Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

comprehensive-interpretation-of-& Case Commentaries

Procedural Diligence in Appellate Practice: Dismissal for Failure to Comply with NRAP Requirements

Procedural Diligence in Appellate Practice: Dismissal for Failure to Comply with NRAP Requirements

Date: May 7, 2025
Procedural Diligence in Appellate Practice: Dismissal for Failure to Comply with NRAP Requirements Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Nevada’s Order in Nicherie v. Sharda (No....
Reinforcing the Barker-Doggett Framework: Proper Application of Speedy-Trial Factors in Georgia

Reinforcing the Barker-Doggett Framework: Proper Application of Speedy-Trial Factors in Georgia

Date: May 7, 2025
Reinforcing the Barker-Doggett Framework: Proper Application of Speedy-Trial Factors in Georgia Introduction Nelson v. State, decided May 6, 2025 by the Supreme Court of Georgia, concerns appellant...
Allowing Employer’s Interested-Witness Evidence at Summary Judgment in Discrimination Cases: New Rule in Mauldin v. Wormuth

Allowing Employer’s Interested-Witness Evidence at Summary Judgment in Discrimination Cases: New Rule in Mauldin v. Wormuth

Date: May 7, 2025
Allowing Employer’s Interested-Witness Evidence at Summary Judgment in Discrimination Cases: New Rule in Mauldin v. Wormuth Introduction Mauldin v. Wormuth (10th Cir. May 6, 2025) is a landmark...
Incorporation of Standard Supervised-Release Conditions and Controlled Substance Offense Clarification under the Fourth Circuit Sentencing Guidelines

Incorporation of Standard Supervised-Release Conditions and Controlled Substance Offense Clarification under the Fourth Circuit Sentencing Guidelines

Date: May 7, 2025
Incorporation of Standard Supervised-Release Conditions and Controlled Substance Offense Clarification under the Fourth Circuit Sentencing Guidelines Introduction The Fourth Circuit’s unpublished per...
Johnson v. State: Discretion to Reopen Evidence Post-Deliberation and Counsel-Guided Testimony Decisions

Johnson v. State: Discretion to Reopen Evidence Post-Deliberation and Counsel-Guided Testimony Decisions

Date: May 7, 2025
Johnson v. State: Discretion to Reopen Evidence Post-Deliberation and Counsel-Guided Testimony Decisions Introduction In Johnson v. State, 307 Ga. 109 (2025), the Supreme Court of Georgia confronted...
Admissibility of Gang Affiliation Evidence as Motive and Harmless Omission of Lesser-Included Offense Jury Instructions

Admissibility of Gang Affiliation Evidence as Motive and Harmless Omission of Lesser-Included Offense Jury Instructions

Date: May 7, 2025
Admissibility of Gang Affiliation Evidence as Motive and Harmless Omission of Lesser-Included Offense Jury Instructions Introduction Johnson v. State is a 2025 decision of the Supreme Court of...
Establishing the Constitutional Threshold for Judicial Impartiality: Unexceptional Campaign Contributions and Past Associations Do Not Violate Due Process

Establishing the Constitutional Threshold for Judicial Impartiality: Unexceptional Campaign Contributions and Past Associations Do Not Violate Due Process

Date: May 7, 2025
Establishing the Constitutional Threshold for Judicial Impartiality: Unexceptional Campaign Contributions and Past Associations Do Not Violate Due Process Introduction Meade v. Bonin is a Fifth...
Qualified Immunity Shield for Non-Lethal Force Against Suicidal, Noncompliant Subjects: Cambre v. Gottardi

Qualified Immunity Shield for Non-Lethal Force Against Suicidal, Noncompliant Subjects: Cambre v. Gottardi

Date: May 7, 2025
Qualified Immunity Shield for Non-Lethal Force Against Suicidal, Noncompliant Subjects: Cambre v. Gottardi Introduction In Cambre v. Gottardi, the Fifth Circuit addressed whether two Sheriff’s Office...
Strict Compliance with Procedural Requirements and Specific Findings in Child Abuse and Neglect Proceedings

Strict Compliance with Procedural Requirements and Specific Findings in Child Abuse and Neglect Proceedings

Date: May 7, 2025
Strict Compliance with Procedural Requirements and Specific Findings in Child Abuse and Neglect Proceedings Introduction In In re E.W., N.W., and R.W., the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia...
Affirming the Substantial Compliance Standard for Post-Adjudicatory Improvement Periods in Parental Rights Termination

Affirming the Substantial Compliance Standard for Post-Adjudicatory Improvement Periods in Parental Rights Termination

Date: May 7, 2025
Affirming the Substantial Compliance Standard for Post-Adjudicatory Improvement Periods in Parental Rights Termination Introduction This memorandum decision arises from the appeal of Father A.W....
Robinson v. State: Geolocation Evidence and Gang Conspiracy Liability

Robinson v. State: Geolocation Evidence and Gang Conspiracy Liability

Date: May 7, 2025
Robinson v. State: Geolocation Evidence and Gang Conspiracy Liability Introduction Robinson v. State is a 2025 decision of the Supreme Court of Delaware affirming convictions for illegal gang...
Daniels v. State: Reinforcement of Procedural Bars and Actual-Innocence Threshold in Postconviction Relief

Daniels v. State: Reinforcement of Procedural Bars and Actual-Innocence Threshold in Postconviction Relief

Date: May 7, 2025
Daniels v. State: Reinforcement of Procedural Bars and Actual-Innocence Threshold in Postconviction Relief Introduction In Daniels v. State, No. 532, 2024 (Del. May 6, 2025), the Supreme Court of...
Reyes Santos v. Bondi: Strict Exhaustion and the Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Date-Less Notices to Appear

Reyes Santos v. Bondi: Strict Exhaustion and the Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Date-Less Notices to Appear

Date: May 7, 2025
Reyes Santos v. Bondi: Strict Exhaustion and the Non-Jurisdictional Nature of Date-Less Notices to Appear 1. Introduction Reyes Santos v. Bondi, No. 23-7182 (2d Cir. May 6 2025) is a Second Circuit...
Reinforcement of Supersedeas Doctrine: Jurisdictional Effect of Defective Notices of Appeal in Patterson v. State

Reinforcement of Supersedeas Doctrine: Jurisdictional Effect of Defective Notices of Appeal in Patterson v. State

Date: May 7, 2025
Reinforcement of Supersedeas Doctrine: Jurisdictional Effect of Defective Notices of Appeal in Patterson v. State Introduction Patterson v. State, decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on May 6,...
Extension of Doyle: Prohibition on Using Post-Arrest Partial Silence for Impeachment

Extension of Doyle: Prohibition on Using Post-Arrest Partial Silence for Impeachment

Date: May 7, 2025
Extension of Doyle: Prohibition on Using Post-Arrest Partial Silence for Impeachment Introduction Case: United States v. Ward Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Date: May 6, 2025...
Raising a Reasonable Inference: Standards for Third-Party Perpetrator Evidence and Harmless-Error Review in Morgan v. State

Raising a Reasonable Inference: Standards for Third-Party Perpetrator Evidence and Harmless-Error Review in Morgan v. State

Date: May 7, 2025
Raising a Reasonable Inference: Standards for Third-Party Perpetrator Evidence and Harmless-Error Review in Morgan v. State Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Georgia’s...
RFRA’s Express‐Authorization Exception to Consular Nonreviewability: Judicial Review of Visa Decisions

RFRA’s Express‐Authorization Exception to Consular Nonreviewability: Judicial Review of Visa Decisions

Date: May 7, 2025
RFRA’s Express‐Authorization Exception to Consular Nonreviewability: Judicial Review of Visa Decisions Introduction In Calvary Albuquerque Inc. v. Rubio (10th Cir. 2025), a New Mexico church...
No Right to Original Trial Judge as “Thirteenth Juror” on General-Grounds New Trial Motions

No Right to Original Trial Judge as “Thirteenth Juror” on General-Grounds New Trial Motions

Date: May 7, 2025
No Right to Original Trial Judge as “Thirteenth Juror” on General-Grounds New Trial Motions Introduction In Jones v. State, Supreme Court of Georgia, decided May 6, 2025, the Court clarified that a...
Defining the Boundaries of Noerr-Pennington Immunity for Litigation Series: Navient v. Lohman

Defining the Boundaries of Noerr-Pennington Immunity for Litigation Series: Navient v. Lohman

Date: May 7, 2025
Defining the Boundaries of Noerr-Pennington Immunity for Litigation Series: Navient v. Lohman Introduction In Navient Solutions, LLC v. Jeffrey Lohman, 23-2109 & 23-2163 (4th Cir. 2025), the U.S....
Deference to Trial Counsel’s Strategic Defense Choices and Standards for Affirmative Defense Jury Instructions in Fox v. State

Deference to Trial Counsel’s Strategic Defense Choices and Standards for Affirmative Defense Jury Instructions in Fox v. State

Date: May 7, 2025
Deference to Trial Counsel’s Strategic Defense Choices and Standards for Affirmative Defense Jury Instructions in Fox v. State Introduction Fox v. State, decided May 6, 2025 by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert