Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

federal Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Felon-in-Possession Ban After Bruen and Rahimi

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Felon-in-Possession Ban After Bruen and Rahimi

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Felon-in-Possession Ban After Bruen and Rahimi Introduction United States v. Kenya Miguel Johnson, No. 23-10642 (11th Cir. June 16, 2025) is an unpublished but...
Reaffirming the Presumptive Lawfulness of Felon-in-Possession Statutes after Bruen and Rahimi – A Commentary on United States v. Walter Rider

Reaffirming the Presumptive Lawfulness of Felon-in-Possession Statutes after Bruen and Rahimi – A Commentary on United States v. Walter Rider

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Reaffirming the Presumptive Lawfulness of Felon-in-Possession Statutes after Bruen and Rahimi A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Walter Rider, 23-13043 (11th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction In...
Sixth Circuit Narrows “Pre-Emptive Retaliation” – Anthony Lee v. Dana Inc.

Sixth Circuit Narrows “Pre-Emptive Retaliation” – Anthony Lee v. Dana Inc.

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Anthony Lee v. Dana Inc.: Sixth Circuit Clarifies the Evidentiary Burden for “Pre-Emptive Retaliation” under Title VII and Michigan’s ELCRA 1. Introduction Anthony Lee, a long-term Black employee at...
“Bringing-the-Parcel-Inside” as a Sufficient Trigger: Sixth Circuit’s Refined Limits on Franks Hearings and Anticipatory Warrants in United States v. Kendrick Watson

“Bringing-the-Parcel-Inside” as a Sufficient Trigger: Sixth Circuit’s Refined Limits on Franks Hearings and Anticipatory Warrants in United States v. Kendrick Watson

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Bringing-the-Parcel-Inside” as a Sufficient Trigger: Sixth Circuit’s Refined Limits on Franks Hearings and Anticipatory Warrants in United States v. Kendrick Watson I. Introduction In an unpublished...
“No Automatic Federal Hook”: Tenth Circuit Declares that Motor Vehicles Are NOT Per Se “Instrumentalities of Interstate Commerce” under the Federal Kidnapping Act

“No Automatic Federal Hook”: Tenth Circuit Declares that Motor Vehicles Are NOT Per Se “Instrumentalities of Interstate Commerce” under the Federal Kidnapping Act

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“No Automatic Federal Hook”: Tenth Circuit Declares that Motor Vehicles Are NOT Per Se “Instrumentalities of Interstate Commerce” under the Federal Kidnapping Act Introduction United States v....

        United States v. Rivera: Tenth Circuit Endorses “Blind” Grooming-Expert Testimony
        and Clarifies Rule 702/703 Reliance on Third-Party Technical Data

United States v. Rivera: Tenth Circuit Endorses “Blind” Grooming-Expert Testimony and Clarifies Rule 702/703 Reliance on Third-Party Technical Data

Date: Jun 18, 2025
United States v. Rivera: Tenth Circuit Endorses “Blind” Grooming-Expert Testimony and Clarifies Rule 702/703 Reliance on Third-Party Technical Data I. Introduction In United States v. Rivera (10th...
“No Longer than Necessary” – The Tenth Circuit Draws a Bright Line on Detention Length Incident to Third-Party Arrests

“No Longer than Necessary” – The Tenth Circuit Draws a Bright Line on Detention Length Incident to Third-Party Arrests

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“No Longer than Necessary” – The Tenth Circuit Draws a Bright Line on Detention Length Incident to Third-Party Arrests Introduction In United States v. Tyler, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Curtis Walker v. Cromwell: Seventh Circuit Re-affirms AEDPA Deference in Juvenile “De Facto” LWOP Cases

Curtis Walker v. Cromwell: Seventh Circuit Re-affirms AEDPA Deference in Juvenile “De Facto” LWOP Cases

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Curtis Walker v. Dan Cromwell Seventh Circuit Clarifies the Interplay of Miller, Montgomery and Jones under AEDPA 1. Introduction Curtis L. Walker, sentenced at age 17 to life imprisonment with first...
Seventh Circuit Endorses “Search-for-Truth” Reasonable-Doubt Language Under AEDPA Deference

Seventh Circuit Endorses “Search-for-Truth” Reasonable-Doubt Language Under AEDPA Deference

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Seventh Circuit Endorses “Search-for-Truth” Reasonable-Doubt Language Under AEDPA Deference: Commentary on Michael Williams v. Michael Meisner (7th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction On 16 June 2025, the...
The “Orabona Rule”: When Any Determination of Liability or Damages Requires Reference to an ERISA Plan, All Parallel State-Law Termination Claims Are Pre-empted

The “Orabona Rule”: When Any Determination of Liability or Damages Requires Reference to an ERISA Plan, All Parallel State-Law Termination Claims Are Pre-empted

Date: Jun 18, 2025
The “Orabona Rule”: When Any Determination of Liability or Damages Requires Reference to an ERISA Plan, All Parallel State-Law Termination Claims Are Pre-empted Introduction In Orabona v. Santander...
Forfeiture of Unraised Issues and Judicial Authority to Enjoin Vexatious Litigants – Commentary on Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Commonwealth of Westmoreland County

Forfeiture of Unraised Issues and Judicial Authority to Enjoin Vexatious Litigants – Commentary on Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Commonwealth of Westmoreland County

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Forfeiture of Unraised Issues and Judicial Authority to Enjoin Vexatious Litigants: A Commentary on Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Commonwealth of Westmoreland County 1. Introduction In a...
Martinez v. Westmoreland Courts: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal

Martinez v. Westmoreland Courts: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Martinez v. Westmoreland Courts: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal Introduction Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez, a prolific pro se litigant, filed seven...
Martinez v. Obarto (3d Cir. 2025): Reinforcing Objective Standards for Judicial Recusal and Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions

Martinez v. Obarto (3d Cir. 2025): Reinforcing Objective Standards for Judicial Recusal and Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Martinez v. Obarto (3d Cir. 2025): Reinforcing Objective Standards for Judicial Recusal and Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions I. Introduction The consolidated appeal Justin Juan De la Cruz Martinez v....
Martinez v. Westmoreland County et al.: Third Circuit Reaffirms Forfeiture Doctrine and High Bar for Judicial Recusal & Vexatious-Litigant Designations

Martinez v. Westmoreland County et al.: Third Circuit Reaffirms Forfeiture Doctrine and High Bar for Judicial Recusal & Vexatious-Litigant Designations

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Martinez v. Westmoreland County et al. Third Circuit Reaffirms Forfeiture Doctrine and High Bar for Judicial Recusal & Vexatious-Litigant Designations Introduction Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez, a...
Martinez v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal

Martinez v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Martinez v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal 1. Introduction The consolidated appeal of Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez v....

        “Unfounded Allegations Do Not Compel Recusal” – Third Circuit Commentary on 
        Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

“Unfounded Allegations Do Not Compel Recusal” – Third Circuit Commentary on Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Unfounded Allegations Do Not Compel Recusal” – Third Circuit Commentary on Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania 1. Introduction In a...
“Adverse Rulings ≠ Bias” – The Third Circuit Re-Affirms Strict Standards for Judicial Recusal and Endorses Robust District‐Court Power to Curb Vexatious Litigation

“Adverse Rulings ≠ Bias” – The Third Circuit Re-Affirms Strict Standards for Judicial Recusal and Endorses Robust District‐Court Power to Curb Vexatious Litigation

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“Adverse Rulings ≠ Bias” – The Third Circuit Re-Affirms Strict Standards for Judicial Recusal and Endorses Robust District‐Court Power to Curb Vexatious Litigation Introduction The consolidated...
Affirming Consumer-Level Limitation-of-Liability Clauses: Commentary on Marie Lamb v. CVS Pharmacy LLC

Affirming Consumer-Level Limitation-of-Liability Clauses: Commentary on Marie Lamb v. CVS Pharmacy LLC

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Affirming Consumer-Level Limitation-of-Liability Clauses: Marie Lamb v. CVS Pharmacy LLC (3d Cir. 2025) Introduction In Marie Lamb v. CVS Pharmacy LLC, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Gorrio v. Francis: Third Circuit Declares Blanket Discovery Bans Unlawful but Requires Prejudice for Relief

Gorrio v. Francis: Third Circuit Declares Blanket Discovery Bans Unlawful but Requires Prejudice for Relief

Date: Jun 18, 2025
Gorrio v. Francis: Third Circuit Declares Blanket Discovery Bans Unlawful but Requires Prejudice for Relief 1. Introduction In Michael Gorrio v. Francis, No. 24-1711 (3d Cir. 2025), the United States...
“From Passive to Active”: Anderson v. Estrada and the Fifth Circuit’s Refined Test for Active Resistance and Drive-Stun Taser Use

“From Passive to Active”: Anderson v. Estrada and the Fifth Circuit’s Refined Test for Active Resistance and Drive-Stun Taser Use

Date: Jun 18, 2025
“From Passive to Active”: Anderson v. Estrada and the Fifth Circuit’s Refined Test for Active Resistance and Drive-Stun Taser Use Introduction Anderson v. Estrada, No. 24-20142 (5th Cir. June 13...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert