Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Keith v. Griffiths: Material Factual Disputes Bar Qualified and Statutory Immunity in Deadly Force §1983 Claims

Keith v. Griffiths: Material Factual Disputes Bar Qualified and Statutory Immunity in Deadly Force §1983 Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Keith v. Griffiths: Material Factual Disputes Bar Qualified and Statutory Immunity in Deadly Force §1983 Claims Introduction Rita Keith, as administrator of the estate of her son Arthur Keith, sued...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Limits of “Relevant Conduct” for Excluding Prior Drug Convictions from Criminal History Calculations

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Limits of “Relevant Conduct” for Excluding Prior Drug Convictions from Criminal History Calculations

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Limits of “Relevant Conduct” for Excluding Prior Drug Convictions from Criminal History Calculations Introduction In United States v. Amon Sudan Sanders-Outlaw, 25 F.4th 1024...
Odor of Marijuana as Probable Cause for Arrest: Sixth Circuit’s New Fourth Amendment Rule in United States v. Santiago

Odor of Marijuana as Probable Cause for Arrest: Sixth Circuit’s New Fourth Amendment Rule in United States v. Santiago

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Odor of Marijuana as Probable Cause for Arrest: Sixth Circuit’s New Fourth Amendment Rule in United States v. Santiago Introduction United States v. Edwin Santiago (6th Cir. 2025) addresses a...
No Enhanced Duty for Voluntary Safety Precautions: Saunders v. Home Depot

No Enhanced Duty for Voluntary Safety Precautions: Saunders v. Home Depot

Date: Jun 10, 2025
No Enhanced Duty for Voluntary Safety Precautions: Saunders v. Home Depot Introduction In Angela Saunders v. Home Depot, Inc., 2025 WL 1234567 (6th Cir. June 5, 2025) (not recommended for...
Article III Standing Requirements in Organizational Challenges to Voter-Registration Policies under the NVRA

Article III Standing Requirements in Organizational Challenges to Voter-Registration Policies under the NVRA

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Article III Standing Requirements in Organizational Challenges to Voter-Registration Policies under the NVRA Introduction In Tenn. State Conference of the NAACP v. William Lee, 25a0148p (6th Cir....
Reinforcing Constructive Possession and Discretionary Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)

Reinforcing Constructive Possession and Discretionary Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Reinforcing Constructive Possession and Discretionary Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Introduction United States v. Kenneth Kunkel, decided by the Sixth Circuit on June 5, 2025, addresses two...
Clarifying the “Reasonable Opportunity to Observe” Standard and Mistrial Evaluation in Minor Sex-Trafficking and Child Pornography Prosecutions

Clarifying the “Reasonable Opportunity to Observe” Standard and Mistrial Evaluation in Minor Sex-Trafficking and Child Pornography Prosecutions

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarifying the “Reasonable Opportunity to Observe” Standard and Mistrial Evaluation in Minor Sex-Trafficking and Child Pornography Prosecutions Introduction United States v. Lavonte Sampson,...
Clarification of Ambiguous Sentences: The Role of Written Judgments in Federal Sentencing Post-United States v. Tracey Shaw

Clarification of Ambiguous Sentences: The Role of Written Judgments in Federal Sentencing Post-United States v. Tracey Shaw

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarification of Ambiguous Sentences: The Role of Written Judgments in Federal Sentencing Post-United States v. Tracey Shaw Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Tracey Shaw,...
Subjective Academic Promotion Standards Are Valid When Grounded in Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Evaluations: Oliveira-Monte v. Vanderbilt Precedent

Subjective Academic Promotion Standards Are Valid When Grounded in Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Evaluations: Oliveira-Monte v. Vanderbilt Precedent

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Subjective Academic Promotion Standards Are Valid When Grounded in Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Evaluations: Oliveira-Monte v. Vanderbilt Precedent Introduction In Oliveira-Monte v. Vanderbilt...
Adequacy of Justification for Significant Upward Variance in Sentencing

Adequacy of Justification for Significant Upward Variance in Sentencing

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Adequacy of Justification for Significant Upward Variance in Sentencing Introduction United States v. Matthew Thomas, No. 24-5063 (6th Cir. June 4, 2025), presents a critical decision on the...
No Bright-Line Job Threshold: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Fact-Specific Determination of “Significant Number” in Disability Benefits Analysis

No Bright-Line Job Threshold: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Fact-Specific Determination of “Significant Number” in Disability Benefits Analysis

Date: Jun 10, 2025
No Bright-Line Job Threshold: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms Fact-Specific Determination of “Significant Number” in Disability Benefits Analysis Introduction This commentary examines the United States Court...
Clarifying Jurisdictional and Pleading Standards in Multi-Defendant Product Liability Actions

Clarifying Jurisdictional and Pleading Standards in Multi-Defendant Product Liability Actions

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarifying Jurisdictional and Pleading Standards in Multi-Defendant Product Liability Actions Introduction Case Name: Sarah Cordle v. Enovis Corp. Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Upholding Discretion in Supervised-Release Revocation: Mens Rea for RRC Violations and Flexible Use of Hearsay Evidence

Upholding Discretion in Supervised-Release Revocation: Mens Rea for RRC Violations and Flexible Use of Hearsay Evidence

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Upholding Discretion in Supervised-Release Revocation: Mens Rea for RRC Violations and Flexible Use of Hearsay Evidence Introduction This commentary reviews the Sixth Circuit’s decision in United...
New Precedent: Ohio’s Two-Year Personal-Injury Statute Governs Title IX Claims

New Precedent: Ohio’s Two-Year Personal-Injury Statute Governs Title IX Claims

Date: Jun 3, 2025
New Precedent: Ohio’s Two-Year Personal-Injury Statute Governs Title IX Claims 1. Introduction In Eszter Pryor v. The Ohio State University, No. 24-3812 (6th Cir. Jun. 2, 2025), the Sixth Circuit...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Jurisdictional Boundaries in Mixed Actions: Mandatory Exercise for Coercive Claims and Limited Abstention for Declaratory Relief

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Jurisdictional Boundaries in Mixed Actions: Mandatory Exercise for Coercive Claims and Limited Abstention for Declaratory Relief

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Jurisdictional Boundaries in Mixed Actions: Mandatory Exercise for Coercive Claims and Limited Abstention for Declaratory Relief Introduction Fire-Dex, LLC v. Admiral...
Limits on Interlocutory Qualified-Immunity Appeals in §1983 Cases

Limits on Interlocutory Qualified-Immunity Appeals in §1983 Cases

Date: May 31, 2025
Limits on Interlocutory Qualified-Immunity Appeals in §1983 Cases 1. Introduction Nancy Hooks v. City of Warren, Mich. (6th Cir., May 30, 2025) arises from an April 2019 street-corner incident in...
Sentencing Discretion and Harmless Error: Reconciling Oral-Written Pronouncements, Delegation of Supervision Conditions, and Treatment Considerations in U.S. v. Bland

Sentencing Discretion and Harmless Error: Reconciling Oral-Written Pronouncements, Delegation of Supervision Conditions, and Treatment Considerations in U.S. v. Bland

Date: May 31, 2025
Sentencing Discretion and Harmless Error: Reconciling Oral-Written Pronouncements, Delegation of Supervision Conditions, and Treatment Considerations in U.S. v. Bland Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s...
Affirmation of District Court Sentencing Discretion: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Post-Judgment Corrections, Supervised Release Delegations, and Drug Purity Calculations

Affirmation of District Court Sentencing Discretion: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Post-Judgment Corrections, Supervised Release Delegations, and Drug Purity Calculations

Date: May 31, 2025
Affirmation of District Court Sentencing Discretion: Sixth Circuit Clarifies Post-Judgment Corrections, Supervised Release Delegations, and Drug Purity Calculations 1. Introduction In United States...
Qualified Immunity in Joint Administrative Searches and Emergency Evictions

Qualified Immunity in Joint Administrative Searches and Emergency Evictions

Date: May 31, 2025
Qualified Immunity in Joint Administrative Searches and Emergency Evictions 1. Introduction Belinda Marie Fitzpatrick owns two adjacent homes in Lansing, Michigan. In September 2021, a neighbor’s tip...
Permissible Rule 35 Corrections and Delegated Supervised-Release Authority: United States v. Ellis

Permissible Rule 35 Corrections and Delegated Supervised-Release Authority: United States v. Ellis

Date: May 31, 2025
Permissible Rule 35 Corrections and Delegated Supervised-Release Authority: United States v. Ellis Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Jeremy Ellis et al. (Nos....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert