Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

application-of-the-sixth-amendment& Case Commentaries

Separate Misconduct, Separate Punishments: Kentucky High Court Signals Consecutive Suspensions When New Violations Breach Disciplinary Probation

Separate Misconduct, Separate Punishments: Kentucky High Court Signals Consecutive Suspensions When New Violations Breach Disciplinary Probation

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Separate Misconduct, Separate Punishments: Kentucky High Court Signals Consecutive Suspensions When New Violations Breach Disciplinary Probation Introduction In a published opinion and order dated...
Jurisdictional Discovery First: Kentucky Supreme Court Requires “Ample Opportunity” Before Dismissing for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; Indirect “Substantial Revenue” Satisfies the Long-Arm Statute

Jurisdictional Discovery First: Kentucky Supreme Court Requires “Ample Opportunity” Before Dismissing for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; Indirect “Substantial Revenue” Satisfies the Long-Arm Statute

Date: Oct 28, 2025
Jurisdictional Discovery First: Kentucky Supreme Court Requires “Ample Opportunity” Before Dismissing for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction; Indirect “Substantial Revenue” Satisfies the Long-Arm Statute...
KRS 532.110’s Aggregate Cap Controls PFO‑2–Enhanced Class D Felonies; Competency for Resentencing Measured at the Time of Resentencing

KRS 532.110’s Aggregate Cap Controls PFO‑2–Enhanced Class D Felonies; Competency for Resentencing Measured at the Time of Resentencing

Date: Oct 28, 2025
KRS 532.110’s Aggregate Cap Controls PFO‑2–Enhanced Class D Felonies; Competency for Resentencing Measured at the Time of Resentencing Introduction In Thomas R. Moore v. Commonwealth of Kentucky...
RAP 21 Stays Require Particularized, Immediate Irreparable Harm: No Automatic Stay of Merits Pending Class-Certification Appeals

RAP 21 Stays Require Particularized, Immediate Irreparable Harm: No Automatic Stay of Merits Pending Class-Certification Appeals

Date: Oct 28, 2025
RAP 21 Stays Require Particularized, Immediate Irreparable Harm: No Automatic Stay of Merits Pending Class-Certification Appeals Case: Toby Berry, on Behalf of Himself and a Certified Class v....
After Goldey and Egbert: Third Circuit Reaffirms No Bivens for Federal Prison Conditions and Excessive Force, But Requires Leave to Amend for Rehabilitation Act and RFRA Claims

After Goldey and Egbert: Third Circuit Reaffirms No Bivens for Federal Prison Conditions and Excessive Force, But Requires Leave to Amend for Rehabilitation Act and RFRA Claims

Date: Oct 27, 2025
After Goldey and Egbert: Third Circuit Reaffirms No Bivens for Federal Prison Conditions and Excessive Force, But Requires Leave to Amend for Rehabilitation Act and RFRA Claims Introduction In Thomas...
Flow-Down Defective-Work Clauses Override Time-and-Materials Billing; Recoupment Permitted Against Same-Contract Sums

Flow-Down Defective-Work Clauses Override Time-and-Materials Billing; Recoupment Permitted Against Same-Contract Sums

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Flow-Down Defective-Work Clauses Override Time-and-Materials Billing; Recoupment Permitted Against Same-Contract Sums Case: Umoja Erectors LLC v. D.A. Nolt Inc., et al. Court: United States Court of...
Hermann Estoppel Revived and Provider Assignments Clarified: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework for Out‑of‑Network ERISA Claims in Angelina Emergency Med. v. Blue Cross

Hermann Estoppel Revived and Provider Assignments Clarified: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework for Out‑of‑Network ERISA Claims in Angelina Emergency Med. v. Blue Cross

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Hermann Estoppel Revived and Provider Assignments Clarified: The Fifth Circuit’s Framework for Out‑of‑Network ERISA Claims in Angelina Emergency Med. v. Blue Cross Introduction In Angelina Emergency...
No Statutory Lanham Act Damages Without a Registered Mark: Fifth Circuit Vacates Awards and Clarifies Limits on Attorney Immunity in Lewis Brisbois v. Bitgood

No Statutory Lanham Act Damages Without a Registered Mark: Fifth Circuit Vacates Awards and Clarifies Limits on Attorney Immunity in Lewis Brisbois v. Bitgood

Date: Oct 27, 2025
No Statutory Lanham Act Damages Without a Registered Mark: Fifth Circuit Vacates Awards and Clarifies Limits on Attorney Immunity in Lewis Brisbois v. Bitgood Introduction In an unpublished but...
No Post‑Termination Royalties Absent Express Language: “Developed and Manufactured During the Initial Term” Means What It Says

No Post‑Termination Royalties Absent Express Language: “Developed and Manufactured During the Initial Term” Means What It Says

Date: Oct 27, 2025
No Post‑Termination Royalties Absent Express Language: “Developed and Manufactured During the Initial Term” Means What It Says Case: Strategy and Execution, Inc. v. Black Rifle Coffee Company,...
General Compliance Clauses Do Not Waive Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FLSA Suit Against Tribally Owned Casino

General Compliance Clauses Do Not Waive Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FLSA Suit Against Tribally Owned Casino

Date: Oct 27, 2025
General Compliance Clauses Do Not Waive Tribal Sovereign Immunity: Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FLSA Suit Against Tribally Owned Casino Alexandria Parrotta v. Island Resort & Casino, No....
Undercover buyer’s export statement and contextual cues suffice for § 2K2.1(b)(6)(A): Sixth Circuit affirms export-enhancement, invited-error bar to acceptance-of-responsibility challenge, and within-Guidelines sentence in United States v. Darvell Jackson

Undercover buyer’s export statement and contextual cues suffice for § 2K2.1(b)(6)(A): Sixth Circuit affirms export-enhancement, invited-error bar to acceptance-of-responsibility challenge, and within-Guidelines sentence in United States v. Darvell Jackson

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Undercover buyer’s export statement and contextual cues suffice for § 2K2.1(b)(6)(A): Sixth Circuit affirms export-enhancement, invited-error bar to acceptance-of-responsibility challenge, and...
Sixth Circuit: Kentucky Wanton Second-Degree Manslaughter Is Not a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines; Misclassification Is Plain Error (United States v. Tooley)

Sixth Circuit: Kentucky Wanton Second-Degree Manslaughter Is Not a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines; Misclassification Is Plain Error (United States v. Tooley)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Sixth Circuit: Kentucky Wanton Second-Degree Manslaughter Is Not a “Crime of Violence” Under the Guidelines; Misclassification Is Plain Error Introduction In United States v. Tooley, the Sixth...
Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Extends to Sentences Consecutive to Life; MVRA Permits Lost-Income Restitution to Deceased Victims’ Family Members (Clarified): Commentary on United States v. Lesley Green (and Philmon Chambers)

Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Extends to Sentences Consecutive to Life; MVRA Permits Lost-Income Restitution to Deceased Victims’ Family Members (Clarified): Commentary on United States v. Lesley Green (and Philmon Chambers)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Concurrent Sentence Doctrine Extends to Sentences Consecutive to Life; MVRA Permits Lost-Income Restitution to Deceased Victims’ Family Members (Clarified) Commentary on United States v. Lesley Green...
United States v. Philmon Chambers (11th Cir. 2025): Eleventh Circuit Extends the Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine to Life-Plus Sentences and Affirms MVRA Restitution for Deceased Victims’ Family Members

United States v. Philmon Chambers (11th Cir. 2025): Eleventh Circuit Extends the Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine to Life-Plus Sentences and Affirms MVRA Restitution for Deceased Victims’ Family Members

Date: Oct 27, 2025
United States v. Philmon Chambers (11th Cir. 2025): Eleventh Circuit Extends the Concurrent-Sentence Doctrine to Life-Plus Sentences and Affirms MVRA Restitution for Deceased Victims’ Family Members...
Reciprocal Rule 404(b) Notice and No Remmer Hearing Absent Genuine External Influence: United States v. Acebo (10th Cir. 2025)

Reciprocal Rule 404(b) Notice and No Remmer Hearing Absent Genuine External Influence: United States v. Acebo (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Reciprocal Rule 404(b) Notice and No Remmer Hearing Absent Genuine External Influence: United States v. Acebo (10th Cir. 2025) United States v. Acebo, No. 24-8035 (10th Cir. Oct. 23, 2025) —...
Third Circuit Clarifies: No “Agency Exception” to Twombly/Iqbal and No Consumer‑Initiation Requirement under FCRA § 1681b(a)(3)(A)

Third Circuit Clarifies: No “Agency Exception” to Twombly/Iqbal and No Consumer‑Initiation Requirement under FCRA § 1681b(a)(3)(A)

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Third Circuit Clarifies: No “Agency Exception” to Twombly/Iqbal and No Consumer‑Initiation Requirement under FCRA § 1681b(a)(3)(A) Case: Eva Migliore v. Vision Solar LLC, et al. (Sunlight Financial...
Third Circuit Holds Section 1782 Petitions Are Not “Civil Actions” Under FAA § 4, So Arbitration Cannot Be Compelled From the § 1782 Docket

Third Circuit Holds Section 1782 Petitions Are Not “Civil Actions” Under FAA § 4, So Arbitration Cannot Be Compelled From the § 1782 Docket

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Third Circuit Holds Section 1782 Petitions Are Not “Civil Actions” Under FAA § 4, So Arbitration Cannot Be Compelled From the § 1782 Docket Note: The opinion is designated “Not Precedential,” but...
Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols

Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Arzamendi v. Hegseth: Rescission of Federal Vaccine Mandate Does Not Moot Damages Claims; Religious Accommodation Pleadings Must Specifically Tie Beliefs to Testing/Masking Protocols Introduction In...
Common‑Area Visibility as the “Additional Nexus” for Proving Knowledge of Firearms in Joint‑Occupancy § 924(c) Cases

Common‑Area Visibility as the “Additional Nexus” for Proving Knowledge of Firearms in Joint‑Occupancy § 924(c) Cases

Date: Oct 27, 2025
Common‑Area Visibility as the “Additional Nexus” for Proving Knowledge of Firearms in Joint‑Occupancy § 924(c) Cases United States v. Aaric Murray and Richard Kirkland Johnson, No. 23‑4328 & 23‑4331...
United States v. Johnson (4th Cir. 2025): Circumstantial Proof of Firearm Knowledge in Jointly Occupied Homes Suffices for § 924(c) Aiding-and-Abetting

United States v. Johnson (4th Cir. 2025): Circumstantial Proof of Firearm Knowledge in Jointly Occupied Homes Suffices for § 924(c) Aiding-and-Abetting

Date: Oct 27, 2025
United States v. Johnson (4th Cir. 2025): Circumstantial Proof of Firearm Knowledge in Jointly Occupied Homes Suffices for § 924(c) Aiding-and-Abetting Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert