Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reaffirmation-of-strict-liability-in-manufacturers&amp Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Successive Reconsideration Motions Do Not Extend the 90-Day Appeal Period from Tax Court Decisions; Actual Receipt of a Deficiency Notice Obviates Proof of Certified Mailing

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Successive Reconsideration Motions Do Not Extend the 90-Day Appeal Period from Tax Court Decisions; Actual Receipt of a Deficiency Notice Obviates Proof of Certified Mailing

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms: Successive Reconsideration Motions Do Not Extend the 90-Day Appeal Period from Tax Court Decisions; Actual Receipt of a Deficiency Notice Obviates Proof of Certified...
Evans v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Affirms Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing Based on Prison-Intimidation Evidence and Requires Merger of Assault and Aggravated Battery into Malice Murder

Evans v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Affirms Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing Based on Prison-Intimidation Evidence and Requires Merger of Assault and Aggravated Battery into Malice Murder

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Evans v. State: Georgia Supreme Court Affirms Forfeiture-by-Wrongdoing Based on Prison-Intimidation Evidence and Requires Merger of Assault and Aggravated Battery into Malice Murder Court: Supreme...
No Executive Exception to Civil Wage Theft Liability Under Labor Law §§ 193 and 198 After the No Wage Theft Loophole Act

No Executive Exception to Civil Wage Theft Liability Under Labor Law §§ 193 and 198 After the No Wage Theft Loophole Act

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Executive Exception to Civil Wage Theft Liability Under Labor Law §§ 193 and 198 After the No Wage Theft Loophole Act Patel v. Maybank Kim Eng Securities USA Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 05194 (1st Dep’t...
Unusual Deference to Mandated Reporters Reaffirmed; Consent-Based Home Body Checks Upheld; Qualified Immunity Shields § 1983 “Malicious Prosecution” Theories Based on Article 10 Petitions — Commentary on Stollman v. Williams (2d Cir. 2025)

Unusual Deference to Mandated Reporters Reaffirmed; Consent-Based Home Body Checks Upheld; Qualified Immunity Shields § 1983 “Malicious Prosecution” Theories Based on Article 10 Petitions — Commentary on Stollman v. Williams (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Unusual Deference to Mandated Reporters Reaffirmed; Consent-Based Home Body Checks Upheld; Qualified Immunity Shields § 1983 “Malicious Prosecution” Theories Based on Article 10 Petitions Commentary...
No Second Bite at the Apple under Montana’s MHRA: Exclusive Administrative Pathways, Strict 30/90-Day Deadlines, and Mailing Suffices for Due-Process Notice

No Second Bite at the Apple under Montana’s MHRA: Exclusive Administrative Pathways, Strict 30/90-Day Deadlines, and Mailing Suffices for Due-Process Notice

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Second Bite at the Apple under Montana’s MHRA: Exclusive Administrative Pathways, Strict 30/90-Day Deadlines, and Mailing Suffices for Due-Process Notice Note: The Montana Supreme Court designated...
Abandonment Is Fatal: Second Circuit Reaffirms “One Central Reason” Nexus for Withholding and CAT Acquiescence Requirement; Refers Counsel to Grievance Panel (Guerrero-Andachz v. Bondi)

Abandonment Is Fatal: Second Circuit Reaffirms “One Central Reason” Nexus for Withholding and CAT Acquiescence Requirement; Refers Counsel to Grievance Panel (Guerrero-Andachz v. Bondi)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Abandonment Is Fatal: Second Circuit Reaffirms “One Central Reason” Nexus for Withholding and CAT Acquiescence Requirement; Refers Counsel to Grievance Panel Introduction In Guerrero-Andachz v....
Second Circuit Reinforces Specificity in Software Trade Secrets and Limits NDAs to Information Actually Treated as Confidential — Capricorn Mgmt. Sys., Inc. v. GEICO & CCC (2d Cir. 2025)

Second Circuit Reinforces Specificity in Software Trade Secrets and Limits NDAs to Information Actually Treated as Confidential — Capricorn Mgmt. Sys., Inc. v. GEICO & CCC (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Second Circuit Reinforces Specificity in Software Trade Secrets and Limits NDAs to Information Actually Treated as Confidential — Capricorn Mgmt. Sys., Inc. v. GEICO & CCC (2d Cir. 2025) Court: U.S....
Reverse Adverse Possession of Ditch Easements Requires Uniform, Conspicuous Exclusion; “Prevailing Party” Fees Under § 70‑17‑112, MCA, Turn on Statutory Claims Alone

Reverse Adverse Possession of Ditch Easements Requires Uniform, Conspicuous Exclusion; “Prevailing Party” Fees Under § 70‑17‑112, MCA, Turn on Statutory Claims Alone

Date: Oct 1, 2025
Reverse Adverse Possession of Ditch Easements Requires Uniform, Conspicuous Exclusion; “Prevailing Party” Fees Under § 70‑17‑112, MCA, Turn on Statutory Claims Alone Introduction In Apecella v....
Corporate Venue Statute Applies to LLCs: Alabama Supreme Court Overrules WMS and Aligns LLC Venue with § 6-3-7

Corporate Venue Statute Applies to LLCs: Alabama Supreme Court Overrules WMS and Aligns LLC Venue with § 6-3-7

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Corporate Venue Statute Applies to LLCs: Alabama Supreme Court Overrules WMS and Aligns LLC Venue with § 6-3-7 Introduction In Ex parte Phillip H. Rivers, Steven Nobles, Todd Martin, Stan Roberts,...
Ex parte Thompson: Post-Deposition Inaction Defeats Relation Back — Due Diligence Requires Timely Discovery and Prompt Substitution Under Rule 9(h)

Ex parte Thompson: Post-Deposition Inaction Defeats Relation Back — Due Diligence Requires Timely Discovery and Prompt Substitution Under Rule 9(h)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Ex parte Thompson: Post-Deposition Inaction Defeats Relation Back — Due Diligence Requires Timely Discovery and Prompt Substitution Under Rule 9(h) Introduction In Ex parte Grisby Jacob Thompson, the...
When a Continuance Extends Rule 59.1: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Continuance Motions and Orders to Appear in the Appellate Record

When a Continuance Extends Rule 59.1: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Continuance Motions and Orders to Appear in the Appellate Record

Date: Sep 30, 2025
When a Continuance Extends Rule 59.1: Alabama Supreme Court Requires Continuance Motions and Orders to Appear in the Appellate Record Introduction In Teresa Williams and Barney’s Childcare and...
No Preservation Bar to “Failure to Charge an Offense” in De Novo Municipal Appeals; Rule 13.2 Supplants Pre‑Rules Ordinance‑Averment Requirements

No Preservation Bar to “Failure to Charge an Offense” in De Novo Municipal Appeals; Rule 13.2 Supplants Pre‑Rules Ordinance‑Averment Requirements

Date: Sep 30, 2025
No Preservation Bar to “Failure to Charge an Offense” in De Novo Municipal Appeals; Rule 13.2 Supplants Pre‑Rules Ordinance‑Averment Requirements Case: Ex parte John Sandifer; Ex parte Curtis Tanner;...
Breach-of-Trust, Not Double Counting: The Eleventh Circuit affirms consecutive, within-Guidelines revocation sentences despite an upward variance on the new offense (United States v. Foley)

Breach-of-Trust, Not Double Counting: The Eleventh Circuit affirms consecutive, within-Guidelines revocation sentences despite an upward variance on the new offense (United States v. Foley)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Breach-of-Trust, Not Double Counting: The Eleventh Circuit affirms consecutive, within-Guidelines revocation sentences despite an upward variance on the new offense Introduction In United States v....
No Interlocutory Appeal of Qualified Immunity Denials When Genuine Fact Disputes Persist: Cornelius v. Luna (2d Cir. 2025)

No Interlocutory Appeal of Qualified Immunity Denials When Genuine Fact Disputes Persist: Cornelius v. Luna (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
No Interlocutory Appeal of Qualified Immunity Denials When Genuine Fact Disputes Persist: Cornelius v. Luna (2d Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Summary Order,...
Posthumous Vacatur of 2005 Registration Suspensions: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies that Attorney Registration Sanctions Do Not Survive a Lawyer’s Death

Posthumous Vacatur of 2005 Registration Suspensions: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies that Attorney Registration Sanctions Do Not Survive a Lawyer’s Death

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Posthumous Vacatur of 2005 Registration Suspensions: Ohio Supreme Court Clarifies that Attorney Registration Sanctions Do Not Survive a Lawyer’s Death Introduction In an Administrative Actions entry...
Sixth Circuit Applies Muldrow to Title VII Religion Claims, Abrogates “Independent Harm” Rule, and Treats Coercive Sincerity Interviews as Potential Retaliation

Sixth Circuit Applies Muldrow to Title VII Religion Claims, Abrogates “Independent Harm” Rule, and Treats Coercive Sincerity Interviews as Potential Retaliation

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Sixth Circuit Applies Muldrow to Title VII Religion Claims, Abrogates “Independent Harm” Rule, and Treats Coercive Sincerity Interviews as Potential Retaliation Introduction In Jeffrey Bilyeu v....
EEZs Count as “High Seas,” MDLEA’s Stateless-Vessel Rule Stands, and No U.S. Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms in United States v. Juan De Leon Berroa

EEZs Count as “High Seas,” MDLEA’s Stateless-Vessel Rule Stands, and No U.S. Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms in United States v. Juan De Leon Berroa

Date: Sep 30, 2025
EEZs Count as “High Seas,” MDLEA’s Stateless-Vessel Rule Stands, and No U.S. Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms in United States v. Juan De Leon Berroa Introduction In United States v....
Harmless Error Permits Reliance on a Dismissed Co‑Defendant’s Expert Disclosure: Seventh Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment Where Opponent Had Notice and Opportunity to Respond

Harmless Error Permits Reliance on a Dismissed Co‑Defendant’s Expert Disclosure: Seventh Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment Where Opponent Had Notice and Opportunity to Respond

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Harmless Error Permits Reliance on a Dismissed Co‑Defendant’s Expert Disclosure Seventh Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment Where Opponent Had Notice and Opportunity to Respond Introduction In a...
Nebraska Failure‑to‑Warn Law Clarified: Learned Intermediary Extends to Proximate Cause and Supports Merging Negligence and Strict Liability Claims

Nebraska Failure‑to‑Warn Law Clarified: Learned Intermediary Extends to Proximate Cause and Supports Merging Negligence and Strict Liability Claims

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Nebraska Failure‑to‑Warn Law Clarified: Learned Intermediary Extends to Proximate Cause and Supports Merging Negligence and Strict Liability Claims Introduction In Jeffrey Thelen v. Somatics, LLC,...
Lying About Indictment Status on Form 4473 Is “Material” Under § 922(a)(6) Where § 922(n) Is Facially Valid: Commentary on United States v. Reilly (10th Cir. 2025)

Lying About Indictment Status on Form 4473 Is “Material” Under § 922(a)(6) Where § 922(n) Is Facially Valid: Commentary on United States v. Reilly (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Lying About Indictment Status on Form 4473 Is “Material” Under § 922(a)(6) Where § 922(n) Is Facially Valid: Commentary on United States v. Reilly (10th Cir. 2025) Introduction In United States v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.