Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying the “Unable-or-Unwilling” Government Standard and the Futility Exception in Asylum & CAT Claims – Commentary on Yunga Uyaguari v. Bondi

Clarifying the “Unable-or-Unwilling” Government Standard and the Futility Exception in Asylum & CAT Claims – Commentary on Yunga Uyaguari v. Bondi

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Clarifying the “Unable-or-Unwilling” Government Standard and the Futility Exception in Asylum & CAT Claims – Commentary on Yunga Uyaguari v. Bondi (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Yunga Uyaguari v....
“Meaningfully-Constrain” Test Confirmed: The Second Circuit Upholds 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(3) in United States v. Perez

“Meaningfully-Constrain” Test Confirmed: The Second Circuit Upholds 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(3) in United States v. Perez

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Meaningfully-Constrain” Test Confirmed: The Second Circuit Upholds 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(3) in United States v. Perez 1. Introduction On 19 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
“Ascertainability” and the 30-Day Removal Clock under § 1446(b)(3): A Commentary on Vermont v. 3M Co.

“Ascertainability” and the 30-Day Removal Clock under § 1446(b)(3): A Commentary on Vermont v. 3M Co.

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Ascertainability” and the 30-Day Removal Clock under § 1446(b)(3): A Comprehensive Commentary on Vermont v. 3M Co. (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The Second Circuit’s decision in Vermont v. 3M Co.,...
Collins v. Northeast Grocery, Inc.: Second Circuit Implements Cunningham and Lowers the Pleading Bar for ERISA §1106(a) Prohibited-Transaction Claims

Collins v. Northeast Grocery, Inc.: Second Circuit Implements Cunningham and Lowers the Pleading Bar for ERISA §1106(a) Prohibited-Transaction Claims

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Collins v. Northeast Grocery, Inc.: Second Circuit Implements Cunningham and Lowers the Pleading Bar for ERISA §1106(a) Prohibited-Transaction Claims 1. Introduction On 18 August 2025 the United...
United States v. Perryman – Second Circuit Clarifies Use of “Intended Loss” Under § 2X1.1 in Conspiracy-Based Health-Care Fraud Sentencing

United States v. Perryman – Second Circuit Clarifies Use of “Intended Loss” Under § 2X1.1 in Conspiracy-Based Health-Care Fraud Sentencing

Date: Aug 25, 2025
United States v. Perryman – Second Circuit Clarifies Use of “Intended Loss” Under § 2X1.1 in Conspiracy-Based Health-Care Fraud Sentencing Introduction In United States v. Perryman, No. 24-1729-cr...
“No Injury, No Standing” – The Second Circuit Mandates Individualized Loss for ERISA 401(k) Plaintiffs in Collins v. Northeast Grocery, LLC

“No Injury, No Standing” – The Second Circuit Mandates Individualized Loss for ERISA 401(k) Plaintiffs in Collins v. Northeast Grocery, LLC

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“No Injury, No Standing” – The Second Circuit Mandates Individualized Loss for ERISA 401(k) Plaintiffs in Collins v. Northeast Grocery, LLC 1. Introduction The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second...
Accrual-Point and Jurisdictional Deference under 28 U.S.C. § 2467: A Commentary on In Re Enforcement of Philippine Forfeiture Judgment

Accrual-Point and Jurisdictional Deference under 28 U.S.C. § 2467: A Commentary on In Re Enforcement of Philippine Forfeiture Judgment

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Accrual-Point and Jurisdictional Deference under 28 U.S.C. § 2467 – Commentary on In Re Enforcement of Philippine Forfeiture Judgment, 24-185(L) (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction On 18 August 2025 the...
Kellogg v. Nichols: The Second Circuit Bars § 1983 Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Against State Judges Serving as Firearms Licensing Officers

Kellogg v. Nichols: The Second Circuit Bars § 1983 Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Against State Judges Serving as Firearms Licensing Officers

Date: Aug 25, 2025
Kellogg v. Nichols: The Second Circuit Bars § 1983 Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Against State Judges Serving as Firearms Licensing Officers 1. Introduction Kellogg v. Nichols, No. 23-8093-cv (2d...
“Proximity-and-Accessibility” as the Determinative Nexus & Plain-Error Limits on Predicate Switching: An In-Depth Commentary on United States v. Prawl (2d Cir. 2025)

“Proximity-and-Accessibility” as the Determinative Nexus & Plain-Error Limits on Predicate Switching: An In-Depth Commentary on United States v. Prawl (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 25, 2025
“Proximity-and-Accessibility” as the Determinative Nexus & Plain-Error Limits on Predicate Switching: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Prawl (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction United States v....
Second Circuit Re-characterizes § 6213(a) as a Non-Jurisdictional, Equitably-Tollable Deadline

Second Circuit Re-characterizes § 6213(a) as a Non-Jurisdictional, Equitably-Tollable Deadline

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Second Circuit Redefines the 90-Day Deficiency Deadline: I.R.C. § 6213(a) Deemed Non-Jurisdictional and Subject to Equitable Tolling I. Introduction In Buller v. Commissioner, No. 24-1557 (2d Cir....
“Arbitration in Name Only” – Second Circuit Refines the FAA’s Limits in Flores v. N.Y. Football Giants

“Arbitration in Name Only” – Second Circuit Refines the FAA’s Limits in Flores v. N.Y. Football Giants

Date: Aug 19, 2025
“Arbitration in Name Only” – Second Circuit Refines the FAA’s Limits in Flores v. N.Y. Football Giants 1. Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has delivered a...
Continuances after Patel: Second Circuit Confirms Judicial Review & Re-states the “Good-Cause/Prima-Facie–Eligibility” Test – Commentary on Hernandez Flores v. Bondi (2025)

Continuances after Patel: Second Circuit Confirms Judicial Review & Re-states the “Good-Cause/Prima-Facie–Eligibility” Test – Commentary on Hernandez Flores v. Bondi (2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Continuances after Patel: Second Circuit Confirms Judicial Review & Re-states the “Good-Cause/Prima-Facie–Eligibility” Test – Commentary on Hernandez Flores v. Bondi (2025) 1. Introduction Hernandez...
Employer Assurances Can Nullify Broad Release: The “Knowing-and-Voluntary” Standard Re-Defined in Schuyler v. Sun Life

Employer Assurances Can Nullify Broad Release: The “Knowing-and-Voluntary” Standard Re-Defined in Schuyler v. Sun Life

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Employer Assurances Can Nullify Broad Release: The “Knowing-and-Voluntary” Standard Re-Defined in Schuyler v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada Introduction On 14 August 2025 the United States...
Debit-Card Numbers and PINs as “Means of Identification”: A Commentary on United States v Constantinescu (2d Cir. 2025)

Debit-Card Numbers and PINs as “Means of Identification”: A Commentary on United States v Constantinescu (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 19, 2025
Debit-Card Numbers and PINs as “Means of Identification”: A Structured Commentary on United States v. Constantinescu, 91 F.4th ___ (2d Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction The Second Circuit’s decision in...
Clarifying the Boundary Between Medical Screening and Strip Search: Sanchez v. Binghamton CSD (2d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying the Boundary Between Medical Screening and Strip Search: Sanchez v. Binghamton CSD (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 16, 2025
Clarifying the Boundary Between Medical Screening and Strip Search: Sanchez v. Binghamton City School District 1. Introduction Sanchez v. Binghamton City School District, No. 24-2125-cv, decided by...
“Public Reprimand as a Stand-Alone Sanction for Lapsed or Non-Member Counsel” — Commentary on In Re Cruikshank, 22-90079 (2d Cir. Aug. 13, 2025)

“Public Reprimand as a Stand-Alone Sanction for Lapsed or Non-Member Counsel” — Commentary on In Re Cruikshank, 22-90079 (2d Cir. Aug. 13, 2025)

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“Public Reprimand as a Stand-Alone Sanction for Lapsed or Non-Member Counsel” Commentary on In Re Cruikshank, 22-90079 (2d Cir. Aug. 13, 2025) 1. Introduction In In Re Cruikshank, the United States...
Clarifying “Cause” for Dismissal of Involuntary Bankruptcy Petitions and the Limits of Appellate Jurisdiction over § 303(i) Fee Awards

Clarifying “Cause” for Dismissal of Involuntary Bankruptcy Petitions and the Limits of Appellate Jurisdiction over § 303(i) Fee Awards

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Clarifying “Cause” for Dismissal of Involuntary Bankruptcy Petitions and the Limits of Appellate Jurisdiction over § 303(i) Fee Awards 1. Introduction In Re: Valuex Research, LLC concerns creditors...
Clarifying Prevailing-Party Status and Recognising Joint Trademark Ownership: A Commentary on Zioness Movement, Inc. v. The Lawfare Project, Inc.

Clarifying Prevailing-Party Status and Recognising Joint Trademark Ownership: A Commentary on Zioness Movement, Inc. v. The Lawfare Project, Inc.

Date: Aug 15, 2025
Clarifying Prevailing-Party Status and Recognising Joint Trademark Ownership: Commentary on Zioness Movement, Inc. v. The Lawfare Project, Inc. (2d Cir. 2025) Introduction The Second Circuit's...

        “No Legislative Short-Cut to Article III”:  The Second Circuit Rejects 
        “Congressionally-Authorized Representational Standing” and Clarifies 
        Mootness Procedure —  Commentary on A.H. v. N.Y. State Dep’t of Health

“No Legislative Short-Cut to Article III”: The Second Circuit Rejects “Congressionally-Authorized Representational Standing” and Clarifies Mootness Procedure — Commentary on A.H. v. N.Y. State Dep’t of Health

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“No Legislative Short-Cut to Article III”: The Second Circuit Rejects “Congressionally-Authorized Representational Standing” and Clarifies Mootness Procedure — Commentary on A.H. v. N.Y. State Dep’t...
“The Carew Principle” – No Per-Se Duty on Defence Counsel to Pursue a Batson Remedy

“The Carew Principle” – No Per-Se Duty on Defence Counsel to Pursue a Batson Remedy

Date: Aug 15, 2025
“The Carew Principle” No Per-Se Duty on Defence Counsel to Pursue a Batson Remedy – Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 2025 1. Introduction In Carew v. Morton, the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.