Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

affirmation-of-illinois-central-railroad&amp Case Commentaries

Interest-Based Allocation of Joint Loss‑Payee Insurance Proceeds and Preclusion of Insurer’s Post‑Verdict Attacks under Tennessee Law

Interest-Based Allocation of Joint Loss‑Payee Insurance Proceeds and Preclusion of Insurer’s Post‑Verdict Attacks under Tennessee Law

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Interest-Based Allocation of Joint Loss‑Payee Insurance Proceeds and Preclusion of Insurer’s Post‑Verdict Attacks under Tennessee Law Introduction This appeal—Hanover American Insurance Co. v....
EEZ as “High Seas,” Validity of “Neither Confirm Nor Deny” Statelessness, and No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Foundational Limits on Constitutional Challenges

EEZ as “High Seas,” Validity of “Neither Confirm Nor Deny” Statelessness, and No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Foundational Limits on Constitutional Challenges

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZ as “High Seas,” Validity of “Neither Confirm Nor Deny” Statelessness, and No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Foundational Limits on Constitutional Challenges...
Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing May Weigh Overdose-Related Investigation Context Without Proving Causation

Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing May Weigh Overdose-Related Investigation Context Without Proving Causation

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing May Weigh Overdose-Related Investigation Context Without Proving Causation Case: United States v. Sudiata Neket Zanja Stinson, No. 24-11993 (11th Cir. Sept. 25, 2025)...
“High Seas” Includes Foreign Contiguous Zones: Eleventh Circuit Confirms MDLEA Jurisdiction Over Stateless Vessels Interdicted Beyond Territorial Seas

“High Seas” Includes Foreign Contiguous Zones: Eleventh Circuit Confirms MDLEA Jurisdiction Over Stateless Vessels Interdicted Beyond Territorial Seas

Date: Sep 26, 2025
“High Seas” Includes Foreign Contiguous Zones: Eleventh Circuit Confirms MDLEA Jurisdiction Over Stateless Vessels Interdicted Beyond Territorial Seas Case Overview Case: United States v. Cristian...
Recklessness Suffices for § 875(c) “True Threats”; Rule 106 Context Is Narrow; Keene Alternative-Sentence Harmlessness Reaffirmed

Recklessness Suffices for § 875(c) “True Threats”; Rule 106 Context Is Narrow; Keene Alternative-Sentence Harmlessness Reaffirmed

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Recklessness Suffices for § 875(c) “True Threats”; Rule 106 Context Is Narrow; Keene Alternative-Sentence Harmlessness Reaffirmed Introduction In United States v. Cloepha Franks, No. 24-11546 (11th...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs and “Non‑Affirmation” Statelessness; Confirms No Nexus Requirement; Courier Minor‑Role Denial Upheld

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs and “Non‑Affirmation” Statelessness; Confirms No Nexus Requirement; Courier Minor‑Role Denial Upheld

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms MDLEA Jurisdiction in Foreign EEZs and “Non‑Affirmation” Statelessness; Confirms No Nexus Requirement; Courier Minor‑Role Denial Upheld Commentary on United States v....
EEZs Are “High Seas,” Nationality Equals Registry Under the MDLEA, and No Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Puello

EEZs Are “High Seas,” Nationality Equals Registry Under the MDLEA, and No Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Puello

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZs Are “High Seas,” Nationality Equals Registry Under the MDLEA, and No Nexus Is Required: Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Puello Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Erlinger’s Admission Exception in Practice: Eleventh Circuit Holds Plea Admissions to “Separate Occasions” Sustain ACCA and § 841 Enhancements (United States v. Scott)

Erlinger’s Admission Exception in Practice: Eleventh Circuit Holds Plea Admissions to “Separate Occasions” Sustain ACCA and § 841 Enhancements (United States v. Scott)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Erlinger’s Admission Exception in Practice: Plea Admissions to “Separate Occasions” Sustain ACCA and § 841 Enhancements Case: United States v. Hiawatha Laquinta Scott, III, No. 24-11045 (11th Cir....
“Touching the Vehicle Touches the Person”: The Eleventh Circuit Holds That Shooting and Striking a Car Seizes Its Driver, and Treats Gunfire-Initiated Stops as Arrests (Watkins v. Davis)

“Touching the Vehicle Touches the Person”: The Eleventh Circuit Holds That Shooting and Striking a Car Seizes Its Driver, and Treats Gunfire-Initiated Stops as Arrests (Watkins v. Davis)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
“Touching the Vehicle Touches the Person”: The Eleventh Circuit Holds That Shooting and Striking a Car Seizes Its Driver, and Treats Gunfire-Initiated Stops as Arrests Introduction In a published...
Allocation, Not Priority: Sixth Circuit Limits Insurers’ Post-Verdict Challenges and Adopts Leasehold-Value Allocation for Joint “As Interests May Appear” Loss-Payable Clauses

Allocation, Not Priority: Sixth Circuit Limits Insurers’ Post-Verdict Challenges and Adopts Leasehold-Value Allocation for Joint “As Interests May Appear” Loss-Payable Clauses

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Allocation, Not Priority: Sixth Circuit Limits Insurers’ Post-Verdict Challenges and Adopts Leasehold-Value Allocation for Joint “As Interests May Appear” Loss-Payable Clauses Introduction This...
“Because of” in § 245(b)(2)(B) Means But‑For Causation; Racially Motivated Road Violence Is a Badge of Slavery Congress May Prohibit Under the Thirteenth Amendment

“Because of” in § 245(b)(2)(B) Means But‑For Causation; Racially Motivated Road Violence Is a Badge of Slavery Congress May Prohibit Under the Thirteenth Amendment

Date: Sep 26, 2025
“Because of” in § 245(b)(2)(B) Means But‑For Causation; Racially Motivated Road Violence Is a Badge of Slavery Congress May Prohibit Under the Thirteenth Amendment Introduction In United States v....
No Bond Coverage for Financing Disguised as Sale–Leaseback; Surety May Invoke Parol Evidence as a “Stranger”; Prevailing Defendants Can Recover § 936 Fees Based on Suit’s Gravamen

No Bond Coverage for Financing Disguised as Sale–Leaseback; Surety May Invoke Parol Evidence as a “Stranger”; Prevailing Defendants Can Recover § 936 Fees Based on Suit’s Gravamen

Date: Sep 26, 2025
No Bond Coverage for Financing Disguised as Sale–Leaseback; Surety May Invoke Parol Evidence as a “Stranger”; Prevailing Defendants Can Recover § 936 Fees Based on Suit’s Gravamen Introduction In...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Racial Harassment: “Monkey” and “Monkey Ass” Are Race-Specific Slurs; Comparator Race May Be Proven by Perception; Workload Disparities May Support a Hostile Work Environment

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Racial Harassment: “Monkey” and “Monkey Ass” Are Race-Specific Slurs; Comparator Race May Be Proven by Perception; Workload Disparities May Support a Hostile Work Environment

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Racial Harassment: “Monkey” and “Monkey Ass” Are Race-Specific Slurs; Comparator Race May Be Proven by Perception; Workload Disparities May Support a Hostile Work Environment...
Speculative “Diversion of Resources” Is Not Enough: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms “Certainly Impending” Injury Requirement for Organizational Standing in NVRA Injunction Suits

Speculative “Diversion of Resources” Is Not Enough: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms “Certainly Impending” Injury Requirement for Organizational Standing in NVRA Injunction Suits

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Speculative “Diversion of Resources” Is Not Enough: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms “Certainly Impending” Injury Requirement for Organizational Standing in NVRA Injunction Suits Introduction In RNC v....
Contract, Not Takings: Fifth Circuit Holds Municipal Refusal to Extend a Development Agreement Is Commercial (Non‑Sovereign) Conduct

Contract, Not Takings: Fifth Circuit Holds Municipal Refusal to Extend a Development Agreement Is Commercial (Non‑Sovereign) Conduct

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Contract, Not Takings: Fifth Circuit Holds Municipal Refusal to Extend a Development Agreement Is Commercial (Non‑Sovereign) Conduct Introduction In Mesquite Asset Recovery Group, L.L.C. v. City of...
Law-of-the-Case Bars Codefendants’ Relitigation in Successive Appeals; Managerial Control and Proceeds Suffice to Uphold § 846 Marijuana Conspiracy Conviction

Law-of-the-Case Bars Codefendants’ Relitigation in Successive Appeals; Managerial Control and Proceeds Suffice to Uphold § 846 Marijuana Conspiracy Conviction

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Law-of-the-Case Bars Codefendants’ Relitigation in Successive Appeals; Managerial Control and Proceeds Suffice to Uphold § 846 Marijuana Conspiracy Conviction Introduction In United States v. Weng,...
Noncompliance with R.C. 2969.25(C) Is Not an Affirmative Defense; Institutional‑Cashier Certification of Inmate Account Statements Is Mandatory for Fee-Waiver Requests

Noncompliance with R.C. 2969.25(C) Is Not an Affirmative Defense; Institutional‑Cashier Certification of Inmate Account Statements Is Mandatory for Fee-Waiver Requests

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Noncompliance with R.C. 2969.25(C) Is Not an Affirmative Defense; Institutional‑Cashier Certification of Inmate Account Statements Is Mandatory for Fee-Waiver Requests Introduction This commentary...
No Safe Harbor in Post-Default Litigation: First Department Holds General Litigation Activity Does Not Satisfy CPLR 3215(c) Absent an Explicit “Sufficient Cause” Showing

No Safe Harbor in Post-Default Litigation: First Department Holds General Litigation Activity Does Not Satisfy CPLR 3215(c) Absent an Explicit “Sufficient Cause” Showing

Date: Sep 25, 2025
No Safe Harbor in Post-Default Litigation: First Department Holds General Litigation Activity Does Not Satisfy CPLR 3215(c) Absent an Explicit “Sufficient Cause” Showing Introduction In 938 St....
Wyoming Supreme Court Bars Double Counting of Pass‑Through Business Income in Child Support Calculations: Stenson v. Stenson (2025 WY 102)

Wyoming Supreme Court Bars Double Counting of Pass‑Through Business Income in Child Support Calculations: Stenson v. Stenson (2025 WY 102)

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Wyoming Supreme Court Bars Double Counting of Pass‑Through Business Income in Child Support Calculations Case: Matthew R. Stenson v. Nikole M. Stenson, 2025 WY 102 (Wyo. Sept. 23, 2025) Court:...
Clarifying Brady’s “Reasonable Probability” Standard and the Use of Supervisory Control to Prevent a Second Trial Under a Mistake of Law

Clarifying Brady’s “Reasonable Probability” Standard and the Use of Supervisory Control to Prevent a Second Trial Under a Mistake of Law

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Clarifying Brady’s “Reasonable Probability” Standard and the Use of Supervisory Control to Prevent a Second Trial Under a Mistake of Law Introduction This supervisory-control proceeding arises from a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.