Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

United States v. August: Affirmation of Broad Protective Sweep Doctrine and Independent Source Exception

United States v. August: Affirmation of Broad Protective Sweep Doctrine and Independent Source Exception

Date: May 9, 2025
United States v. August: Affirmation of Broad Protective Sweep Doctrine and Independent Source Exception Introduction United States v. August is a Fifth Circuit decision rendered on May 8, 2025,...
Landlord Non-Liability for Tenant’s Concealed Dog under a “No-Pet” Lease: Actual or Constructive Knowledge Requirement Clarified

Landlord Non-Liability for Tenant’s Concealed Dog under a “No-Pet” Lease: Actual or Constructive Knowledge Requirement Clarified

Date: May 9, 2025
Landlord Non-Liability for Tenant’s Concealed Dog under a “No-Pet” Lease: Actual or Constructive Knowledge Requirement Clarified Introduction TLM Investments, LLC v. Shanda Yates, decided by the...
“Minor Political Assaults Outside Custodial Context Do Not Constitute Past Persecution” – A Commentary on Singh v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

“Minor Political Assaults Outside Custodial Context Do Not Constitute Past Persecution” – A Commentary on Singh v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: May 9, 2025
“Minor Political Assaults Outside Custodial Context Do Not Constitute Past Persecution” A Comprehensive Commentary on Singh v. Bondi, 23-6750-ag (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Case Overview. In Singh...
Predominant Intent Requirement for Statutory No-Fault Separation Divorce

Predominant Intent Requirement for Statutory No-Fault Separation Divorce

Date: May 9, 2025
Predominant Intent Requirement for Statutory No-Fault Separation Divorce Introduction Lisann v. Lisann is a 2025 decision of the Supreme Court of Virginia resolving a novel question about the intent...
Clarifying “Marriage Duration” and Res Judicata in Equitable Distribution: Nagle v. Nagle

Clarifying “Marriage Duration” and Res Judicata in Equitable Distribution: Nagle v. Nagle

Date: May 9, 2025
Clarifying “Marriage Duration” and Res Judicata in Equitable Distribution: Nagle v. Nagle Introduction Nagle v. Nagle, 2025 ND 94, is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of North Dakota issued...
Upholding Procedural Bars and Rejecting As-Applied Execution Claims: Rogers v. State

Upholding Procedural Bars and Rejecting As-Applied Execution Claims: Rogers v. State

Date: May 9, 2025
Upholding Procedural Bars and Rejecting As-Applied Execution Claims: Rogers v. State Introduction Glen Edward Rogers v. State of Florida (No. SC2025-0585) is a May 8, 2025 decision of the Supreme...
Parole Authority Jurisdiction and the Proper Use of Extraordinary Writs: State ex rel. Ellis v. Adult Parole Authority

Parole Authority Jurisdiction and the Proper Use of Extraordinary Writs: State ex rel. Ellis v. Adult Parole Authority

Date: May 9, 2025
Parole Authority Jurisdiction and the Proper Use of Extraordinary Writs Introduction State ex rel. Ellis v. Adult Parole Authority, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1625, decided May 8, 2025, presented...
Reaffirming Qualified Immunity Boundaries: Reasonable Threat Perception in Winkley v. Blackwell

Reaffirming Qualified Immunity Boundaries: Reasonable Threat Perception in Winkley v. Blackwell

Date: May 9, 2025
Reaffirming Qualified Immunity Boundaries: Reasonable Threat Perception in Winkley v. Blackwell Introduction Winkley v. Blackwell, No. 24-60244 (5th Cir. May 8, 2025), represents a significant...
Clarification of Jurisdictional and Evidentiary Standards in I-130 Marriage Fraud Denials Under 8 U.S.C. §1154(c)

Clarification of Jurisdictional and Evidentiary Standards in I-130 Marriage Fraud Denials Under 8 U.S.C. §1154(c)

Date: May 9, 2025
Clarification of Jurisdictional and Evidentiary Standards in I-130 Marriage Fraud Denials Under 8 U.S.C. §1154(c) Introduction In Stacey Watson v. Attorney General United States of America, No....
AstraZeneca v. HHS: Defining Standing and Due-Process Limits in the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program

AstraZeneca v. HHS: Defining Standing and Due-Process Limits in the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program

Date: May 9, 2025
AstraZeneca v. HHS: Defining Standing and Due-Process Limits in the IRA’s Drug Price Negotiation Program Introduction In AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. Secretary, United States Department of...
Intervening Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Redefines Generic Robbery and Permits Reassessment of Circuit Precedent

Intervening Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Redefines Generic Robbery and Permits Reassessment of Circuit Precedent

Date: May 8, 2025
Intervening Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Redefines Generic Robbery and Permits Reassessment of Circuit Precedent Introduction United States v. Wickware (5th Cir. 2025) addresses whether a 2023...
Kelsey v. Kessel – Second Circuit Clarifies that Eleventh-Amendment Dismissals Must Be Without Prejudice and Re-emphasises the “Ongoing-Violation” Prerequisite to Ex parte Young

Kelsey v. Kessel – Second Circuit Clarifies that Eleventh-Amendment Dismissals Must Be Without Prejudice and Re-emphasises the “Ongoing-Violation” Prerequisite to Ex parte Young

Date: May 8, 2025
Kelsey v. Kessel – Second Circuit Clarifies that Eleventh-Amendment Dismissals Must Be Without Prejudice and Re-emphasises the “Ongoing-Violation” Prerequisite to Ex parte Young 1. Introduction In...
Requirement of Reasoned Explanation for Denial of Asylum Based on Private‐Actor Persecution

Requirement of Reasoned Explanation for Denial of Asylum Based on Private‐Actor Persecution

Date: May 8, 2025
Requirement of Reasoned Explanation for Denial of Asylum Based on Private‐Actor Persecution Introduction In the unpublished per curiam decision Yamilet Del Carmen Garcia Chavez v. Pamela Bondi, No....
Recalibrating Home Rule: The Appellate Division Upholds New York’s Even-Year Election Law

Recalibrating Home Rule: The Appellate Division Upholds New York’s Even-Year Election Law

Date: May 8, 2025
Recalibrating Home Rule: The Appellate Division Upholds New York’s Even-Year Election Law Introduction County governments from eight regions (Onondaga, Nassau, Oneida, Rensselaer, Rockland, Dutchess,...
No larceny-by-conversion for contractor deposits absent specific earmarking or trust: People v. Clinton (Mich. 2025)

No larceny-by-conversion for contractor deposits absent specific earmarking or trust: People v. Clinton (Mich. 2025)

Date: May 8, 2025
No larceny-by-conversion for contractor deposits absent specific earmarking or trust: People v. Clinton (Mich. 2025) Introduction In People of the State of Michigan v. Christopher Robert Clinton, the...
Limits on Standing and Waiver under the Specialty Doctrine in Extradition Treaties

Limits on Standing and Waiver under the Specialty Doctrine in Extradition Treaties

Date: May 8, 2025
Limits on Standing and Waiver under the Specialty Doctrine in Extradition Treaties Introduction Ricardo Alberto Martinelli Berrocal, a former President of the Republic of Panama, challenged his...
“Notice-and-Knowledge” as the Linchpin of Retaliation: Collymore v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2025)

“Notice-and-Knowledge” as the Linchpin of Retaliation: Collymore v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: May 8, 2025
“Notice-and-Knowledge” as the Linchpin of Retaliation: Collymore v. City of New York (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction In Collymore v. City of New York, No. 23-1304 (2d Cir. May 7 2025), the United...
Ensuring Material Consistency in Supervised Release Conditions under Rogers: United States v. Aughenbaugh

Ensuring Material Consistency in Supervised Release Conditions under Rogers: United States v. Aughenbaugh

Date: May 8, 2025
Ensuring Material Consistency in Supervised Release Conditions under Rogers: United States v. Aughenbaugh Introduction In United States v. Ryan Aughenbaugh, decided May 7, 2025, the Fourth Circuit...
Clarification of Larceny by Conversion in Construction Deposits: Title and Possession Principles

Clarification of Larceny by Conversion in Construction Deposits: Title and Possession Principles

Date: May 8, 2025
Clarification of Larceny by Conversion in Construction Deposits: Title and Possession Principles Introduction This commentary examines the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision in People of the State of...
Clarifying Custodial Responsibility Under Ohio’s Public Records Act

Clarifying Custodial Responsibility Under Ohio’s Public Records Act

Date: May 8, 2025
Clarifying Custodial Responsibility Under Ohio’s Public Records Act Introduction State ex rel. Clark v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, 2025-Ohio-1611, arose from a pro se mandamus...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert