Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

first-circuit-reinforces-first-amendment-protections-for-secret-audio-recording-of-police-in-public:-interpretation-of-massachusetts& Case Commentaries

In re F.S.: Compelled Treatment, Aggravated Circumstances, and the Written-Motion Requirement for Improvement Periods

In re F.S.: Compelled Treatment, Aggravated Circumstances, and the Written-Motion Requirement for Improvement Periods

Date: Sep 11, 2025
In re F.S.: Compelled Treatment, Aggravated Circumstances, and the Written-Motion Requirement for Improvement Periods Introduction In this memorandum decision, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West...
Second Circuit: Rule 37(b) Attorney Sanctions—Including MDL Leadership Removal and Common Benefit Restrictions—Are Not Immediately Appealable Under the Collateral Order Doctrine

Second Circuit: Rule 37(b) Attorney Sanctions—Including MDL Leadership Removal and Common Benefit Restrictions—Are Not Immediately Appealable Under the Collateral Order Doctrine

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Second Circuit: Rule 37(b) Attorney Sanctions—Including MDL Leadership Removal and Common Benefit Restrictions—Are Not Immediately Appealable Under the Collateral Order Doctrine Introduction In In...
Reaffirming That Noncompliance With DHS Services Precludes an Improvement Period and Supports Termination: In re E.Y. and G.S.

Reaffirming That Noncompliance With DHS Services Precludes an Improvement Period and Supports Termination: In re E.Y. and G.S.

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Reaffirming That Noncompliance With DHS Services Precludes an Improvement Period and Supports Termination: In re E.Y. and G.S. Introduction In In re E.Y. and G.S., No. 24-358 (W. Va. Sept. 10, 2025)...
Finality First: Second-in-Time §2255 Filings During a Pending Appeal Are “Second or Successive”; District Courts Must Consider §3553(a) When Asked to Modify Supervised-Release Conditions

Finality First: Second-in-Time §2255 Filings During a Pending Appeal Are “Second or Successive”; District Courts Must Consider §3553(a) When Asked to Modify Supervised-Release Conditions

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Finality First: Second-in-Time §2255 Filings During a Pending Appeal Are “Second or Successive”; District Courts Must Consider §3553(a) When Asked to Modify Supervised-Release Conditions Introduction...
Child Disclosures and Behavioral Corroboration Can Meet the Clear-and-Convincing Standard Without Physical Evidence; Rule 19(b) Permits Reopened Adjudications on Amended Allegations

Child Disclosures and Behavioral Corroboration Can Meet the Clear-and-Convincing Standard Without Physical Evidence; Rule 19(b) Permits Reopened Adjudications on Amended Allegations

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Child Disclosures and Behavioral Corroboration Can Meet the Clear-and-Convincing Standard Without Physical Evidence; Rule 19(b) Permits Reopened Adjudications on Amended Allegations Introduction In...
New York Claim Preclusion Reaffirmed: “Convenient Trial Unit” Is Non‑Dispositive; Different Contracts Do Not Avoid Res Judicata When Tied to the Same Transactional Nucleus

New York Claim Preclusion Reaffirmed: “Convenient Trial Unit” Is Non‑Dispositive; Different Contracts Do Not Avoid Res Judicata When Tied to the Same Transactional Nucleus

Date: Sep 11, 2025
New York Claim Preclusion Reaffirmed: “Convenient Trial Unit” Is Non‑Dispositive; Different Contracts Do Not Avoid Res Judicata When Tied to the Same Transactional Nucleus Introduction This...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Appeal-Waiver Cap Tied to a Fixed Offense Level: A Sentence Below the Level-35 Top End Is Unappealable Even If the Court Calculates a Higher Offense Level

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Appeal-Waiver Cap Tied to a Fixed Offense Level: A Sentence Below the Level-35 Top End Is Unappealable Even If the Court Calculates a Higher Offense Level

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Appeal-Waiver Cap Tied to a Fixed Offense Level: A Sentence Below the Level-35 Top End Is Unappealable Even If the Court Calculates a Higher Offense Level Introduction In...
Proof of Contractual Default Notices Must Come From the Mailer or Contemporaneous Records: Wilmington Trust, N.A. v. Singh

Proof of Contractual Default Notices Must Come From the Mailer or Contemporaneous Records: Wilmington Trust, N.A. v. Singh

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Proof of Contractual Default Notices Must Come From the Mailer or Contemporaneous Records: Wilmington Trust, N.A. v. Singh Introduction In Wilmington Trust, N.A. v. Singh, 2025 NY Slip Op 04938 (App...
Pittman v. State (Fla. 2025): Reaffirming Phillips—Hall Is Not Retroactive and Intellectual-Disability Claims Remain Subject to Strict Time and Successiveness Bars

Pittman v. State (Fla. 2025): Reaffirming Phillips—Hall Is Not Retroactive and Intellectual-Disability Claims Remain Subject to Strict Time and Successiveness Bars

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Pittman v. State (Fla. 2025): Reaffirming Phillips—Hall Is Not Retroactive and Intellectual-Disability Claims Remain Subject to Strict Time and Successiveness Bars Introduction In David Joseph...
Principles-Based Sensitive-Places Doctrine: Third Circuit Upholds Most Location Bans, Invalidates Insurance Mandate and Private-Property Default in Koons v. Attorney General of New Jersey

Principles-Based Sensitive-Places Doctrine: Third Circuit Upholds Most Location Bans, Invalidates Insurance Mandate and Private-Property Default in Koons v. Attorney General of New Jersey

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Principles-Based Sensitive-Places Doctrine: Third Circuit Upholds Most Location Bans, Invalidates Insurance Mandate and Private-Property Default in Koons v. Attorney General of New Jersey...
Title VII Retaliation After a Sexual-Assault Report: Sixth Circuit Requires Proof of a Reasonable, Good‑Faith Belief in Nonconsent; Intrinsic Consent Evidence Not Barred by Rule 412

Title VII Retaliation After a Sexual-Assault Report: Sixth Circuit Requires Proof of a Reasonable, Good‑Faith Belief in Nonconsent; Intrinsic Consent Evidence Not Barred by Rule 412

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Title VII Retaliation After a Sexual-Assault Report: Sixth Circuit Requires Proof of a Reasonable, Good‑Faith Belief in Nonconsent; Intrinsic Consent Evidence Not Barred by Rule 412 Case: Samantha...
Nonjurisdictional Filing Defects and Estate Ownership of Product‑Line Successor Claims: Third Circuit’s Guidance in In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels

Nonjurisdictional Filing Defects and Estate Ownership of Product‑Line Successor Claims: Third Circuit’s Guidance in In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Nonjurisdictional Filing Defects and Estate Ownership of Product‑Line Successor Claims: Third Circuit’s Guidance in In re Whittaker Clark & Daniels Introduction The Third Circuit’s precedential...
No Fifth Amendment Retaliation at Sentencing Without a Demonstrable Nexus: United States v. Johnathan Crawford (4th Cir. 2025)

No Fifth Amendment Retaliation at Sentencing Without a Demonstrable Nexus: United States v. Johnathan Crawford (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
No Fifth Amendment Retaliation at Sentencing Without a Demonstrable Nexus: United States v. Johnathan Crawford (4th Cir. 2025) Introduction In this unpublished but instructive decision, the Fourth...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Third-Party Consent at Family Businesses and Reaffirms Broad Discretion in Public Contracting Under “Best-Interest” RFPs

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Third-Party Consent at Family Businesses and Reaffirms Broad Discretion in Public Contracting Under “Best-Interest” RFPs

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Third-Party Consent at Family Businesses and Reaffirms Broad Discretion in Public Contracting Under “Best-Interest” RFPs Introduction In Rockwood Auto Parts, Inc.; Rockwood...
Non-Exhaustive Duties Clauses Foreclose Extra-Compensation and Quasi-Contract Claims; Promissory Estoppel Requires Unconscionable Injury — Commentary on Holman v. St. John's Episcopal Hospital (2d Dept. 2025)

Non-Exhaustive Duties Clauses Foreclose Extra-Compensation and Quasi-Contract Claims; Promissory Estoppel Requires Unconscionable Injury — Commentary on Holman v. St. John's Episcopal Hospital (2d Dept. 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Non-Exhaustive Duties Clauses Foreclose Extra-Compensation and Quasi-Contract Claims; Promissory Estoppel Requires Unconscionable Injury — Holman v. St. John's Episcopal Hospital (2d Dept. 2025)...
Recall Alone Is Not Enough for Article III Standing: Sixth Circuit Demands Plausible Contamination Allegations in Benefit-of-the-Bargain and Risk-of-Illness Suits

Recall Alone Is Not Enough for Article III Standing: Sixth Circuit Demands Plausible Contamination Allegations in Benefit-of-the-Bargain and Risk-of-Illness Suits

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Recall Alone Is Not Enough for Article III Standing: Sixth Circuit Demands Plausible Contamination Allegations in Benefit-of-the-Bargain and Risk-of-Illness Suits Case: Ward v. J.M. Smucker Co., No....
CPLR 2001 Can Cure Minor RPAPL 1304 Counseling-List Mislabeling; Referee’s Computations Must Rest on Admissible Business Records

CPLR 2001 Can Cure Minor RPAPL 1304 Counseling-List Mislabeling; Referee’s Computations Must Rest on Admissible Business Records

Date: Sep 11, 2025
CPLR 2001 Can Cure Minor RPAPL 1304 Counseling-List Mislabeling; Referee’s Computations Must Rest on Admissible Business Records Introduction In Bank of America, N.A. v. Barnett, 2025 NY Slip Op...
Borden Does Not Control West Virginia’s Habitual Offender Statute: DUI Causing Serious Bodily Injury Remains a “Crime of Violence” for Recidivist Life Sentencing

Borden Does Not Control West Virginia’s Habitual Offender Statute: DUI Causing Serious Bodily Injury Remains a “Crime of Violence” for Recidivist Life Sentencing

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Borden Does Not Control West Virginia’s Habitual Offender Statute: DUI Causing Serious Bodily Injury Remains a “Crime of Violence” for Recidivist Life Sentencing Introduction In State of West...
Meaningful Participation in a Medically Fragile Child’s Care Is Required for “Substantial Compliance”: Moderate Compliance Does Not Compel Extension of Improvement Periods (In re N.E., W. Va. 2025)

Meaningful Participation in a Medically Fragile Child’s Care Is Required for “Substantial Compliance”: Moderate Compliance Does Not Compel Extension of Improvement Periods (In re N.E., W. Va. 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Meaningful Participation in a Medically Fragile Child’s Care Is Required for “Substantial Compliance”: Moderate Compliance Does Not Compel Extension of Improvement Periods Commentary on In re N.E.,...
Acknowledgment of Domestic Violence Is a Prerequisite to Improvement Periods; Ongoing Abuse During Proceedings Supports Immediate Termination — Commentary on In re J.C.-1 and J.C.-2 (W. Va. Sept. 10, 2025)

Acknowledgment of Domestic Violence Is a Prerequisite to Improvement Periods; Ongoing Abuse During Proceedings Supports Immediate Termination — Commentary on In re J.C.-1 and J.C.-2 (W. Va. Sept. 10, 2025)

Date: Sep 11, 2025
Acknowledgment of Domestic Violence Is a Prerequisite to Improvement Periods; Ongoing Abuse During Proceedings Supports Immediate Termination Case: In re J.C.-1 and J.C.-2, No. 24-554 (W. Va. Sept....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert