Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

First Circuit Holds “Extraordinary Circumstances” Excuses for Untimely Asylum Are Unreviewable Discretionary Judgments After Wilkinson

First Circuit Holds “Extraordinary Circumstances” Excuses for Untimely Asylum Are Unreviewable Discretionary Judgments After Wilkinson

Date: Sep 24, 2025
First Circuit Holds “Extraordinary Circumstances” Excuses for Untimely Asylum Are Unreviewable Discretionary Judgments After Wilkinson Introduction In Zapet-Alvarado v. Bondi, the First Circuit...
"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime-Inflated Hours: Third Circuit Clarifies CBA Contribution Bases Under ERISA § 515

"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime-Inflated Hours: Third Circuit Clarifies CBA Contribution Bases Under ERISA § 515

Date: Sep 24, 2025
"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime-Inflated Hours: Third Circuit Clarifies CBA Contribution Bases Under ERISA § 515 Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (not...
"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime Multipliers: The Third Circuit’s Textual Clarification for ERISA Multiemployer Contributions

"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime Multipliers: The Third Circuit’s Textual Clarification for ERISA Multiemployer Contributions

Date: Sep 24, 2025
"Hours Paid" Means Compensated Hours, Not Overtime Multipliers: The Third Circuit’s Textual Clarification for ERISA Multiemployer Contributions Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (Not...
Anchoring Criminal History to the Offense of Conviction: Third Circuit Rejects Relevant-Conduct Start Date for §4A1.2(e) Look-Back in United States v. Josey

Anchoring Criminal History to the Offense of Conviction: Third Circuit Rejects Relevant-Conduct Start Date for §4A1.2(e) Look-Back in United States v. Josey

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Anchoring Criminal History to the Offense of Conviction: Third Circuit Rejects Relevant-Conduct Start Date for §4A1.2(e) Look-Back in United States v. Josey Introduction In a precedential opinion...
No Standalone Due‑Process Right to Obtain DNA Electronic Files Outside Court‑Supervised Habeas Discovery: The Fifth Circuit’s Decision in In re Blaine Milam

No Standalone Due‑Process Right to Obtain DNA Electronic Files Outside Court‑Supervised Habeas Discovery: The Fifth Circuit’s Decision in In re Blaine Milam

Date: Sep 24, 2025
No Standalone Due‑Process Right to Obtain DNA Electronic Files Outside Court‑Supervised Habeas Discovery: The Fifth Circuit’s Decision in In re Blaine Milam Introduction In a consolidated capital...
No Due Process Right to Pre‑Habeas Access to Raw DNA Data: Fifth Circuit Upholds Texas’s Court‑Controlled Postconviction Discovery Regime and Rejects § 1983 Mandamus

No Due Process Right to Pre‑Habeas Access to Raw DNA Data: Fifth Circuit Upholds Texas’s Court‑Controlled Postconviction Discovery Regime and Rejects § 1983 Mandamus

Date: Sep 24, 2025
No Due Process Right to Pre‑Habeas Access to Raw DNA Data: Fifth Circuit Upholds Texas’s Court‑Controlled Postconviction Discovery Regime and Rejects § 1983 Mandamus Introduction In Milam v....
Unsealing During Appeal: Fourth Circuit Confirms First Amendment Access to Summary‑Judgment Video Exhibits and Treats Motions to Unseal as Collateral

Unsealing During Appeal: Fourth Circuit Confirms First Amendment Access to Summary‑Judgment Video Exhibits and Treats Motions to Unseal as Collateral

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Unsealing During Appeal: Fourth Circuit Confirms First Amendment Access to Summary‑Judgment Video Exhibits and Treats Motions to Unseal as Collateral Introduction In Gray Media Group, Inc. v....
Trust-Fund Withholdings as “Income from Criminal Activity” Under U.S.S.G. § 2T1.1(b)(1): Fourth Circuit (Unpublished) Affirms Enhancement and Orders Full Resentencing for Rogers Error

Trust-Fund Withholdings as “Income from Criminal Activity” Under U.S.S.G. § 2T1.1(b)(1): Fourth Circuit (Unpublished) Affirms Enhancement and Orders Full Resentencing for Rogers Error

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Trust-Fund Withholdings as “Income from Criminal Activity” Under U.S.S.G. § 2T1.1(b)(1): Fourth Circuit (Unpublished) Affirms Enhancement and Orders Full Resentencing for Rogers Error Introduction...
Uncorroborated Recantations Do Not Justify Coram Nobis: Second Circuit Affirms Denial Without Evidentiary Hearing in Nkansah v. United States

Uncorroborated Recantations Do Not Justify Coram Nobis: Second Circuit Affirms Denial Without Evidentiary Hearing in Nkansah v. United States

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Uncorroborated Recantations Do Not Justify Coram Nobis: Second Circuit Affirms Denial Without Evidentiary Hearing in Nkansah v. United States Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit...
Oppedisano v. Zur: Second Circuit Reaffirms Loss‑Sharing as Indispensable to Implied Partnerships Under New York Law and Rejects Declaratory Workarounds to Unjust Enrichment Time Bars

Oppedisano v. Zur: Second Circuit Reaffirms Loss‑Sharing as Indispensable to Implied Partnerships Under New York Law and Rejects Declaratory Workarounds to Unjust Enrichment Time Bars

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Oppedisano v. Zur: Second Circuit Reaffirms Loss‑Sharing as Indispensable to Implied Partnerships Under New York Law and Rejects Declaratory Workarounds to Unjust Enrichment Time Bars Note: The...
Foreseeability of Co‑Conspirator Death Threats and Broad Electronic‑Device Search Conditions: The Second Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Deloatch

Foreseeability of Co‑Conspirator Death Threats and Broad Electronic‑Device Search Conditions: The Second Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Deloatch

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Foreseeability of Co‑Conspirator Death Threats and Broad Electronic‑Device Search Conditions: The Second Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Deloatch Note: This decision is a Second...
“Sensitive Places” in the Modern City: Times Square and Public Transit Upheld; Open-Carry Bans and City-Specific Permits Presumptively Constitutional after Bruen

“Sensitive Places” in the Modern City: Times Square and Public Transit Upheld; Open-Carry Bans and City-Specific Permits Presumptively Constitutional after Bruen

Date: Sep 24, 2025
“Sensitive Places” in the Modern City: Times Square and Public Transit Upheld; Open-Carry Bans and City-Specific Permits Presumptively Constitutional after Bruen Introduction In Frey v. City of New...
Entwinement Doesn’t Reach Party Identity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms District Courts May Resolve Disputed LLC Membership on a Rule 12(b)(1) Factual Attack to Determine Diversity

Entwinement Doesn’t Reach Party Identity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms District Courts May Resolve Disputed LLC Membership on a Rule 12(b)(1) Factual Attack to Determine Diversity

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Entwinement Doesn’t Reach Party Identity: Eleventh Circuit Affirms District Courts May Resolve Disputed LLC Membership on a Rule 12(b)(1) Factual Attack to Determine Diversity Introduction In...
No Third-Party Dissemination and Self-Imposed Decisions Do Not Create Article III Standing in FCRA Disputes

No Third-Party Dissemination and Self-Imposed Decisions Do Not Create Article III Standing in FCRA Disputes

Date: Sep 24, 2025
No Third-Party Dissemination and Self-Imposed Decisions Do Not Create Article III Standing in FCRA Disputes Introduction In Lashonda Peeples v. National Data Research, Inc. (d.b.a. Integrascan), No....
De Novo Review for Rule 59(J) “Clearly Erroneous” Motions and Limits on Using Video/Intoxication to Prove Contributory Negligence as a Matter of Law

De Novo Review for Rule 59(J) “Clearly Erroneous” Motions and Limits on Using Video/Intoxication to Prove Contributory Negligence as a Matter of Law

Date: Sep 16, 2025
De Novo Review for Rule 59(J) “Clearly Erroneous” Motions and Limits on Using Video/Intoxication to Prove Contributory Negligence as a Matter of Law Introduction In Indianapolis Public Transportation...
Unsworn Statements Cannot Create Fact Disputes, But May Prompt Rule 56(e) Cure Orders: Third Circuit’s Precedential Clarification in Lauria v. Lieb

Unsworn Statements Cannot Create Fact Disputes, But May Prompt Rule 56(e) Cure Orders: Third Circuit’s Precedential Clarification in Lauria v. Lieb

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Unsworn Statements Cannot Create Fact Disputes, But May Prompt Rule 56(e) Cure Orders: The Third Circuit’s Precedential Clarification in Lauria v. Lieb Introduction In a precedential opinion, the...
United States v. Mosley: Post-Esteras boundaries on revocation sentencing—no § 3553(a)(2)(A) retribution, “ballpark” deference, and unified justification for prison and supervision

United States v. Mosley: Post-Esteras boundaries on revocation sentencing—no § 3553(a)(2)(A) retribution, “ballpark” deference, and unified justification for prison and supervision

Date: Sep 13, 2025
United States v. Mosley: Post-Esteras boundaries on revocation sentencing—no § 3553(a)(2)(A) retribution, “ballpark” deference, and unified justification for prison and supervision Introduction In...
Lake v. State: Late-Disclosed Impeachment Evidence During Trial Is Not Brady “Suppression,” and Child-Witness Competency Turns on Mental Ability, Not Detailed Recall

Lake v. State: Late-Disclosed Impeachment Evidence During Trial Is Not Brady “Suppression,” and Child-Witness Competency Turns on Mental Ability, Not Detailed Recall

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Lake v. State: Late-Disclosed Impeachment Evidence During Trial Is Not Brady “Suppression,” and Child-Witness Competency Turns on Mental Ability, Not Detailed Recall Introduction In Justin Scott Lake...
First Circuit Clarifies INA Parole Authority: “Case‑by‑Case” Limits Grants, Not Termination; DHS May Categorically End and Revoke Parole Programs

First Circuit Clarifies INA Parole Authority: “Case‑by‑Case” Limits Grants, Not Termination; DHS May Categorically End and Revoke Parole Programs

Date: Sep 13, 2025
First Circuit Clarifies INA Parole Authority: “Case‑by‑Case” Limits Grants, Not Termination; DHS May Categorically End and Revoke Parole Programs Introduction Doe v. Noem addresses the scope of the...
Lascivious Exhibition Instructions May Include Defendant’s Intent; Sentence Affirmed via Assumed-Error Harmlessness — United States v. Tatum (4th Cir. 2025)

Lascivious Exhibition Instructions May Include Defendant’s Intent; Sentence Affirmed via Assumed-Error Harmlessness — United States v. Tatum (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 13, 2025
Lascivious Exhibition Instructions May Include Defendant’s Intent; Sentence Affirmed via Assumed-Error Harmlessness — United States v. Tatum (4th Cir. 2025) Note: This is an unpublished Fourth...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert