Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms § 922(g)(1) Felon-in-Possession Ban After Bruen and Rahimi Introduction United States v. Kenya Miguel Johnson, No. 23-10642 (11th Cir. June 16, 2025) is an unpublished but...
Reaffirming the Presumptive Lawfulness of Felon-in-Possession Statutes after Bruen and Rahimi A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Walter Rider, 23-13043 (11th Cir. 2025) I. Introduction In...
Anthony Lee v. Dana Inc.: Sixth Circuit Clarifies the Evidentiary Burden for “Pre-Emptive Retaliation” under Title VII and Michigan’s ELCRA 1. Introduction Anthony Lee, a long-term Black employee at...
“Bringing-the-Parcel-Inside” as a Sufficient Trigger: Sixth Circuit’s Refined Limits on Franks Hearings and Anticipatory Warrants in United States v. Kendrick Watson I. Introduction In an unpublished...
“No Automatic Federal Hook”: Tenth Circuit Declares that Motor Vehicles Are NOT Per Se “Instrumentalities of Interstate Commerce” under the Federal Kidnapping Act Introduction United States v....
United States v. Rivera: Tenth Circuit Endorses “Blind” Grooming-Expert Testimony and Clarifies Rule 702/703 Reliance on Third-Party Technical Data I. Introduction In United States v. Rivera (10th...
“No Longer than Necessary” – The Tenth Circuit Draws a Bright Line on Detention Length Incident to Third-Party Arrests Introduction In United States v. Tyler, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Curtis Walker v. Dan Cromwell Seventh Circuit Clarifies the Interplay of Miller, Montgomery and Jones under AEDPA 1. Introduction Curtis L. Walker, sentenced at age 17 to life imprisonment with first...
Seventh Circuit Endorses “Search-for-Truth” Reasonable-Doubt Language Under AEDPA Deference: Commentary on Michael Williams v. Michael Meisner (7th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction On 16 June 2025, the...
The “Orabona Rule”: When Any Determination of Liability or Damages Requires Reference to an ERISA Plan, All Parallel State-Law Termination Claims Are Pre-empted Introduction In Orabona v. Santander...
Forfeiture of Unraised Issues and Judicial Authority to Enjoin Vexatious Litigants: A Commentary on Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Commonwealth of Westmoreland County 1. Introduction In a...
Martinez v. Westmoreland Courts: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal Introduction Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez, a prolific pro se litigant, filed seven...
Martinez v. Obarto (3d Cir. 2025): Reinforcing Objective Standards for Judicial Recusal and Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions I. Introduction The consolidated appeal Justin Juan De la Cruz Martinez v....
Martinez v. Westmoreland County et al. Third Circuit Reaffirms Forfeiture Doctrine and High Bar for Judicial Recusal & Vexatious-Litigant Designations Introduction Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez, a...
Martinez v. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania: Re-affirming Standards for Vexatious-Litigant Injunctions and Judicial Recusal 1. Introduction The consolidated appeal of Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez v....
“Unfounded Allegations Do Not Compel Recusal” – Third Circuit Commentary on Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania 1. Introduction In a...
“Adverse Rulings ≠ Bias” – The Third Circuit Re-Affirms Strict Standards for Judicial Recusal and Endorses Robust District‐Court Power to Curb Vexatious Litigation Introduction The consolidated...
Affirming Consumer-Level Limitation-of-Liability Clauses: Marie Lamb v. CVS Pharmacy LLC (3d Cir. 2025) Introduction In Marie Lamb v. CVS Pharmacy LLC, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Gorrio v. Francis: Third Circuit Declares Blanket Discovery Bans Unlawful but Requires Prejudice for Relief 1. Introduction In Michael Gorrio v. Francis, No. 24-1711 (3d Cir. 2025), the United States...
“From Passive to Active”: Anderson v. Estrada and the Fifth Circuit’s Refined Test for Active Resistance and Drive-Stun Taser Use Introduction Anderson v. Estrada, No. 24-20142 (5th Cir. June 13...