Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

without-prejudice-privilege-in-pre-agreement-negotiations:-the-acorn-wave-ltd-v-o& Case Commentaries

No Proactive Monitoring Injunctions Under the Digital Services Act and No Automatic Right to Reinstatement: Farina v X Internet UC [2025] IEHC 514

No Proactive Monitoring Injunctions Under the Digital Services Act and No Automatic Right to Reinstatement: Farina v X Internet UC [2025] IEHC 514

Date: Sep 30, 2025
No Proactive Monitoring Injunctions Under the Digital Services Act and No Automatic Right to Reinstatement: Farina v X Internet UC [2025] IEHC 514 Introduction This High Court of Ireland decision,...
Deemed transfer clauses require a notice to remedy and repudiatory breaches can be “capable of remedy”: Commentary on Kulkarni v Gwent Holdings Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1206

Deemed transfer clauses require a notice to remedy and repudiatory breaches can be “capable of remedy”: Commentary on Kulkarni v Gwent Holdings Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1206

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Deemed transfer clauses require a notice to remedy and repudiatory breaches can be “capable of remedy” Commentary on Kulkarni v Gwent Holdings Ltd & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1206 (CA) Introduction The...
The Trial-First Rule for Delay and Deceased-Witness Challenges: M v Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] IEHC 512

The Trial-First Rule for Delay and Deceased-Witness Challenges: M v Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] IEHC 512

Date: Sep 30, 2025
The Trial-First Rule for Delay and Deceased-Witness Challenges: M v Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] IEHC 512 Introduction In this judicial review, the High Court (Simons J) refused to restrain...
Full One-Third Plea Credit Preserved When Plea Is Delayed Only for Fitness-to-Plead Assessment and Intention Is Recorded: R v Muhammad [2025] EWCA Crim 1316

Full One-Third Plea Credit Preserved When Plea Is Delayed Only for Fitness-to-Plead Assessment and Intention Is Recorded: R v Muhammad [2025] EWCA Crim 1316

Date: Sep 27, 2025
Full One-Third Plea Credit Preserved When Plea Is Delayed Only for Fitness-to-Plead Assessment and Intention Is Recorded Case: Muhammad, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1316 Court: England and Wales Court of...
No Duty to “Condition into Compliance”: Scale, Distance, and Direct Linkage as Inherent Planning Considerations for Family-Flat Permissions

No Duty to “Condition into Compliance”: Scale, Distance, and Direct Linkage as Inherent Planning Considerations for Family-Flat Permissions

Date: Sep 27, 2025
No Duty to “Condition into Compliance”: Scale, Distance, and Direct Linkage as Inherent Planning Considerations for Family-Flat Permissions Case: Moran v An Bord Pleanála & Ors [2025] IEHC 510 (High...
Cromwell (R v) [2025]: Caring Responsibilities Do Not Compel Suspension Where Offending Is Not on the Cusp; 100‑Metre Restraining Orders Upheld

Cromwell (R v) [2025]: Caring Responsibilities Do Not Compel Suspension Where Offending Is Not on the Cusp; 100‑Metre Restraining Orders Upheld

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Cromwell (R v) [2025]: Caring Responsibilities Do Not Compel Suspension Where Offending Is Not on the Cusp; 100‑Metre Restraining Orders Upheld Introduction This commentary analyses the judgment of...
R v Gates [2025] EWCA Crim 1313: Prison Conditions as a “Soft Factor” in Decisions to Suspend Short Custodial Sentences

R v Gates [2025] EWCA Crim 1313: Prison Conditions as a “Soft Factor” in Decisions to Suspend Short Custodial Sentences

Date: Sep 26, 2025
R v Gates [2025] EWCA Crim 1313: Prison Conditions as a “Soft Factor” in Decisions to Suspend Short Custodial Sentences Introduction This commentary examines the decision of the England and Wales...
“Peace of mind” is not enough: Necessity and future-risk as the touchstones for restraining orders under s.360 Sentencing Act 2020 — R v Amri [2025] EWCA Crim 1314

“Peace of mind” is not enough: Necessity and future-risk as the touchstones for restraining orders under s.360 Sentencing Act 2020 — R v Amri [2025] EWCA Crim 1314

Date: Sep 26, 2025
“Peace of mind” is not enough: Necessity and future-risk as the touchstones for restraining orders under s.360 Sentencing Act 2020 — R v Amri [2025] EWCA Crim 1314 Court: England and Wales Court of...
“Haul Before You Cross”: Irish High Court imposes a duty of care on trawler operators over known submarine cables and affirms cost‑of‑repair damages without proof of payment — Virgin Media Wholesale Ltd v The Lida Suzanna [2025] IEHC 493

“Haul Before You Cross”: Irish High Court imposes a duty of care on trawler operators over known submarine cables and affirms cost‑of‑repair damages without proof of payment — Virgin Media Wholesale Ltd v The Lida Suzanna [2025] IEHC 493

Date: Sep 25, 2025
“Haul Before You Cross”: A New Irish Admiralty Benchmark on Fishermen’s Duties to Subsea Cables and Cost‑of‑Repair Damages Introduction In Virgin Media Wholesale Ltd v Owners and All Persons Claiming...
Open justice first: High Court sets exacting, evidence-specific test for permanent confidentiality orders and judgment redactions in patent litigation

Open justice first: High Court sets exacting, evidence-specific test for permanent confidentiality orders and judgment redactions in patent litigation

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Open justice first: High Court sets exacting, evidence-specific test for permanent confidentiality orders and judgment redactions in patent litigation Introduction In Sandoz AG & Rowex Ltd v Bayer...
Section 50 IPA 2015 is not a Second Protection Assessment: No Duty to Re‑Run Article 15(c) or Article 8 ECHR at Refoulement Stage Absent New Material

Section 50 IPA 2015 is not a Second Protection Assessment: No Duty to Re‑Run Article 15(c) or Article 8 ECHR at Refoulement Stage Absent New Material

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Section 50 IPA 2015 is not a Second Protection Assessment: No Duty to Re‑Run Article 15(c) or Article 8 ECHR at Refoulement Stage Absent New Material Introduction In M v Minister for Justice, Home...
Litigation Restraint Orders as a Discretionary Factor in Extending Time for Judicial Review: Commentary on Leahy & Ors v Medical Council of Ireland & Ors [2025] IEHC 503

Litigation Restraint Orders as a Discretionary Factor in Extending Time for Judicial Review: Commentary on Leahy & Ors v Medical Council of Ireland & Ors [2025] IEHC 503

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Litigation Restraint Orders as a Discretionary Factor in Extending Time for Judicial Review: Commentary on Leahy & Ors v Medical Council of Ireland & Ors [2025] IEHC 503 Introduction This commentary...
Late IPAT Appeals Do Not Halt Deportation: High Court refuses injunctions despite arguable challenge to Regulation 4(5) and clarifies Regulation 4(2) notice duty

Late IPAT Appeals Do Not Halt Deportation: High Court refuses injunctions despite arguable challenge to Regulation 4(5) and clarifies Regulation 4(2) notice duty

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Late IPAT Appeals Do Not Halt Deportation: High Court refuses injunctions despite arguable challenge to Regulation 4(5) and clarifies Regulation 4(2) notice duty Introduction This commentary analyses...
Farrell & Ors v PIAB & Ors: Costs for Parked Parallel Challenges Following Lead‑Case Success under s.169 LSRA 2015

Farrell & Ors v PIAB & Ors: Costs for Parked Parallel Challenges Following Lead‑Case Success under s.169 LSRA 2015

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Farrell & Ors v PIAB & Ors: Costs for Parked Parallel Challenges Following Lead‑Case Success under s.169 LSRA 2015 Court: High Court of Ireland | Neutral Citation: [2025] IEHC 504 | Date: 17...
Modified Universalism Within the UK: Discretion to Apply Scots Insolvency Law to Northern Irish Assets Under s 426 Insolvency Act 1986 — MacLennan v Walkington [2025] NICA 47

Modified Universalism Within the UK: Discretion to Apply Scots Insolvency Law to Northern Irish Assets Under s 426 Insolvency Act 1986 — MacLennan v Walkington [2025] NICA 47

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Modified Universalism Within the UK: Discretion to Apply Scots Insolvency Law to Northern Irish Assets Under s 426 Insolvency Act 1986 Case: MacLennan v Walkington [2025] NICA 47 Court: Court of...
R v Grizzle [2025] EWCA Crim 1298: Category 1 harm in ABH can be proved by substantial psychological impact without psychiatric diagnosis; consecutive sentences for in‑custody assaults on prison officers upheld despite delay

R v Grizzle [2025] EWCA Crim 1298: Category 1 harm in ABH can be proved by substantial psychological impact without psychiatric diagnosis; consecutive sentences for in‑custody assaults on prison officers upheld despite delay

Date: Sep 24, 2025
R v Grizzle [2025] EWCA Crim 1298: Category 1 harm in ABH can be proved by substantial psychological impact without psychiatric diagnosis; consecutive sentences for in‑custody assaults on prison...
MacCormack [2025] NICA 49: Establishing a 12–14 year starting band for aggravated human trafficking and clarifying how concurrent offences (drug supply and control of prostitution) aggravate the headline offence

MacCormack [2025] NICA 49: Establishing a 12–14 year starting band for aggravated human trafficking and clarifying how concurrent offences (drug supply and control of prostitution) aggravate the headline offence

Date: Sep 24, 2025
MacCormack [2025] NICA 49: Establishing a 12–14 year starting band for aggravated human trafficking and clarifying how concurrent offences (drug supply and control of prostitution) aggravate the...
No “Condition Precedent”: Defects in Section 189A Assessments Do Not Invalidate Lawful Suitability Reviews under Section 202 in Prevention Duty Cases — Fatolahzadeh v London Borough of Barnet [2025] EWCA Civ 1174

No “Condition Precedent”: Defects in Section 189A Assessments Do Not Invalidate Lawful Suitability Reviews under Section 202 in Prevention Duty Cases — Fatolahzadeh v London Borough of Barnet [2025] EWCA Civ 1174

Date: Sep 23, 2025
No “Condition Precedent”: Defects in Section 189A Assessments Do Not Invalidate Lawful Suitability Reviews under Section 202 in Prevention Duty Cases — Fatolahzadeh v London Borough of Barnet [2025]...
Pre‑Action Injunction Applications Are “Proceedings”: Court of Appeal Confirms Costs/Damages Jurisdiction and Permits CPR 3.10 to Cure Wrong Form — Commentary on Gotti v Perrett [2025] EWCA Civ 1168

Pre‑Action Injunction Applications Are “Proceedings”: Court of Appeal Confirms Costs/Damages Jurisdiction and Permits CPR 3.10 to Cure Wrong Form — Commentary on Gotti v Perrett [2025] EWCA Civ 1168

Date: Sep 23, 2025
Pre‑Action Injunction Applications Are “Proceedings”: Court of Appeal Confirms Costs/Damages Jurisdiction and Permits CPR 3.10 to Cure Wrong Form Case: Gotti v Perrett [2025] EWCA Civ 1168 (Court of...
Comprehensive Masterplans Must Cover the Entire Institutional Landholding: INST Designation Determined by Ownership and Use, Not Map Pinpointing

Comprehensive Masterplans Must Cover the Entire Institutional Landholding: INST Designation Determined by Ownership and Use, Not Map Pinpointing

Date: Sep 20, 2025
Comprehensive Masterplans Must Cover the Entire Institutional Landholding: INST Designation Determined by Ownership and Use, Not Map Pinpointing Introduction In Churchfields Management Company CLG v...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert