Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

reinforcing-the-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-in-commercial-development-contracts:-anthony& Case Commentaries

Restricting Federal Habeas Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to Underlying Conviction Challenges: Excluding Post-Conviction Procedural Claims

Restricting Federal Habeas Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to Underlying Conviction Challenges: Excluding Post-Conviction Procedural Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Restricting Federal Habeas Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to Underlying Conviction Challenges: Excluding Post-Conviction Procedural Claims Introduction Williams v. Bridges, No. 25-6025 (10th Cir. June...
Categorical Exclusion of Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery from “Crime of Violence” Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

Categorical Exclusion of Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery from “Crime of Violence” Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Categorical Exclusion of Attempted Hobbs Act Robbery from “Crime of Violence” Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) Introduction This commentary examines the Seventh Circuit’s decision in United States v. Deaunta...
Permissible Inferences from Silence and Nationality Neutrality in Sentencing: United States v. Paul Williams Anti

Permissible Inferences from Silence and Nationality Neutrality in Sentencing: United States v. Paul Williams Anti

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Permissible Inferences from Silence and Nationality Neutrality in Sentencing: United States v. Paul Williams Anti Introduction United States v. Paul Williams Anti is a Seventh Circuit decision issued...
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services: The Supreme Court Abolishes the “Background-Circumstances” Hurdle for Majority-Group Plaintiffs under Title VII

Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services: The Supreme Court Abolishes the “Background-Circumstances” Hurdle for Majority-Group Plaintiffs under Title VII

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services: The Supreme Court Abolishes the “Background-Circumstances” Hurdle for Majority-Group Plaintiffs under Title VII Introduction In Ames v. Ohio Department of...
“Extraordinary Means Extraordinary”: The Supreme Court Re-cements the Rigid Threshold for Rule 60(b)(6) Motions and Rejects Any Balancing with Rule 15(a)

“Extraordinary Means Extraordinary”: The Supreme Court Re-cements the Rigid Threshold for Rule 60(b)(6) Motions and Rejects Any Balancing with Rule 15(a)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
“Extraordinary Means Extraordinary”: The Supreme Court Re-cements the Rigid Threshold for Rule 60(b)(6) Motions and Rejects Any Balancing with Rule 15(a) 1. Introduction In BLOM Bank SAL v....
“Automatic Personal Jurisdiction” under the FSIA: CC/Devas v. Antrix and the Demise of the Minimum-Contacts Overlay

“Automatic Personal Jurisdiction” under the FSIA: CC/Devas v. Antrix and the Demise of the Minimum-Contacts Overlay

Date: Jun 10, 2025
“Automatic Personal Jurisdiction” under the FSIA: CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd. & Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. Ltd. (U.S. 2025) I. Introduction The Supreme Court’s unanimous opinion in...
No Proselytization Requirement: The Denominational-Neutrality Rule Refined in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin LIRC (U.S. 2025)

No Proselytization Requirement: The Denominational-Neutrality Rule Refined in Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin LIRC (U.S. 2025)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
No Proselytization Requirement: The U.S. Supreme Court Refines the Denominational-Neutrality Rule in Religious Employer Exemptions Introduction In Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor &...
When the High Court Abstains: Laboratory Corp. of America v. Davis and the Unsettled Doctrine of “Mixed-Injury” Class Certification

When the High Court Abstains: Laboratory Corp. of America v. Davis and the Unsettled Doctrine of “Mixed-Injury” Class Certification

Date: Jun 10, 2025
When the High Court Abstains: Laboratory Corp. of America v. Davis and the Unsettled Doctrine of “Mixed-Injury” Class Certification 1. Introduction On 5 June 2025 the U.S. Supreme Court issued a...
Aiding-and-Abetting under PLCAA Requires Active, Targeted Participation: Commentary on Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos (605 U.S. ___ 2025)

Aiding-and-Abetting under PLCAA Requires Active, Targeted Participation: Commentary on Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos (605 U.S. ___ 2025)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Aiding-and-Abetting under PLCAA Requires Active, Targeted Participation: An In-Depth Commentary on Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, 605 U.S. ___ (2025) 1. Introduction In...
Irrevocability Requirement for Government-Granted Property Interests under Florida’s Takings Clause

Irrevocability Requirement for Government-Granted Property Interests under Florida’s Takings Clause

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Irrevocability Requirement for Government-Granted Property Interests under Florida’s Takings Clause Introduction In Gustavo Bojorquez, et al. v. State of Florida, the Supreme Court of Florida...
Mandating Multilingual Residential Eviction Summons: Enhancing Procedural Fairness under Florida Rule 1.923(a)

Mandating Multilingual Residential Eviction Summons: Enhancing Procedural Fairness under Florida Rule 1.923(a)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Mandating Multilingual Residential Eviction Summons: Enhancing Procedural Fairness under Florida Rule 1.923(a) Introduction This commentary examines the Supreme Court of Florida’s per curiam decision...
Inherent Docket-Management Authority and Fair-Notice Pleading: Gorawara v. Caprio

Inherent Docket-Management Authority and Fair-Notice Pleading: Gorawara v. Caprio

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Inherent Docket-Management Authority and Fair-Notice Pleading: Gorawara v. Caprio Introduction Gorawara v. Caprio, 24-17 (2d Cir. June 4, 2025), presents two primary issues: first, whether the...
Second Circuit Upholds the “Reasonable Opportunity to Observe” Mens Rea Standard in 18 U.S.C. § 1591(c)

Second Circuit Upholds the “Reasonable Opportunity to Observe” Mens Rea Standard in 18 U.S.C. § 1591(c)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Second Circuit Upholds the “Reasonable Opportunity to Observe” Mens Rea Standard in 18 U.S.C. § 1591(c) Introduction United States v. Concepcion, decided June 4, 2025 by the Second Circuit, tested...
Coker v. Warren: Clarifying Article III Standing and Pleading Requirements for Section 1985 Conspiracy Claims

Coker v. Warren: Clarifying Article III Standing and Pleading Requirements for Section 1985 Conspiracy Claims

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Coker v. Warren: Clarifying Article III Standing and Pleading Requirements for Section 1985 Conspiracy Claims Introduction In Befaithful Coker v. Sylvester Warren, III (No. 23-11160, 11th Cir. June...
United States v. Robinson: Harmless‐Error Review of ACCA “Different Occasions” Findings and Due Process in Supervised Release Conditions

United States v. Robinson: Harmless‐Error Review of ACCA “Different Occasions” Findings and Due Process in Supervised Release Conditions

Date: Jun 10, 2025
United States v. Robinson: Harmless‐Error Review of ACCA “Different Occasions” Findings and Due Process in Supervised Release Conditions Introduction This commentary examines the Eleventh Circuit’s...
Preservation of Expert-Testimony Objections and Batson Affiliation Strikes: Third Circuit’s Clarification in United States v. Hamlet, Phillips & Manley

Preservation of Expert-Testimony Objections and Batson Affiliation Strikes: Third Circuit’s Clarification in United States v. Hamlet, Phillips & Manley

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Preservation of Expert-Testimony Objections and Batson Affiliation Strikes: Third Circuit’s Clarification in United States v. Hamlet, Phillips & Manley Introduction United States v. Corey Hamlet,...
Defining Waiver of Daubert Challenges and Batson Affiliation Strikes – United States v. Corey Hamlet

Defining Waiver of Daubert Challenges and Batson Affiliation Strikes – United States v. Corey Hamlet

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Defining Waiver of Daubert Challenges and Batson Affiliation Strikes United States v. Corey Hamlet Introduction United States v. Corey Hamlet (3d Cir. 2025) is a consolidated appeal from convictions...
Clarifying Waiver of Evidentiary Objections and Batson’s Affiliation-Based Challenges: United States v. Tony Phillips

Clarifying Waiver of Evidentiary Objections and Batson’s Affiliation-Based Challenges: United States v. Tony Phillips

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarifying Waiver of Evidentiary Objections and Batson’s Affiliation-Based Challenges: United States v. Tony Phillips Introduction United States v. Tony Phillips (3d Cir. June 4, 2025) arose from a...
Clarifying Bankruptcy Fee Approval: Proper Use of §§328 and 330 in Assadi v. Osherow

Clarifying Bankruptcy Fee Approval: Proper Use of §§328 and 330 in Assadi v. Osherow

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Clarifying Bankruptcy Fee Approval: Proper Use of §§328 and 330 in Assadi v. Osherow Introduction In Assadi v. Osherow, the Fifth Circuit confronted recurring fee disputes in a long-running Chapter 7...
Strict Enforcement of FTCA Presentment and Westfall Act Certification: Beary v. Harris County

Strict Enforcement of FTCA Presentment and Westfall Act Certification: Beary v. Harris County

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Strict Enforcement of FTCA Presentment and Westfall Act Certification: Beary v. Harris County Introduction Beary v. Harris County (5th Cir. June 4, 2025) presents a federal appeals court’s guidance...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert