Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

All High Courts Case Commentaries


        The “Specificity & Corporate Distinction” Doctrine:  
        Karnataka High Court on Pleading Requirements and Proper Party
        Identification in Online Defamation Suits – Google India Pvt. Ltd. v. Nayana Krishna

The “Specificity & Corporate Distinction” Doctrine: Karnataka High Court on Pleading Requirements and Proper Party Identification in Online Defamation Suits – Google India Pvt. Ltd. v. Nayana Krishna

Date: Jul 10, 2025
The “Specificity & Corporate Distinction” Doctrine Karnataka High Court on Pleading Requirements and Proper Party Identification in Online Defamation Suits Introduction In Google India Private...
Teachers of U.P. Basic Institutions are NOT “Employees” under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 – Commentary on Bindra Prasad Patel v. State of U.P. & Ors.

Teachers of U.P. Basic Institutions are NOT “Employees” under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 – Commentary on Bindra Prasad Patel v. State of U.P. & Ors.

Date: Jul 9, 2025
Teachers of U.P. Basic Institutions are NOT “Employees” under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Commentary on Bindra Prasad Patel v. State of Uttar Pradesh & 3 Ors. (2025 AHC 106762) 1. Introduction...
From Special-Leave to Statutory Right: High Court Affirms that NI-Act Complainants May Appeal Acquittals Directly Under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC

From Special-Leave to Statutory Right: High Court Affirms that NI-Act Complainants May Appeal Acquittals Directly Under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC

Date: Jul 8, 2025
From Special-Leave to Statutory Right: High Court Affirms that NI-Act Complainants May Appeal Acquittals Directly Under the Proviso to Section 372 CrPC 1. Introduction Case: Raj Kumar v. Rajender,...
Commentary – Posthumous Registration of Wills Held Valid & Limits on Inquiry at Interlocutory Stage

Commentary – Posthumous Registration of Wills Held Valid & Limits on Inquiry at Interlocutory Stage

Date: Jul 8, 2025
“Fence but Do Not Pre-Judge” – Karnataka High Court Validates Posthumous Registration of Wills and Restricts Merit Analysis at the Interim-Injunction Stage 1. Introduction In Smt. M.D. Devamma (by...
Beyond the Register: Recognising Pre-Scheme Service and Alternative Proof for Advocate-Clerks’ Welfare Claims – Commentary on A. Chandran v. State of Kerala (2025)

Beyond the Register: Recognising Pre-Scheme Service and Alternative Proof for Advocate-Clerks’ Welfare Claims – Commentary on A. Chandran v. State of Kerala (2025)

Date: Jul 8, 2025
Beyond the Register: Recognising Pre-Scheme Service and Alternative Proof for Advocate-Clerks’ Welfare Claims Comprehensive Commentary on A. Chandran v. State of Kerala (2025 KER 49749) 1....
Appellate-Stage CST ‘C-Form’ Disputes Are to Be Treated as “Disputed Amount” Cases under the M.P. Old Arrears Settlement Ordinance, 2020 – A Commentary on M/S Rathi Iron and Steel Industries Ltd. v. State of M.P. (2025)

Appellate-Stage CST ‘C-Form’ Disputes Are to Be Treated as “Disputed Amount” Cases under the M.P. Old Arrears Settlement Ordinance, 2020 – A Commentary on M/S Rathi Iron and Steel Industries Ltd. v. State of M.P. (2025)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Appellate-Stage CST ‘C-Form’ Disputes Are to Be Treated as “Disputed Amount” Cases under the Madhya Pradesh Old Arrears Settlement Ordinance, 2020 Introduction In M/S Rathi Iron and Steel Industries...
Expanding Bodily Autonomy: Delhi High Court Allows Termination Beyond 24-Weeks for Minor Rape Victims Despite Medical-Board Dissent

Expanding Bodily Autonomy: Delhi High Court Allows Termination Beyond 24-Weeks for Minor Rape Victims Despite Medical-Board Dissent

Date: Jul 3, 2025
Expanding Bodily Autonomy: Delhi High Court Allows Termination Beyond 24-Weeks for Minor Rape Victims Despite Medical-Board Dissent 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s decision in Minor A (Through...
“Doctrine of Candour & Locus Standi” Reinforced – Commentary on Gulshan Babbar Advocate v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. (2025 DHC 5184)

“Doctrine of Candour & Locus Standi” Reinforced – Commentary on Gulshan Babbar Advocate v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. (2025 DHC 5184)

Date: Jul 3, 2025
“Doctrine of Candour & Locus Standi” Reinforced – Commentary on Gulshan Babbar Advocate v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. (2025 DHC 5184) 1. Introduction The Delhi High Court’s decision dated 2 July...
“Matching Ammunition” and Fair-Trial Estoppel in Defence Tenders: Delhi High Court’s Framework for Rifle Trials and Judicial Restraint

“Matching Ammunition” and Fair-Trial Estoppel in Defence Tenders: Delhi High Court’s Framework for Rifle Trials and Judicial Restraint

Date: Jul 2, 2025
“Matching Ammunition” and Fair-Trial Estoppel in Defence Tenders: A Structured Commentary on Stumpp Schuele Lewis Machine Tools Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors. (2025 DHC 5134) Court: Delhi High...
Capri Global Housing Finance v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025) – Continuous Executive Duty to Re-Possess Secured Assets under Section 14 SARFAESI

Capri Global Housing Finance v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2025) – Continuous Executive Duty to Re-Possess Secured Assets under Section 14 SARFAESI

Date: Jul 2, 2025
Capri Global Housing Finance Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. (MP High Court, 1 July 2025) Continuous Executive Duty to Re-Possess Secured Assets under Section 14 SARFAESI 1. Introduction The...
BNSS Section 528 Clarified: “Reasonable, Fact‑Based Apprehension,” Not Political Status, Governs Transfer of Criminal Cases

BNSS Section 528 Clarified: “Reasonable, Fact‑Based Apprehension,” Not Political Status, Governs Transfer of Criminal Cases

Date: Jul 1, 2025
BNSS Section 528 Clarified: “Reasonable, Fact‑Based Apprehension,” Not Political Status, Governs Transfer of Criminal Cases Decision: DR. RANGANATHAN v. DR. LAKSHMANAN, Crl.O.P. No. 17181 of 2025...
Chancellor’s Wide Discretion in Interim Vice-Chancellor “Arrangements” under §10(19) of the Kerala University Act – Age & Qualification Caps Held Inapplicable

Chancellor’s Wide Discretion in Interim Vice-Chancellor “Arrangements” under §10(19) of the Kerala University Act – Age & Qualification Caps Held Inapplicable

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Chancellor’s Wide Discretion in Interim Vice-Chancellor “Arrangements” under §10(19) of the Kerala University Act – Age & Qualification Caps Held Inapplicable 1. Introduction The Kerala High Court’s...
“No Compulsion in Custom” – Karnataka High Court Affirms the Right to Abstain from Traditional Tasks during Communal Festivities

“No Compulsion in Custom” – Karnataka High Court Affirms the Right to Abstain from Traditional Tasks during Communal Festivities

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“No Compulsion in Custom” – Karnataka High Court Affirms the Right to Abstain from Traditional Tasks during Communal Festivities Madiga Dandora v. State of Karnataka, W.P. No. 201685 of 2025,...
Calcutta High Court Mandates Statutory Interest on Delayed Gratuity: 
            Himangshu Karmakar v. Food Corporation of India & Ors. (2025)

Calcutta High Court Mandates Statutory Interest on Delayed Gratuity: Himangshu Karmakar v. Food Corporation of India & Ors. (2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Calcutta High Court Mandates Statutory Interest on Delayed Gratuity Himangshu Karmakar v. Food Corporation of India & Ors. (2025 CHC-AS 1093) Introduction In Himangshu Karmakar v. Food Corporation of...
“Guest Faculty ≠ Workman” – Calcutta High Court Re-delineates the Boundaries of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act (Hansraj Koley v. Secretary, Labour Department & Ors., 2025)

“Guest Faculty ≠ Workman” – Calcutta High Court Re-delineates the Boundaries of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act (Hansraj Koley v. Secretary, Labour Department & Ors., 2025)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Guest Faculty ≠ Workman” – Calcutta High Court Re-delineates the Boundaries of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act 1. Introduction The Calcutta High Court, in Hansraj Koley v. The Secretary,...
“Compensation Mandate for State Take-Over of Private Educational Institutions’ Assets” – Commentary on SANATAN DHARAM PRATINIDHI SABHA v. STATE (2025 HHC 19366)

“Compensation Mandate for State Take-Over of Private Educational Institutions’ Assets” – Commentary on SANATAN DHARAM PRATINIDHI SABHA v. STATE (2025 HHC 19366)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
“Compensation Mandate for State Take-Over of Private Educational Institutions’ Assets” Comprehensive Commentary on SANATAN DHARAM PRATINIDHI SABHA v. STATE (2025 HHC 19366) 1. Introduction The...
Post-FIR Addition of SC/ST Act Charges and the Scope of Anticipatory Bail under the BNSS: Commentary on Sahil Sharma v. State of H.P. (2025 HHC 19540)

Post-FIR Addition of SC/ST Act Charges and the Scope of Anticipatory Bail under the BNSS: Commentary on Sahil Sharma v. State of H.P. (2025 HHC 19540)

Date: Jun 30, 2025
Post-FIR Addition of SC/ST Act Charges Does Not Bar Anticipatory Bail when Prima-Facie Ingredients Are Absent – A Detailed Commentary on Sahil Sharma v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2025 HHC 19540) 1....
Doctrine of Judicial Immunity & Proper-Forum Rule Reaffirmed – Comment on Kamlesh Chaturvedi v. Saksham Adhikari (MPHC, 2025)

Doctrine of Judicial Immunity & Proper-Forum Rule Reaffirmed – Comment on Kamlesh Chaturvedi v. Saksham Adhikari (MPHC, 2025)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Doctrine of Judicial Immunity & Proper-Forum Rule Reaffirmed (Commentary on Kamlesh Chaturvedi v. Saksham Adhikari, MP High Court, 16-06-2025) 1. Introduction Court : High Court of Madhya Pradesh,...
“Beyond Patent Illegality” – Bombay High Court Confirms Narrow Section 34 Review & Validates Mixed-Heads Damages in Arbitration Awards

“Beyond Patent Illegality” – Bombay High Court Confirms Narrow Section 34 Review & Validates Mixed-Heads Damages in Arbitration Awards

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Beyond Patent Illegality” – Bombay High Court Confirms Narrow Section 34 Review & Validates Mixed-Heads Damages in Arbitration Awards 1. Introduction The judgment of Chagla J. in Board of Control...
“Proximate-Trigger Liability” for Custodial Deaths – Commentary on PREMA HATHTHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH (2025 CGHC 23811-DB)

“Proximate-Trigger Liability” for Custodial Deaths – Commentary on PREMA HATHTHEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH (2025 CGHC 23811-DB)

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“Proximate-Trigger Liability” for Custodial Deaths Commentary on Prema Haththel v. State of Chhattisgarh (2025 CGHC 23811-DB) 1. Introduction The Chhattisgarh High Court’s division bench decision in...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert