Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

first-circuit-reinforces-first-amendment-protections-for-secret-audio-recording-of-police-in-public:-interpretation-of-massachusetts& Case Commentaries

Structural Challenges Survive Personnel Changes: Amendment 33’s Shield Over Constitutional Boards Confirmed

Structural Challenges Survive Personnel Changes: Amendment 33’s Shield Over Constitutional Boards Confirmed

Date: Jun 6, 2025
Structural Challenges Survive Personnel Changes: Amendment 33’s Shield Over Constitutional Boards Confirmed Introduction In Sarah Sanders, Governor, et al. v. Arkansas Board of Corrections, 2025 Ark....
Lovett v. State (2025): The Arkansas Supreme Court Re-Affirms a “Strict-Preservation” Rule for Trial Objections

Lovett v. State (2025): The Arkansas Supreme Court Re-Affirms a “Strict-Preservation” Rule for Trial Objections

Date: Jun 6, 2025
Lovett v. State (2025): The Arkansas Supreme Court Re-Affirms a “Strict-Preservation” Rule for Trial Objections Introduction Raymond Lovett was convicted of capital murder and received a life...

        Overton v. State of Arkansas (2025): Prosecutorial Latitude in Voir-Dire
        to Reference the “Single-Witness Sufficiency” Rule

Overton v. State of Arkansas (2025): Prosecutorial Latitude in Voir-Dire to Reference the “Single-Witness Sufficiency” Rule

Date: Jun 6, 2025
Overton v. State of Arkansas (2025): Prosecutorial Latitude in Voir-Dire to Reference the “Single-Witness Sufficiency” Rule Introduction In Eric Overton v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 105, the...
“Digital Impersonation as an Aggravating Factor in Attorney Discipline” – Commentary on Matter of Perry (2025 NY Slip Op 03386)

“Digital Impersonation as an Aggravating Factor in Attorney Discipline” – Commentary on Matter of Perry (2025 NY Slip Op 03386)

Date: Jun 6, 2025
“Digital Impersonation as an Aggravating Factor in Attorney Discipline” Commentary on Matter of Perry (2025 NY Slip Op 03386) 1. Introduction Matter of Perry concerns disciplinary proceedings brought...
Successive Use of New York’s Saving Statute: The Second Department Authorises Multiple Invocations of CPLR 205(a) – Analysis of Tumminia v. Staten Island University Hospital (2025)

Successive Use of New York’s Saving Statute: The Second Department Authorises Multiple Invocations of CPLR 205(a) – Analysis of Tumminia v. Staten Island University Hospital (2025)

Date: Jun 5, 2025
Successive Use of New York’s Saving Statute: The Second Department Authorises Multiple Invocations of CPLR 205(a) Commentary on Tumminia v. Staten Island University Hospital, 2025 NY Slip Op 03352 1....
No Self-Review: Appellate Division Bars Administrative Law Judges from Issuing Final Determinations on Their Own Recommended Decisions in Justice Center Abuse Proceedings (Matter of Doe v. New York State Justice Center, 2025)

No Self-Review: Appellate Division Bars Administrative Law Judges from Issuing Final Determinations on Their Own Recommended Decisions in Justice Center Abuse Proceedings (Matter of Doe v. New York State Justice Center, 2025)

Date: Jun 5, 2025
No Self-Review: Appellate Division Bars Administrative Law Judges from Issuing Final Determinations on Their Own Recommended Decisions in Justice Center Abuse Proceedings (Matter of Doe v. New York...
Vindell v. Site 2 DSA Owner, LLC – Re-drawing the Boundary of the “Inherent Hazards” Exception under Labor Law § 200

Vindell v. Site 2 DSA Owner, LLC – Re-drawing the Boundary of the “Inherent Hazards” Exception under Labor Law § 200

Date: Jun 5, 2025
Vindell v. Site 2 DSA Owner, LLC – Re-drawing the Boundary of the “Inherent Hazards” Exception under Labor Law § 200 I. Introduction Vindell v. Site 2 DSA Owner, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 03353 (2d Dep’t...
“Harco v. Scottsdale: Clarifying the Limits of Collateral Estoppel and Documentary Evidence in Follow-Form Excess Coverage Disputes”

“Harco v. Scottsdale: Clarifying the Limits of Collateral Estoppel and Documentary Evidence in Follow-Form Excess Coverage Disputes”

Date: Jun 5, 2025
Harco v. Scottsdale: Clarifying the Limits of Collateral Estoppel and Documentary Evidence in Follow-Form Excess Coverage Disputes Introduction The Appellate Division, Second Department’s decision in...
Merger Clauses Trump Alleged Oral Joint-Ventures in New York Real-Estate Deals: A Commentary on IPA Asset Mgt., LLC v. Schuman (2025)

Merger Clauses Trump Alleged Oral Joint-Ventures in New York Real-Estate Deals: A Commentary on IPA Asset Mgt., LLC v. Schuman (2025)

Date: Jun 5, 2025
Merger Clauses Trump Alleged Oral Joint-Ventures in New York Real-Estate Deals: A Commentary on IPA Asset Management, LLC v. Schuman (2025) Introduction On 4 June 2025 the Appellate Division, Second...
“Let the Doctors Speak” – State v. Soto and the New Mandate Against Undue Restriction of Expert Medical Testimony in Child-Abuse Homicide Trials

“Let the Doctors Speak” – State v. Soto and the New Mandate Against Undue Restriction of Expert Medical Testimony in Child-Abuse Homicide Trials

Date: Jun 4, 2025
“Let the Doctors Speak” – State v. Soto and the New Mandate Against Undue Restriction of Expert Medical Testimony in Child-Abuse Homicide Trials 1. Introduction Court & Date: New Mexico Supreme...
Reaffirming Colton: The Strict Test for Double Jeopardy Based on Prosecutorial Intent in Connecticut

Reaffirming Colton: The Strict Test for Double Jeopardy Based on Prosecutorial Intent in Connecticut

Date: Jun 4, 2025
Reaffirming Colton: The Strict Test for Double Jeopardy Based on Prosecutorial Intent in Connecticut Introduction State v. Patrick M. (Supreme Court of Connecticut, officially released 3 June 2025)...
“The Walsh Protocol”: Judicial Duties When a Plea Agreement Is Ambiguous at Sentencing

“The Walsh Protocol”: Judicial Duties When a Plea Agreement Is Ambiguous at Sentencing

Date: Jun 4, 2025
“The Walsh Protocol”: Judicial Duties When a Plea Agreement Is Ambiguous at Sentencing Introduction State v. Walsh, 373 Or 714 (2025), confronts a recurring but seldom-resolved problem: what must a...
Establishing Limits on Victim Character Evidence Under the Plain Error Doctrine

Establishing Limits on Victim Character Evidence Under the Plain Error Doctrine

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Establishing Limits on Victim Character Evidence Under the Plain Error Doctrine Introduction The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia’s decision in State of West Virginia v. David Hunter Lewis...
“A New Clock for Every Act” – The Supreme Court’s (Non-)Decision in Nicholson v. W. L. York, Inc. and the Reaffirmation of Discrete-Act Accrual Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981

“A New Clock for Every Act” – The Supreme Court’s (Non-)Decision in Nicholson v. W. L. York, Inc. and the Reaffirmation of Discrete-Act Accrual Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Date: Jun 3, 2025
“A New Clock for Every Act” – The Supreme Court’s (Non-)Decision in Nicholson v. W. L. York, Inc. and the Reaffirmation of Discrete-Act Accrual Under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Introduction In Nicholson v. W....
Preservation of Judicial Immunity for Public Bodies Under the New Mexico Civil Rights Act

Preservation of Judicial Immunity for Public Bodies Under the New Mexico Civil Rights Act

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Preservation of Judicial Immunity for Public Bodies Under the New Mexico Civil Rights Act 1. Introduction The Supreme Court of New Mexico’s decision in Bolen v. New Mexico Racing Commission (2025)...
Issuer Repurchases Outside the Reach of Section 16(b): No Short-Swing Liability for Treasury Stock Buybacks

Issuer Repurchases Outside the Reach of Section 16(b): No Short-Swing Liability for Treasury Stock Buybacks

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Issuer Repurchases Outside the Reach of Section 16(b): No Short-Swing Liability for Treasury Stock Buybacks Introduction This commentary examines the Eleventh Circuit’s June 2, 2025 per curiam...
New Precedent: Ohio’s Two-Year Personal-Injury Statute Governs Title IX Claims

New Precedent: Ohio’s Two-Year Personal-Injury Statute Governs Title IX Claims

Date: Jun 3, 2025
New Precedent: Ohio’s Two-Year Personal-Injury Statute Governs Title IX Claims 1. Introduction In Eszter Pryor v. The Ohio State University, No. 24-3812 (6th Cir. Jun. 2, 2025), the Sixth Circuit...
Establishing the Threshold for “Extraordinary Circumstances” Under Younger Abstention in Federal Challenges to Ongoing State Criminal Proceedings

Establishing the Threshold for “Extraordinary Circumstances” Under Younger Abstention in Federal Challenges to Ongoing State Criminal Proceedings

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Establishing the Threshold for “Extraordinary Circumstances” Under Younger Abstention in Federal Challenges to Ongoing State Criminal Proceedings Introduction This commentary examines the Third...
United States v. Lawrence: Affirming District Court Discretion in Crack/Powder Cocaine Sentencing and PSR-Adopted Search Conditions

United States v. Lawrence: Affirming District Court Discretion in Crack/Powder Cocaine Sentencing and PSR-Adopted Search Conditions

Date: Jun 3, 2025
United States v. Lawrence: Affirming District Court Discretion in Crack/Powder Cocaine Sentencing and PSR-Adopted Search Conditions Introduction In United States v. Lawrence (2d Cir. June 2, 2025),...
Reaffirmation of Mens Rea Requirements under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) in True Threat Prosecutions

Reaffirmation of Mens Rea Requirements under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) in True Threat Prosecutions

Date: Jun 3, 2025
Reaffirmation of Mens Rea Requirements under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) in True Threat Prosecutions Introduction In United States v. Bedell, No. 24-1783 (2d Cir. June 2, 2025), the Second Circuit addressed...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert