Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

strict-standards-for-successive-habeas-petitions-reinforced-in-in-re-ivan-abner-cantu Case Commentaries

Competency vs. Credibility: First Circuit okays judicial notice of a witness’s prior plea-competency finding and clarifies appeals from Rule 37 indicative rulings — United States v. Vázquez‑Rijos

Competency vs. Credibility: First Circuit okays judicial notice of a witness’s prior plea-competency finding and clarifies appeals from Rule 37 indicative rulings — United States v. Vázquez‑Rijos

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Competency vs. Credibility: First Circuit okays judicial notice of a witness’s prior plea-competency finding and clarifies appeals from Rule 37 indicative rulings — United States v. Vázquez‑Rijos...
Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Clarifies Appellate Procedure for Rule 37 Motions

Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Clarifies Appellate Procedure for Rule 37 Motions

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Upholds Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Clarifies Appellate Procedure for Rule 37 Motions Introduction In United States v. Vázquez-Rijos, the...
Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re G.A.)

Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re G.A.)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Oral Requests Are Not Enough: West Virginia Reaffirms Written-Motion Requirement for Additional Improvement Periods and Permits Direct Termination When No Reasonable Likelihood of Correction (In re...
Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Approves Limited Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Clarifies Appellate Practice for Rule 37 Motions in United States v. Vázquez-Rijos

Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Approves Limited Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Clarifies Appellate Practice for Rule 37 Motions in United States v. Vázquez-Rijos

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Competency Is Not Credibility: First Circuit Approves Limited Judicial Notice of Prior Plea Competency and Clarifies Appellate Practice for Rule 37 Motions in United States v. Vázquez-Rijos...
Corporate Venue Statute Applies to LLCs: Alabama Supreme Court Overrules WMS and Aligns LLC Venue with § 6-3-7

Corporate Venue Statute Applies to LLCs: Alabama Supreme Court Overrules WMS and Aligns LLC Venue with § 6-3-7

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Corporate Venue Statute Applies to LLCs: Alabama Supreme Court Overrules WMS and Aligns LLC Venue with § 6-3-7 Introduction In Ex parte Phillip H. Rivers, Steven Nobles, Todd Martin, Stan Roberts,...
Ex parte Thompson: Post-Deposition Inaction Defeats Relation Back — Due Diligence Requires Timely Discovery and Prompt Substitution Under Rule 9(h)

Ex parte Thompson: Post-Deposition Inaction Defeats Relation Back — Due Diligence Requires Timely Discovery and Prompt Substitution Under Rule 9(h)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Ex parte Thompson: Post-Deposition Inaction Defeats Relation Back — Due Diligence Requires Timely Discovery and Prompt Substitution Under Rule 9(h) Introduction In Ex parte Grisby Jacob Thompson, the...
When a Continuance Extends Rule 59.1: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Continuance Motions and Orders to Appear in the Appellate Record

When a Continuance Extends Rule 59.1: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Continuance Motions and Orders to Appear in the Appellate Record

Date: Sep 30, 2025
When a Continuance Extends Rule 59.1: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Continuance Motions and Orders to Appear in the Appellate Record Introduction In Teresa Williams and Barney’s Childcare and...
No Preservation Bar to “Failure to Charge an Offense” in De Novo Municipal Appeals; Rule 13.2 Supplants Pre‑Rules Ordinance‑Averment Requirements

No Preservation Bar to “Failure to Charge an Offense” in De Novo Municipal Appeals; Rule 13.2 Supplants Pre‑Rules Ordinance‑Averment Requirements

Date: Sep 30, 2025
No Preservation Bar to “Failure to Charge an Offense” in De Novo Municipal Appeals; Rule 13.2 Supplants Pre‑Rules Ordinance‑Averment Requirements Case: Ex parte John Sandifer; Ex parte Curtis Tanner;...
Breach-of-Trust, Not Double Counting: The Eleventh Circuit affirms consecutive, within-Guidelines revocation sentences despite an upward variance on the new offense (United States v. Foley)

Breach-of-Trust, Not Double Counting: The Eleventh Circuit affirms consecutive, within-Guidelines revocation sentences despite an upward variance on the new offense (United States v. Foley)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Breach-of-Trust, Not Double Counting: The Eleventh Circuit affirms consecutive, within-Guidelines revocation sentences despite an upward variance on the new offense Introduction In United States v....
No Interlocutory Appeal of Qualified Immunity Denials When Genuine Fact Disputes Persist: Cornelius v. Luna (2d Cir. 2025)

No Interlocutory Appeal of Qualified Immunity Denials When Genuine Fact Disputes Persist: Cornelius v. Luna (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
No Interlocutory Appeal of Qualified Immunity Denials When Genuine Fact Disputes Persist: Cornelius v. Luna (2d Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Summary Order,...
Posthumous Vacatur of 2005 Registration Suspensions: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies that Attorney Registration Sanctions Do Not Survive a Lawyer’s Death

Posthumous Vacatur of 2005 Registration Suspensions: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies that Attorney Registration Sanctions Do Not Survive a Lawyer’s Death

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Posthumous Vacatur of 2005 Registration Suspensions: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies that Attorney Registration Sanctions Do Not Survive a Lawyer’s Death Introduction In an Administrative Actions entry...
Harmless Error Permits Reliance on a Dismissed Co‑Defendant’s Expert Disclosure: Seventh Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment Where Opponent Had Notice and Opportunity to Respond

Harmless Error Permits Reliance on a Dismissed Co‑Defendant’s Expert Disclosure: Seventh Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment Where Opponent Had Notice and Opportunity to Respond

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Harmless Error Permits Reliance on a Dismissed Co‑Defendant’s Expert Disclosure Seventh Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment Where Opponent Had Notice and Opportunity to Respond Introduction In a...
Nebraska Failure‑to‑Warn Law Clarified: Learned Intermediary Extends to Proximate Cause and Supports Merging Negligence and Strict Liability Claims

Nebraska Failure‑to‑Warn Law Clarified: Learned Intermediary Extends to Proximate Cause and Supports Merging Negligence and Strict Liability Claims

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Nebraska Failure‑to‑Warn Law Clarified: Learned Intermediary Extends to Proximate Cause and Supports Merging Negligence and Strict Liability Claims Introduction In Jeffrey Thelen v. Somatics, LLC,...
Lying About Indictment Status on Form 4473 Is “Material” Under § 922(a)(6) Where § 922(n) Is Facially Valid: Commentary on United States v. Reilly (10th Cir. 2025)

Lying About Indictment Status on Form 4473 Is “Material” Under § 922(a)(6) Where § 922(n) Is Facially Valid: Commentary on United States v. Reilly (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Lying About Indictment Status on Form 4473 Is “Material” Under § 922(a)(6) Where § 922(n) Is Facially Valid: Commentary on United States v. Reilly (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v....
Sixth Circuit Applies Muldrow to Title VII Religion Claims, Abrogates “Independent Harm” Rule, and Treats Coercive Sincerity Interviews as Potential Retaliation

Sixth Circuit Applies Muldrow to Title VII Religion Claims, Abrogates “Independent Harm” Rule, and Treats Coercive Sincerity Interviews as Potential Retaliation

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Sixth Circuit Applies Muldrow to Title VII Religion Claims, Abrogates “Independent Harm” Rule, and Treats Coercive Sincerity Interviews as Potential Retaliation Introduction In Jeffrey Bilyeu v....
EEZs Count as “High Seas,” MDLEA’s Stateless-Vessel Rule Stands, and No U.S. Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms in United States v. Juan De Leon Berroa

EEZs Count as “High Seas,” MDLEA’s Stateless-Vessel Rule Stands, and No U.S. Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms in United States v. Juan De Leon Berroa

Date: Sep 30, 2025
EEZs Count as “High Seas,” MDLEA’s Stateless-Vessel Rule Stands, and No U.S. Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms in United States v. Juan De Leon Berroa Introduction In United States v....
Post‑Abitron, Narrowing an Injunction Does Not Strip Prevailing‑Party Status or Preclude Exceptional‑Case Fees Under § 1117(a)

Post‑Abitron, Narrowing an Injunction Does Not Strip Prevailing‑Party Status or Preclude Exceptional‑Case Fees Under § 1117(a)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Post‑Abitron, Narrowing an Injunction Does Not Strip Prevailing‑Party Status or Preclude Exceptional‑Case Fees Under § 1117(a) Introduction In this unpublished per curiam decision, the Eleventh...
No Constructive Amendment Where §1344 Indictment Language Subsumes Both Prongs; Second Circuit Reaffirms Deference to “Intended Loss” Commentary and Jointly Undertaken Activity at Sentencing (United States v. Rahmankulov)

No Constructive Amendment Where §1344 Indictment Language Subsumes Both Prongs; Second Circuit Reaffirms Deference to “Intended Loss” Commentary and Jointly Undertaken Activity at Sentencing (United States v. Rahmankulov)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
No Constructive Amendment Where §1344 Indictment Language Subsumes Both Prongs; Second Circuit Reaffirms Deference to “Intended Loss” Commentary and Jointly Undertaken Activity at Sentencing Case:...
“Move Over” Means Move Over: Second Circuit (Nonprecedential) Clarification That N.Y. VTL § 1144-a(b) Mandates a Lane Change (When Safe), Supporting Reasonable Suspicion for a Traffic Stop

“Move Over” Means Move Over: Second Circuit (Nonprecedential) Clarification That N.Y. VTL § 1144-a(b) Mandates a Lane Change (When Safe), Supporting Reasonable Suspicion for a Traffic Stop

Date: Sep 30, 2025
“Move Over” Means Move Over: Second Circuit (Nonprecedential) Clarification That N.Y. VTL § 1144-a(b) Mandates a Lane Change (When Safe), Supporting Reasonable Suspicion for a Traffic Stop...
Reaffirming Deference to Sentencing Courts: Above-Guidelines Variance Upheld for Aggravated NFA Possession Involving Discharge and Protective-Order Violations

Reaffirming Deference to Sentencing Courts: Above-Guidelines Variance Upheld for Aggravated NFA Possession Involving Discharge and Protective-Order Violations

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Reaffirming Deference to Sentencing Courts: Above-Guidelines Variance Upheld for Aggravated NFA Possession Involving Discharge and Protective-Order Violations Introduction In United States v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert