Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Trial Courts’ Discretion to Amend Penalty-Phase Instructions Mid-Deliberation: Commentary on Bobby Anderson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)

Affirmation of Trial Courts’ Discretion to Amend Penalty-Phase Instructions Mid-Deliberation: Commentary on Bobby Anderson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Affirmation of Trial Courts’ Discretion to Amend Penalty-Phase Instructions Mid-Deliberation: Commentary on Bobby Anderson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. 2025) Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Blaker v. Kroger – Reaffirming the Independence of Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Adjudications from Social-Security Disability Findings

Blaker v. Kroger – Reaffirming the Independence of Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Adjudications from Social-Security Disability Findings

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Blaker v. Kroger – Reaffirming the Independence of Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Adjudications from Social-Security Disability Findings Introduction In Robert Blaker, Jr. v. The Kroger Company, the...
Affirmative Approval Equals Waiver: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-affirms that Explicit Agreement to Jury Instructions Waives Double-Jeopardy and Jury-Unanimity Claims

Affirmative Approval Equals Waiver: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-affirms that Explicit Agreement to Jury Instructions Waives Double-Jeopardy and Jury-Unanimity Claims

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Affirmative Approval Equals Waiver: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-affirms that Explicit Agreement to Jury Instructions Waives Double-Jeopardy and Jury-Unanimity Claims Introduction Michael Dodson, the...
Extended-Block Visitation and IDEA “Comparable Services” Under Tropea: First Department Affirms Out‑of‑State Relocation Without Requiring Economic Necessity (Matter of Jasmine M. v. Albert M., 2025)

Extended-Block Visitation and IDEA “Comparable Services” Under Tropea: First Department Affirms Out‑of‑State Relocation Without Requiring Economic Necessity (Matter of Jasmine M. v. Albert M., 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Extended-Block Visitation and IDEA “Comparable Services” Under Tropea: First Department Affirms Out‑of‑State Relocation Without Requiring Economic Necessity Introduction This commentary examines the...
“Disposal-Likelihood” & Fair-Market Valuation: The Ooten Clarification on Directed-Verdict Standards in Kentucky Theft and Criminal Mischief Cases

“Disposal-Likelihood” & Fair-Market Valuation: The Ooten Clarification on Directed-Verdict Standards in Kentucky Theft and Criminal Mischief Cases

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Disposal-Likelihood” & Fair-Market Valuation: Ooten v. Commonwealth Clarifies Kentucky’s Directed-Verdict Thresholds in Theft and Criminal Mischief Cases 1. Introduction In Jesse Ooten v....
Restitution and Candor as Absolute Conditions for Bar Reinstatement – A Commentary on In Re: Travis Olen Myles, Jr.

Restitution and Candor as Absolute Conditions for Bar Reinstatement – A Commentary on In Re: Travis Olen Myles, Jr.

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Restitution and Candor as Absolute Conditions for Bar Reinstatement – Supreme Court of Kentucky Defines the Outer Limits in In Re: Travis Olen Myles, Jr. 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
No Advantage Through Threats: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-Affirms that Subjective Belief Cannot Excuse Violations of SCR 3.130(3.4)(f) and 8.2(a)

No Advantage Through Threats: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-Affirms that Subjective Belief Cannot Excuse Violations of SCR 3.130(3.4)(f) and 8.2(a)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
No Advantage Through Threats: Kentucky Supreme Court Re-Affirms that Subjective Belief Cannot Excuse Violations of SCR 3.130(3.4)(f) and 8.2(a) 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of Kentucky’s opinion...
“When the Defendant Tells His Own Story” – Kentucky Clarifies the Scope of the
            “Inextricably Intertwined” Exception to KRE 404(b)

“When the Defendant Tells His Own Story” – Kentucky Clarifies the Scope of the “Inextricably Intertwined” Exception to KRE 404(b)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“When the Defendant Tells His Own Story” – Kentucky Clarifies the Scope of the “Inextricably Intertwined” Exception to KRE 404(b) Introduction In Damon R. Cruse v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Supreme...
Granting Expert Funding Yet Denying a Continuance: The New Prohibition in Simpson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Granting Expert Funding Yet Denying a Continuance: The New Prohibition in Simpson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Granting Expert Funding Yet Denying a Continuance: The New Prohibition in Simpson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Introduction In Ronald Simpson v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Supreme Court of Kentucky,...
Cuthbertson v. Commonwealth: Clarifying “Forcible Compulsion” and the Limits of Reading Surplusage in Indictments

Cuthbertson v. Commonwealth: Clarifying “Forcible Compulsion” and the Limits of Reading Surplusage in Indictments

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Cuthbertson v. Commonwealth: Clarifying “Forcible Compulsion” and the Limits of Reading Surplusage in Indictments Introduction This commentary examines the Kentucky Supreme Court’s unpublished...
“Physically Impossible Threats” and the Objective Prong of Protection-of-Another – A Commentary on Jones v. Commonwealth (Ky. 2025)

“Physically Impossible Threats” and the Objective Prong of Protection-of-Another – A Commentary on Jones v. Commonwealth (Ky. 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Physically Impossible Threats” and the Objective Prong of Protection-of-Another – A Commentary on Jones v. Commonwealth (Ky. 2025) 1. Introduction In Dazzamon R. Jones v. Commonwealth of Kentucky,...
“Agreed-Order Waiver” and the Boundaries of KRE 404(b): A Commentary on Robert Geary v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

“Agreed-Order Waiver” and the Boundaries of KRE 404(b): A Commentary on Robert Geary v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Agreed-Order Waiver” and the Boundaries of KRE 404(b): A Commentary on Robert Geary v. Commonwealth of Kentucky 1. Introduction In Robert Geary v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, the Supreme Court of...
Textual Primacy & Limited Scrivener’s-Error Doctrine in Kentucky Administrative Law – Commentary on Professional Home Health Care v. Commonwealth (Ky. 2025)

Textual Primacy & Limited Scrivener’s-Error Doctrine in Kentucky Administrative Law – Commentary on Professional Home Health Care v. Commonwealth (Ky. 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Textual Primacy & the Narrow Reach of the Scrivener’s-Error Doctrine: Commentary on Professional Home Health Care v. Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Health & Family Services, Supreme Court of...
“Qualified Official Immunity Over Special-Relationship Duties” – A Commentary on Paula M. Haney v. City of Paintsville (Ky. 2025)

“Qualified Official Immunity Over Special-Relationship Duties” – A Commentary on Paula M. Haney v. City of Paintsville (Ky. 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Qualified Official Immunity Over Special-Relationship Duties: The Kentucky Supreme Court’s Comprehensive Immunity Road-Map in Haney v. City of Paintsville (2025) 1. Introduction On 14 August 2025 the...

The “Ross–Haydon Distinction” Reaffirmed:  Sovereign Immunity Bars Refunds of Funds
Due to the Commonwealth but Not of Money Never Owed

The “Ross–Haydon Distinction” Reaffirmed: Sovereign Immunity Bars Refunds of Funds Due to the Commonwealth but Not of Money Never Owed

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The “Ross–Haydon Distinction” Reaffirmed: Kentucky’s High Court Limits Sovereign Immunity to State Funds But Allows Restitution of Money Never Actually Owed 1. Introduction On 14 August 2025 the...
“Equal Authority over Pedestrian and Motorist Stops”: Commentary on Jon Buechele v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. 2025)

“Equal Authority over Pedestrian and Motorist Stops”: Commentary on Jon Buechele v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Ky. 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Equal Authority over Pedestrian and Motorist Stops” A Comprehensive Commentary on Jon Buechele v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (Supreme Court of Kentucky, 2025) 1. Introduction In Jon Buechele v....
Prevailing “In Whole” Without Judicial Imprimatur: Third Department Adopts a Text‑Driven Catalyst Rule Under New York’s EAJA and Overrules Clarke v. Annucci

Prevailing “In Whole” Without Judicial Imprimatur: Third Department Adopts a Text‑Driven Catalyst Rule Under New York’s EAJA and Overrules Clarke v. Annucci

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Prevailing “In Whole” Without Judicial Imprimatur: Third Department Adopts a Text‑Driven Catalyst Rule Under New York’s EAJA and Overrules Clarke v. Annucci Case: Matter of Markey v. Tietz, 2025 NY...
Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief

Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Approval-as-Injury: New York Recognizes Organizational Standing to Preemptively Challenge Certified Voting Machines and Permits Recasting of Article 78 Relief Introduction In Matter of Common Cause...
Supreme Court Clarifies that Unjust-Enrichment Claims Cannot Circumvent Mississippi’s Minutes Rule

Supreme Court Clarifies that Unjust-Enrichment Claims Cannot Circumvent Mississippi’s Minutes Rule

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Supreme Court Clarifies that Unjust-Enrichment Claims Cannot Circumvent Mississippi’s Minutes Rule Introduction In The Mississippi State Port Authority at Gulfport v. Yilport Holding A.S., No....
The Three-Day Filing Rule Is Jurisdictional: First Department Vacates Neglect Finding and Declares Prolonged Removal Unlawful in Matter of Kaius A. v. Abigail H.

The Three-Day Filing Rule Is Jurisdictional: First Department Vacates Neglect Finding and Declares Prolonged Removal Unlawful in Matter of Kaius A. v. Abigail H.

Date: Aug 15, 2025
The Three-Day Filing Rule Is Jurisdictional: First Department Vacates Neglect Finding and Declares Prolonged Removal Unlawful in Matter of Kaius A. v. Abigail H. Introduction This commentary examines...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert