Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

first-circuit-reinforces-first-amendment-protections-for-secret-audio-recording-of-police-in-public:-interpretation-of-massachusetts& Case Commentaries

Revised GIA Damages Cap Requires Independent Constitutional Analysis: Limited Reach of Condemarin

Revised GIA Damages Cap Requires Independent Constitutional Analysis: Limited Reach of Condemarin

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Revised GIA Damages Cap Requires Independent Constitutional Analysis: Limited Reach of Condemarin Introduction This commentary examines the Utah Supreme Court’s decision in University of Utah...
Establishing a Claim-of-Right Defense in Criminal Trespass: The Objective Evidence Threshold

Establishing a Claim-of-Right Defense in Criminal Trespass: The Objective Evidence Threshold

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Establishing a Claim-of-Right Defense in Criminal Trespass: The Objective Evidence Threshold Introduction In Commonwealth v. Kartozia, the Supreme Court of Virginia addressed whether a defendant...
Reinforcing the Strickland Two-Prong Test in Rule 37.1 Postconviction Proceedings: Turnbo v. Arkansas

Reinforcing the Strickland Two-Prong Test in Rule 37.1 Postconviction Proceedings: Turnbo v. Arkansas

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Reinforcing the Strickland Two-Prong Test in Rule 37.1 Postconviction Proceedings: Turnbo v. Arkansas Introduction Clarence Turnbo v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 106 addresses the scope and...
Strict Preservation of Objections to Prosecutorial Closing Arguments Established in Raymond Lovett v. State of Arkansas

Strict Preservation of Objections to Prosecutorial Closing Arguments Established in Raymond Lovett v. State of Arkansas

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Strict Preservation of Objections to Prosecutorial Closing Arguments Established in Raymond Lovett v. State of Arkansas Introduction Raymond Lovett v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 100, is a Supreme...
Reasonably Calculated Notice Meets Due Process in Tax Sales; Sovereign Immunity Bars Invalid Claims

Reasonably Calculated Notice Meets Due Process in Tax Sales; Sovereign Immunity Bars Invalid Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Reasonably Calculated Notice Meets Due Process in Tax Sales; Sovereign Immunity Bars Invalid Claims Introduction This case arises from Tommy Land’s role as Arkansas Commissioner of State Lands and...
In re C.N. et al.: Mandating Specific Factual Findings and Proper Dispositional Standards in Child Abuse and Neglect Proceedings

In re C.N. et al.: Mandating Specific Factual Findings and Proper Dispositional Standards in Child Abuse and Neglect Proceedings

Date: Jun 10, 2025
In re C.N., D.N., H.N-1, I.P. & H.N-2: Mandating Specific Factual Findings and Proper Dispositional Standards in Child Abuse & Neglect Proceedings Introduction In this appeal, the Supreme Court of...
Stipulating ‘Court May Impose’ Consecutive Sentences: Resolving Ambiguities in Oregon Plea Agreements

Stipulating ‘Court May Impose’ Consecutive Sentences: Resolving Ambiguities in Oregon Plea Agreements

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Stipulating ‘Court May Impose’ Consecutive Sentences: Resolving Ambiguities in Oregon Plea Agreements Introduction In State of Oregon v. James Clare Walsh IV (373 Or 712, June 5, 2025), the Oregon...
No Enhanced Duty for Voluntary Safety Precautions: Saunders v. Home Depot

No Enhanced Duty for Voluntary Safety Precautions: Saunders v. Home Depot

Date: Jun 10, 2025
No Enhanced Duty for Voluntary Safety Precautions: Saunders v. Home Depot Introduction In Angela Saunders v. Home Depot, Inc., 2025 WL 1234567 (6th Cir. June 5, 2025) (not recommended for...
Article III Standing Requirements in Organizational Challenges to Voter-Registration Policies under the NVRA

Article III Standing Requirements in Organizational Challenges to Voter-Registration Policies under the NVRA

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Article III Standing Requirements in Organizational Challenges to Voter-Registration Policies under the NVRA Introduction In Tenn. State Conference of the NAACP v. William Lee, 25a0148p (6th Cir....
Reinforcing Constructive Possession and Discretionary Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)

Reinforcing Constructive Possession and Discretionary Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Reinforcing Constructive Possession and Discretionary Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Introduction United States v. Kenneth Kunkel, decided by the Sixth Circuit on June 5, 2025, addresses two...
Clarifying the “Reasonable Opportunity to Observe” Standard and Mistrial Evaluation in Minor Sex-Trafficking and Child Pornography Prosecutions

Clarifying the “Reasonable Opportunity to Observe” Standard and Mistrial Evaluation in Minor Sex-Trafficking and Child Pornography Prosecutions

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarifying the “Reasonable Opportunity to Observe” Standard and Mistrial Evaluation in Minor Sex-Trafficking and Child Pornography Prosecutions Introduction United States v. Lavonte Sampson,...
Clarification of Ambiguous Sentences: The Role of Written Judgments in Federal Sentencing Post-United States v. Tracey Shaw

Clarification of Ambiguous Sentences: The Role of Written Judgments in Federal Sentencing Post-United States v. Tracey Shaw

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarification of Ambiguous Sentences: The Role of Written Judgments in Federal Sentencing Post-United States v. Tracey Shaw Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Tracey Shaw,...
Restricting Federal Habeas Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to Underlying Conviction Challenges: Excluding Post-Conviction Procedural Claims

Restricting Federal Habeas Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to Underlying Conviction Challenges: Excluding Post-Conviction Procedural Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Restricting Federal Habeas Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to Underlying Conviction Challenges: Excluding Post-Conviction Procedural Claims Introduction Williams v. Bridges, No. 25-6025 (10th Cir. June...
Categorical Exclusion of Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery from “Crime of Violence” Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

Categorical Exclusion of Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery from “Crime of Violence” Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Categorical Exclusion of Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery from “Crime of Violence” Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) Introduction This commentary examines the Seventh Circuit’s decision in United States v. Deaunta...
Permissible Inferences from Silence and Nationality Neutrality in Sentencing: United States v. Paul Williams Anti

Permissible Inferences from Silence and Nationality Neutrality in Sentencing: United States v. Paul Williams Anti

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Permissible Inferences from Silence and Nationality Neutrality in Sentencing: United States v. Paul Williams Anti Introduction United States v. Paul Williams Anti is a Seventh Circuit decision issued...
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services: The Supreme Court Abolishes the “Background-Circumstances” Hurdle for Majority-Group Plaintiffs under Title VII

Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services: The Supreme Court Abolishes the “Background-Circumstances” Hurdle for Majority-Group Plaintiffs under Title VII

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services: The Supreme Court Abolishes the “Background-Circumstances” Hurdle for Majority-Group Plaintiffs under Title VII Introduction In Ames v. Ohio Department of...
“Extraordinary Means Extraordinary”: The Supreme Court Re-cements the Rigid Threshold for Rule 60(b)(6) Motions and Rejects Any Balancing with Rule 15(a)

“Extraordinary Means Extraordinary”: The Supreme Court Re-cements the Rigid Threshold for Rule 60(b)(6) Motions and Rejects Any Balancing with Rule 15(a)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
“Extraordinary Means Extraordinary”: The Supreme Court Re-cements the Rigid Threshold for Rule 60(b)(6) Motions and Rejects Any Balancing with Rule 15(a) 1. Introduction In BLOM Bank SAL v....
“Automatic Personal Jurisdiction” under the FSIA: CC/Devas v. Antrix and the Demise of the Minimum-Contacts Overlay

“Automatic Personal Jurisdiction” under the FSIA: CC/Devas v. Antrix and the Demise of the Minimum-Contacts Overlay

Date: Jun 10, 2025
“Automatic Personal Jurisdiction” under the FSIA: CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd. & Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. Ltd. (U.S. 2025) I. Introduction The Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion in...
No Proselytization Requirement: The Denominational-Neutrality Rule Refined in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin LIRC (U.S. 2025)

No Proselytization Requirement: The Denominational-Neutrality Rule Refined in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin LIRC (U.S. 2025)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
No Proselytization Requirement: The U.S. Supreme Court Refines the Denominational-Neutrality Rule in Religious Employer Exemptions Introduction In Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor &...
When the High Court Abstains: Laboratory Corp. of America v. Davis and the Unsettled Doctrine of “Mixed-Injury” Class Certification

When the High Court Abstains: Laboratory Corp. of America v. Davis and the Unsettled Doctrine of “Mixed-Injury” Class Certification

Date: Jun 10, 2025
When the High Court Abstains: Laboratory Corp. of America v. Davis and the Unsettled Doctrine of “Mixed-Injury” Class Certification 1. Introduction On 5 June 2025 the U.S. Supreme Court issued a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert