Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-qualified-immunity-in-prisoners& Case Commentaries

“Rough Justice, Not Auditing Perfection” – The Second Circuit’s Robust Deference to District-Court Fee Awards under the IDEA

“Rough Justice, Not Auditing Perfection” – The Second Circuit’s Robust Deference to District-Court Fee Awards under the IDEA

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“Rough Justice, Not Auditing Perfection” – The Second Circuit’s Robust Deference to District-Court Fee Awards under the IDEA Introduction In Y.G. v. New York City Department of Education and eighteen...
Blecher v. Holy See — The “Mandatory-Compliance Shield”: When Following a Foreign Sovereign’s Policy Restores Immunity under the FSIA

Blecher v. Holy See — The “Mandatory-Compliance Shield”: When Following a Foreign Sovereign’s Policy Restores Immunity under the FSIA

Date: Jul 26, 2025
The “Mandatory-Compliance Shield”: Second Circuit Holds that Obedience to a Foreign Sovereign’s Policy Triggers the FSIA Discretionary Function Exclusion Introduction In Blecher v. Holy See, the...
“Good-Faith Reasonableness” Becomes the Test for Substantial-Justification under the IDEA Fee-Cap: A Commentary on N.G.B. v. New York City Department of Education (2d Cir. 2025)

“Good-Faith Reasonableness” Becomes the Test for Substantial-Justification under the IDEA Fee-Cap: A Commentary on N.G.B. v. New York City Department of Education (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“Good-Faith Reasonableness” Becomes the Test for Substantial-Justification Under the IDEA’s Attorneys’-Fees Cap A Detailed Commentary on N.G.B. v. New York City Department of Education, 2d Cir., 2025...
“From Use-Based to Evidence-Based Nexus”: Second Circuit Re-calibrates Probable-Cause Requirements for Digital-Device Warrants

“From Use-Based to Evidence-Based Nexus”: Second Circuit Re-calibrates Probable-Cause Requirements for Digital-Device Warrants

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“From Use-Based to Evidence-Based Nexus”: United States v. Silva (2d Cir. 2025) and the New Standard for Cell-Phone Search Warrants 1. Introduction United States v. Silva marks the Second Circuit’s...
“Written-Terms Trump Hand-to-Hand Cash” – The Second Circuit’s Clarification of
U.C.C. §2-201/2-209, Apparent Authority and Foreseeability in Vista Food Exchange, Inc. v. Comercial De Alimentos Sanchez (2025)

“Written-Terms Trump Hand-to-Hand Cash” – The Second Circuit’s Clarification of U.C.C. §2-201/2-209, Apparent Authority and Foreseeability in Vista Food Exchange, Inc. v. Comercial De Alimentos Sanchez (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“Written-Terms Trump Hand-to-Hand Cash” – The Second Circuit’s Clarification of U.C.C. §§ 2-201 & 2-209, Apparent Authority and Foreseeability in Vista Food Exchange, Inc. v. Comercial De Alimentos...
No Shortcuts Around Medicare’s Administrative Review Scheme: The Eleventh Circuit Fortifies § 405(g) Exclusivity in Bishins v. HHS

No Shortcuts Around Medicare’s Administrative Review Scheme: The Eleventh Circuit Fortifies § 405(g) Exclusivity in Bishins v. HHS

Date: Jul 26, 2025
No Shortcuts Around Medicare’s Administrative Review Scheme: The Eleventh Circuit Fortifies § 405(g) Exclusivity in Bishins v. HHS 1. Introduction Larry V. Bishins, a Medicare beneficiary and...
Exclusive Economic Zones Are “High Seas” for MDLEA Purposes: United States v. Quijije Mero, 22-11929 (11th Cir. 2025)

