Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

clarifying-the-& Case Commentaries

Defining “Superficial” Interaction in SSA Disability Evaluations: Quality vs Quantity Distinction

Defining “Superficial” Interaction in SSA Disability Evaluations: Quality vs Quantity Distinction

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Defining “Superficial” Interaction in SSA Disability Evaluations: Quality vs Quantity Distinction Introduction In Dawn Mabry-Schlicher v. Commissioner of Social Security, the Sixth Circuit tackled...
Preemption of Emissions Fraud Claims Under the Clean Air Act: Counts v. General Motors

Preemption of Emissions Fraud Claims Under the Clean Air Act: Counts v. General Motors

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Preemption of Emissions Fraud Claims Under the Clean Air Act: Counts v. General Motors Introduction In Counts v. General Motors, LLC, 25a0150p.06 (6th Cir. June 6, 2025), a putative class of...
Keith v. Griffiths: Material Factual Disputes Bar Qualified and Statutory Immunity in Deadly Force §1983 Claims

Keith v. Griffiths: Material Factual Disputes Bar Qualified and Statutory Immunity in Deadly Force §1983 Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Keith v. Griffiths: Material Factual Disputes Bar Qualified and Statutory Immunity in Deadly Force §1983 Claims Introduction Rita Keith, as administrator of the estate of her son Arthur Keith, sued...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Limits of “Relevant Conduct” for Excluding Prior Drug Convictions from Criminal History Calculations

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Limits of “Relevant Conduct” for Excluding Prior Drug Convictions from Criminal History Calculations

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Limits of “Relevant Conduct” for Excluding Prior Drug Convictions from Criminal History Calculations Introduction In United States v. Amon Sudan Sanders-Outlaw, 25 F.4th 1024...
Odor of Marijuana as Probable Cause for Arrest: Sixth Circuit’s New Fourth Amendment Rule in United States v. Santiago

Odor of Marijuana as Probable Cause for Arrest: Sixth Circuit’s New Fourth Amendment Rule in United States v. Santiago

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Odor of Marijuana as Probable Cause for Arrest: Sixth Circuit’s New Fourth Amendment Rule in United States v. Santiago Introduction United States v. Edwin Santiago (6th Cir. 2025) addresses a...
Angarita-Quezada v. Garland: Clarifying Persecution and Government Protection Standards in LGBTQ Asylum Claims

Angarita-Quezada v. Garland: Clarifying Persecution and Government Protection Standards in LGBTQ Asylum Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Angarita-Quezada v. Garland: Clarifying Persecution and Government Protection Standards in LGBTQ Asylum Claims Introduction This case involves Diana Fernanda Angarita-Quezada, a Colombian national,...
Mutual Assent and Arbitration: Parisi v. GreenSky Clarifies Formation of Valid Arbitration Agreements

Mutual Assent and Arbitration: Parisi v. GreenSky Clarifies Formation of Valid Arbitration Agreements

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Mutual Assent and Arbitration: Parisi v. GreenSky Clarifies Formation of Valid Arbitration Agreements Introduction Parisi v. GreenSky, LLC et al., decided June 6, 2025 by the United States Court of...
Life Sentencing Beyond the Guidelines for Second-Degree Murder in Indian Country:  Clarifying the Role of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in United States v. Washington

Life Sentencing Beyond the Guidelines for Second-Degree Murder in Indian Country: Clarifying the Role of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in United States v. Washington

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Life Sentencing Beyond the Guidelines for Second-Degree Murder in Indian Country: Clarifying the Role of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in United States v. Washington Introduction United States v. Washington,...
Discretion and Limits in Recruiting Pro Bono Counsel Under §1915(e) in Civil Rights Litigation

Discretion and Limits in Recruiting Pro Bono Counsel Under §1915(e) in Civil Rights Litigation

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Discretion and Limits in Recruiting Pro Bono Counsel Under §1915(e) in Civil Rights Litigation 1. Introduction Lazerek Austin v. Cheryl Hansen is a Seventh Circuit decision addressing for the first...
SSA v. AFSCME (2025): The Supreme Court Softens the Irreparable-Harm Requirement for Governmental Stay Applications

SSA v. AFSCME (2025): The Supreme Court Softens the Irreparable-Harm Requirement for Governmental Stay Applications

Date: Jun 10, 2025
SSA v. AFSCME (605 U.S. ____ (2025)): The Supreme Court Softens the Irreparable-Harm Requirement for Governmental Stay Applications 1. Introduction SSA v. AFSCME concerns an “emergency-docket”...
Definitive Scope Requirement for Final § 1782 Discovery Orders

Definitive Scope Requirement for Final § 1782 Discovery Orders

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Definitive Scope Requirement for Final § 1782 Discovery Orders Introduction In Amgen Inc. v. Celltrion USA Inc., the Third Circuit addressed a threshold jurisdictional question under 28 U.S.C. §...
Limiting Public Employee First Amendment Retaliation: Public Concern and Employer Knowledge Requirements

Limiting Public Employee First Amendment Retaliation: Public Concern and Employer Knowledge Requirements

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Limiting Public Employee First Amendment Retaliation: Public Concern and Employer Knowledge Requirements Introduction Nancy E. Lewen v. Pennsylvania Soldiers and Sailors Home presented the Third...
Non-Finality of Denial Without Prejudice of Motion to Dissolve Writ of Garnishment Under 28 U.S.C. §1291

Non-Finality of Denial Without Prejudice of Motion to Dissolve Writ of Garnishment Under 28 U.S.C. §1291

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Non-Finality of Denial Without Prejudice of Motion to Dissolve Writ of Garnishment Under 28 U.S.C. §1291 Introduction Natour v. Bank of America, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Reasonable Limits on Discovery Access for Pro Se Incarcerated Defendants: United States v. Black

Reasonable Limits on Discovery Access for Pro Se Incarcerated Defendants: United States v. Black

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Reasonable Limits on Discovery Access for Pro Se Incarcerated Defendants: United States v. Black Introduction United States v. Black (5th Cir. 2025) arises from the conviction of Brian Deboris Black...
Aiding-and-Abetting Liability under the Anti-Kickback Statute for Pharmaceutical Marketers – United States v. Cockerell (5th Cir. 2025)

Aiding-and-Abetting Liability under the Anti-Kickback Statute for Pharmaceutical Marketers – United States v. Cockerell (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Aiding-and-Abetting Liability under the Anti-Kickback Statute for Pharmaceutical Marketers Introduction United States v. Cockerell is a Fifth Circuit decision handed down on June 5, 2025, affirming...
Circumstantial Inference of Recklessness in Aircraft Laser Offenses: United States v. Roberson

Circumstantial Inference of Recklessness in Aircraft Laser Offenses: United States v. Roberson

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Circumstantial Inference of Recklessness in Aircraft Laser Offenses: United States v. Roberson Introduction United States v. Roberson (5th Cir. 2025) addresses the sentencing enhancement under...
Receivership Supersession of Turnover Orders and Mootness in Post-Judgment Proceedings

Receivership Supersession of Turnover Orders and Mootness in Post-Judgment Proceedings

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Receivership Supersession of Turnover Orders and Mootness in Post-Judgment Proceedings Introduction In Weslease 2018 Operating, L.P. v. Behan, 24-10246 (5th Cir. June 5, 2025), the Fifth Circuit...
Post-Appeal Receivership Appointments Moot Turnover and Enforcement Order Appeals

Post-Appeal Receivership Appointments Moot Turnover and Enforcement Order Appeals

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Post-Appeal Receivership Appointments Moot Turnover and Enforcement Order Appeals Introduction This commentary examines the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Weslease 2018 Operating, L.P. v. Behan (No....
Supersession of Turnover and Enforcement Orders by Subsequent Receivership Appointment

Supersession of Turnover and Enforcement Orders by Subsequent Receivership Appointment

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Supersession of Turnover and Enforcement Orders by Subsequent Receivership Appointment Introduction This commentary examines the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s per curiam...
Receivership Supersession as a Mootness Rule: Weslease 2018 v. Behan

Receivership Supersession as a Mootness Rule: Weslease 2018 v. Behan

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Receivership Supersession as a Mootness Rule: Weslease 2018 v. Behan Introduction In Weslease 2018 Operating, L.P. v. Behan, the Fifth Circuit addressed the interplay between turnover orders under...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert