Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reaffirmation-of-strict-liability-in-manufacturers&amp Case Commentaries

Washington Supreme Court Recognizes Appellate Discretion to Permit Limited Nonparty Intervention in Criminal Appeals When the Same Nonparty Intervened in the Trial Court

Washington Supreme Court Recognizes Appellate Discretion to Permit Limited Nonparty Intervention in Criminal Appeals When the Same Nonparty Intervened in the Trial Court

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Appellate Discretion to Permit Limited Nonparty Intervention After Trial: State v. Thompson Introduction In State v. Thompson (No. 103338-9, Aug. 28, 2025), the Washington Supreme Court addressed a...
Post-Loper Bright, Circuit Precedent Controls: Third Circuit Reaffirms Jordon’s Sequencing Rule for Former § 1432(a)(3) and Holds BIA Self-Certification Denials Unreviewable

Post-Loper Bright, Circuit Precedent Controls: Third Circuit Reaffirms Jordon’s Sequencing Rule for Former § 1432(a)(3) and Holds BIA Self-Certification Denials Unreviewable

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Post-Loper Bright, Circuit Precedent Controls: Third Circuit Reaffirms Jordon’s Sequencing Rule for Former § 1432(a)(3) and Holds BIA Self-Certification Denials Unreviewable Introduction In...
No Double Disgorgement: Third Circuit Bars Duplicate Profit Awards Across Overlapping Trade‑Secret and Unfair‑Competition Claims; Clarifies Rule 50 Forfeiture and “Use” Proof Under the DTSA

No Double Disgorgement: Third Circuit Bars Duplicate Profit Awards Across Overlapping Trade‑Secret and Unfair‑Competition Claims; Clarifies Rule 50 Forfeiture and “Use” Proof Under the DTSA

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Double Disgorgement: Third Circuit Bars Duplicate Profit Awards Across Overlapping Trade‑Secret and Unfair‑Competition Claims; Clarifies Rule 50 Forfeiture and “Use” Proof Under the DTSA...
State Law Controls Attorney Charging Liens in MDLs: Third Circuit Endorses Pennsylvania’s Recht Causation Test and Rejects McKenzie-Based Fee-Splitting for Former Counsel in NFL Concussion Awards

State Law Controls Attorney Charging Liens in MDLs: Third Circuit Endorses Pennsylvania’s Recht Causation Test and Rejects McKenzie-Based Fee-Splitting for Former Counsel in NFL Concussion Awards

Date: Aug 31, 2025
State Law Controls Attorney Charging Liens in MDLs: Third Circuit Endorses Pennsylvania’s Recht Causation Test and Rejects McKenzie-Based Fee-Splitting for Former Counsel in NFL Concussion Awards...
Bruen’s “Shall‑Issue” Presumption Shields the NFA’s Suppressor Licensing; Good‑Faith Exception Bars Suppression: A Commentary on United States v. Peterson (5th Cir. 2025)

Bruen’s “Shall‑Issue” Presumption Shields the NFA’s Suppressor Licensing; Good‑Faith Exception Bars Suppression: A Commentary on United States v. Peterson (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Bruen’s “Shall‑Issue” Presumption Shields the NFA’s Suppressor Licensing; Good‑Faith Exception Bars Suppression: A Commentary on United States v. Peterson (5th Cir. 2025) Introduction United States...
Immediate Applicability of H.B. 265’s Public-Records Mandamus Prerequisites: Ohio Supreme Court Mandates Dismissal Without Pre‑Suit Complaint Affirmation

Immediate Applicability of H.B. 265’s Public-Records Mandamus Prerequisites: Ohio Supreme Court Mandates Dismissal Without Pre‑Suit Complaint Affirmation

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Immediate Applicability of H.B. 265’s Public-Records Mandamus Prerequisites: Ohio Supreme Court Mandates Dismissal Without Pre‑Suit Complaint Affirmation Case: State ex rel. Jordan v. Dept. of...
Schools Within Parks Sustain Firearm Bans on Facial Review; Signage-Based Enforcement Defeats Pre‑Enforcement Standing — A Structured Commentary on LaFave v. County of Fairfax (4th Cir. 2025)

Schools Within Parks Sustain Firearm Bans on Facial Review; Signage-Based Enforcement Defeats Pre‑Enforcement Standing — A Structured Commentary on LaFave v. County of Fairfax (4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Schools Within Parks Sustain Firearm Bans on Facial Review; Signage-Based Enforcement Defeats Pre‑Enforcement Standing — A Structured Commentary on LaFave v. County of Fairfax (4th Cir. 2025)...
Title VII’s 90‑Day Rule Stays in Its Lane: Fourth Circuit Bars Relation‑Back for Discrete Acts and Rejects Cross‑Statute Procedural Borrowing in Hollis v. Morgan State University

Title VII’s 90‑Day Rule Stays in Its Lane: Fourth Circuit Bars Relation‑Back for Discrete Acts and Rejects Cross‑Statute Procedural Borrowing in Hollis v. Morgan State University

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Title VII’s 90‑Day Rule Stays in Its Lane: Fourth Circuit Bars Relation‑Back for Discrete Acts and Rejects Cross‑Statute Procedural Borrowing Comprehensive Commentary on Hollis v. Morgan State...
Discretion Required: Fourth Circuit Holds South Carolina’s Quasi‑Judicial Administrative Immunity Applies Only to Discretionary Acts

Discretion Required: Fourth Circuit Holds South Carolina’s Quasi‑Judicial Administrative Immunity Applies Only to Discretionary Acts

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Discretion Required: Fourth Circuit Holds South Carolina’s Quasi‑Judicial Administrative Immunity Applies Only to Discretionary Acts Commentary on Tim Landholt v. Kendall Corley & Jeanette McBride,...
Nonbypassable Transmission Riders Under R.C. 4928.05: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms PUCO’s Discretion and Demands Particularized Harm for Discovery Challenges

Nonbypassable Transmission Riders Under R.C. 4928.05: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms PUCO’s Discretion and Demands Particularized Harm for Discovery Challenges

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Nonbypassable Transmission Riders Under R.C. 4928.05: Ohio Supreme Court Affirms PUCO’s Discretion and Demands Particularized Harm for Discovery Challenges Introduction In In re Application of Ohio...
Failure-to-Remedy Findings Are Sufficient When the Basis Is Discernible from the Order as a Whole: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Termination of Parental Rights

Failure-to-Remedy Findings Are Sufficient When the Basis Is Discernible from the Order as a Whole: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Termination of Parental Rights

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Failure-to-Remedy Findings Are Sufficient When the Basis Is Discernible from the Order as a Whole Case: Alana M. (Mother) v. State of Alaska, Department of Family & Community Services, Office of...
No Custody Fee Award Without Explicit AS 25.20.115 Findings; Rule 77(j) Sanctions Run Against Counsel, Not Parties — Commentary on Wallace v. O’Hara (Alaska 2025)

No Custody Fee Award Without Explicit AS 25.20.115 Findings; Rule 77(j) Sanctions Run Against Counsel, Not Parties — Commentary on Wallace v. O’Hara (Alaska 2025)

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Custody Fee Award Without Explicit AS 25.20.115 Findings; Rule 77(j) Sanctions Run Against Counsel, Not Parties Case: Amye Wallace v. John O’Hara, Supreme Court of the State of Alaska, No. S-19241...
No Due Process Violation from Extensive Representation Hearings; “Reasonable Efforts” Satisfied Despite Parental Noncooperation — Commentary on R.G. (Father) v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS

No Due Process Violation from Extensive Representation Hearings; “Reasonable Efforts” Satisfied Despite Parental Noncooperation — Commentary on R.G. (Father) v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS

Date: Aug 31, 2025
No Due Process Violation from Extensive Representation Hearings; “Reasonable Efforts” Satisfied Despite Parental Noncooperation — Commentary on R.G. (Father) v. State of Alaska, DFCS/OCS Memorandum...
Riverside Reaffirmed: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Bench-Trier May Resolve Conflicting Inferences at Summary Judgment; No “Rent Substitution” Credit for Affiliate-Funded Construction Absent Proof

Riverside Reaffirmed: Idaho Supreme Court Confirms Bench-Trier May Resolve Conflicting Inferences at Summary Judgment; No “Rent Substitution” Credit for Affiliate-Funded Construction Absent Proof

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Riverside Reaffirmed: Bench-Trier Summary Judgment and the Limits of “Rent Substitution” under a Triple‑Net Lease Introduction In Erie Properties, LLC v. Global Growth Holdings, Inc., the Idaho...
Imminent Danger Without Observable Impairment: Positive Methamphetamine UA and Ignoring Infant Car-Seat Instructions Suffice for Neglect in Wyoming

Imminent Danger Without Observable Impairment: Positive Methamphetamine UA and Ignoring Infant Car-Seat Instructions Suffice for Neglect in Wyoming

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Imminent Danger Without Observable Impairment: Positive Methamphetamine UA and Ignoring Infant Car-Seat Instructions Suffice for Neglect in Wyoming Introduction In In the Interest of MC, Minor Child:...
State v. McGuire: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Dual “Duty” Standards—Broad for Felony Battery on Officers, Narrow (Lawfulness-Dependent) for Resisting; Burden-Shifting Misconduct Cured by Prompt Judicial Intervention

State v. McGuire: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Dual “Duty” Standards—Broad for Felony Battery on Officers, Narrow (Lawfulness-Dependent) for Resisting; Burden-Shifting Misconduct Cured by Prompt Judicial Intervention

Date: Aug 31, 2025
State v. McGuire: Idaho Supreme Court Clarifies Dual “Duty” Standards—Broad for Felony Battery on Officers, Narrow (Lawfulness-Dependent) for Resisting; Burden-Shifting Misconduct Cured by Prompt...
Castro‑Castro v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Reopening and Administrative Closure to Pursue DHS Prosecutorial Discretion; DHS Enforcement Memos Are Not “New Evidence”

Castro‑Castro v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Reopening and Administrative Closure to Pursue DHS Prosecutorial Discretion; DHS Enforcement Memos Are Not “New Evidence”

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Castro‑Castro v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms Limits on Reopening and Administrative Closure to Pursue DHS Prosecutorial Discretion; DHS Enforcement Memos Are Not “New Evidence” Court: U.S. Court...
Ambiguity in State Confidentiality Law Defeats “Clearly Established” Prong: Second Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity for VHRC Officials and Confirms the Commission’s Sovereign Immunity

Ambiguity in State Confidentiality Law Defeats “Clearly Established” Prong: Second Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity for VHRC Officials and Confirms the Commission’s Sovereign Immunity

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Ambiguity in State Confidentiality Law Defeats “Clearly Established” Prong: Second Circuit Grants Qualified Immunity for VHRC Officials and Confirms the Commission’s Sovereign Immunity Case: Leise v....
Good-Faith Reliance on Cellphone Warrants with Minimal Nexus: The Second Circuit’s Guidance in United States v. Santos

Good-Faith Reliance on Cellphone Warrants with Minimal Nexus: The Second Circuit’s Guidance in United States v. Santos

Date: Aug 31, 2025
Good-Faith Reliance on Cellphone Warrants with Minimal Nexus: The Second Circuit’s Guidance in United States v. Santos Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Summary Order) Date: August...
When “Hypothetical” Risk Factors Mask Realized Risks—and Strategy Labels Mislead: The Second Circuit’s Partial Revival of Peloton Securities Claims

When “Hypothetical” Risk Factors Mask Realized Risks—and Strategy Labels Mislead: The Second Circuit’s Partial Revival of Peloton Securities Claims

Date: Aug 31, 2025
When “Hypothetical” Risk Factors Mask Realized Risks—and Strategy Labels Mislead: The Second Circuit’s Partial Revival of Peloton Securities Claims Introduction This commentary analyzes the Second...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.