Exclusive Economic Zones Are “High Seas” for MDLEA Purposes: United States v. Quijije Mero, 22-11929 (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Exclusive Economic Zones Are “High Seas” for MDLEA Purposes: United States v. Quijije Mero, 22-11929 (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Nilson Olaya Grueso, José Junior Bailon Franco,...
Everson: No Per Se Adjournment for Late Discovery Under CPL 245.80(1)(a); Out‑of‑Order Peremptory Strike of an Alternate Is Moot Absent Alternate Deliberations

Everson: No Per Se Adjournment for Late Discovery Under CPL 245.80(1)(a); Out‑of‑Order Peremptory Strike of an Alternate Is Moot Absent Alternate Deliberations

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Everson: No Per Se Adjournment for Late Discovery Under CPL 245.80(1)(a); Out‑of‑Order Peremptory Strike of an Alternate Is Moot Absent Alternate Deliberations Introduction In People v. Everson (2025...
Erlinger Challenges Must Be Preserved, and Officer Responses to “What Are My Charges?” Are Not Interrogation: Commentary on People v. Emanuel (2025)

Erlinger Challenges Must Be Preserved, and Officer Responses to “What Are My Charges?” Are Not Interrogation: Commentary on People v. Emanuel (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Erlinger Challenges Must Be Preserved, and Officer Responses to “What Are My Charges?” Are Not Interrogation: Commentary on People v. Emanuel (2025) Case: People v. Emanuel, 2025 NY Slip Op 04354...
Inferring Shared Intent in Unidentified‑Shooter Cases: People v. Brown (2025) Clarifies Accomplice Liability and Coconspirator Text Admissibility in New York

Inferring Shared Intent in Unidentified‑Shooter Cases: People v. Brown (2025) Clarifies Accomplice Liability and Coconspirator Text Admissibility in New York

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Inferring Shared Intent in Unidentified‑Shooter Cases: People v. Brown (2025) Clarifies Accomplice Liability and Coconspirator Text Admissibility in New York Introduction In People v. Brown (2025 NY...
Parsons v. County of Steuben: Ladder Removal Held Outside Labor Law § 240(1) Where Securing Would Contradict the Work Plan; Slippery Crushed‑Gravel Pad Recognized as an Enumerated Work Surface Under § 241(6)

Parsons v. County of Steuben: Ladder Removal Held Outside Labor Law § 240(1) Where Securing Would Contradict the Work Plan; Slippery Crushed‑Gravel Pad Recognized as an Enumerated Work Surface Under § 241(6)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Parsons v. County of Steuben: Ladder Removal Held Outside Labor Law § 240(1) Where Securing Would Contradict the Work Plan; Slippery Crushed‑Gravel Pad Recognized as an Enumerated Work Surface Under...
Apparent Authority as a Dual Gateway: Fraud Pleading and CPLR 302 Jurisdiction; Six‑Year Cutoff for Serial Misrepresentations; Strict Propensity Notice for Negligent Supervision

Apparent Authority as a Dual Gateway: Fraud Pleading and CPLR 302 Jurisdiction; Six‑Year Cutoff for Serial Misrepresentations; Strict Propensity Notice for Negligent Supervision

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Apparent Authority as a Dual Gateway: Fraud Pleading and CPLR 302 Jurisdiction; Six‑Year Cutoff for Serial Misrepresentations; Strict Propensity Notice for Negligent Supervision Introduction In...
“The Prevention Doctrine Meets Auto-Insurance”: A Commentary on Mario De Los Santos v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

“The Prevention Doctrine Meets Auto-Insurance”: A Commentary on Mario De Los Santos v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“The Prevention Doctrine Meets Auto-Insurance” Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Section 3915 and Blocks Insurers from Benefiting from Their Own Premium-Collection Errors Introduction In Mario De Los...
“Same-Gun Nexus” as Significant Common Evidence: People v. Spinks Clarifies Joinder Under CPL 200.20(2)(b) and (c)

“Same-Gun Nexus” as Significant Common Evidence: People v. Spinks Clarifies Joinder Under CPL 200.20(2)(b) and (c)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
“Same-Gun Nexus” as Significant Common Evidence: People v. Spinks Clarifies Joinder Under CPL 200.20(2)(b) and (c) Introduction People v. Spinks (2025 NY Slip Op 04303) arises from two violent...

      Rule of Completeness Can Permit Testimonial Hearsay to Correct Defense Misrepresentation; Security-Guard 911 Calls Are Non-Anonymous for Reasonable Suspicion: Commentary on People v. Peterson (2025)

Rule of Completeness Can Permit Testimonial Hearsay to Correct Defense Misrepresentation; Security-Guard 911 Calls Are Non-Anonymous for Reasonable Suspicion: Commentary on People v. Peterson (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Rule of Completeness Can Permit Testimonial Hearsay to Correct Defense Misrepresentation; Security-Guard 911 Calls Are Non-Anonymous for Reasonable Suspicion Introduction In People v. Peterson (2025...
Fourth Department Recognizes Nonwaivable Appellate Authority to Reduce Sentences in the Interest of Justice, Even After a Valid Appeal Waiver — People v. Hannah T. (2025)

Fourth Department Recognizes Nonwaivable Appellate Authority to Reduce Sentences in the Interest of Justice, Even After a Valid Appeal Waiver — People v. Hannah T. (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Fourth Department Recognizes Nonwaivable Appellate Authority to Reduce Sentences in the Interest of Justice, Even After a Valid Appeal Waiver — People v. Hannah T. (2025) Introduction In People v....
Preserving CPL 30.30 Claims Despite Withdrawal of a Renewal Motion: The Fourth Department’s Clarification in People v. Banks

Preserving CPL 30.30 Claims Despite Withdrawal of a Renewal Motion: The Fourth Department’s Clarification in People v. Banks

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Preserving CPL 30.30 Claims Despite Withdrawal of a Renewal Motion: The Fourth Department’s Clarification in People v. Banks Introduction In People v. Banks, 2025 NY Slip Op 04346 (App Div 4th Dept...
Emergency Doctrine and Sudden Non‑Vehicular Highway Obstructions: Rear‑End Presumption Rebuttal, Police‑Report Hearsay, and Abandonment Clarified in Gallt v. Nelk (2025)

Emergency Doctrine and Sudden Non‑Vehicular Highway Obstructions: Rear‑End Presumption Rebuttal, Police‑Report Hearsay, and Abandonment Clarified in Gallt v. Nelk (2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Emergency Doctrine and Sudden Non‑Vehicular Highway Obstructions: Rear‑End Presumption Rebuttal, Police‑Report Hearsay, and Abandonment Clarified in Gallt v. Nelk (2025) Introduction In Gallt v....
Precision in Damages and a New Lens on Merchant Cash Advances: Bridge Funding Cap LLC v. SimonExpress Pizza, LLC (AD4th 2025)

Precision in Damages and a New Lens on Merchant Cash Advances: Bridge Funding Cap LLC v. SimonExpress Pizza, LLC (AD4th 2025)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Precision in Damages and a New Lens on Merchant Cash Advances: Bridge Funding Cap LLC v. SimonExpress Pizza, LLC (AD4th 2025) Introduction In Bridge Funding Cap LLC v. SimonExpress Pizza, LLC (2025...
Flight After a Level‑Two Inquiry in a “Shots‑Fired” Investigation Can Ripen Founded Suspicion into Reasonable Suspicion; Consent‑to‑Frisk Requests Permissible at Level Two — Commentary on People v. Smith (2025 NY Slip Op 04317)

Flight After a Level‑Two Inquiry in a “Shots‑Fired” Investigation Can Ripen Founded Suspicion into Reasonable Suspicion; Consent‑to‑Frisk Requests Permissible at Level Two — Commentary on People v. Smith (2025 NY Slip Op 04317)

Date: Jul 26, 2025
Flight After a Level‑Two Inquiry in a “Shots‑Fired” Investigation Can Ripen Founded Suspicion into Reasonable Suspicion; Consent‑to‑Frisk Requests Permissible at Level Two — Commentary on People v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert