain Error; Home Confinement Treated as an Alternative to Incarceration for Substantial-Rights Analysis

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Esteras in Action: Express Reliance on § 3553(a)(2)(A) at Revocation Is Plain Error; Home Confinement Treated as an Alternative to Incarceration for Substantial-Rights Analysis Introduction United...
Pretext or Bust: The Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Evidentiary Demands for Pretext and Clarifies the Prejudice Showing Required to Challenge Sua Sponte Summary Judgment

Pretext or Bust: The Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Evidentiary Demands for Pretext and Clarifies the Prejudice Showing Required to Challenge Sua Sponte Summary Judgment

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Pretext or Bust: The Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Strict Evidentiary Demands for Pretext and Clarifies the Prejudice Showing Required to Challenge Sua Sponte Summary Judgment Introduction In Darryl...
Post-Muldrow Clarity in the Sixth Circuit: Written Reprimands, Proposed Removals, and Mere Threats Do Not Constitute Adverse Actions; Rigor in Comparator Proof Reaffirmed (Palmer v. Department of the Air Force)

Post-Muldrow Clarity in the Sixth Circuit: Written Reprimands, Proposed Removals, and Mere Threats Do Not Constitute Adverse Actions; Rigor in Comparator Proof Reaffirmed (Palmer v. Department of the Air Force)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Post-Muldrow Clarity in the Sixth Circuit: Written Reprimands, Proposed Removals, and Mere Threats Do Not Constitute Adverse Actions; Rigor in Comparator Proof Reaffirmed Introduction This commentary...
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms “Low Bar” for U.S.S.G. §2D1.1(b)(12) Stash‑House Enhancement and Approves Use of Empirical Sentencing Data to Address §3553(a)(6) Disparities

Sixth Circuit Reaffirms “Low Bar” for U.S.S.G. §2D1.1(b)(12) Stash‑House Enhancement and Approves Use of Empirical Sentencing Data to Address §3553(a)(6) Disparities

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Sixth Circuit Reaffirms “Low Bar” for U.S.S.G. §2D1.1(b)(12) Stash‑House Enhancement and Approves Use of Empirical Sentencing Data to Address §3553(a)(6) Disparities Case: United States v. Richard...
Ramos v. Bondi: Enforcing Clear-Error Review and the Futility-of-Remand Remedy—Tenth Circuit Orders Reinstatement of IJ’s Asylum Grant

Ramos v. Bondi: Enforcing Clear-Error Review and the Futility-of-Remand Remedy—Tenth Circuit Orders Reinstatement of IJ’s Asylum Grant

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Ramos v. Bondi: Enforcing Clear-Error Review and the Futility-of-Remand Remedy—Tenth Circuit Orders Reinstatement of IJ’s Asylum Grant Introduction In Ramos v. Bondi (10th Cir. Oct. 15, 2025), the...
Proper Exhaustion Requires Proof of Appeal: Tenth Circuit Confirms Generic Postage Charges Cannot Substantiate PLRA Exhaustion in Religious-Diet Claims

Proper Exhaustion Requires Proof of Appeal: Tenth Circuit Confirms Generic Postage Charges Cannot Substantiate PLRA Exhaustion in Religious-Diet Claims

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Proper Exhaustion Requires Proof of Appeal: Tenth Circuit Confirms Generic Postage Charges Cannot Substantiate PLRA Exhaustion in Religious-Diet Claims Case: Wiggins v. Hatch, United States Court of...
Eleventh Circuit Predicts Florida Will Apply the Notice-Prejudice Rule to Prompt-Notice Breaches in Claims-Made Policies When Claims Are Timely Reported

Eleventh Circuit Predicts Florida Will Apply the Notice-Prejudice Rule to Prompt-Notice Breaches in Claims-Made Policies When Claims Are Timely Reported

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Predicts Florida Will Apply the Notice-Prejudice Rule to Prompt-Notice Breaches in Claims-Made Policies When Claims Are Timely Reported Introduction In L. Squared Industries, Inc. v....
Mandatory Pre‑Suit Exhaustion for ERISA Fiduciary‑Breach Claims Reaffirmed; Narrow Exceptions and No Stay for Premature Suits (Bolton v. Inland Fresh)

Mandatory Pre‑Suit Exhaustion for ERISA Fiduciary‑Breach Claims Reaffirmed; Narrow Exceptions and No Stay for Premature Suits (Bolton v. Inland Fresh)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Mandatory Pre‑Suit Exhaustion for ERISA Fiduciary‑Breach Claims Reaffirmed; Narrow Exceptions and No Stay for Premature Suits Case: Rani Bolton v. Inland Fresh Seafood Corporation of America, Inc....
First Circuit Requires District Courts to Address Rehabilitation—In Combination with Family Circumstances—When Ruling on Compassionate Release under Amended U.S.S.G. §1B1.13

First Circuit Requires District Courts to Address Rehabilitation—In Combination with Family Circumstances—When Ruling on Compassionate Release under Amended U.S.S.G. §1B1.13

Date: Oct 17, 2025
First Circuit Requires District Courts to Address Rehabilitation—In Combination with Family Circumstances—When Ruling on Compassionate Release under Amended U.S.S.G. §1B1.13 Introduction In United...
Crawford v. Mississippi: Supreme Court Declines to Resolve Retroactivity of McCoy v. Louisiana; Sotomayor Dissent Urges Retroactive Application on Collateral Review

Crawford v. Mississippi: Supreme Court Declines to Resolve Retroactivity of McCoy v. Louisiana; Sotomayor Dissent Urges Retroactive Application on Collateral Review

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Crawford v. Mississippi: Supreme Court Declines to Resolve Retroactivity of McCoy v. Louisiana; Sotomayor Dissent Urges Retroactive Application on Collateral Review Introduction In Crawford v....
Paternity-by-Estoppel Secures Standing for Grandparent Visitation: O’Connell v. Clay (Ind. 2025)

Paternity-by-Estoppel Secures Standing for Grandparent Visitation: O’Connell v. Clay (Ind. 2025)

Date: Oct 17, 2025
Paternity-by-Estoppel Secures Standing for Grandparent Visitation: O’Connell v. Clay (Ind. 2025) Introduction In O’Connell v. Clay, the Indiana Supreme Court resolved a recurring problem at the...
No Relitigation Injunction for Post‑Complaint Conduct: Third Circuit Limits Claim and Issue Preclusion Under the Anti‑Injunction Act

No Relitigation Injunction for Post‑Complaint Conduct: Third Circuit Limits Claim and Issue Preclusion Under the Anti‑Injunction Act

Date: Oct 16, 2025
No Relitigation Injunction for Post‑Complaint Conduct: Third Circuit Limits Claim and Issue Preclusion Under the Anti‑Injunction Act Introduction In Erie Indemnity Co. v. Troy Stephenson, the U.S....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert