Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

all Case Commentaries

Collective Enforcement and Access to “Means Required” under the European Works Council Regime: Comment on Charpentier v Verizon Ireland Ltd [2025] IEHC 628

Collective Enforcement and Access to “Means Required” under the European Works Council Regime: Comment on Charpentier v Verizon Ireland Ltd [2025] IEHC 628

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Collective Enforcement and Access to “Means Required” under the European Works Council Regime: Comment on Charpentier v Verizon Ireland Ltd [2025] IEHC 628 1. Introduction This High Court judgment,...

    Obedience to Unappealed Court Orders and the Limits of Conscience:
    Commentary on Board of Management of Wilson’s Hospital School v Burke (No. 1) [2025] IEHC 635

Obedience to Unappealed Court Orders and the Limits of Conscience: Commentary on Board of Management of Wilson’s Hospital School v Burke (No. 1) [2025] IEHC 635

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Obedience to Unappealed Court Orders and the Limits of Conscience: Commentary on Board of Management of Wilson’s Hospital School v Burke (No. 1) [2025] IEHC 635 1. Introduction This judgment by...
No Excessive Evidential Burden and No “More than Normal Emotional Ties” Requirement in Dependency Assessments under Article 3(2) of the Citizens’ Directive

No Excessive Evidential Burden and No “More than Normal Emotional Ties” Requirement in Dependency Assessments under Article 3(2) of the Citizens’ Directive

Date: Nov 21, 2025
No Excessive Evidential Burden and No “More than Normal Emotional Ties” Requirement in Dependency Assessments under Article 3(2) of the Citizens’ Directive 1. Introduction This commentary analyses...
Negative Declarations, Non‑Party Costs and the Narrow Scope of Article 22(5) Lugano Convention – Commentary on Vigeland v Zurich Insurance plc [2025] IESC 46

Negative Declarations, Non‑Party Costs and the Narrow Scope of Article 22(5) Lugano Convention – Commentary on Vigeland v Zurich Insurance plc [2025] IESC 46

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Negative Declarations, Non‑Party Costs and the Narrow Scope of Article 22(5) Lugano Convention – Commentary on Vigeland v Zurich Insurance plc [2025] IESC 46 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of...
Exclusive Judicial Review Route for Challenges to CCPC Decisions under Section 15AAA: Commentary on Ryanair DAC v CCPC [2025] IEHC 639

Exclusive Judicial Review Route for Challenges to CCPC Decisions under Section 15AAA: Commentary on Ryanair DAC v CCPC [2025] IEHC 639

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Exclusive Judicial Review Route for Challenges to CCPC Mutual Assistance Decisions under Section 15AAA of the Competition Act 2002 – Commentary on Ryanair DAC & Ryanair Holdings plc v CCPC (No. 2)...
Finality and the Scope of LSRA Review Committee Powers under s.62(5)(b): Commentary on Cooney v Legal Services Regulatory Authority [2025] IEHC 640

Finality and the Scope of LSRA Review Committee Powers under s.62(5)(b): Commentary on Cooney v Legal Services Regulatory Authority [2025] IEHC 640

Date: Nov 21, 2025
Finality in LSRA Complaints: The Scope of Review Committee Powers under s.62(5)(b) and the Effect of High Court Remittal Orders Commentary on Cooney v Legal Services Regulatory Authority [2025] IEHC...
R v Toloui [2025] EWCA Crim 1599: Limits on Trial Judges’ Case Management Powers and the Threshold for an Unfair Trial by Judicial Intervention

R v Toloui [2025] EWCA Crim 1599: Limits on Trial Judges’ Case Management Powers and the Threshold for an Unfair Trial by Judicial Intervention

Date: Nov 21, 2025
R v Toloui [2025] EWCA Crim 1599: Limits on Trial Judges’ Case Management Powers and the Threshold for an Unfair Trial by Judicial Intervention 1. Introduction R v Toloui [2025] EWCA Crim 1599 is a...
R v Singh [2025] EWCA Crim 1520: Murder “Done for Gain” in a Domestic, Delusional Context – Mixed Motives, Mental Disorder and Minimum Terms under Schedule 21

R v Singh [2025] EWCA Crim 1520: Murder “Done for Gain” in a Domestic, Delusional Context – Mixed Motives, Mental Disorder and Minimum Terms under Schedule 21

Date: Nov 21, 2025
R v Singh [2025] EWCA Crim 1520: Murder “Done for Gain” in a Domestic, Delusional Context – Mixed Motives, Mental Disorder and Minimum Terms under Schedule 21 1. Introduction This commentary analyses...
Adjournment of Enforcement Pending Foreign Set‑Aside Proceedings: 
        Clarifying Article 36(2) UNCITRAL Model Law in 
        Site Facility APS v Randridge Holdings Ltd [2025] IEHC 668

Adjournment of Enforcement Pending Foreign Set‑Aside Proceedings: Clarifying Article 36(2) UNCITRAL Model Law in Site Facility APS v Randridge Holdings Ltd [2025] IEHC 668

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Adjournment of Enforcement Pending Foreign Set‑Aside Proceedings: Clarifying Article 36(2) UNCITRAL Model Law in Site Facility APS v Randridge Holdings Ltd [2025] IEHC 668 1. Introduction This...
Substitution, Redacted Assignment Deeds, and Leave to Execute: Commentary on Everyday Finance DAC v Brennan [2025] IEHC 678

Substitution, Redacted Assignment Deeds, and Leave to Execute: Commentary on Everyday Finance DAC v Brennan [2025] IEHC 678

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Substitution, Redacted Assignment Deeds, and Leave to Execute After Six Years A Commentary on Everyday Finance DAC v Brennan [2025] IEHC 678 High Court (Ireland), Jackson J, 19 November 2025 1....
Exceptional Cross‑Examination in Winding‑Up Petitions: Anvil Real Estate Ltd v Companies Act 2014 [2025] IEHC 630

Exceptional Cross‑Examination in Winding‑Up Petitions: Anvil Real Estate Ltd v Companies Act 2014 [2025] IEHC 630

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Exceptional Cross‑Examination in Winding‑Up Petitions: Commentary on Anvil Real Estate Ltd v Companies Act 2014 [2025] IEHC 630 1. Introduction This judgment of Cahill J in the High Court addresses a...
No Duty to Pre‑Notify Mainstream Country of Origin Information in IPAT Appeals: Commentary on K v IPAT [2025] IEHC 643

No Duty to Pre‑Notify Mainstream Country of Origin Information in IPAT Appeals: Commentary on K v IPAT [2025] IEHC 643

Date: Nov 20, 2025
No Duty to Pre‑Notify Mainstream Country of Origin Information in International Protection Appeals Commentary on K v The International Protection Appeals Tribunal & Anor [2025] IEHC 643 1....
Webb & Somerset‑How v R: Personal Autonomy, Servitude and the Single Offence of “Holding in Slavery” under the Modern Slavery Act 2015

Webb & Somerset‑How v R: Personal Autonomy, Servitude and the Single Offence of “Holding in Slavery” under the Modern Slavery Act 2015

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Webb & Somerset‑How v R [2025] EWCA Crim 1491: Personal Autonomy, Servitude and the Single Offence of “Holding in Slavery” under the Modern Slavery Act 2015 1. Introduction This Court of Appeal...
Assessing Potential Environmental Impacts and Material Contravention of Non‑Zoning Objectives: Commentary on Oxigen Environmental Unlimited Company v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 632

Assessing Potential Environmental Impacts and Material Contravention of Non‑Zoning Objectives: Commentary on Oxigen Environmental Unlimited Company v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 632

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Assessing Potential Environmental Impacts and Material Contravention of Non‑Zoning Objectives: Commentary on Oxigen Environmental Unlimited Company v An Coimisiún Pleanála [2025] IEHC 632 1....
R v Shah [2025] EWCA Crim 1459: Sexual Fantasy Messaging with Sex Workers Admissible as Bad Character to Prove Mindset and Sexual Intent under s.101(1)(d)

R v Shah [2025] EWCA Crim 1459: Sexual Fantasy Messaging with Sex Workers Admissible as Bad Character to Prove Mindset and Sexual Intent under s.101(1)(d)

Date: Nov 19, 2025
R v Shah [2025] EWCA Crim 1459: Sexual Fantasy Messaging with Sex Workers Admissible as Bad Character to Prove Mindset and Sexual Intent under s.101(1)(d) Court: England and Wales Court of Appeal...
Khan v Khan: No fraud or gratuity required—Acquisition constructive trusts clarified; post‑acquisition emails can satisfy s53(1)(b) LPA 1925

Khan v Khan: No fraud or gratuity required—Acquisition constructive trusts clarified; post‑acquisition emails can satisfy s53(1)(b) LPA 1925

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Khan v Khan: No fraud or gratuity required—Acquisition constructive trusts clarified; post‑acquisition emails can satisfy s53(1)(b) LPA 1925 Court: England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division)...
Substance Over Form in IPEC Applications and a Restrained Threshold for “Unreasonable Behaviour” Costs: Commentary on Costa v Dissociadid Ltd & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1475

Substance Over Form in IPEC Applications and a Restrained Threshold for “Unreasonable Behaviour” Costs: Commentary on Costa v Dissociadid Ltd & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1475

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Substance Over Form in IPEC Applications and a Restrained Threshold for “Unreasonable Behaviour” Costs: Costa v Dissociadid Ltd & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1475 Introduction This Court of Appeal decision...
Acquiescence by Open Litigation Conduct: NICA holds that counsel‑endorsed position papers and a draft order conceding jurisdiction amount to clear and irrevocable Article 13(1)(a) acquiescence

Acquiescence by Open Litigation Conduct: NICA holds that counsel‑endorsed position papers and a draft order conceding jurisdiction amount to clear and irrevocable Article 13(1)(a) acquiescence

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Acquiescence by Open Litigation Conduct: NICA holds that counsel‑endorsed position papers and a draft order conceding jurisdiction amount to clear and irrevocable Article 13(1)(a) acquiescence...
Historic Tax Non‑Compliance Does Not Bar Wage‑Loss; Consent Breach Can Materially Cause SSD: Commentary on Brian Taylor v Forth Valley Health Board [2025] CSOH 103

Historic Tax Non‑Compliance Does Not Bar Wage‑Loss; Consent Breach Can Materially Cause SSD: Commentary on Brian Taylor v Forth Valley Health Board [2025] CSOH 103

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Historic Tax Non‑Compliance Does Not Bar Wage‑Loss; Consent Breach Can Materially Cause Somatic Symptom Disorder (SSD) Case Overview Citation: [2025] CSOH 103 (Outer House, Court of Session). Judge:...
Mandatory Interlocutory Injunctions and Cross‑Border Competition Investigations: Commentary on Ryanair DAC & Ryanair Holdings plc v CCPC [2025] IEHC 637

Mandatory Interlocutory Injunctions and Cross‑Border Competition Investigations: Commentary on Ryanair DAC & Ryanair Holdings plc v CCPC [2025] IEHC 637

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Limits on Mandatory Interlocutory Injunctions in Cross‑Border Competition Investigations: Commentary on Ryanair DAC & Ryanair Holdings plc v CCPC [2025] IEHC 637 1. Introduction This judgment of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert