Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Arizona Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Capital Sentence in State v. Doerr: Implications for Jury Impartiality and Sentencing Standards in Arizona

Affirmation of Capital Sentence in State v. Doerr: Implications for Jury Impartiality and Sentencing Standards in Arizona

Date: Nov 13, 1998
Affirmation of Capital Sentence in State of Arizona v. Doerr: Implications for Jury Impartiality and Sentencing Standards in Arizona Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Eugene...
State of Arizona v. Beau John Greene: Interpretation of Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing and Reversal of Kidnapping Conviction

State of Arizona v. Beau John Greene: Interpretation of Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing and Reversal of Kidnapping Conviction

Date: Oct 21, 1998
State of Arizona v. Beau John Greene: Interpretation of Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing and Reversal of Kidnapping Conviction Introduction In State of Arizona v. Beau John Greene, the...
Estoppel by Inducement in Statute of Limitations: Insights from NOLDE v. FRANKIE

Estoppel by Inducement in Statute of Limitations: Insights from NOLDE v. FRANKIE

Date: Sep 18, 1998
Estoppel by Inducement in Statute of Limitations: Insights from NOLDE v. FRANKIE Introduction The case of Mary Ella Nolde; Mya Johnson and Kathleen Andersen v. Bruce Frankie; Glendale Union High...
Gutierrez v. Gutierrez: Reinforcing Standards for Waste of Community Assets and Lifetime Spousal Maintenance

Gutierrez v. Gutierrez: Reinforcing Standards for Waste of Community Assets and Lifetime Spousal Maintenance

Date: Sep 16, 1998
Gutierrez v. Gutierrez: Reinforcing Standards for Waste of Community Assets and Lifetime Spousal Maintenance Introduction In the landmark case In re the Marriage of: Richard O. Gutierrez v. Adelita...
Standing Requirements in Mandamus Actions: Supreme Court of Arizona Reverses Sears v. Hull

Standing Requirements in Mandamus Actions: Supreme Court of Arizona Reverses Sears v. Hull

Date: Jul 17, 1998
Standing Requirements in Mandamus Actions: Supreme Court of Arizona Reverses Sears v. Hull Introduction In the landmark case Paula S. Sears and Alan E. Sears v. Jane Dee Hull, the Supreme Court of...
State of Arizona v. Toribio Rodriguez: Alibi Instruction and Fingerprint Evidence Standards

State of Arizona v. Toribio Rodriguez: Alibi Instruction and Fingerprint Evidence Standards

Date: Jul 15, 1998
State of Arizona v. Toribio Rodriguez: Alibi Instruction and Fingerprint Evidence Standards Introduction State of Arizona v. Toribio Rodriguez, 192 Ariz. 58 (1998), is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Comparative Negligence in Emergency Response: HUTCHERSON v. CITY OF PHOENIX

Comparative Negligence in Emergency Response: HUTCHERSON v. CITY OF PHOENIX

Date: Jul 3, 1998
Comparative Negligence in Emergency Response: HUTCHERSON v. CITY OF PHOENIX Introduction Hutcherson and Usher v. City of Phoenix is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Arizona on July...
Repressed Memory and Statute of Limitations: Jane DOE v. ROE Establishes Critical Precedents in Arizona Law

Repressed Memory and Statute of Limitations: Jane DOE v. ROE Establishes Critical Precedents in Arizona Law

Date: Apr 8, 1998
Repressed Memory and Statute of Limitations: Jane DOE v. ROE Establishes Critical Precedents in Arizona Law Introduction In the landmark case of Jane Doe v. John Roe and Jane Roe, decided by the...
Limiting Absolute Immunity in Administrative Decisions: Fidelity Security Life Insurance Co. v. State of Arizona

Limiting Absolute Immunity in Administrative Decisions: Fidelity Security Life Insurance Co. v. State of Arizona

Date: Feb 20, 1998
Limiting Absolute Immunity in Administrative Decisions: Fidelity Security Life Insurance Co. v. State of Arizona Introduction The landmark case FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. STATE OF...
Clarifying 'Same Occasion' for Sentence Enhancement: Arizona Supreme Court in State v. Kelly

Clarifying 'Same Occasion' for Sentence Enhancement: Arizona Supreme Court in State v. Kelly

Date: Jan 1, 1998
Clarifying 'Same Occasion' for Sentence Enhancement: Arizona Supreme Court in State v. Kelly Introduction In State of Arizona v. Timothy David Kelly, the Supreme Court of Arizona addressed a pivotal...
State of Arizona v. David Anthony Trostle: Comprehensive Examination of Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing

State of Arizona v. David Anthony Trostle: Comprehensive Examination of Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing

Date: Dec 25, 1997
State of Arizona v. David Anthony Trostle: Comprehensive Examination of Aggravating and Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing Introduction The case of State of Arizona v. David Anthony Trostle...
State v. Rienhardt: Supreme Court of Arizona Affirms Death Sentence Amid Admissibility of Evidence and Aggravating Factors

State v. Rienhardt: Supreme Court of Arizona Affirms Death Sentence Amid Admissibility of Evidence and Aggravating Factors

Date: Dec 25, 1997
State v. Rienhardt: Supreme Court of Arizona Affirms Death Sentence Amid Admissibility of Evidence and Aggravating Factors Introduction In the landmark case of State of Arizona v. Charles Bradley...
Limits on Judicial Notice in Capital Sentencing: Insights from STATE v. SCHACKART

Limits on Judicial Notice in Capital Sentencing: Insights from STATE v. SCHACKART

Date: Oct 31, 1997
Limits on Judicial Notice in Capital Sentencing: Insights from STATE v. SCHACKART Introduction State of Arizona v. Ronald Dwight Schackart, 190 Ariz. 238 (1997), presents a pivotal examination of...
Equitable Distribution of Joint Tenancy Property Under A.R.S. §25-318(A): Analysis of In re the Marriage of Anthony Toth v. Gloria Snyder Toth

Equitable Distribution of Joint Tenancy Property Under A.R.S. §25-318(A): Analysis of In re the Marriage of Anthony Toth v. Gloria Snyder Toth

Date: Oct 10, 1997
Equitable Distribution of Joint Tenancy Property Under A.R.S. §25-318(A): Analysis of In re the Marriage of Anthony Toth v. Gloria Snyder Toth Introduction In re the Marriage of Anthony Toth,...
A Comprehensive Commentary on State of Arizona v. Christopher John Spreitz: Upholding Death Penalty Amidst Waived Speedy Trial Rights

A Comprehensive Commentary on State of Arizona v. Christopher John Spreitz: Upholding Death Penalty Amidst Waived Speedy Trial Rights

Date: Sep 12, 1997
Affirmation of Death Penalty in State of Arizona v. Christopher John Spreitz: Implications for Speedy Trial Waivers and Aggravating Circumstances Introduction The case of State of Arizona v....
STATE v. LEE (1997): Upholding Death Sentencing and Forensic Evidence Standards in Arizona

STATE v. LEE (1997): Upholding Death Sentencing and Forensic Evidence Standards in Arizona

Date: Aug 27, 1997
STATE v. LEE (1997): Upholding Death Sentencing and Forensic Evidence Standards in Arizona Introduction In State of Arizona v. Chad Alan Lee (189 Ariz. 608, 944 P.2d 1204, 1997), the Supreme Court of...
Severance of Multiple Murder Counts and Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Chad Alan Lee

Severance of Multiple Murder Counts and Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Chad Alan Lee

Date: Aug 27, 1997
Severance of Multiple Murder Counts and Aggravating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Comprehensive Analysis of State v. Chad Alan Lee Introduction State of Arizona v. Chad Alan Lee is a landmark...
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Prior Bad Acts in Arizona Criminal Cases: State of Arizona v. Mario Amado Terrazas

Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Prior Bad Acts in Arizona Criminal Cases: State of Arizona v. Mario Amado Terrazas

Date: Aug 15, 1997
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Prior Bad Acts in Arizona Criminal Cases Introduction State of Arizona v. Mario Amado Terrazas is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Arizona that...
Limits on Diminished Capacity Defense in Arizona: Analysis of STATE v. MOTT

Limits on Diminished Capacity Defense in Arizona: Analysis of STATE v. MOTT

Date: Jan 17, 1997
Limits on Diminished Capacity Defense in Arizona: Analysis of STATE v. MOTT Introduction In State of Arizona v. Shelly Kay Mott, 183 Ariz. 191 (App. 1995), the Supreme Court of Arizona addressed the...
Presumption of Validity Upholds Scottsdale's Development Fee under A.R.S. § 9-463.05

Presumption of Validity Upholds Scottsdale's Development Fee under A.R.S. § 9-463.05

Date: Jan 8, 1997
Presumption of Validity Upholds Scottsdale's Development Fee under A.R.S. § 9-463.05 Introduction The case of Home Builders Association of Central Arizona v. City of Scottsdale addresses the legality...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert