Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that “Knee-on-Neck” Force on Restrained, Non-Resisting Suspects Is Clearly Established Excessive Force

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that “Knee-on-Neck” Force on Restrained, Non-Resisting Suspects Is Clearly Established Excessive Force

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that “Knee-on-Neck” Force on Restrained, Non-Resisting Suspects Is Clearly Established Excessive Force Introduction Ray Shepard v. Anthony Paul (No. 23-13611, 11th Cir. 25...
The “Invited-Error Bar” and Intrinsic-Evidence Doctrine Reinforced: 
            A Commentary on United States v. Hasan Muhammed (11th Cir. 2025)

The “Invited-Error Bar” and Intrinsic-Evidence Doctrine Reinforced: A Commentary on United States v. Hasan Muhammed (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The “Invited-Error Bar” and Intrinsic-Evidence Doctrine Reinforced: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Hasan Muhammed (11th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In United States v. Hasan Muhammed,...
Crosbie v. Asante: Remand-Scope Orders Are Not Immediately Appealable under ORS 19.205(3)

Crosbie v. Asante: Remand-Scope Orders Are Not Immediately Appealable under ORS 19.205(3)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Crosbie v. Asante: Remand-Scope Orders Are Not Immediately Appealable under ORS 19.205(3) 1. Introduction In Crosbie v. Asante, 373 Or 773 (2025), the Oregon Supreme Court confronted a recurring...
The Burton Rule: Defense Counsel’s Latitude to Emphasize the Absence of Testimony in Closing Argument

The Burton Rule: Defense Counsel’s Latitude to Emphasize the Absence of Testimony in Closing Argument

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The Burton Rule: Defense Counsel’s Latitude to Emphasize the Absence of Testimony in Closing Argument Introduction In State v. Burton, 373 Or 750 (2025), the Oregon Supreme Court clarified the...
State v. Worsham: Plain-Error Limits on Unrequested Supplemental Jury Instructions

State v. Worsham: Plain-Error Limits on Unrequested Supplemental Jury Instructions

Date: Jun 30, 2025
State v. Worsham (373 Or 739, 2025): Plain-Error Limits on Unrequested Supplemental Jury Instructions Introduction State v. Worsham presented the Supreme Court of Oregon with a deceptively narrow...
Dixon v. Brown – The Second Circuit’s Firm Line on “Lip-Service” Acceptance of Plaintiff’s Facts in Qualified-Immunity Appeals

Dixon v. Brown – The Second Circuit’s Firm Line on “Lip-Service” Acceptance of Plaintiff’s Facts in Qualified-Immunity Appeals

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Dixon v. Brown – The Second Circuit’s Firm Line on “Lip-Service” Acceptance of Plaintiff’s Facts in Qualified-Immunity Appeals 1. Introduction In Dixon v. Brown, the United States Court of Appeals...
Second Circuit Clarifies That Use of an Innocent Intermediary Cannot, by Itself, Establish Agreement for a RICO Conspiracy – Commentary on Moss v. First Premier Bank (2025)

Second Circuit Clarifies That Use of an Innocent Intermediary Cannot, by Itself, Establish Agreement for a RICO Conspiracy – Commentary on Moss v. First Premier Bank (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Second Circuit Clarifies That Use of an Innocent Intermediary Cannot, by Itself, Establish Agreement for a RICO Conspiracy – Moss v. First Premier Bank 1. Introduction Moss v. First Premier Bank,...
“Cover-Up” Is Not a “New Injury”: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies
Statute-of-Limitations, Standing, and Tax-Injunction Principles in
Brian K. Rice v. Chief Examiner of the Alabama Department of Examiners of Public Accounts

“Cover-Up” Is Not a “New Injury”: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Statute-of-Limitations, Standing, and Tax-Injunction Principles in Brian K. Rice v. Chief Examiner of the Alabama Department of Examiners of Public Accounts

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Cover-Up” Is Not a “New Injury”: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Statute-of-Limitations, Standing, and Tax-Injunction Principles Introduction Brian Rice, a Birmingham property owner, became convinced...
“Below the Lowest Point”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Robust Re-affirmation of the Justice Oaks Settlement Standard and the Forfeiture Doctrine in Don Smith v. Sonya Salkin Slott

“Below the Lowest Point”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Robust Re-affirmation of the Justice Oaks Settlement Standard and the Forfeiture Doctrine in Don Smith v. Sonya Salkin Slott

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Below the Lowest Point”: The Eleventh Circuit’s Robust Re-affirmation of the Justice Oaks Settlement Standard and the Forfeiture Doctrine in Don Smith v. Sonya Salkin Slott Introduction The decision...

        Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms a “Rigorous Identity” Comparator Standard 
        for Class-of-One Equal Protection Claims in Complex Regulatory Contexts

Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms a “Rigorous Identity” Comparator Standard for Class-of-One Equal Protection Claims in Complex Regulatory Contexts

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Re-Affirms a “Rigorous Identity” Comparator Standard for Class-of-One Equal Protection Claims in Complex Regulatory Contexts Introduction In Hybrid Pharma LLC v. Matthew Knispel,...
United States v. Mirasol: Re-affirming that Correct Guideline Calculation Alone Satisfies the § 3553(a)(6) “Sentence-Disparity” Inquiry

United States v. Mirasol: Re-affirming that Correct Guideline Calculation Alone Satisfies the § 3553(a)(6) “Sentence-Disparity” Inquiry

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Mirasol: Re-affirming that Correct Guideline Calculation Alone Satisfies the § 3553(a)(6) “Sentence-Disparity” Inquiry Introduction In United States v. Arvin Joseph Mirasol, No....
“Knowledge & Intent Trump Stipulation” – The Eleventh Circuit’s Rule-404(b) Clarification in United States v. Whitfield

“Knowledge & Intent Trump Stipulation” – The Eleventh Circuit’s Rule-404(b) Clarification in United States v. Whitfield

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Knowledge & Intent Trump Stipulation” – The Eleventh Circuit’s Rule-404(b) Clarification in United States v. Whitfield Introduction On 24 June 2025, the Eleventh Circuit decided United States v....
Resentencing in the Eleventh Circuit after a Taylor-Based § 2255 Vacatur: Scope, Limits, and the “One-Claim Only” Rule

Resentencing in the Eleventh Circuit after a Taylor-Based § 2255 Vacatur: Scope, Limits, and the “One-Claim Only” Rule

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Resentencing in the Eleventh Circuit after a Taylor-Based § 2255 Vacatur: Scope, Limits, and the “One-Claim Only” Rule 1. Introduction In United States v. Michael Shane Ragland, No. 23-12278 (11th...
Second Circuit Clarifies Finality and Intervenor Access in § 1782 Discovery: In re Application of Loudmila Bourlakova (2025)

Second Circuit Clarifies Finality and Intervenor Access in § 1782 Discovery: In re Application of Loudmila Bourlakova (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Second Circuit Clarifies Finality and Intervenor Access in § 1782 Discovery: In re Application of Loudmila Bourlakova, 24-3187-cv & 25-49-cv (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction The United States Court of...
Simmons v. Ferrigno: The Second Circuit’s Persuasive Blueprint for Admitting ShotSpotter Data and Prior Ammunition Evidence in Civil-Rights Trials

Simmons v. Ferrigno: The Second Circuit’s Persuasive Blueprint for Admitting ShotSpotter Data and Prior Ammunition Evidence in Civil-Rights Trials

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Simmons v. Ferrigno: The Second Circuit’s Persuasive Blueprint for Admitting ShotSpotter Data and Prior Ammunition Evidence in Civil-Rights Trials 1. Introduction Silvon S. Simmons—a private citizen...
United States v. Santos: Second Circuit Re-Affirms Broad District-Court Discretion to Deny Compassionate Release Solely on § 3553(a) Factors

United States v. Santos: Second Circuit Re-Affirms Broad District-Court Discretion to Deny Compassionate Release Solely on § 3553(a) Factors

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Santos: Second Circuit Re-Affirms Broad District-Court Discretion to Deny Compassionate Release Solely on § 3553(a) Factors Introduction United States v. Santos, No. 22-3213-cr (2d...
Redefining “Paternity Established by Legitimation” –  The Parental-Rights Test under former INA § 321(a)(3) after Lainez v. Bondi

Redefining “Paternity Established by Legitimation” – The Parental-Rights Test under former INA § 321(a)(3) after Lainez v. Bondi

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Redefining “Paternity Established by Legitimation” – The Parental-Rights Test under former INA § 321(a)(3) after Lainez v. Bondi Introduction Case: Lainez v. Bondi, United States Court of Appeals for...

        Collective Inconsistencies & Post-Santos-Zocaria Exhaustion:
        Commentary on Abdul Ohab v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025)

Collective Inconsistencies & Post-Santos-Zocaria Exhaustion: Commentary on Abdul Ohab v. U.S. Attorney General (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Collective Inconsistencies & Post-Santos-Zocaria Exhaustion Commentary on Abdul Ohab v. U.S. Attorney General 1. Introduction In Abdul Ohab v. U.S. Attorney General, the Eleventh Circuit Court of...
“No Representation by Proxy”: The Eleventh Circuit Re-affirms Pro-Se Limits, Rule 4(i) Service, and Bivens Restraints in Akash Dixit v. Vincent Fairnot

“No Representation by Proxy”: The Eleventh Circuit Re-affirms Pro-Se Limits, Rule 4(i) Service, and Bivens Restraints in Akash Dixit v. Vincent Fairnot

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“No Representation by Proxy”: The Eleventh Circuit Re-affirms Pro-Se Limits, Rule 4(i) Service, and Bivens Restraints in Akash Dixit v. Vincent Fairnot Introduction The unpublished decision of the...
Divestiture Doctrine Meets Core Proceedings: Eleventh Circuit Holds that Pending Appeals Do Not Halt Claim-Allowance Litigation – Commentary on Alice Guan v. Ellingsworth Residential Community Association, Inc.

Divestiture Doctrine Meets Core Proceedings: Eleventh Circuit Holds that Pending Appeals Do Not Halt Claim-Allowance Litigation – Commentary on Alice Guan v. Ellingsworth Residential Community Association, Inc.

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Divestiture Doctrine Meets Core Proceedings: Eleventh Circuit Holds that Pending Appeals Do Not Halt Claim-Allowance Litigation Introduction Alice Guan, homeowner and erstwhile litigant against her...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert