Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

clarifying-state-action-doctrine:-acgme&amp Case Commentaries

“Deceptive” ≠ “Unfair”: The Fifth-Circuit’s Definitive Statement on §45(n) and the Scope of FTC Authority – A Commentary on Traffic Jam Events v. FTC (2025)

“Deceptive” ≠ “Unfair”: The Fifth-Circuit’s Definitive Statement on §45(n) and the Scope of FTC Authority – A Commentary on Traffic Jam Events v. FTC (2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
“Deceptive” ≠ “Unfair”: The Fifth-Circuit’s Definitive Statement on §45(n) and the Scope of FTC Authority – Commentary on Traffic Jam Events v. FTC, No. 21-60947 (5th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction...
United States v. Cortez-Zepeda: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms the Defendant’s Burden to Invalidate Signed Waivers in § 1326(d) Collateral Attacks

United States v. Cortez-Zepeda: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms the Defendant’s Burden to Invalidate Signed Waivers in § 1326(d) Collateral Attacks

Date: Jul 12, 2025
United States v. Cortez-Zepeda: Fifth Circuit Reaffirms the Defendant’s Burden to Invalidate Signed Waivers in § 1326(d) Collateral Attacks Introduction In United States v. Cortez-Zepeda,...
United States v. Silva: Endorsing Proportional Drug-Quantity Attribution for Minor Co-Conspirators under U.S.S.G. §1B1.3

United States v. Silva: Endorsing Proportional Drug-Quantity Attribution for Minor Co-Conspirators under U.S.S.G. §1B1.3

Date: Jul 12, 2025
United States v. Silva: Endorsing Proportional Drug-Quantity Attribution for Minor Co-Conspirators under U.S.S.G. §1B1.3 Introduction The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in United States v....
“Knowledge-Based Waiver” and the Party-Presentation Rule:  A Commentary on Andrew Berzanskis v. FCA US, LLC (6th Cir. 2025)

“Knowledge-Based Waiver” and the Party-Presentation Rule: A Commentary on Andrew Berzanskis v. FCA US, LLC (6th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
“Knowledge-Based Waiver” and the Party-Presentation Rule: A Comprehensive Commentary on Andrew Berzanskis v. FCA US, LLC (6th Cir. July 10, 2025) 1. Introduction The Sixth Circuit’s published opinion...
Finality over Flexibility: Sixth Circuit Bars Rule 60(b) Re-Litigation after an FTCA Judgment

Finality over Flexibility: Sixth Circuit Bars Rule 60(b) Re-Litigation after an FTCA Judgment

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Finality over Flexibility: Sixth Circuit Bars Rule 60(b) Re-Litigation after an FTCA Judgment Introduction James King v. United States is the latest chapter in a decade-long fight over the limits of...
Braid v. Stilley: Interpleader Jurisdiction Meets Colorado River – Seventh Circuit Defines the Limits of Federal Intervention in S.B. 8 “Bounty Hunter” Actions

Braid v. Stilley: Interpleader Jurisdiction Meets Colorado River – Seventh Circuit Defines the Limits of Federal Intervention in S.B. 8 “Bounty Hunter” Actions

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Braid v. Stilley: Interpleader Jurisdiction Meets Colorado River – Seventh Circuit Defines the Limits of Federal Intervention in S.B. 8 “Bounty Hunter” Actions 1. Introduction In Alan Braid v. Oscar...

        Personal Knowledge, Hearsay Barriers, and Prisoner Litigation: The
        Seventh Circuit’s Clarification in Taylor v. Buss on Deliberate
        Indifference and Retaliation Proof

Personal Knowledge, Hearsay Barriers, and Prisoner Litigation: The Seventh Circuit’s Clarification in Taylor v. Buss on Deliberate Indifference and Retaliation Proof

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Personal Knowledge, Hearsay Barriers, and Prisoner Litigation: The Seventh Circuit’s Clarification in Taylor v. Buss on Deliberate Indifference and Retaliation Proof 1. Introduction In Brent Taylor...
Reaffirming the High Bar for “Class-of-One” Equal-Protection Claims in the Sex-Offender Registration Context: Flynt Lee v. Perez Stanford (7th Cir. 2025)

Reaffirming the High Bar for “Class-of-One” Equal-Protection Claims in the Sex-Offender Registration Context: Flynt Lee v. Perez Stanford (7th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Reaffirming the High Bar for “Class-of-One” Equal-Protection Claims in the Sex-Offender Registration Context: Flynt J. Lee v. Perez Stanford, No. 24-2417 (7th Cir. July 10, 2025) 1. Introduction This...
Establishing Vacancy Through Rule 37 Sanctions: A Commentary on Ohio Security Insurance Co. v. Best Inn Midwest, LLC

Establishing Vacancy Through Rule 37 Sanctions: A Commentary on Ohio Security Insurance Co. v. Best Inn Midwest, LLC

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Establishing Vacancy Through Rule 37 Sanctions: A Commentary on Ohio Security Insurance Company v. Best Inn Midwest, LLC Introduction The Seventh Circuit’s decision in Ohio Security Insurance Company...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Reliance on Reliable Hearsay for the §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Enhancement

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Reliance on Reliable Hearsay for the §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Enhancement

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Reliance on Reliable Hearsay for the §2K2.1(b)(6)(B) Enhancement United States v. Patrick Hilkah McManus, No. 23-4278 (4th Cir. July 10, 2025) – Unpublished but persuasive...
Loginov v. Sheridan Memorial Hospital: Tenth Circuit Affirms Broad Wyoming COVID-19 Health-Care Immunity and Reinforces Strict Rule 56(d) Affidavit Requirement

Loginov v. Sheridan Memorial Hospital: Tenth Circuit Affirms Broad Wyoming COVID-19 Health-Care Immunity and Reinforces Strict Rule 56(d) Affidavit Requirement

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Loginov v. Sheridan Memorial Hospital: Tenth Circuit Affirms Broad Wyoming COVID-19 Health-Care Immunity and Reinforces Strict Rule 56(d) Affidavit Requirement Introduction In Loginov v. Sheridan...
“From Speculation to Substantial Evidence” – The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification of the Personalized-Risk Standard for CAT Protection in Moundih v. Bondi

“From Speculation to Substantial Evidence” – The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification of the Personalized-Risk Standard for CAT Protection in Moundih v. Bondi

Date: Jul 12, 2025
“From Speculation to Substantial Evidence” The Tenth Circuit’s Clarification of the Personalized-Risk Standard for CAT Protection in Moundih v. Bondi 1. Introduction Case Name: Fonka Arouna Moundih...
Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity Now Encompasses the Initiation of Civil Enforcement Actions – A Commentary on Rodgers v. Torrez (10th Cir. 2025)

Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity Now Encompasses the Initiation of Civil Enforcement Actions – A Commentary on Rodgers v. Torrez (10th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity Now Encompasses the Initiation of Civil Enforcement Actions: Rodgers v. Torrez, 82 F.4th ___ (10th Cir. 2025) 1. Introduction Rodgers v. Torrez presented the U.S....
United States v. Bayless: Delineating the Outer Limits of Confrontation-Clause Impeachment and Rule 412 Exceptions

United States v. Bayless: Delineating the Outer Limits of Confrontation-Clause Impeachment and Rule 412 Exceptions

Date: Jul 12, 2025
United States v. Bayless: Delineating the Outer Limits of Confrontation-Clause Impeachment and Rule 412 Exceptions Introduction United States v. Bayless (10th Cir. July 10, 2025) addresses a...
Frazier v. Kuhn: Third Circuit Reaffirms that Alternative Religious Accommodations Defeat Likelihood of Success for Prisoner Preliminary Injunctions

Frazier v. Kuhn: Third Circuit Reaffirms that Alternative Religious Accommodations Defeat Likelihood of Success for Prisoner Preliminary Injunctions

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Frazier v. Kuhn: Third Circuit Reaffirms that Alternative Religious Accommodations Defeat Likelihood of Success for Prisoner Preliminary Injunctions 1. Introduction In Jasper Frazier v. Victoria L....
“No Grievance, No Federal Claim” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Temporary Grievance Filing Restrictions Do Not Excuse PLRA Exhaustion (Jackson v. Knapp, 2025)

“No Grievance, No Federal Claim” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Temporary Grievance Filing Restrictions Do Not Excuse PLRA Exhaustion (Jackson v. Knapp, 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
“No Grievance, No Federal Claim” – Third Circuit Clarifies that Temporary Grievance Filing Restrictions Do Not Excuse PLRA Exhaustion (Commentary on Rhonshawn Jackson v. Knapp, 24-3183, 3d Cir. July...
“From Molestation-Pornography Nexus to Counsel Performance” – United States v. Galletta and the Expansive Reach of the Good-Faith Exception

“From Molestation-Pornography Nexus to Counsel Performance” – United States v. Galletta and the Expansive Reach of the Good-Faith Exception

Date: Jul 12, 2025
“From Molestation-Pornography Nexus to Counsel Performance” – United States v. Galletta and the Expansive Reach of the Good-Faith Exception 1. Introduction The Third Circuit’s not-precedential...
Clarifying the Wealth-Versus-Family Nexus in Persecution Claims – A Commentary on Wilde Olivares-Arteaga v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Clarifying the Wealth-Versus-Family Nexus in Persecution Claims – A Commentary on Wilde Olivares-Arteaga v. Attorney General (3d Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Clarifying the Wealth-Versus-Family Nexus in Persecution Claims A Detailed Commentary on Wilde Olivares-Arteaga v. Attorney General United States, 3d Cir. July 9 2025 1. Introduction Wilde Daniel...
Clarifying Immunity and Rooker-Feldman in Post-Eviction § 1983 Litigation: A Commentary on Kemp v. Powers (5th Cir. 2025)

Clarifying Immunity and Rooker-Feldman in Post-Eviction § 1983 Litigation: A Commentary on Kemp v. Powers (5th Cir. 2025)

Date: Jul 12, 2025
Clarifying Immunity and Rooker-Feldman in Post-Eviction § 1983 Litigation: A Commentary on Kemp v. Powers (5th Cir. 2025) Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Docket No.: 25-30024   |  ...
United States v. Barrow: Fifth Circuit Affirms Officer’s Authority to Extend a Traffic Stop When Investigating a Plate-VIN Discrepancy — Even If the Discrepancy Originates from the Officer’s Own Typographical Error

United States v. Barrow: Fifth Circuit Affirms Officer’s Authority to Extend a Traffic Stop When Investigating a Plate-VIN Discrepancy — Even If the Discrepancy Originates from the Officer’s Own Typographical Error

Date: Jul 12, 2025
United States v. Barrow: Fifth Circuit Affirms Officer’s Authority to Extend a Traffic Stop When Investigating a Plate-VIN Discrepancy — Even If the Discrepancy Originates from the Officer’s Own...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert