...properties is movable property and the assignment of the share does not require registration under Section 17, Registration Act. (See Ajudhia Pershad Ram Pershad v. Sham Sunder AIR 1947 Lah 13, ILR...1947 Lah 417 Addanki Narayanappa v. Bhaskara Krishtappa (1966) 3 SCR 400, AIR 1966...SC 1300, (1966) 2 SCJ 490 and CIT v. Juggilal Kamalapat (1967) 1 SCR 784, AIR 1967 SC 401, (1967) 63 ITR 292. But the award with which we are...

...Sunder AIR 1947 Lah 13 in which Cornelius, J., has discussed most of the decisions we have earlier referred to in addition to several others and reached the conclusion that while a partnership is in...AIR 1939 Mad 884.8. We may also refer to the decision of a Full Bench in Ajudhia Pershad Ram Pershad v. Sham.... Bishwanath AIR 1963 Patna 221. We do not think it necessary to discuss them because they do not add to what we have already said in support of our view.11. For these reasons we uphold the decree of the High Court and dismiss the appeal with costs....

..., Civil Procedure Code, apply to revisions as well as to appeals. He has drawn my attention to Ajudhia Pershad v. Sham Sunder. AIR 1947 Lah 13 (FB) (C). In.... AIR 1947 Lah 13 (FB) (C), was expressed by the Full Bench. It was held that Order 22, Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure was not applicable...applicability to appeals only. The trial Court followed Mohd. Saddat All Khan v. Administrator, Corporation of City of Lahore, AIR 1949 Lah 186 (FB) (A); and...

...Pershad v. Sham Sunder AIR 1947 Lah 13, ILR 1947 Lah 417 with approval:“These sections require that the debts and liabilities...immovable property. In taking this view reliance was placed on the decision Ajudhia Pershad case AIR 1947 Lah 13, ILR 1947 Lah 417 as well as the decision of this Court in Addanki Narayanappa AIR 1966 SC 1300, (1966) 2 MLJ 60 (SC), (1966) 3 SCR 400.13. Again...the decision reported in Addanki Narayanappa v. Bhaskara Krishtappa AIR 1959 AP 380, 1959 Andh LT 377, (1959) 1 AWR 300 (FB) which decision has...

...Others, AIR 1947 Lah 13, Addanki Narayanappa and another v. Bhaskara Krishnappa and Others...Chand AIR 1978 Cal 352, Madiammal v. Glory Chandrakanthd, AIR 1977...Mad 209, G. Ramappa and Others vs. Secy. to the Revenue Department and others, AIR 1959 A. P. 318, Ayodhya Pershad Ram Pershad v. Sham Sunder and...

...: (AIR 1925 Bom 420) and Ajudhia Pershad v. Sham Sunder, AIR 1947 Lah 13 (FB), and also on the provisions of O...is subject to the direction of another Court. 6. In AIR 1947 Lah 13 (FB), it was held that the charging order under O. 21, R. 49, C. P. Code is an attachment for...: (AIR 1925 Bom 420), to cases where an attachment is levied against property and a decree passed against its owner by the Court of a higher grade but the property is sold by...

...Court in Ajudhia Pershad Ram Pershad v. Sham Sunder, AIR 1947 Lah 13 [FB] and in...Addanki Narayanappa v. Bhaskara Krishnappa, AIR 1959 AP 380 [FB], has received the seal of approval of the Supreme Court in...Addanki Narayanappa v. Bhaskara Krishnappa, AIR 1966 SC 1300 and...

...— ‘Ajudhia Pershad v. Sham Sunder’, AIR 1947 Lah 13 (FB) (C). The High Courts of Madras, Bombay, Allahabad & Nagpur...’, AIR 1923 Lah 560 (A), and the decision of the Patna High Court in the Full Bench case of — ‘Hakim Syed Muhammad Taki v. Rai Fateh...Bahadur Singh*’, AIR 1929 Pat 565 (FB) (B).6. Speaking of authorities, it appears that the Lahore decision has since been over-ruled by the same High Court in the case of...

...AIR 1947 Lah 13, a Full Bench of Lahore High Court has overruled its previous view and has dissented from the view taken by Patna High Court. Orissa High Court has taken the same view, as the...Hakeem Syed Mohammad Taqi v. Fateh Bahadur Singh, reported in AIR 1929 Pat 565. The majority of the Full Bench has taken a view in...Laxmi Narayan Singh v. Dipen Rai, reported in AIR 1950 Pat 290. Both of these decisions undoubtedly support the contention of Shri Kedar Ishwar, but, for the reasons already stated above, we find...

...AIR 1947 Lah 13 (FB) (Ajudhia Pershad Ram Pershad v. Sham Sunder). In the said decision, it was inter alia, held as follows...(AIR 1947 Lah 13) (FB) and Addanki Narayanappa (AIR 1966 SC 1300) had no application. Furthermore it cannot be...dissolved on and from November 13, 1989, winding up of the partnerhsip business carried on under the name and style of Tagore Park Apartments at No. 587/18, Dr. R.N Tagore Road, Tagore Park, Calcutta...

...1947 Lah 13. In that case they also dissented from the Patna view in AIR 1929 Pat 565 (FB). In the case of..., AIR 1923 Lah 560 and the learned Judges naturally relied upon that decision.9. This Lahore decision has subsequently been, overruled by the Lahore High..., AIR 1947 Bom 480, a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court held that the provisions of Rule 12 apply to proceedings in execution...

...’, AIR 1947 Lah 13 (FB) (A); — “Trimbak Narhar v. Gopal Narayan...’, AIR 1947 Bom 480 (B); — ‘Rajah of Kalahasti v. Jagannadha Rayanimgar’, AIR 1932 Mad 574 (C) and — Chhanga Mal v....13. The principle indicated above finds support from another decision in — ‘Jaminikanto Narendralal v. Bonomali Dey,’ AIR...

...-- 'Ajudhia Pershad Ram Pershad v. Sham Sunder', AIR 1947 Lah 13 (J). The first case arose out of a pre-emption suit. One of the vendees died and his legal representatives were not..., 'AIR 1937 Lah 220 (E)'. 14. The second Oudh case is -- 'Mt. Jainath Kaur v. Dhanpal Singh', AIR 1947 Oudh 164 (G). This case arises...the suits by the reversioners: AIR 1947 Oudh 164 (G), and also of the suits brought under Order 21, Rule 63, Civil P. C.: AIR 1937 Lah...

..., as held by a Full Bench of the Lahore High Court in Ajudhia Pershad Ram Pershad v. Sham Sunder, AIR 1947 Lah 13 at.... Bhaskara Krishnappa (AIR 1966 SC 1300) mainly contended that a mortgagor, who is a partner of the firm, cannot claim or exercise any...Mudaliar… v. Abraham Pillai…. pillai, (1950) 1 Mad LJ 309 : (AIR 1950 Mad...

...1022 and was overruled later by a Full Bench decision of the same Court in AIR 1947 Lah 13 where the Full Bench observed as...AIR 1923 Lah 560. This decision (which was a single Bench decision) was expressly dissented from by a Division Bench decision of the Lahore High Court in AIR 1936 Lah...follows:—“It was held in Cheda Lal v. Aijaz Hussain, ILR 1937 Lah 80 : (AIR 1936 Lah 1022) by a Division Bench that appeals from orders in...

...(AIR 1966 SC 1300). In that case the following observation of Cornelious, J. in Ajudhia Pershad Ram Pershad v. Sham Sunder, AIR 1947 Lah 13 (FB) was...assignable interest in any such property (See Narayanappa v. Bhaskara Krishnappa, AIR 1966 SC 1300, para 3) So, it is obvious...shares. 8. In (AIR 1966 SC 1300 para 5), the Supreme Court held that, on dissolution of the partnership, the right of a...

...v. Sham Sunder, AIR 1947 Lah 13 have held that an appeal against an order made in execution proceedings is not itself a...Bombay High Court in Trimbak v. Gopal, AIR 1947 Bom 480, the Madras High Court in...Rajah of Kalahasti v. Jagannadha Rayanimgar, AIR 1932 Mad 574, the Allahabad High Court in Chaganmal v. Chaubey Ramdulare Lal...

...(1947) Lah 417: (AIR 1947 Lah 13) held that the interest of a partner in partnership assets comprising of movable and immovable property would be treated as movable property. We are...(3) ALT 1 2 2 012 (3) ALT 476 3 2001 (5) ALT 13 0 (F.B....) 4 (2004 ) 11 SCC 393 3 13 To substantiate the...

..., AIR 1947 Lah 13 (FB); Trimbak Narhar v. Gopal Narayan, AIR 1947 Bom 480...); Cheda Lal v. Aijas Hussain, AIR 1936 Lah 1022; Ajodhia Pershad Ram Pershad v. Sham Sunder...Gokalbhai, 1965 All LJ 525 : (AIR 1965 SC 1477). Learned counsel for the respondents on the other hand relies upon...

...the immovable property is only an uncertain factor.A Full Bench of the Lahore High Court in the case of Ajudhia Pershad v. Shamsunder, ILR (1947) Lah 417 : (AIR 1947 Lah 13) held...the initial defect. If ultimately observed as under (Para 30, at p. 3103 of AIR):“……..Order, 7, Rule 13 of the CPC would permit the filing of a fresh suit...Buhari Trading Co. v. Star Metal Co., AIR 1983 Madras 150. After reviewing the judgments rendered by the High Courts of Punjab and Haryana, Nagpur, Lahore and by itself, the Madras High...