Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

new-precedent-on... Case Commentaries

Fork-in-the-Road under Revised La. C.C.P. art. 3653: Courts Must Choose Between Paragraph (A)(1) and (A)(2) Based on Defendant’s Possession — Commentary on Winans v. McKay (5th Cir. 2025)

Fork-in-the-Road under Revised La. C.C.P. art. 3653: Courts Must Choose Between Paragraph (A)(1) and (A)(2) Based on Defendant’s Possession — Commentary on Winans v. McKay (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Fork-in-the-Road under Revised La. C.C.P. art. 3653: Courts Must Choose Between Paragraph (A)(1) and (A)(2) Based on Defendant’s Possession — Commentary on Winans v. McKay (5th Cir. 2025)...
Aggregation Controls FSA Credits: Any Disqualifying Conviction Bars First Step Act Time Credits for the Entire Aggregate Term (Bonnie v. Dunbar, 4th Cir. 2025)

Aggregation Controls FSA Credits: Any Disqualifying Conviction Bars First Step Act Time Credits for the Entire Aggregate Term (Bonnie v. Dunbar, 4th Cir. 2025)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Aggregation Controls FSA Credits: Any Disqualifying Conviction Bars First Step Act Time Credits for the Entire Aggregate Term Commentary on Gregory Allen Bonnie v. Warden Dunbar, No. 24-6665 (4th...
Post‑Hoc Alternative Grounds Do Not Cure Fabrications: Fourth Circuit Affirms Frivolous Asylum Finding and Demands Individualized Proof for Withholding/CAT Remands

Post‑Hoc Alternative Grounds Do Not Cure Fabrications: Fourth Circuit Affirms Frivolous Asylum Finding and Demands Individualized Proof for Withholding/CAT Remands

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Post‑Hoc Alternative Grounds Do Not Cure Fabrications: Fourth Circuit Affirms Frivolous Asylum Finding and Demands Individualized Proof for Withholding/CAT Remands Case: Gurwinder Singh v. Pamela Jo...
De Novo, Not Clear Error: Fourth Circuit Requires BIA to Review Application of the § 1101(f)(6) False-Testimony Bar De Novo and Reaffirms Jurisdiction over Mixed Questions Post-Wilkinson

De Novo, Not Clear Error: Fourth Circuit Requires BIA to Review Application of the § 1101(f)(6) False-Testimony Bar De Novo and Reaffirms Jurisdiction over Mixed Questions Post-Wilkinson

Date: Nov 7, 2025
De Novo, Not Clear Error: Fourth Circuit Requires BIA to Review Application of the § 1101(f)(6) False-Testimony Bar De Novo and Reaffirms Jurisdiction over Mixed Questions Post-Wilkinson Introduction...
"Actual Innocence Plus" Reaffirmed: The Tenth Circuit’s Gatekeeping Standard for Successive § 2254 Petitions in In re: Macklin

"Actual Innocence Plus" Reaffirmed: The Tenth Circuit’s Gatekeeping Standard for Successive § 2254 Petitions in In re: Macklin

Date: Nov 7, 2025
"Actual Innocence Plus" Reaffirmed: The Tenth Circuit’s Gatekeeping Standard for Successive § 2254 Petitions in In re: Macklin Introduction In In re: Macklin, No. 25-6160 (10th Cir. Nov. 5, 2025),...
Thompson v. Killian: RPA Limited to Title 12 Taxes; Class Actions Against Local Governments Permitted Outside Property Tax Disputes; Unjust Enrichment Barred by SCTCA

Thompson v. Killian: RPA Limited to Title 12 Taxes; Class Actions Against Local Governments Permitted Outside Property Tax Disputes; Unjust Enrichment Barred by SCTCA

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Thompson v. Killian: RPA Limited to Title 12 Taxes; Class Actions Against Local Governments Permitted Outside Property Tax Disputes; Unjust Enrichment Barred by SCTCA Introduction In Mark Gregory...
Adoption-with-Review: South Carolina Upholds Party-Drafted PCR Orders and Reaffirms Prejudice-Driven Mitigation Review in Capital Cases

Adoption-with-Review: South Carolina Upholds Party-Drafted PCR Orders and Reaffirms Prejudice-Driven Mitigation Review in Capital Cases

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Adoption-with-Review: South Carolina Upholds Party-Drafted PCR Orders and Reaffirms Prejudice-Driven Mitigation Review in Capital Cases Introduction In Marion Alexander Lindsey v. State, Opinion No....
IIED Claims Predicated on Medical Judgments Require Expert Affidavits; “Obvious Occurrence” Exception Does Not Reach Discharge and Pain‑Management Decisions — Commentary on McMahon v. Sanford, 2025 ND 184

IIED Claims Predicated on Medical Judgments Require Expert Affidavits; “Obvious Occurrence” Exception Does Not Reach Discharge and Pain‑Management Decisions — Commentary on McMahon v. Sanford, 2025 ND 184

Date: Nov 7, 2025
IIED Claims Predicated on Medical Judgments Require Expert Affidavits; “Obvious Occurrence” Exception Does Not Reach Discharge and Pain‑Management Decisions — Commentary on McMahon v. Sanford, 2025...
Smith v. State: No Per Se Strickland Prejudice from 404(b) Errors; Contextual Prejudice Analysis and Record Supplementation Required

Smith v. State: No Per Se Strickland Prejudice from 404(b) Errors; Contextual Prejudice Analysis and Record Supplementation Required

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Smith v. State: No Per Se Strickland Prejudice from 404(b) Errors; Contextual Prejudice Analysis and Record Supplementation Required Introduction In Smith v. State, 2025 ND 189 (N.D. Nov. 5, 2025),...
Playback of Evidence During Deliberations Must Occur in Open Court: Closure Violates the Public Trial Right — State v. Barrett, 2025 ND 186

Playback of Evidence During Deliberations Must Occur in Open Court: Closure Violates the Public Trial Right — State v. Barrett, 2025 ND 186

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Playback of Evidence During Deliberations Must Occur in Open Court: Closure Violates the Public Trial Right — State v. Barrett, 2025 ND 186 Introduction In State v. Barrett, 2025 ND 186, the North...
Consecutive Misdemeanor Sentences Permitted When Offenses Target Different Victims on Different Dates: State v. Cotton (2025 ND 191)

Consecutive Misdemeanor Sentences Permitted When Offenses Target Different Victims on Different Dates: State v. Cotton (2025 ND 191)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Consecutive Misdemeanor Sentences Permitted When Offenses Target Different Victims on Different Dates: State v. Cotton (2025 ND 191) Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota Date: November 5, 2025...
Parole Practices Cannot Create an Illegal Mandatory Minimum from Lawful Consecutive Sentences: A Commentary on State v. Wallette, 2025 ND 190

Parole Practices Cannot Create an Illegal Mandatory Minimum from Lawful Consecutive Sentences: A Commentary on State v. Wallette, 2025 ND 190

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Parole Practices Cannot Create an Illegal Mandatory Minimum from Lawful Consecutive Sentences: State v. Wallette, 2025 ND 190 Introduction In State v. Wallette, 2025 ND 190, the North Dakota Supreme...
State v. Watterud: Pattern Child-Testimony Can Sustain Multi-Year GSI Counts; Open-Court Playback During Deliberations Requires Proof of Actual Prejudice for Mistrial

State v. Watterud: Pattern Child-Testimony Can Sustain Multi-Year GSI Counts; Open-Court Playback During Deliberations Requires Proof of Actual Prejudice for Mistrial

Date: Nov 7, 2025
State v. Watterud: Pattern Child-Testimony Can Sustain Multi-Year GSI Counts; Open-Court Playback During Deliberations Requires Proof of Actual Prejudice for Mistrial Court: Supreme Court of North...
State v. Wilson: Calibrating Waiver-of-Counsel Advisements at Probation Revocation—No Sixth Amendment Right; Tailored Warnings Under Rule 32(f)(3)(A)(iii) Suffice

State v. Wilson: Calibrating Waiver-of-Counsel Advisements at Probation Revocation—No Sixth Amendment Right; Tailored Warnings Under Rule 32(f)(3)(A)(iii) Suffice

Date: Nov 7, 2025
State v. Wilson: Calibrating Waiver-of-Counsel Advisements at Probation Revocation—No Sixth Amendment Right; Tailored Warnings Under Rule 32(f)(3)(A)(iii) Suffice Court: Supreme Court of North Dakota...
Commonwealth v. Blakeney: No Public-Record Presumption in PCRA “Unknown Fact” Exception and Reasonable Diligence in Juror-Nondisclosure Claims

Commonwealth v. Blakeney: No Public-Record Presumption in PCRA “Unknown Fact” Exception and Reasonable Diligence in Juror-Nondisclosure Claims

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Commonwealth v. Blakeney: No Public-Record Presumption in PCRA “Unknown Fact” Exception and Reasonable Diligence in Juror-Nondisclosure Claims Introduction In Commonwealth v. Blakeney (Pa. Nov. 5,...
Maurent v. Spatny: Habeas Release Does Not Moot the State’s Appeal When Return to Custody Remains Possible

Maurent v. Spatny: Habeas Release Does Not Moot the State’s Appeal When Return to Custody Remains Possible

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Maurent v. Spatny: Habeas Release Does Not Moot the State’s Appeal When Return to Custody Remains Possible Introduction In Maurent v. Spatny, 2025-Ohio-5002, the Supreme Court of Ohio clarifies a...
Jurisdiction to Resentence Persists After Federal Habeas Vacates Death Sentence; Extraordinary Writs Inapplicable to Indictment and Verdict-Form Errors

Jurisdiction to Resentence Persists After Federal Habeas Vacates Death Sentence; Extraordinary Writs Inapplicable to Indictment and Verdict-Form Errors

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Jurisdiction to Resentence Persists After Federal Habeas Vacates Death Sentence; Extraordinary Writs Inapplicable to Indictment and Verdict-Form Errors Introduction In State ex rel. Allah-U-Akbar v....
Partial Constructive Eviction From Parking Spaces, Nonwaiver Clauses, and Limits on CPLR 3211(b): Diversified Building Co., LLC v. Nader Enterprises, LLC

Partial Constructive Eviction From Parking Spaces, Nonwaiver Clauses, and Limits on CPLR 3211(b): Diversified Building Co., LLC v. Nader Enterprises, LLC

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Partial Constructive Eviction From Parking Spaces, Nonwaiver Clauses, and Limits on CPLR 3211(b): Clarifying Tenant Defenses in Commercial Lease Disputes Introduction In Diversified Building Co., LLC...
Matter of Ebel: Nonpayment of a Part 137 Fee Arbitration Award Constitutes Misconduct Warranting Suspension

Matter of Ebel: Nonpayment of a Part 137 Fee Arbitration Award Constitutes Misconduct Warranting Suspension

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Matter of Ebel: Nonpayment of a Part 137 Fee Arbitration Award Constitutes Misconduct Warranting Suspension Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Judicial Department (Per Curiam)...
Prior Corrosion Inspections and Visible Stair Defects Establish Constructive Notice; Comparative Negligence Charge Requires Evidentiary Basis; Past Pain-and-Suffering Remitted to $100,000 — Schollmeier v. Metropolitan Tr. Auth. (LIRR)

Prior Corrosion Inspections and Visible Stair Defects Establish Constructive Notice; Comparative Negligence Charge Requires Evidentiary Basis; Past Pain-and-Suffering Remitted to $100,000 — Schollmeier v. Metropolitan Tr. Auth. (LIRR)

Date: Nov 7, 2025
Prior Corrosion Inspections and Visible Stair Defects Establish Constructive Notice; Comparative Negligence Charge Requires Evidentiary Basis; Past Pain-and-Suffering Remitted to $100,000 —...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert