Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

juvenile-sentencing-guidelines:-iowa-supreme-court Case Commentaries

Ensuring Reliability in CSAAS-Based Expert Testimony: Daubert Compliance under MRE 702

Ensuring Reliability in CSAAS-Based Expert Testimony: Daubert Compliance under MRE 702

Date: May 3, 2025
Ensuring Reliability in CSAAS-Based Expert Testimony: Daubert Compliance under MRE 702 Introduction The Michigan Supreme Court’s May 2, 2025 order in People of the State of Michigan v. Juan Jose Del...
Habeas Corpus Relief for Void Habitual‐Criminal Sentences and the Limits of Nunc Pro Tunc Corrections

Habeas Corpus Relief for Void Habitual‐Criminal Sentences and the Limits of Nunc Pro Tunc Corrections

Date: May 3, 2025
Habeas Corpus Relief for Void Habitual-Criminal Sentences and the Limits of Nunc Pro Tunc Corrections Introduction Ballheim v. Settles (318 Neb. 873, 2025) arose from Trever Ballheim’s collateral...
Protecting Foreclosure Surplus Under the Takings Clause: Sikorsky v. City of Newburgh

Protecting Foreclosure Surplus Under the Takings Clause: Sikorsky v. City of Newburgh

Date: May 3, 2025
Protecting Foreclosure Surplus Under the Takings Clause: Sikorsky v. City of Newburgh Introduction In Sikorsky v. City of Newburgh, 23-1171-cv (2d Cir. May 2, 2025), the Second Circuit addressed...
Balancing Child Welfare, Abduction Risk, and Cryptocurrency Gains: Discretion in Parenting Time and Property Division

Balancing Child Welfare, Abduction Risk, and Cryptocurrency Gains: Discretion in Parenting Time and Property Division

Date: May 3, 2025
Balancing Child Welfare, Abduction Risk, and Cryptocurrency Gains: Discretion in Parenting Time and Property Division Introduction In In the Matter of Jonathan Kent and Lei Luo (Supreme Court of New...
“Stay Within the Mandate”: Effective Assistance of Counsel on Remittal after People v. Nathan (2025)

“Stay Within the Mandate”: Effective Assistance of Counsel on Remittal after People v. Nathan (2025)

Date: May 3, 2025
“Stay Within the Mandate”: Effective Assistance of Counsel on Remittal after People v. Nathan (2025) Introduction The Fourth Department’s 2025 decision in People v. Nathan, 238 A.D.3d 1516, tackles a...
Clarification of Lease Lookback Provisions and Standards of Review in State Airport Hangar Rent Appeals

Clarification of Lease Lookback Provisions and Standards of Review in State Airport Hangar Rent Appeals

Date: May 3, 2025
Clarification of Lease Lookback Provisions and Standards of Review in State Airport Hangar Rent Appeals Introduction This decision arises from a consolidated appeal by five tenants of state-owned...
Ensuring Voluntary Admissions in Child Protective Plea Hearings: Obligatory Record Completeness and Advisements

Ensuring Voluntary Admissions in Child Protective Plea Hearings: Obligatory Record Completeness and Advisements

Date: May 3, 2025
Ensuring Voluntary Admissions in Child Protective Plea Hearings: Obligatory Record Completeness and Advisements Introduction In the matter In re T. Hewitt, Minor, the Michigan Supreme Court, by a...
Consent Threshold for Eighth Amendment Prison Sexual Abuse Claims

Consent Threshold for Eighth Amendment Prison Sexual Abuse Claims

Date: May 3, 2025
Consent Threshold for Eighth Amendment Prison Sexual Abuse Claims Introduction David C.L. Walton, a state prisoner in Wisconsin, sued prison nurse Ashley Nehls under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that...
Allocation of Nonresident Guided Hunt Permits Upholds Alaska Constitutional Principles

Allocation of Nonresident Guided Hunt Permits Upholds Alaska Constitutional Principles

Date: May 3, 2025
Allocation of Nonresident Guided Hunt Permits Upholds Alaska Constitutional Principles Introduction In Robert Cassell v. State of Alaska, Department of Fish & Game, Board of Game (Supreme Court No....
Clarifying COA Requirements and Ineffective Assistance Analysis under §2255: United States v. Guzman-Dominguez

Clarifying COA Requirements and Ineffective Assistance Analysis under §2255: United States v. Guzman-Dominguez

Date: May 3, 2025
Clarifying COA Requirements and Ineffective Assistance Analysis under §2255: United States v. Guzman-Dominguez Introduction United States v. Guzman-Dominguez, decided by the Tenth Circuit on May 2,...
Defendant-Caused Delay Bars Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Claim

Defendant-Caused Delay Bars Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Claim

Date: May 3, 2025
Defendant-Caused Delay Bars Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Claim Introduction United States v. Eric Michael Schuster, 25a0113p.06 (6th Cir. May 2, 2025), is a published Sixth Circuit decision...
Harmless Allocution Error in Unlawful Reentry Sentencing: Clarifying Plain Error Review under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32

Harmless Allocution Error in Unlawful Reentry Sentencing: Clarifying Plain Error Review under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32

Date: May 3, 2025
Harmless Allocution Error in Unlawful Reentry Sentencing: Clarifying Plain Error Review under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 Introduction This commentary examines United States v. Rudys Osvaldo Torres, No....
Probable Cause Suffices for Pre-Revocation Detention: Limits of Due-Process in Probation Revocation

Probable Cause Suffices for Pre-Revocation Detention: Limits of Due-Process in Probation Revocation

Date: May 3, 2025
Probable Cause Suffices for Pre-Revocation Detention: Limits of Due-Process in Probation Revocation Introduction In Dion Horton v. Administrative Judge Jill Rangos (3d Cir. 2025), a panel of the...
Physician’s Duty Under FTCA: No Liability for Emotional Distress from Treatment-Related Discharge Threat

Physician’s Duty Under FTCA: No Liability for Emotional Distress from Treatment-Related Discharge Threat

Date: May 3, 2025
Physician’s Duty Under FTCA: No Liability for Emotional Distress from Treatment-Related Discharge Threat Introduction In David D. Richardson v. United States, the Third Circuit addressed whether a...
Waiver of “Person Aggrieved” Requirement: Jurisdiction vs. Capacity in Zoning Appeals

Waiver of “Person Aggrieved” Requirement: Jurisdiction vs. Capacity in Zoning Appeals

Date: May 3, 2025
Waiver of “Person Aggrieved” Requirement: Jurisdiction vs. Capacity in Zoning Appeals Introduction In Ex parte Teachers’ Retirement System of Alabama et al. (2025), the Supreme Court of Alabama...
Qualified Immunity for Discretionary Functions: De Novo Review and the Limits of Internal Policies

Qualified Immunity for Discretionary Functions: De Novo Review and the Limits of Internal Policies

Date: May 3, 2025
Qualified Immunity for Discretionary Functions: De Novo Review and the Limits of Internal Policies Introduction In Jason Moorhead v. West Virginia Army National Guard and West Virginia Mountaineer...
Immunity for Municipal “Good Samaritan” Services: Interpreting “Gratuitous” in AS 09.65.070(d)(4)

Immunity for Municipal “Good Samaritan” Services: Interpreting “Gratuitous” in AS 09.65.070(d)(4)

Date: May 3, 2025
Immunity for Municipal “Good Samaritan” Services: Interpreting “Gratuitous” in AS 09.65.070(d)(4) Introduction In John D. Rochon v. City of Nome, Allen Wright, and Jackie L. Reader, the Alaska...
Clarifying Attorney Disclosure Obligations and Proximate Cause in Legal Malpractice: Signal Funding v. Sugar Felsenthal

Clarifying Attorney Disclosure Obligations and Proximate Cause in Legal Malpractice: Signal Funding v. Sugar Felsenthal

Date: May 3, 2025
Clarifying Attorney Disclosure Obligations and Proximate Cause in Legal Malpractice: Signal Funding v. Sugar Felsenthal Introduction Signal Funding, LLC (“Signal”) is a pre-settlement...
Clarifying Insurer Duty to Defend BIPA Claims: Access or Disclosure vs. Statutory Violations Exclusions

Clarifying Insurer Duty to Defend BIPA Claims: Access or Disclosure vs. Statutory Violations Exclusions

Date: May 3, 2025
Clarifying Insurer Duty to Defend BIPA Claims: Access or Disclosure vs. Statutory Violations Exclusions Introduction This commentary examines Citizens Insurance Company of America v. Mullins Food...
Evidence‐Based Requirement for “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D): Consideration of Intra‐Country Relocation

Evidence‐Based Requirement for “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D): Consideration of Intra‐Country Relocation

Date: May 3, 2025
Evidence‐Based Requirement for “Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship” under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D): Consideration of Intra‐Country Relocation Introduction Herrera-Arellano v. Garland is an...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert