Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

reaffirmation-of-& Case Commentaries

No Mitigation Without Nexus: Fresh Psychiatric Evidence on CCRC Reference must Demonstrably Link to the Offending (R v Brogan [2025] EWCA Crim 1208)

No Mitigation Without Nexus: Fresh Psychiatric Evidence on CCRC Reference must Demonstrably Link to the Offending (R v Brogan [2025] EWCA Crim 1208)

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Mitigation Without Nexus: Fresh Psychiatric Evidence on CCRC Reference must Demonstrably Link to the Offending (R v Brogan [2025] EWCA Crim 1208) Introduction In R v Brogan [2025] EWCA Crim 1208,...
No Agency Signature under s.53(1)(b): Corporate Execution Required, and Non‑Compliant Self‑Declared Trusts Cannot Defeat s.423 Transactions-at-Undervalue

No Agency Signature under s.53(1)(b): Corporate Execution Required, and Non‑Compliant Self‑Declared Trusts Cannot Defeat s.423 Transactions-at-Undervalue

Date: Oct 1, 2025
No Agency Signature under s.53(1)(b): Corporate Execution Required, and Non‑Compliant Self‑Declared Trusts Cannot Defeat s.423 Transactions-at-Undervalue Introduction In National Iranian Oil Company...

      Country Guidance on Protection Risk Does Not Preclude Article 8 “Very Significant Obstacles” Claims: Quashing of Section 94 Certification in SV [2025] CSOH 88

Country Guidance on Protection Risk Does Not Preclude Article 8 “Very Significant Obstacles” Claims: Quashing of Section 94 Certification in SV [2025] CSOH 88

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Country Guidance on Protection Risk Does Not Preclude Article 8 “Very Significant Obstacles” Claims: Quashing of Section 94 Certification in SV [2025] CSOH 88 Introduction This commentary examines...
“Reconsideration” under the NHS (Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Regulations 2009: Limited Remit, Conditional Admission of New Evidence, and Successor Contractors’ Standing to Appeal

“Reconsideration” under the NHS (Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Regulations 2009: Limited Remit, Conditional Admission of New Evidence, and Successor Contractors’ Standing to Appeal

Date: Sep 30, 2025
“Reconsideration” under the NHS (Pharmaceutical Services) (Scotland) Regulations 2009: Limited Remit, Conditional Admission of New Evidence, and Successor Contractors’ Standing to Appeal Case...
No Bare Declarators of Age and No Enforceable Right to Accommodation under s25(3): Clarifying Age‑Assessment Litigation in Scotland

No Bare Declarators of Age and No Enforceable Right to Accommodation under s25(3): Clarifying Age‑Assessment Litigation in Scotland

Date: Sep 30, 2025
No Bare Declarators of Age and No Enforceable Right to Accommodation under s25(3): Clarifying Age‑Assessment Litigation in Scotland Introduction In AN v Renfrewshire Council and others [2025] CSOH...
Vedanta Resources v Commissioner of Valuation [2025] IEHC 511: The High Court mandates an explicit, reasoned choice of valuation methodology—especially the contractor’s method—for specialised, post-closure facilities

Vedanta Resources v Commissioner of Valuation [2025] IEHC 511: The High Court mandates an explicit, reasoned choice of valuation methodology—especially the contractor’s method—for specialised, post-closure facilities

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Vedanta Resources v Commissioner of Valuation [2025] IEHC 511: The High Court mandates an explicit, reasoned choice of valuation methodology—especially the contractor’s method—for specialised,...
S v Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] IEHC 513: Trial-Court Primacy and the “Real Possibility” Threshold in Delay-Based Prohibition Applications Involving a Deceased Witness

S v Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] IEHC 513: Trial-Court Primacy and the “Real Possibility” Threshold in Delay-Based Prohibition Applications Involving a Deceased Witness

Date: Sep 30, 2025
S v Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] IEHC 513: Trial-Court Primacy and the “Real Possibility” Threshold in Delay-Based Prohibition Applications Involving a Deceased Witness Introduction This...
O’Rourke v Minister for Defence & Ors [2025] IEHC 518: A Procedural Framework for Court‑Ordered Use of Redacted Protected Disclosure Materials under s.16(2) of the 2014 Act

O’Rourke v Minister for Defence & Ors [2025] IEHC 518: A Procedural Framework for Court‑Ordered Use of Redacted Protected Disclosure Materials under s.16(2) of the 2014 Act

Date: Sep 30, 2025
A Procedural Framework for Court‑Ordered Use of Redacted Protected Disclosure Materials under s.16(2) of the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 (as amended) Introduction This High Court judgment...
Baniulyte v R: No Routine Anonymity for Adult Trafficking Victims in Criminal Appeals; Convictions Unsafe Where s45 MSA Defence Was Not Put Despite Clear Indicators

Baniulyte v R: No Routine Anonymity for Adult Trafficking Victims in Criminal Appeals; Convictions Unsafe Where s45 MSA Defence Was Not Put Despite Clear Indicators

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Baniulyte v R: No Routine Anonymity for Adult Trafficking Victims in Criminal Appeals; Convictions Unsafe Where s45 MSA Defence Was Not Put Despite Clear Indicators Introduction In Baniulyte v R...
“No Illusory Solvency”: Post‑Arrangement Sustainability and Unfair Prejudice under s.115A — Maloney & Anor [2025] IEHC 516

“No Illusory Solvency”: Post‑Arrangement Sustainability and Unfair Prejudice under s.115A — Maloney & Anor [2025] IEHC 516

Date: Sep 30, 2025
“No Illusory Solvency”: Post‑Arrangement Sustainability and Unfair Prejudice under s.115A — Maloney & Anor [2025] IEHC 516 Court: High Court of Ireland (Owens J) | Citation: [2025] IEHC 516 | Date:...
Kapp: Section 117B public‑interest factors apply to revocation of deportation orders, requiring a forward‑looking assessment of financial independence

Kapp: Section 117B public‑interest factors apply to revocation of deportation orders, requiring a forward‑looking assessment of financial independence

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Kapp: Section 117B public‑interest factors apply to revocation of deportation orders, requiring a forward‑looking assessment of financial independence Introduction In Secretary of State for the Home...
No Proactive Monitoring Injunctions Under the Digital Services Act and No Automatic Right to Reinstatement: Farina v X Internet UC [2025] IEHC 514

No Proactive Monitoring Injunctions Under the Digital Services Act and No Automatic Right to Reinstatement: Farina v X Internet UC [2025] IEHC 514

Date: Sep 30, 2025
No Proactive Monitoring Injunctions Under the Digital Services Act and No Automatic Right to Reinstatement: Farina v X Internet UC [2025] IEHC 514 Introduction This High Court of Ireland decision,...
Deemed transfer clauses require a notice to remedy and repudiatory breaches can be “capable of remedy”: Commentary on Kulkarni v Gwent Holdings Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1206

Deemed transfer clauses require a notice to remedy and repudiatory breaches can be “capable of remedy”: Commentary on Kulkarni v Gwent Holdings Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 1206

Date: Sep 30, 2025
Deemed transfer clauses require a notice to remedy and repudiatory breaches can be “capable of remedy” Commentary on Kulkarni v Gwent Holdings Ltd & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 1206 (CA) Introduction The...
“Haul Before You Cross”: Irish High Court imposes a duty of care on trawler operators over known submarine cables and affirms cost‑of‑repair damages without proof of payment — Virgin Media Wholesale Ltd v The Lida Suzanna [2025] IEHC 493

“Haul Before You Cross”: Irish High Court imposes a duty of care on trawler operators over known submarine cables and affirms cost‑of‑repair damages without proof of payment — Virgin Media Wholesale Ltd v The Lida Suzanna [2025] IEHC 493

Date: Sep 25, 2025
“Haul Before You Cross”: A New Irish Admiralty Benchmark on Fishermen’s Duties to Subsea Cables and Cost‑of‑Repair Damages Introduction In Virgin Media Wholesale Ltd v Owners and All Persons Claiming...
Open justice first: High Court sets exacting, evidence-specific test for permanent confidentiality orders and judgment redactions in patent litigation

Open justice first: High Court sets exacting, evidence-specific test for permanent confidentiality orders and judgment redactions in patent litigation

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Open justice first: High Court sets exacting, evidence-specific test for permanent confidentiality orders and judgment redactions in patent litigation Introduction In Sandoz AG & Rowex Ltd v Bayer...
Section 50 IPA 2015 is not a Second Protection Assessment: No Duty to Re‑Run Article 15(c) or Article 8 ECHR at Refoulement Stage Absent New Material

Section 50 IPA 2015 is not a Second Protection Assessment: No Duty to Re‑Run Article 15(c) or Article 8 ECHR at Refoulement Stage Absent New Material

Date: Sep 25, 2025
Section 50 IPA 2015 is not a Second Protection Assessment: No Duty to Re‑Run Article 15(c) or Article 8 ECHR at Refoulement Stage Absent New Material Introduction In M v Minister for Justice, Home...
Litigation Restraint Orders as a Discretionary Factor in Extending Time for Judicial Review: Commentary on Leahy & Ors v Medical Council of Ireland & Ors [2025] IEHC 503

Litigation Restraint Orders as a Discretionary Factor in Extending Time for Judicial Review: Commentary on Leahy & Ors v Medical Council of Ireland & Ors [2025] IEHC 503

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Litigation Restraint Orders as a Discretionary Factor in Extending Time for Judicial Review: Commentary on Leahy & Ors v Medical Council of Ireland & Ors [2025] IEHC 503 Introduction This commentary...
Late IPAT Appeals Do Not Halt Deportation: High Court refuses injunctions despite arguable challenge to Regulation 4(5) and clarifies Regulation 4(2) notice duty

Late IPAT Appeals Do Not Halt Deportation: High Court refuses injunctions despite arguable challenge to Regulation 4(5) and clarifies Regulation 4(2) notice duty

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Late IPAT Appeals Do Not Halt Deportation: High Court refuses injunctions despite arguable challenge to Regulation 4(5) and clarifies Regulation 4(2) notice duty Introduction This commentary analyses...
Farrell & Ors v PIAB & Ors: Costs for Parked Parallel Challenges Following Lead‑Case Success under s.169 LSRA 2015

Farrell & Ors v PIAB & Ors: Costs for Parked Parallel Challenges Following Lead‑Case Success under s.169 LSRA 2015

Date: Sep 24, 2025
Farrell & Ors v PIAB & Ors: Costs for Parked Parallel Challenges Following Lead‑Case Success under s.169 LSRA 2015 Court: High Court of Ireland | Neutral Citation: [2025] IEHC 504 | Date: 17...
No “Condition Precedent”: Defects in Section 189A Assessments Do Not Invalidate Lawful Suitability Reviews under Section 202 in Prevention Duty Cases — Fatolahzadeh v London Borough of Barnet [2025] EWCA Civ 1174

No “Condition Precedent”: Defects in Section 189A Assessments Do Not Invalidate Lawful Suitability Reviews under Section 202 in Prevention Duty Cases — Fatolahzadeh v London Borough of Barnet [2025] EWCA Civ 1174

Date: Sep 23, 2025
No “Condition Precedent”: Defects in Section 189A Assessments Do Not Invalidate Lawful Suitability Reviews under Section 202 in Prevention Duty Cases — Fatolahzadeh v London Borough of Barnet [2025]...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert