Log In
  • India
  • US
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Commentaries
    United Kingdom
    England and Wales
    Scotland
    Northern Ireland
    Ireland
Log In Sign Up UK Judgments
  • India
  • US

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

strict-standards-for-successive-habeas-petitions-reinforced-in-in-re-ivan-abner-cantu Case Commentaries

No-Reasonable-Attorney Foreshadowing Standard: Seventh Circuit narrows Strickland deficiency for missed categorical-approach arguments in Elion v. United States

No-Reasonable-Attorney Foreshadowing Standard: Seventh Circuit narrows Strickland deficiency for missed categorical-approach arguments in Elion v. United States

Date: Sep 26, 2025
No-Reasonable-Attorney Foreshadowing Standard: Seventh Circuit narrows Strickland deficiency for missed categorical-approach arguments Introduction In Otis R. Elion v. United States, No. 24-3014 (7th...
Mandamus Is Not a Shortcut Around Nonfinal Custody Orders: State ex rel. Conomy v. Fuller (2025-Ohio-4411)

Mandamus Is Not a Shortcut Around Nonfinal Custody Orders: State ex rel. Conomy v. Fuller (2025-Ohio-4411)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Mandamus Is Not a Shortcut Around Nonfinal Custody Orders: State ex rel. Conomy v. Fuller Introduction In State ex rel. Conomy v. Fuller, 2025-Ohio-4411, the Supreme Court of Ohio reaffirmed core...
In Reopened Appeals, Appellants Must Brief Deficiency and Prejudice: No Presumption of Ineffective Assistance Under App.R. 26(B)

In Reopened Appeals, Appellants Must Brief Deficiency and Prejudice: No Presumption of Ineffective Assistance Under App.R. 26(B)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
In Reopened Appeals, Appellants Must Brief Deficiency and Prejudice: No Presumption of Ineffective Assistance Under App.R. 26(B) Introduction In State v. Clark, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-4410, the...
Constructive Discharge in Alaska Whistleblower Cases Is an Objective, Position-Specific Inquiry (Nonprecedential Clarification)

Constructive Discharge in Alaska Whistleblower Cases Is an Objective, Position-Specific Inquiry (Nonprecedential Clarification)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Constructive Discharge in Alaska Whistleblower Cases Is an Objective, Position-Specific Inquiry (Nonprecedential Clarification) Court: Supreme Court of the State of Alaska (Memorandum Opinion and...
Recent Compliance Is Not Enough: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Termination Where Change Is Unproven Outside Structured Settings; “Reasonable Efforts” Do Not Require Early Neuropsychological Referral Absent Indicators

Recent Compliance Is Not Enough: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Termination Where Change Is Unproven Outside Structured Settings; “Reasonable Efforts” Do Not Require Early Neuropsychological Referral Absent Indicators

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Recent Compliance Is Not Enough: Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Termination Where Change Is Unproven Outside Structured Settings; “Reasonable Efforts” Do Not Require Early Neuropsychological Referral...
A single address can satisfy Fourth Amendment particularity for unmarked, attached efficiency apartments when officers reasonably could not know the property is subdivided

A single address can satisfy Fourth Amendment particularity for unmarked, attached efficiency apartments when officers reasonably could not know the property is subdivided

Date: Sep 26, 2025
A single address can satisfy Fourth Amendment particularity for unmarked, attached efficiency apartments when officers reasonably could not know the property is subdivided Introduction In United...
Post-Wilkinson Review in Cancellation Cases: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms No Jurisdiction Over Factual Hardship Findings and Confirms That Number of Qualifying Relatives Is a Proper Totality Factor

Post-Wilkinson Review in Cancellation Cases: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms No Jurisdiction Over Factual Hardship Findings and Confirms That Number of Qualifying Relatives Is a Proper Totality Factor

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Post-Wilkinson Review in Cancellation Cases: Sixth Circuit Reaffirms No Jurisdiction Over Factual Hardship Findings and Confirms That Number of Qualifying Relatives Is a Proper Totality Factor...
Moslem (2d Cir. 2025): Harmless Ciminelli Instruction Error, Intended-Loss Sentencing, and Dubin’s “Who” Standard for Aggravated Identity Theft

Moslem (2d Cir. 2025): Harmless Ciminelli Instruction Error, Intended-Loss Sentencing, and Dubin’s “Who” Standard for Aggravated Identity Theft

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Moslem (2d Cir. 2025): Harmless Ciminelli Instruction Error, Intended-Loss Sentencing, and Dubin’s “Who” Standard for Aggravated Identity Theft Note on precedential status: The court labeled this a...
EEZ-as-“High Seas,” Congress’s MDLEA Statelessness Definition, and No-Nexus Requirement Reaffirmed; Minor-Role Denial for High-Quantity Courier — United States v. Vasquez (11th Cir. 2025)

EEZ-as-“High Seas,” Congress’s MDLEA Statelessness Definition, and No-Nexus Requirement Reaffirmed; Minor-Role Denial for High-Quantity Courier — United States v. Vasquez (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZ-as-“High Seas,” Congress’s MDLEA Statelessness Definition, and No-Nexus Requirement Reaffirmed; Minor-Role Denial for High-Quantity Courier — United States v. Vasquez (11th Cir. 2025)...
No Thirteenth Amendment Claim for Routine Prison Labor; Due Process Requires “Atypical and Significant Hardship” — Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Omasta and Applies Sandin in Greene v. Secretary, FDOC

No Thirteenth Amendment Claim for Routine Prison Labor; Due Process Requires “Atypical and Significant Hardship” — Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Omasta and Applies Sandin in Greene v. Secretary, FDOC

Date: Sep 26, 2025
No Thirteenth Amendment Claim for Routine Prison Labor; Due Process Requires “Atypical and Significant Hardship” — Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Omasta and Applies Sandin in Greene v. Secretary, FDOC...
EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” and a Claim of Nationality Triggers Statelessness Under the MDLEA: The Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Rai Martinez

EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” and a Claim of Nationality Triggers Statelessness Under the MDLEA: The Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Rai Martinez

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZ Counts as “High Seas,” and a Claim of Nationality Triggers Statelessness Under the MDLEA: The Eleventh Circuit’s Summary Affirmance in United States v. Rai Martinez Introduction In a...
Eleventh Circuit reaffirms inherent authority to dismiss patently frivolous pro se Bivens claims and confirms abandonment of default arguments raised only in reply

Eleventh Circuit reaffirms inherent authority to dismiss patently frivolous pro se Bivens claims and confirms abandonment of default arguments raised only in reply

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Eleventh Circuit reaffirms inherent authority to dismiss patently frivolous pro se Bivens claims and confirms abandonment of default arguments raised only in reply Introduction This commentary...
Municipal Inaction Toward DEI/Implicit-Bias Trainings Can Constitute a Monell Policy Creating a Hostile Work Environment: Commentary on Chislett v. N.Y.C. Department of Education (2d Cir. 2025)

Municipal Inaction Toward DEI/Implicit-Bias Trainings Can Constitute a Monell Policy Creating a Hostile Work Environment: Commentary on Chislett v. N.Y.C. Department of Education (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Municipal Inaction Toward DEI/Implicit-Bias Trainings Can Constitute a Monell Policy Creating a Hostile Work Environment: Commentary on Chislett v. N.Y.C. Department of Education (2d Cir. 2025)...
Vaghari v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms the “Actual Receipt” Inquiry and Demands Evidence-Based Analysis for Rescinding In Absentia Orders

Vaghari v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms the “Actual Receipt” Inquiry and Demands Evidence-Based Analysis for Rescinding In Absentia Orders

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Vaghari v. Bondi: Second Circuit Reaffirms the “Actual Receipt” Inquiry and Demands Evidence-Based Analysis for Rescinding In Absentia Orders Introduction In Vaghari v. Bondi (No. 23-6727, Sept. 25,...
Aesthetic-Harm Standing for Cultural Monuments, but No Due Process Right to City-Owned Statues: Italian-American Defense League v. City of New Haven (2d Cir. 2025)

Aesthetic-Harm Standing for Cultural Monuments, but No Due Process Right to City-Owned Statues: Italian-American Defense League v. City of New Haven (2d Cir. 2025)

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Aesthetic-Harm Standing for Cultural Monuments, but No Due Process Right to City-Owned Statues Italian-American Defense League v. City of New Haven, No. 24-2877 (2d Cir. Sept. 25, 2025) (summary...
Interest-Based Allocation of Joint Loss‑Payee Insurance Proceeds and Preclusion of Insurer’s Post‑Verdict Attacks under Tennessee Law

Interest-Based Allocation of Joint Loss‑Payee Insurance Proceeds and Preclusion of Insurer’s Post‑Verdict Attacks under Tennessee Law

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Interest-Based Allocation of Joint Loss‑Payee Insurance Proceeds and Preclusion of Insurer’s Post‑Verdict Attacks under Tennessee Law Introduction This appeal—Hanover American Insurance Co. v....
EEZ as “High Seas,” Validity of “Neither Confirm Nor Deny” Statelessness, and No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Foundational Limits on Constitutional Challenges

EEZ as “High Seas,” Validity of “Neither Confirm Nor Deny” Statelessness, and No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Foundational Limits on Constitutional Challenges

Date: Sep 26, 2025
EEZ as “High Seas,” Validity of “Neither Confirm Nor Deny” Statelessness, and No Nexus Requirement Under the MDLEA: Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Foundational Limits on Constitutional Challenges...
Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing May Weigh Overdose-Related Investigation Context Without Proving Causation

Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing May Weigh Overdose-Related Investigation Context Without Proving Causation

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Eleventh Circuit: Sentencing May Weigh Overdose-Related Investigation Context Without Proving Causation Case: United States v. Sudiata Neket Zanja Stinson, No. 24-11993 (11th Cir. Sept. 25, 2025)...
“High Seas” Includes Foreign Contiguous Zones: Eleventh Circuit Confirms MDLEA Jurisdiction Over Stateless Vessels Interdicted Beyond Territorial Seas

“High Seas” Includes Foreign Contiguous Zones: Eleventh Circuit Confirms MDLEA Jurisdiction Over Stateless Vessels Interdicted Beyond Territorial Seas

Date: Sep 26, 2025
“High Seas” Includes Foreign Contiguous Zones: Eleventh Circuit Confirms MDLEA Jurisdiction Over Stateless Vessels Interdicted Beyond Territorial Seas Case Overview Case: United States v. Cristian...
Recklessness Suffices for § 875(c) “True Threats”; Rule 106 Context Is Narrow; Keene Alternative-Sentence Harmlessness Reaffirmed

Recklessness Suffices for § 875(c) “True Threats”; Rule 106 Context Is Narrow; Keene Alternative-Sentence Harmlessness Reaffirmed

Date: Sep 26, 2025
Recklessness Suffices for § 875(c) “True Threats”; Rule 106 Context Is Narrow; Keene Alternative-Sentence Harmlessness Reaffirmed Introduction In United States v. Cloepha Franks, No. 24-11546 (11th...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert

We use cookies to improve your experience

You can accept all cookies or turn off analytical ones.