Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reaffirmation-of-strict-liability-in-manufacturers& Case Commentaries

Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds “Detriment to the Community” as a Valid Parole Denial Basis and Reemphasizes No Liberty Interest in Parole: Howerton v. McCastlain, 2025 Ark. 144

Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds “Detriment to the Community” as a Valid Parole Denial Basis and Reemphasizes No Liberty Interest in Parole: Howerton v. McCastlain, 2025 Ark. 144

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Arkansas Supreme Court Upholds “Detriment to the Community” as a Valid Parole Denial Basis and Reemphasizes No Liberty Interest in Parole Commentary on Howerton v. McCastlain, Chairman, Arkansas...
Coston v. State: Pretrial Addition of Same-Offense Counts Permissible Absent Unfair Surprise; No Presumed Prejudice Without a Continuance Request

Coston v. State: Pretrial Addition of Same-Offense Counts Permissible Absent Unfair Surprise; No Presumed Prejudice Without a Continuance Request

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Pretrial Addition of Same-Offense Counts Permissible Absent Unfair Surprise; No Presumed Prejudice Without a Continuance Request Introduction In William Coston v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 143...
Non‑Precedential Guidance on Inconclusive DNA Evidence, Constructive Possession, and the § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) “In-Connection-With” Enhancement: Commentary on United States v. Fable (2d Cir. 2025)

Non‑Precedential Guidance on Inconclusive DNA Evidence, Constructive Possession, and the § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) “In-Connection-With” Enhancement: Commentary on United States v. Fable (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Non‑Precedential Guidance on Inconclusive DNA Evidence, Constructive Possession, and the § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) “In-Connection-With” Enhancement: Commentary on United States v. Fable (2d Cir. 2025)...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: “Wasted Time” and Attorney Consultation Alone Are Self‑Imposed Harms Insufficient for Article III Standing in FDCPA/FCCPA Suits

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: “Wasted Time” and Attorney Consultation Alone Are Self‑Imposed Harms Insufficient for Article III Standing in FDCPA/FCCPA Suits

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: “Wasted Time” and Attorney Consultation Alone Are Self‑Imposed Harms Insufficient for Article III Standing in FDCPA/FCCPA Suits Case: Alex El Bachiri v. Medicredit, Inc....
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms State-Schedule Approach and Georgia Aggravated Assault as “Crime of Violence” for §2K2.1 Enhancements: United States v. Morris

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms State-Schedule Approach and Georgia Aggravated Assault as “Crime of Violence” for §2K2.1 Enhancements: United States v. Morris

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms State-Schedule Approach and Georgia Aggravated Assault as “Crime of Violence” for §2K2.1 Enhancements Introduction In United States v. Devontae Jammell Morris (No....
No Obligation to Reweigh § 3553(a) in Light of Intervening Law: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Compassionate Release in United States v. Cruz

No Obligation to Reweigh § 3553(a) in Light of Intervening Law: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Compassionate Release in United States v. Cruz

Date: Oct 9, 2025
No Obligation to Reweigh § 3553(a) in Light of Intervening Law: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Denial of Compassionate Release in United States v. Cruz Introduction In an unpublished, per curiam decision,...
Keene Harmless-Error Shield Applies Even When the Alternative Sentence Is Prompted by the Government: United States v. Parks (11th Cir. 2025)

Keene Harmless-Error Shield Applies Even When the Alternative Sentence Is Prompted by the Government: United States v. Parks (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Keene Harmless-Error Shield Applies Even When the Alternative Sentence Is Prompted by the Government: United States v. Parks (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v. Santino Demarco Parks,...
Misdesignated Notices Saved by FRAP 3(c)(7), “Some Day Intentions” Do Not Confer Equitable Standing, and Neutral Single‑Family Zoning Is Not Facially Discriminatory: Commentary on Be the Bush Recovery Ministries v. Coffee County

Misdesignated Notices Saved by FRAP 3(c)(7), “Some Day Intentions” Do Not Confer Equitable Standing, and Neutral Single‑Family Zoning Is Not Facially Discriminatory: Commentary on Be the Bush Recovery Ministries v. Coffee County

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Misdesignated Notices Saved by FRAP 3(c)(7), “Some Day Intentions” Do Not Confer Equitable Standing, and Neutral Single‑Family Zoning Is Not Facially Discriminatory: Commentary on Be the Bush...
A New Interpretation on Appeal Is a Forfeited Issue: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Issue–Argument Divide in Gould v. Interface

A New Interpretation on Appeal Is a Forfeited Issue: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Issue–Argument Divide in Gould v. Interface

Date: Oct 9, 2025
A New Interpretation on Appeal Is a Forfeited Issue: The Eleventh Circuit Clarifies the Issue–Argument Divide in Gould v. Interface Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Date: October...
Reaffirming Arreguin: First Circuit Requires the BIA to Identify Corroboration Before Heavily Relying on Non‑Conviction Police Reports to Deny Adjustment of Status

Reaffirming Arreguin: First Circuit Requires the BIA to Identify Corroboration Before Heavily Relying on Non‑Conviction Police Reports to Deny Adjustment of Status

Date: Oct 9, 2025
Reaffirming Arreguin: First Circuit Requires the BIA to Identify Corroboration Before Heavily Relying on Non‑Conviction Police Reports to Deny Adjustment of Status Introduction In Maurice v. Bondi,...
Pleading-Stage Constitutional Scrutiny of Municipal Tax Classifications: Equal Protection, Vagueness, and Dormant Commerce Clause Claims May Proceed; Zoning-Notice Attack Fails — Campus Crest v. City of Tuscaloosa

Pleading-Stage Constitutional Scrutiny of Municipal Tax Classifications: Equal Protection, Vagueness, and Dormant Commerce Clause Claims May Proceed; Zoning-Notice Attack Fails — Campus Crest v. City of Tuscaloosa

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Pleading-Stage Constitutional Scrutiny of Municipal Tax Classifications: Equal Protection, Vagueness, and Dormant Commerce Clause Claims May Proceed; Zoning-Notice Attack Fails Introduction In Campus...
Mississippi Supreme Court Authorizes $50 CLE Sponsor Application Fee as a Condition of Accreditation

Mississippi Supreme Court Authorizes $50 CLE Sponsor Application Fee as a Condition of Accreditation

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Mississippi Supreme Court Authorizes $50 CLE Sponsor Application Fee as a Condition of Accreditation Introduction This commentary examines the Mississippi Supreme Court’s administrative order in In...
Mississippi Supreme Court Adopts Official Civil Subpoena Forms (Forms 6–8) and Requires Conspicuous Ten‑Day Production Hold Under Rule 45

Mississippi Supreme Court Adopts Official Civil Subpoena Forms (Forms 6–8) and Requires Conspicuous Ten‑Day Production Hold Under Rule 45

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Mississippi Supreme Court Adopts Official Civil Subpoena Forms (Forms 6–8) and Requires Conspicuous Ten‑Day Production Hold Under Rule 45 Introduction In a rulemaking order titled “In re: The Rules...
Pleading-Stage Pathways Around the UCC Statute of Frauds: Joint Counsel’s Email May Qualify as a Merchant’s Confirmation, and Pre‑Closing Control May Constitute Receipt and Acceptance

Pleading-Stage Pathways Around the UCC Statute of Frauds: Joint Counsel’s Email May Qualify as a Merchant’s Confirmation, and Pre‑Closing Control May Constitute Receipt and Acceptance

Date: Oct 8, 2025
Pleading-Stage Pathways Around the UCC Statute of Frauds: Joint Counsel’s Email May Qualify as a Merchant’s Confirmation, and Pre‑Closing Control May Constitute Receipt and Acceptance Introduction In...
No Present Conveyance, No Deed: Mississippi High Court Holds “Upon Sale or My Death Shall Be Shared” Instruments Are Testamentary, Not Inter Vivos Conveyances

No Present Conveyance, No Deed: Mississippi High Court Holds “Upon Sale or My Death Shall Be Shared” Instruments Are Testamentary, Not Inter Vivos Conveyances

Date: Oct 8, 2025
No Present Conveyance, No Deed: Mississippi High Court Holds “Upon Sale or My Death Shall Be Shared” Instruments Are Testamentary, Not Inter Vivos Conveyances Introduction This commentary analyzes...
Including Profit in an Automaker’s “Destination Charge” Is Not Deceptive Under the NJCFA, and Manufacturers Owe No Disclosure Duty for Pass-Through Fees

Including Profit in an Automaker’s “Destination Charge” Is Not Deceptive Under the NJCFA, and Manufacturers Owe No Disclosure Duty for Pass-Through Fees

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Including Profit in an Automaker’s “Destination Charge” Is Not Deceptive Under the NJCFA, and Manufacturers Owe No Disclosure Duty for Pass-Through Fees Introduction In BCR Carpentry LLC v. FCA US...
“Claim-and-Denial” Ripeness Rule for Takings Challenges to Pennsylvania’s Unclaimed Property Custody

“Claim-and-Denial” Ripeness Rule for Takings Challenges to Pennsylvania’s Unclaimed Property Custody

Date: Oct 5, 2025
“Claim-and-Denial” Ripeness Rule for Takings Challenges to Pennsylvania’s Unclaimed Property Custody Case: Brian Dillow v. Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Court: United States Court of...
Judicial Participation, Accurate Sentencing Warnings, and Time‑Limited Plea Offers Do Not Alone Render a Plea Involuntary: Commentary on Devine v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025)

Judicial Participation, Accurate Sentencing Warnings, and Time‑Limited Plea Offers Do Not Alone Render a Plea Involuntary: Commentary on Devine v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Judicial Participation, Accurate Sentencing Warnings, and Time‑Limited Plea Offers Do Not Alone Render a Plea Involuntary Introduction This commentary examines the Third Circuit’s non-precedential...
Mailing, Not Receipt, Triggers FTCA’s Six‑Month Deadline; COVID-Era Office Mail Protocols Do Not Justify Equitable Tolling

Mailing, Not Receipt, Triggers FTCA’s Six‑Month Deadline; COVID-Era Office Mail Protocols Do Not Justify Equitable Tolling

Date: Oct 5, 2025
Mailing, Not Receipt, Triggers FTCA’s Six‑Month Deadline; COVID-Era Office Mail Protocols Do Not Justify Equitable Tolling Case: Margarita Marshall v. United States Post Office, United States Postal...
United States v. Vargas: Contextual Use of Informant Recordings Does Not Implicate the Confrontation Clause; Compulsory Process Requires a Plausible Showing of Favorability

United States v. Vargas: Contextual Use of Informant Recordings Does Not Implicate the Confrontation Clause; Compulsory Process Requires a Plausible Showing of Favorability

Date: Oct 5, 2025
United States v. Vargas: Contextual Use of Informant Recordings Does Not Implicate the Confrontation Clause; Compulsory Process Requires a Plausible Showing of Favorability Introduction This...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert