Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

“Current Asylum Status” as a Condition Precedent to Adjustment of Status:  An In-Depth Commentary on Wassily & Velasquez Arreaga v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

“Current Asylum Status” as a Condition Precedent to Adjustment of Status: An In-Depth Commentary on Wassily & Velasquez Arreaga v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Current Asylum Status” as a Condition Precedent to Adjustment of Status A Comprehensive Commentary on Wassily v. Bondi; Velasquez Arreaga v. Bondi, 2d Cir., 7 Aug 2025 Introduction On 7 August 2025...
“Mouse-Clicks, Not Private Facts” – Third Circuit Declares Non-Personal Session-Replay Tracking Insufficient for Article III Standing

“Mouse-Clicks, Not Private Facts” – Third Circuit Declares Non-Personal Session-Replay Tracking Insufficient for Article III Standing

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Mouse-Clicks, Not Private Facts” – Third Circuit Declares Non-Personal Session-Replay Tracking Insufficient for Article III Standing 1. Introduction In Amber Cook v. GameStop Inc., the United States...
Affirming the Threshold for Access-to-Courts Injury and Other Prisoner-Civil-Rights Limits: A Commentary on Jones v. Harry (3d Cir. 2025)

Affirming the Threshold for Access-to-Courts Injury and Other Prisoner-Civil-Rights Limits: A Commentary on Jones v. Harry (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Affirming the Threshold for Access-to-Courts Injury and Other Prisoner-Civil-Rights Limits: A Commentary on Jones v. Harry (3d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Background. In James Jones v. Harry, an...
Collateral-Order Review of “Favorable Termination” in Malicious-Prosecution Immunity Appeals: Commentary on Marcus Boone v. City of Elizabeth

Collateral-Order Review of “Favorable Termination” in Malicious-Prosecution Immunity Appeals: Commentary on Marcus Boone v. City of Elizabeth

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Collateral-Order Review of “Favorable Termination” in Malicious-Prosecution Immunity Appeals Commentary on Marcus Boone v. City of Elizabeth, 69 F.4th ___ (3d Cir. 2025) I. Introduction The Third...
Boone v. City of Elizabeth: Limiting Interlocutory Appeals and Re-defining “Favorable Termination” after Thompson v. Clark

Boone v. City of Elizabeth: Limiting Interlocutory Appeals and Re-defining “Favorable Termination” after Thompson v. Clark

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Boone v. City of Elizabeth: Limiting Interlocutory Appeals and Re-defining “Favorable Termination” after Thompson v. Clark 1. Introduction In Marcus Boone v. City of Elizabeth, the United States...
“Retreating-Armed-Suspect” Qualified-Immunity Rule – A Commentary on Carico v. Bristow (5th Cir. 2025)

“Retreating-Armed-Suspect” Qualified-Immunity Rule – A Commentary on Carico v. Bristow (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Retreating-Armed-Suspect” Qualified-Immunity Rule Commentary on Carico v. Bristow, No. 24-40239 (5th Cir. Aug. 7, 2025) 1. Introduction Carico v. Bristow addresses an increasingly common policing...
Ferrara v. Swonke – Fifth Circuit Affirms Preclusion of Re-Filed § 1983 Claims and Clarifies Threshold for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions

Ferrara v. Swonke – Fifth Circuit Affirms Preclusion of Re-Filed § 1983 Claims and Clarifies Threshold for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Ferrara v. Swonke – Fifth Circuit Affirms Preclusion of Re-Filed § 1983 Claims and Clarifies Threshold for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Forfeiture of Untimely Statute-of-Limitations Arguments and Futility of Amendment: A Commentary on Kode v. Pargin (5th Cir. 2025)

Forfeiture of Untimely Statute-of-Limitations Arguments and Futility of Amendment: A Commentary on Kode v. Pargin (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Forfeiture of Untimely Statute-of-Limitations Arguments and Futility of Amendment: A Structured Commentary on Kode v. Pargin, No. 24-50759 (5th Cir. Aug. 7 2025) 1. Introduction The Fifth Circuit’s...
“Minutes Rule Trumps Judicial Estoppel”: A Commentary on Retro Metro, LLC v. City of Jackson

“Minutes Rule Trumps Judicial Estoppel”: A Commentary on Retro Metro, LLC v. City of Jackson

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Minutes Rule Trumps Judicial Estoppel”: A Comprehensive Commentary on the Fifth Circuit’s Decision in Retro Metro, LLC v. City of Jackson 1. Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the...
Residual Pollution Is Not a Continuing Violation: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms “Hamker Rule” in Save the Cutoff v. Iron River

Residual Pollution Is Not a Continuing Violation: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms “Hamker Rule” in Save the Cutoff v. Iron River

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Residual Pollution Is Not a Continuing Violation: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms “Hamker Rule” in Save the Cutoff v. Iron River Introduction On 7 August 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
The Richburg Clarification: Fifth Circuit Tightens the Pre-Judgment Standard for Showing Prejudice in Plea-Related Ineffective-Assistance Claims

The Richburg Clarification: Fifth Circuit Tightens the Pre-Judgment Standard for Showing Prejudice in Plea-Related Ineffective-Assistance Claims

Date: Aug 13, 2025
The Richburg Clarification: Fifth Circuit Tightens the Pre-Judgment Standard for Showing Prejudice in Plea-Related Ineffective-Assistance Claims Introduction In United States v. Richburg, No....
Clarifying “Dangerous and Unusual”: Sixth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of the Federal Machine-Gun Ban After Bruen

Clarifying “Dangerous and Unusual”: Sixth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of the Federal Machine-Gun Ban After Bruen

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Clarifying “Dangerous and Unusual”: Sixth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of the Federal Machine-Gun Ban After Bruen 1. Introduction Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit | Caption:...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: No Heightened Pleading Standard for Breach-of-Contract Claims under Rule 8(a)

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: No Heightened Pleading Standard for Breach-of-Contract Claims under Rule 8(a)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: No Heightened Pleading Standard for Breach-of-Contract Claims under Rule 8(a) Introduction In Caterpillar Financial Services Corp. v. Venequip Machinery Sales Corp., No....
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling:  A Deep Dive into United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling: A Deep Dive into United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling: A Deep Dive into United States v. Mark Gyetvay 1. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s published opinion in United States v. Mark Gyetvay,...
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific §3292 Tolling Applications: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific §3292 Tolling Applications: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling Applications: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Gyetvay Introduction On 7 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Fiddler v. Bondi: Clarifying the “Symbiotic” Link Between Specific-Intent and Proscribed-Purpose in CAT Claims

Fiddler v. Bondi: Clarifying the “Symbiotic” Link Between Specific-Intent and Proscribed-Purpose in CAT Claims

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Fiddler v. Bondi: Clarifying the “Symbiotic” Link Between Specific-Intent and Proscribed-Purpose in CAT Claims Introduction In David Japheth Fiddler v. Pamela J. Bondi (7th Cir. Aug. 7, 2025, No....
Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Intent-to-Harm” Standard for Bystander Deaths in Emergency Police Pursuits – Commentary on Flynn v. Indianapolis (2025)

Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Intent-to-Harm” Standard for Bystander Deaths in Emergency Police Pursuits – Commentary on Flynn v. Indianapolis (2025)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies “Intent-to-Harm” Standard for Bystander Deaths in Emergency Police Pursuits – Commentary on Gayl Flynn v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis & Marion County (2025) 1....
United States v. Farias: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Translated Transcripts Are Substantive Evidence

United States v. Farias: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Translated Transcripts Are Substantive Evidence

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Farias: Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Translated Transcripts Are Substantive Evidence 1. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in United States v. Jose Farias (No. 24-2725,...
Piecemeal Action ≠ Reasonable Action: The Fourth Circuit’s Expansion of “Deliberate Indifference” under Title IX in Sage Blair v. Appomattox County School Board

Piecemeal Action ≠ Reasonable Action: The Fourth Circuit’s Expansion of “Deliberate Indifference” under Title IX in Sage Blair v. Appomattox County School Board

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Piecemeal Action ≠ Reasonable Action: The Fourth Circuit’s Expansion of “Deliberate Indifference” under Title IX in Sage Blair v. Appomattox County School Board Introduction The United States Court...
United States v. Terry: Post-Bruen Reaffirmation of § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality and Clarification of Sentencing-Explanation Duties

United States v. Terry: Post-Bruen Reaffirmation of § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality and Clarification of Sentencing-Explanation Duties

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Terry: Post-Bruen Reaffirmation of § 922(g)(1) Constitutionality and Clarification of Sentencing-Explanation Duties 1. Introduction United States v. Charod Terron Terry, an...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert