Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

7th Circuit Case Commentaries

The Barnes Rule: Recruiting and Directing a Single Accomplice Constitutes Supervisory Role under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) and Bars Safety-Valve Relief

The Barnes Rule: Recruiting and Directing a Single Accomplice Constitutes Supervisory Role under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) and Bars Safety-Valve Relief

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The Barnes Rule: Recruiting and Directing a Single Accomplice Constitutes Supervisory Role under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) and Bars Safety-Valve Relief 1. Introduction United States v. Zachary Barnes,...
Pufahl v. Commissioner of Social Security – Seventh Circuit Clarifies
            Deference Owed to Treating-Source Opinions and Adequacy of “Two-Hour-Segment”
            Limitations in SSA Disability Cases

Pufahl v. Commissioner of Social Security – Seventh Circuit Clarifies Deference Owed to Treating-Source Opinions and Adequacy of “Two-Hour-Segment” Limitations in SSA Disability Cases

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Pufahl v. Commissioner of Social Security (7th Cir. 2025) Clarifying the Limits of Treating-Physician Deference and the Sufficiency of “Two-Hour-Segment” Concentration Restrictions 1. Introduction...
Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Reassignment to Pre-Existing Job Duties Is Not a “Tangible Employment Action” — Commentary on Bankruptcy Estate of Santoasha Harris v. City of Milwaukee

Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Reassignment to Pre-Existing Job Duties Is Not a “Tangible Employment Action” — Commentary on Bankruptcy Estate of Santoasha Harris v. City of Milwaukee

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Reassignment to Pre-Existing Job Duties Is Not a “Tangible Employment Action”: A Comprehensive Commentary on Bankruptcy Estate of Santoasha Harris v. City of Milwaukee...
Non-Physician Opinions and Post-Hearing Evidence: Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Materiality Barriers in Disability Appeals – Commentary on Vuletich v. Bisignano (2025)

Non-Physician Opinions and Post-Hearing Evidence: Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Materiality Barriers in Disability Appeals – Commentary on Vuletich v. Bisignano (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Non-Physician Opinions and Post-Hearing Evidence: Seventh Circuit Reaffirms Materiality Barriers in Disability Appeals Comprehensive Commentary on Jason Vuletich v. Frank Bisignano, Court of Appeals...
“Competent Proof” at the Screening Stage: The Seventh Circuit Raises the Pleading Bar for Corporate Citizenship in Pro Se Diversity Cases

“Competent Proof” at the Screening Stage: The Seventh Circuit Raises the Pleading Bar for Corporate Citizenship in Pro Se Diversity Cases

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Competent Proof” at the Screening Stage: The Seventh Circuit Raises the Pleading Bar for Corporate Citizenship in Pro Se Diversity Cases 1. Introduction In Kendall Harlson v. Government Employees...
Seventh Circuit Mandates Review of “Changed Circumstances” in Successive Motions
            to Recruit Counsel – Commentary on Miguel Rico v. John Howe (2025)

Seventh Circuit Mandates Review of “Changed Circumstances” in Successive Motions to Recruit Counsel – Commentary on Miguel Rico v. John Howe (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Seventh Circuit Mandates Review of “Changed Circumstances” in Successive Motions to Recruit Counsel Commentary on Miguel Rico v. John Howe, 24-1175 (7th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Miguel Rico, an...
Walls v. Mershon (7th Cir. 2025): Delineating Prisoners’ Informed-Consent Rights and Trial-Court Discretion to Sever Misjoined Claims

Walls v. Mershon (7th Cir. 2025): Delineating Prisoners’ Informed-Consent Rights and Trial-Court Discretion to Sever Misjoined Claims

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Walls v. Mershon (7th Cir. 2025): Delineating Prisoners’ Informed-Consent Rights and Trial-Court Discretion to Sever Misjoined Claims 1. Introduction In Nirin Walls v. N.P. Mershon, the United States...
When “Different Occasions” Becomes a Jury Question: Seventh Circuit Embraces Erlinger and Vacates ACCA Sentence in United States v. Santana

When “Different Occasions” Becomes a Jury Question: Seventh Circuit Embraces Erlinger and Vacates ACCA Sentence in United States v. Santana

Date: Jun 30, 2025
When “Different Occasions” Becomes a Jury Question: Seventh Circuit Embraces Erlinger and Vacates ACCA Sentence in United States v. Santana Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in United...

The Zambrano Clarification: Inadvertent Police Misstatements Do Not Constitute
“Fabricated Evidence” Absent Proof of Bad-Faith Knowledge and Materiality

The Zambrano Clarification: Inadvertent Police Misstatements Do Not Constitute “Fabricated Evidence” Absent Proof of Bad-Faith Knowledge and Materiality

Date: Jun 30, 2025
The Zambrano Clarification: Inadvertent Police Misstatements Do Not Constitute “Fabricated Evidence” Absent Proof of Bad-Faith Knowledge and Materiality 1. Introduction Jesus Zambrano v. City of...
Confirming Rosemond’s Reach: Advance Knowledge Plus Participation Suffice for 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) Aiding-and-Abetting Liability

Confirming Rosemond’s Reach: Advance Knowledge Plus Participation Suffice for 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) Aiding-and-Abetting Liability

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Confirming Rosemond’s Reach: Advance Knowledge Plus Participation Suffice for 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) Aiding-and-Abetting Liability Introduction United States v. Demetris Campbell, No. 24-3142 (7th Cir....
“Fresh Enough”: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms that Two-Week-Old Intelligence Can Sustain Probable Cause for Warrants Targeting Ongoing Drug Operations

“Fresh Enough”: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms that Two-Week-Old Intelligence Can Sustain Probable Cause for Warrants Targeting Ongoing Drug Operations

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Fresh Enough”: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms that Two-Week-Old Intelligence Can Sustain Probable Cause for Warrants Targeting Ongoing Drug Operations 1. Introduction In United States v. Gregory Harris,...
United States v. Zhao (7th Cir. 2025):  Extending the “Supervision-and-Control” Doctrine to Tangible Pandemic-Response Supplies under 18 U.S.C. § 641

United States v. Zhao (7th Cir. 2025): Extending the “Supervision-and-Control” Doctrine to Tangible Pandemic-Response Supplies under 18 U.S.C. § 641

Date: Jun 30, 2025
United States v. Tangtang Zhao – Seventh Circuit Clarifies that Physical Items Distributed in National-Emergency Programs Remain “Government Property” Where the United States Retains Functionally...
Culp v. Caudill: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Local Rule 56.1 Compliance and Affirms Broad Discretion on Costs in Mixed-Outcome Cases

Culp v. Caudill: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Local Rule 56.1 Compliance and Affirms Broad Discretion on Costs in Mixed-Outcome Cases

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Culp v. Caudill: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Local Rule 56.1 Compliance and Affirms Broad Discretion on Costs in Mixed-Outcome Cases Introduction In Carl Culp v. Scott Caudill, Nos. 23-2397 & 23-2398,...
Culp v. Woods: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms Broad Discretion in Mixed-Outcome Cost Awards and Clarifies N.D. Indiana Local Rule 56.1 Compliance

Culp v. Woods: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms Broad Discretion in Mixed-Outcome Cost Awards and Clarifies N.D. Indiana Local Rule 56.1 Compliance

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Culp v. Woods: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms Broad Discretion in Mixed-Outcome Cost Awards and Clarifies N.D. Indiana Local Rule 56.1 Compliance Introduction On 20 June 2025 the U.S. Court of Appeals...
“Facial-Defense Strikes” under the PLRA: Detailed Commentary on Holmes v. Marion County Sheriff’s Office, No. 22-3032 (7th Cir. 2025)

“Facial-Defense Strikes” under the PLRA: Detailed Commentary on Holmes v. Marion County Sheriff’s Office, No. 22-3032 (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Facial-Defense Strikes” under the Prison Litigation Reform Act Commentary on Holmes v. Marion County Sheriff’s Office, No. 22-3032 (7th Cir. June 20 2025) 1. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s...
Separating Damages from Fees: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Comparative-Fault Limits on Attorney-Fee Awards in Civil Contempt

Separating Damages from Fees: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Comparative-Fault Limits on Attorney-Fee Awards in Civil Contempt

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Separating Damages from Fees: Seventh Circuit Clarifies Comparative-Fault Limits on Attorney-Fee Awards in Civil Contempt 1. Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in Jacqueline Sterling v....
“Incremental Punishment Re-affirmed”: United States v. Rolando Joel De Leon De Paz and the Seventh Circuit’s Endorsement of Robust Upward Variances for Serial § 1326 Offenders

“Incremental Punishment Re-affirmed”: United States v. Rolando Joel De Leon De Paz and the Seventh Circuit’s Endorsement of Robust Upward Variances for Serial § 1326 Offenders

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“Incremental Punishment Re-affirmed”: United States v. Rolando Joel De Leon De Paz and the Seventh Circuit’s Endorsement of Robust Upward Variances for Serial § 1326 Offenders 1. Introduction United...

“Desk-Notes Are Not Business Records” & The Re-affirmed Sufficiency of Pretext:
A Commentary on Brian Murphy v. Caterpillar Inc. (7th Cir. 2025)

“Desk-Notes Are Not Business Records” & The Re-affirmed Sufficiency of Pretext: A Commentary on Brian Murphy v. Caterpillar Inc. (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Desk-Notes Are Not Business Records” & The Re-affirmed Sufficiency of Pretext: A Comprehensive Commentary on Brian Murphy v. Caterpillar Inc., 24-1517 (7th Cir. June 18 2025) 1. Introduction The...
“More Than a Lunch-Group”: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms the High Bar for Proving Pretext at Summary Judgment in Title VII and ADEA Cases

“More Than a Lunch-Group”: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms the High Bar for Proving Pretext at Summary Judgment in Title VII and ADEA Cases

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“More Than a Lunch-Group”: Seventh Circuit Re-Affirms the High Bar for Proving Pretext at Summary Judgment in Title VII and ADEA Cases Introduction Michelle Hagen, a 54-year-old high-school...
“Zero-Tolerance for Rule-30 Non-Compliance in Criminal Appeals” – A Commentary on United States v. Gary Matthews (7th Cir. 2025)

“Zero-Tolerance for Rule-30 Non-Compliance in Criminal Appeals” – A Commentary on United States v. Gary Matthews (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
United States v. Gary Matthews & Monte Brannan Seventh Circuit Establishes a “Zero-Tolerance” Regime for Circuit Rule 30 Non-Compliance in Criminal Appeals I. Introduction United States v. Gary...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert