Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

application-of-the-sixth-amendment& Case Commentaries

Windom v. Florida: No Sixth Amendment “Evolving Standards of Decency”; Rule 3.112 Not Retroactive; Strict Limits on Successive Capital Postconviction Relief Reaffirmed

Windom v. Florida: No Sixth Amendment “Evolving Standards of Decency”; Rule 3.112 Not Retroactive; Strict Limits on Successive Capital Postconviction Relief Reaffirmed

Date: Aug 22, 2025
Windom v. Florida: No Sixth Amendment “Evolving Standards of Decency”; Rule 3.112 Not Retroactive; Strict Limits on Successive Capital Postconviction Relief Reaffirmed Introduction In Curtis Windom...
“Once Recused, Still Disqualified”: Arizona Supreme Court Requires Disclosure and Opportunity to Object Before a Judge Re‑Enters a Case After Recusal

“Once Recused, Still Disqualified”: Arizona Supreme Court Requires Disclosure and Opportunity to Object Before a Judge Re‑Enters a Case After Recusal

Date: Aug 22, 2025
“Once Recused, Still Disqualified”: Arizona Supreme Court Requires Disclosure and Opportunity to Object Before a Judge Re‑Enters a Case After Recusal Introduction In Contreras v. Bourke, the Arizona...
The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump

The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump

Date: Aug 22, 2025
The Excessive Fines Clause Meets Executive Law § 63(12): Appellate Division Vacates Disgorgement, Affirms Injunctive Remedies in People v. Trump Introduction People v. Trump, 2025 NY Slip Op 04756...
Self-Created Stress Is Not Mitigation for Escrow Misappropriation: Second Department Reaffirms Strict Fiduciary Standards in Matter of Bachu

Self-Created Stress Is Not Mitigation for Escrow Misappropriation: Second Department Reaffirms Strict Fiduciary Standards in Matter of Bachu

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Self-Created Stress Is Not Mitigation for Escrow Misappropriation: Second Department Reaffirms Strict Fiduciary Standards in Matter of Bachu Introduction In Matter of Bachu (2025 NY Slip Op 04721),...
State v. Bradshaw: South Dakota Clarifies “Unnecessary Delay” Dismissals under SDCL 23A-44-3 and Distinguishes the 180-Day Rule

State v. Bradshaw: South Dakota Clarifies “Unnecessary Delay” Dismissals under SDCL 23A-44-3 and Distinguishes the 180-Day Rule

Date: Aug 21, 2025
State v. Bradshaw: South Dakota Clarifies “Unnecessary Delay” Dismissals under SDCL 23A-44-3 and Distinguishes the 180-Day Rule Court: Supreme Court of South Dakota | Citation: 2025 S.D. 48 | Date:...
Dynamic IP Circumstantial Evidence Can Sustain Criminal Contempt; Date and Time Are Not Elements of Contempt or Probation Violations in New Hampshire

Dynamic IP Circumstantial Evidence Can Sustain Criminal Contempt; Date and Time Are Not Elements of Contempt or Probation Violations in New Hampshire

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Dynamic IP Circumstantial Evidence Can Sustain Criminal Contempt; Date and Time Are Not Elements of Contempt or Probation Violations in New Hampshire Introduction In State of New Hampshire v. Ian...
Successive Leases Stand Alone: South Dakota Supreme Court Holds “Then Existing Mortgage” Means the Current (Refinanced) Debt and Rejects Carry-Forward of Prior Reserve Obligations

Successive Leases Stand Alone: South Dakota Supreme Court Holds “Then Existing Mortgage” Means the Current (Refinanced) Debt and Rejects Carry-Forward of Prior Reserve Obligations

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Successive Leases Stand Alone: South Dakota Supreme Court Holds “Then Existing Mortgage” Means the Current (Refinanced) Debt and Rejects Carry-Forward of Prior Reserve Obligations Introduction In...
Interrogatory Admissions Can Establish “Damage” and Trigger a Jury Question on Constructive Notice Under SDCL 31‑32‑10; Statutory Authorization Bars Municipal Nuisance Claims — Commentary on Mahmoudi v. City of Spearfish, 2025 S.D. 49

Interrogatory Admissions Can Establish “Damage” and Trigger a Jury Question on Constructive Notice Under SDCL 31‑32‑10; Statutory Authorization Bars Municipal Nuisance Claims — Commentary on Mahmoudi v. City of Spearfish, 2025 S.D. 49

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Interrogatory Admissions Can Establish “Damage” and Trigger a Jury Question on Constructive Notice Under SDCL 31‑32‑10; Statutory Authorization Bars Municipal Nuisance Claims Introduction This...
No Reset by Discontinuance or “Deceleration”: Second Department Applies FAPA Retroactively to Time‑Bar Mortgage Foreclosure (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Salko)

No Reset by Discontinuance or “Deceleration”: Second Department Applies FAPA Retroactively to Time‑Bar Mortgage Foreclosure (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Salko)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
No Reset by Discontinuance or “Deceleration”: Second Department Applies FAPA Retroactively to Time‑Bar Mortgage Foreclosure Introduction In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Salko (2025 NY Slip Op 04743),...
Totality-of-Circumstances Standard and Respondent’s Burden at 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(3)(iii) Hearings: Six-Month Suspension for Repeated DWI Convictions, Probation Violations, and Failure to Report (Matter of Thwaites)

Totality-of-Circumstances Standard and Respondent’s Burden at 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(3)(iii) Hearings: Six-Month Suspension for Repeated DWI Convictions, Probation Violations, and Failure to Report (Matter of Thwaites)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Totality-of-Circumstances Standard and Respondent’s Burden at 22 NYCRR 1240.12(c)(3)(iii) Hearings: Six-Month Suspension for Repeated DWI Convictions, Probation Violations, and Failure to Report...
Pleading Religious-Discrimination Claims in NYC Vaccine-Mandate Cases: Conclusory Allegations Are Insufficient; Post-Rescission Claims Are Moot

Pleading Religious-Discrimination Claims in NYC Vaccine-Mandate Cases: Conclusory Allegations Are Insufficient; Post-Rescission Claims Are Moot

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Pleading Religious-Discrimination Claims in NYC Vaccine-Mandate Cases: Conclusory Allegations Are Insufficient; Post-Rescission Claims Are Moot Introduction Currid v. City of New York, 2025 NY Slip...
“Watchful Waiting” as a Material Alternative in Informed Consent for YAG Vitreolysis; No Duty to Supervise a Referred Specialist — Clinkscales v. Tostanoski (2025)

“Watchful Waiting” as a Material Alternative in Informed Consent for YAG Vitreolysis; No Duty to Supervise a Referred Specialist — Clinkscales v. Tostanoski (2025)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
“Watchful Waiting” as a Material Alternative in Informed Consent for YAG Vitreolysis; No Duty to Supervise a Referred Specialist — Clinkscales v. Tostanoski (2025) Introduction In Clinkscales v....
Second Department Extends ABC Law § 55‑c “Good Cause” Protections to Oral and Implied Beer Distribution Agreements

Second Department Extends ABC Law § 55‑c “Good Cause” Protections to Oral and Implied Beer Distribution Agreements

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Second Department Extends ABC Law § 55‑c “Good Cause” Protections to Oral and Implied Beer Distribution Agreements Case: Oak Beverages, Inc. v. D.G. Yuengling & Son, Inc. (2025 NYSlipOp 04730) —...
DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704)

DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
DHCR Legal Rent as the Measure of Use-and-Occupancy and Strict Rent‑Stabilization Notice Compliance for Ejectment: Commentary on Esposito v. Larig (2025 NY Slip Op 04704) Introduction Esposito v....
RPAPL 1304 Compliance When Using Third‑Party Mailing Vendors: Tracking Numbers and RPAPL 1306 Filings Are Insufficient — Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Ricks

RPAPL 1304 Compliance When Using Third‑Party Mailing Vendors: Tracking Numbers and RPAPL 1306 Filings Are Insufficient — Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Ricks

Date: Aug 21, 2025
RPAPL 1304 Compliance When Using Third‑Party Mailing Vendors: Tracking Numbers and RPAPL 1306 Filings Are Insufficient Commentary on Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Ricks (2025 NY Slip Op 04728,...
Gomez v. Tilden Estates, LLC: Dust on Permanent Stairs as a Potential 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) “Slipping Hazard,” Limits on Untimely Cross-Motions, and No Automatic §240(1) Liability for Stairway Slips

Gomez v. Tilden Estates, LLC: Dust on Permanent Stairs as a Potential 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) “Slipping Hazard,” Limits on Untimely Cross-Motions, and No Automatic §240(1) Liability for Stairway Slips

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Gomez v. Tilden Estates, LLC: Dust on Permanent Stairs as a Potential 12 NYCRR 23-1.7(d) “Slipping Hazard,” Limits on Untimely Cross-Motions, and No Automatic §240(1) Liability for Stairway Slips...
Nominal Damages for Technical Trespass Are Discretionary Absent Prescriptive-Rights Risk; Landowner’s Retention of Trespasser’s Materials Constitutes Conversion — Commentary on Fairchild Corp. v. LIRR (2025 NY Slip Op 04705)

Nominal Damages for Technical Trespass Are Discretionary Absent Prescriptive-Rights Risk; Landowner’s Retention of Trespasser’s Materials Constitutes Conversion — Commentary on Fairchild Corp. v. LIRR (2025 NY Slip Op 04705)

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Nominal Damages for Technical Trespass Are Discretionary Absent Prescriptive-Rights Risk; Landowner’s Retention of Trespasser’s Materials Constitutes Conversion — Commentary on Fairchild Corp. v....
Judicial Factfinding Permitted for § 609.035 Arson–Concealment Exception; Clarified Standards for “Significant Relationship” and “Past Pattern” in Minnesota First-Degree Domestic‑Abuse Murder

Judicial Factfinding Permitted for § 609.035 Arson–Concealment Exception; Clarified Standards for “Significant Relationship” and “Past Pattern” in Minnesota First-Degree Domestic‑Abuse Murder

Date: Aug 21, 2025
Judicial Factfinding Permitted for § 609.035 Arson–Concealment Exception; Clarified Standards for “Significant Relationship” and “Past Pattern” in Minnesota First-Degree Domestic‑Abuse Murder...
No Judicial Preapproval for Refilling Charges After NCNR; Dangerousness Trials Require Pending Charges and Apply Retroactively

No Judicial Preapproval for Refilling Charges After NCNR; Dangerousness Trials Require Pending Charges and Apply Retroactively

Date: Aug 21, 2025
No Judicial Preapproval for Refilling Charges After NCNR; Dangerousness Trials Require Pending Charges and Apply Retroactively Introduction In a consolidated decision arising from a protracted...
Residency by Intent: New Hampshire Validates Rule 902.01 and Denies Credit for Out-of-State Taxes under the Interest and Dividends Tax

Residency by Intent: New Hampshire Validates Rule 902.01 and Denies Credit for Out-of-State Taxes under the Interest and Dividends Tax

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Residency by Intent: New Hampshire Validates Rule 902.01 and Denies Credit for Out-of-State Taxes under the Interest and Dividends Tax Introduction In Morris v. Commissioner, N.H. Department of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert